Author: BRWC

  • Anora: The BRWC Review

    Anora: The BRWC Review

    Anora: The BRWC Review. By Christopher Patterson.

    Hard to Escape the Pandemonium of this Tedious Bore

    Recently, what caught my eye on Hulu was Anora. I watched it once to divergent emotions, but maybe I’ll feel differently revisiting. Right?

    Anora never grows from failure. It is a film that does the bare minimum, despite vapid misdirections to prove otherwise. It’s the desperate tale-as-old-as-time. Anora is never subversive; it’s all too reductive. We have seen not-happily-ever-after narratives so repetitively in popular cinema, it’s become the ever-after for a generation. In naively trying to reinvent, Anora gives a fatigued performance.

    Sudden and untamed love falling apart is not new or tonic; it’s second-rate because Baker is assiduously hackneyed. If you want to see existent uncontrolled love and where it all goes, read Proust for Gilberte and Albertine (the ‘Sweet Cheat’). In his faulty endeavor to make his stubborn audience forget the torture, he follows it up with ill-decided Gen-Z ‘humor’ that makes one akin to illness.

    Conventional is an adequate term to describe Anora’s ‘comedy’. If I had to dead-center it, it’s brilliant un-brilliance: un-timelessness. It’s evident that Anora is attempting to emulate Gen-Z slang as a type of ‘comedy.’  And while yanking our generation’s leg a couple of times can produce a discerning joke here and there, done frequently, with no intuition, gives Anora a vacant and unenviable glow. It’s a trope Sean Baker never learns from. Realism over art defiles the occupation.

    Anora in twenty years won’t be studied for its craft, rather for extracting our age. A 90210 to My So-Called Life. For better or for a bounteousness of worse, Anora is the dilemma of an artist too thrusted in the moment to hark back auld lang syne. A man lost in loopholes. What made The Florida Project brilliant and shallow is what made Anora fascinating and popcorn entertainment. The writing is expendable, but the cinematography is a glittering spectacle.

    Sean Baker is cinema’s McDonald’s, the Stephen King of film. Quick and easy, those fries initially taste delicious, but past their thirty-minute expiration date, it’s all thoroughly wearying. For it becomes all too apparent where it’s going, so it’s hard not to put the pieces together yourself and bemoan the remaining run time. Anora then relies on its actress to keep the audience going, and sadly, it breaks the vows.

    While Mikey Madison provides an accurate, brio performance as a no-nonsense New Yorker, she fails to be Ani. Her performance is a middle-of-the-road view of a stripper as Ani is spurious. She is parallel to a cliché. A for-the-dollar, happy-go-lucky, but born in The Big Apple pole dancer. The few perfections of profundity are scant. Relying too much on Madison’s face to do the talking, Ani is brazenly surface-level. A product of the script; she is to be sad when you suspect, and she perseveres her elementary dignity when you reckon she finally should. But it’s all too forceful to not be registered.

    Baker’s gimmicks: banal use of Russian, stripper-Cinderella, will only charm those seeking unsubstantial fluff. Anora‘s use of two languages is acceptable but woefully unimpressive. A rubbish quirk Baker added ostensibly to make his script less stale and diminish remarkable criticism at large, which proves rather his scope misdirected.

    The end of Anora is not emotional viewing but staggeringly tolerable. Ani breaks down for a myriad of causes: her shameful profession, no more dream world, loss of dignity by a pitiful Russian family. But whilst the escalation, it is obscure. Igor’s and Ani’s interplay is too hysterically unrealized for my taste. All I see are Dead Souls. 

    Take a personal craze a decade ago. Funny then, but presently? Anora is 2024’s ‘realistic’ and ‘funny’ romp, but five prospering years later?

    Too was Zadie Smith’s elated debut, White Teeth, soaked with its decade. There, Smith was able to construct a definitive young adult novel by deconstructing and lavishing the era. She then relied on the telekinetic power of the pen and moreover the prolific history of the written word to guide her path. It was by bridging the gap she made modern writing. Never was there a page I could detect a relic. Whereas Anora is immature and monotonous in its presentation, “equivalent of a hyperactive, ginger-haired, tap-dancing 10-year-old” (a quote from Smith out of context).

