Author: BRWC

  • All The World’s A Cage: The Best Of Times

    All The World’s A Cage: The Best Of Times

    All the World’s a Cage: The Best of Times. By Rufus Black.

    Welcome, once again, to the second instalment of “All the World’s a Cage”, the feature where we methodically review every Nicolas Cage movie ever made, and calculate a Cage score as a metric to assess them. After we saw Nicolas’ first theatrically released film in the previous instalment, we now actually pop back in time a little further, to “The Best of Times”! This television pilot for a teenage pseudo-reality show was never picked up, and thus was instead released as a TV movie. As far as I am aware, this would be his first credit in any capacity. If anyone has any knowledge otherwise, please do leave a comment. I keep encountering its runtime being listed as an hour, though the most complete version of it I could locate on the world wide web clocks in at around 48 mins. Since there’s no obviously missing section, I may just assume that the 60 minutes is the televised time slot complete with full advert breaks.

    “But Rufus”, I hear you say, “You said this was monthly feature. Where was last months?” Shut up. Just shut up. Here’s a ‘no-prize’ excuse for you. We’ll say the feature started in September, and the first one was actually a month early. So there. I’m not late, you’re just lucky.

    Without further ado, let’s dive into this thorough waste of time.

    The Best of Times was directed by Don Mischer, who has an extensive list of prominent directorial and producer credits for televised live events such as the Oscars, the Obama inauguration, Olympic opening ceremonies, and a swathe of musician’s specials. And apparently this pilot, as well.

    In short, this variety show is essentially a collection of supposedly funny skits featuring a handful of teenagers playing fictionalised versions of themselves. Since there’s no real plot here, we may as well dive into the characters, which the show hinges on anyhow. Chiefly notable amongst the cast is our intrepid hero and Crispin Glover. Glover is the lead, and introduces and signs off the episode. He’s presented as a relatable everyman, and I suppose he is. However, especially in his interactions with adults, he behaves much the same as George McFly and it’s damn near impossible to not view it as McFly transposed to a world where he isn’t bullied. Like every one else in the program, he knocks out a few jokes that don’t really land, dances that are surprisingly very nicely choreographed and some short sincere monologues supposedly to elicit sympathy for teenagers. For once I’m grateful for the laugh track: without it I’d be clueless as to which bits are supposed to be funny. Glover does an admirable job with lacklustre material. Unfortunately for him, the characters are predominately separable by way of their two-dimensional gimmicks – there’s a girl who can’t stop eating, a Warren Zevon lookalike who’s scorned by women, and a girl who wants to join a band. Crispin is lumped with being the main character who introduces us to these people, and as such has no gimmick himself to lean into. That said, he has a rather spectacular freakout to the Talking Heads, which is amongst the moments that redeem having to sit through the rest of it.

    Who is the most watchable throughout? You guessed it. Nic’s role in this, Nicolas, is jock with a one track mind, constantly exercising and chasing women. He’s got the build for it and you can see his mad charisma seeping in. If it was 1981 and we’d never heard of him before, we might rightly assume that the character is exhibiting signs of sociopathy or roid rage. He’s magnetic and intense, obsessed with Rocky’s violence and looking pretty good in dungarees. His ‘sincere monologue’ is longer than everyone else’s, and concerns him being worried about being sent off to war in El Salvador. Seems he didn’t need to be so worried in retrospect, but he gets a lovely 2-3 minute section to himself and really feels like a lost kid scared of being blown to smithereens. Like the genesis of his later strategy to ground a massive and almost cartoon lunatic with an on-the-nose emotional foundation.

    We also have Jackie Mason as Mr. O’Reilly, the adult in the show. Here’s a place where the comedy really pays off. You may know him as the voice of Krusty’s father, and that flat delivery is perfect for this job. In contrast to the over enthusiastic kids around him, O’Reilly is tired and confused with it all. It’s easiest to see things from his perspective rather than theirs. 

    The whole thing jumps from skit to skit, some amusing and others not so much. You can usually tell in the first few seconds. It reminded me of newspaper comics in a way. You have the characters and you read through three panels hoping the fourth makes it worth it, and half the time, it is. The only real story that ties it together is the big school dance at the end. This is spookily reminiscent of Back to the Future, with McFly (sorry, Glover) telling us how his parents met at a dance just like it, before the rock band girl comes out enlivening events with a solo. Their parents weren’t ready for that, but they loved it.

    It’s hard to pass any judgement on Mischer’s direction. Most of the scenes are in one or two shots, usually quite wide except for close up monologues. It looks like a sitcom, and I imagine the idea was for one a week they’d be knocking them out quick, so not as much finicky cinematic stuff. It was written by Bob Arnott, Carol Hatfield Sarasohn and Lane Sarasohn. Arnott would do some Sonny & Cher, the Sarasohns some Munsters. I’m not going to be too disparaging on anyone involved as I suspect, given the format and their credit lists, this was one of many jobs they were working on at once with a quick turnaround. It’s not too bad, anyway. I can’t really imagine who the target audience would be. Teenagers would be patronised, and adults would be put off by the constant winging about how hard a teens life is. Since it didn’t kick off, we can suspect that was most people’s takeaway.

    A competent waste of time that’s just watchable enough for you to limp through, the promise of the next gag sufficient to tolerate each one.

    3/10

    Some Notes on Cage

    I couldn’t