    To compare a narrative that in its final moments used the ‘releasing your emotion’ card, look at Tokyo Story, a vastly superior film. Tokyo Story was made for the lasting moments, whereas Anora could be seen with its absence. In avoiding sentimentality, Baker paid a trip to the cold-world, and learned a depthless price. A film cold and uncompromising, causing any possible blemishes to be in spades.

    What astounds me is when I hear people speak of Anora as ‘innovative’ or ‘definitive’. If you recently happened to avoid your local cinema, it is an excusable treat. I dare may say this is the Ultima Thule of brookable fast food.

    VERDICT

    Anora is a passable film. It astounds in zestful segments but irritates the soul on the whole. The potential for this plot, a stripper in love, is unmeasurable. Tragically, the results prove half-measured and can’t stick to the weight of an astonishing synopsis. Gloomily, for Anora, the shoe doesn’t fit.

    2/5

  • The Surfer: The BRWC Review

    The Surfer: The BRWC Review

    The Surfer: The BRWC Review. By Simon Thompson

    Nicolas Cage is currently going through a true late career renaissance and it’s beautiful to see. His last few movies such as Pig, Dream Scenario, and director Lorcan Finnegan’s The Surfer show that he has lost none of his talent or daring trying new things. The Surfer is a lean, mean, and beautifully shot psychological thriller bolstered by two tour de force performances not only from Cage, but also from Julian McMahon, whose performance as the antagonist Scally is one of the more compelling villainous turns that I’ve seen in the last few years. 

    The plot of The Surfer, follows the eponymous protagonist (Nicolas Cage) as he returns to his idyllic, Australian beach, childhood home with his son (Finn Little). Ostensibly there to take his son surfing, the Surfer reveals to his son the surprise twist that they are actually there because he is buying back his old childhood home. 

    Before the two can hit the waves however, they are accosted by a local named Scally (Julian McMahon) and his band of Point Break style goons who try to bully and coerce the Surfer and his son into leaving. What follows from there is an intense, visceral 105 minutes where the Surfer is pushed to his physical and psychological breaking point in his pursuit of reacquiring his childhood home. 

    Although the supporting cast in this film are excellent, the plaudits will deservedly go to Cage and McMahon’s performances. In Cage’s case he expertly balances a steadily increasing and understandable seething anger with a kind of desperate pathos at the same time. His character is a living testament to the idea of one bad day being able to drive even the sanest man to insanity,  à la Alan Moore’s classic Batman story The Killing Joke

    McMahon’s character Scally on the other hand is a jambalaya of Frank TJ Mackey, Don Logan, Dennis Reynolds and Jake Humphrey, a crazed quasi spiritual guru who is a uniquely chilling villain that perfectly reflects the times that we live in. McMahon’s performance is fantastic because he doesn’t turn Scally into a cartoonish Andrew Tate parody, instead he utilises a brooding intensity mixed with a fake caring attitude, which is an intelligent stylistic choice on the part of McMahon and scriptwriter Thomas Martin, as it makes Scally a far more interesting character than other villains of his type.

    Finnegan’s direction squeezes every ounce of cinematic magic out of its beach location. The beach bolsters the film’s dreamlike atmosphere, creating a hazy psychedelic feeling through the constantly boiling sun and the recurring images of its high tide. Finnegan’s repeated use of close ups gives the movie a powerful sense of dread which doesn’t let up until the very end-  at which point everybody in the cinema ( including me) breathed a sigh of relief. 

    Overall, The Surfer is a fantastic throwback to a very 1970s style of psychological thriller that the likes of Nicholas Roeg or Sam Peckinpah would have made. Cage and McMahon play off each other beautifully, and the movie’s deceptively simple premise is far more malleable than a cursory glance at the plot would have you believe. If you want to support  actually interesting and original filmmaking, or are a newcomer to the late career Nic Cage renaissance and want a starting point, The Surfer is the movie for you.

  • Final Destination: Bloodlines – Another Review

    Final Destination: Bloodlines – Another Review

    Final Destination: Bloodlines – Another Review. By Daniel Rester.

    Death is back to claim unintended survivors in Final Destination: Bloodlines. It’s a reboot of the popular horror series, which hasn’t had an entry since Final Destination 5 (2011). Aside from the awful fourth film, The Final Destination (2009), the series has been surprisingly consistent as escapism for fans of the macabre. Thankfully, Final Destination: Bloodlines is a welcome return to the world of Death claiming characters in splat-tastic ways, while also introducing surprisingly fresh – if uneven – angles to the series’ formula. 

    The film opens in the 1960s, where mother-to-be Iris (Brec Bassinger) attends a grand opening for a restaurant inside of a tower. She gets a premonition of the tower collapsing and everyone inside dying. Iris is able to save many lives due to her vision. 

    Years later, Death comes for the family members Iris was never meant to have. Her granddaughter, Stefani (Kaitlyn Santa Juana), has been having visions of the tower collapse and possible horrors to come. Using Iris’ research from over the years, Stefani tries to stop Death from claiming her family – and herself. 

    Final Destination: Bloodlines, directed by Zach Lipovsky and Adam Stein, opens with a bang. The first twenty minutes provide one of the best opening sequences in a series known for its first act set pieces. Bassinger is excellent as the young version of Iris and sells the premonition fear well. The tower collapse premonition itself (ironically placed against a beautiful sunset) is a dynamite blend of CGI, practical effects, and stylish editing. 

    The film takes a bit to find its footing after the opening. While the idea of tying the series’ concept to a family’s different generations – instead of a bunch of strangers and/or teens – is interesting, the path of bringing the family characters together to understand their situation feels clunky. Stefani is a bland protagonist, so her journey in trying to reach her family with her fears can feel tiresome. Final Destination: Bloodlines finds its groove in the second half though once it hits a wild scene in a piercing shop.   

    The tone tries to be a bit too serious and emotional at times since these characters actually care for each other. The depth is a welcome change of pace, but it does sometimes collide with the gory set pieces and dark comedy. Still, kudos to writers Guy Busick and Lori Evans Taylor for attempting to bring actual pathos to some of the scenes. 

    While Santa Juana never really pops as Stefani, some of the supporting players do stand out. Richard Harmon and Owen Patrick Joyner are scene stealers as brothers Erik and Bobby, respectively. They share one of the film’s most creative scenes and have terrific chemistry with each other. The late Tony Todd shows up again as the mysterious character William Bludworth, who finally gets a backstory; Todd is great in his few moments here and will be missed in later installments if they are made. 

    The Rube Goldberg-like suspense scenes where everyday items turn into deadly devices are still inventive. This entry, like those before it, feels like a slasher film that happens to have an invisible force instead of a man behind a mask. The filmmakers clearly enjoy toying with the audience and keeping them waiting for the inevitable bloody payoffs. One of the craziest moments in this sequel involves an MRI machine, but I dare not say anymore. 

    Final Destination: Bloodlines is uneven at times as it tries to reinvent the series’ formula. The opening sequence and a few scenes in the second half remind horror audiences why they enjoy this series though. This sixth film isn’t as good as Final Destination (2000) or Final Destination 2 (2003), but it is better than some of the other installments. 

    Rating: 6.7/10

  • Final Destination Bloodlines: Review

    Final Destination Bloodlines: Review

    Final Destination Bloodlines: Review. By Jake Peffer.

    It has been 14 years since the last Final Destination movie hit theaters. Over the course of the 2000s, and early 2010s, the Final Destination franchise has been one of the most consistent horror franchises around. Featuring a straightforward storyline that allows for the filmmakers to be creative when it comes to killing of its characters, the franchise has been extremely popular since the beginning. Except for The Final Destination, the fourth movie in the franchise, every movie in this series has plenty of fun and entertaining moments of people getting killed in ridiculous ways. Final Destination: Bloodlines manages to continue the fun despite some negatives that keep it from reaching its full potential.

    This time around, the movie follows Stefani, a college student who is having nightmares about a tragic accident from the 1960s. Stefani discovers that these nightmares are of a premonition that her estranged grandmother had so many decades before. Her grandmother Iris had a premonition of a building collapsing, and she was able to save everyone inside. Afterwards, everyone that was saved from the collapse all started dying in mysterious ways. This leads to Stefani starting to have visions of her family members dying. Once she learns the process from her grandmother she tries to do whatever she can to prevent her family from dying.

    If you are going to see a Final Destination movie, chances are you know exactly what you’re going to get. That is exactly what Bloodlines delivers, more of the same. Despite it being more of the same, this time things seem more self-aware, and it feels like the filmmakers really try to play into just how ridiculous these movies can be. This movie manages to be predictable yet at the same time subvert the audience’s expectations. All of this adds to the fun and trying to figure out what is coming next, which character is going to get it next and how this is all going to pan out.

    One thing that Bloodlines does right is there is no shortage of blood and carnage throughout the movie. There are plenty of new and creative ways that characters are killed off and each one is more ridiculous than the last. The opening premonition is one of the weaker ones in the series, but it is still a lot of fun trying to figure out what exactly is going to happen. Many of the death sequences are hilarious and some of the character get some funny lines that make this one of the funniest entries in the series.

    Kaitlyn Santa Juana does a good job in role. She puts in the best performance, and she handles the lead role quite well. The rest of the cast all do fine but nobody else is much of a standout. This does feature the last performance of the late great Tony Todd. He returns as his recurring character William Bludworth. Even though it is easy to see that he was not well at the time of shooting his scene, he still is able to give it his all and provide one of the best scenes in the movie. 

    While Bloodlines is entertaining, there are some things that keep it from reaching its full potential. These movies have gotten more and more CGI heavy with each entry and this one is the most egregious with its effects. There are a few moments where it looks like there might be some practical stuff being used but most of the movie looks like old video game effects. Almost every scene is shot on a poorly done green screen. It constantly looks like the actors are in some warehouse with a big digital screen behind them. At times it almost takes you out of the movie because of how bad it looks.

    Despite some inconsistencies, Final Destination: Bloodlines still manages to do what these movies do best. There are plenty of fun and bloody moments throughout, a few good performances and many laugh out loud moments. If you are a fan of this series, you are sure to enjoy this entry.

    Grade: B-

  • Fight Or Flight: Review

    Fight Or Flight: Review

    Fight Or Flight: Review. By Jake Peffer.

    Over the last few years Josh Hartnett has slowly made his way back into the limelight. While never completely leaving acting, for a while he was only popping up in a few things here and there. None of which was all that noteworthy. Now with roles in movies like Wrath of Man, Oppenheimer and Trap, Hartnett is starting to make a name for himself once again. Fight or Flight sees him taking a different role than he’s played in a while, as a mercenary who is skilled in hand-to-hand combat. Unfortunately, a committed performance by Hartnett isn’t enough to make Fight or Flight worthwhile.

    The movie follows Josh Hartnett plays Lucas Reyes, a mercenary who is hired for a job where he must board a plane to track down a target. While on the plane he ends up having to protect the target from many killers who are not only trying to kill his target, but also Lucas himself. Together, Lucas and Isha (Charithra Chandran), must join forces to take down the never-ending hordes of killers on their plane.

    This is the type of movie that wants to have its cake and eat it too. The movie is directed by first time Director James Madigan. He has done a lot of second unit directing in his career, but it is easy to see that this is his directorial debut for a feature film. While the story is straightforward, and really doesn’t have much going for it, the direction feels a bit all over the place. There are moments when the action sequences look fine and then other times when they look sloppy. Some moments feel like they come completely out of nowhere and the tone shifts so much throughout there are times when it’s hard to tell when the movie is trying to be serious and when it’s not. Everything is mostly played as ridiculous and over the top as it can be and there are moments where it can be fun, but they are too few and far between.

    Josh Hartnett is having a ball with his performance, and he chews the scenery the entire time. Charithra Chandran is a nice counterpart to Hartnett’s character. They both play well off each other and have some good scenes together. Outside of the main two performances, nobody else in the cast is all that memorable. Katee Sackhoff feels like she is in a completely different movie. The movie constantly goes back to her character time and time again and none of it feels like it plays into anything going on in the plane sequences. 

    Despite some of the action sequences looking sloppy, a lot of the hand-to-hand fight scenes are a highlight. There is a lot of blood and gore as characters get killed with all kinds of various tools and it all looks good for the most part. The makeup department and digital effects team put in some good work to make everything look as good as they can. Once it hits a certain point it is nonstop action until the end. After so long, it hits a certain point where it just gets tiresome and with nothing to really latch onto in the story there just isn’t much here to really enjoy.

    Fight or Flight has some entertaining fight sequences and features another solid performance from Josh Hartnett. The movie suffers from some poor direction, bad editing at times and a story that just doesn’t have anything to keep the audience invested. A lot of potential that feels like it was poorly executed.

    Grade: C-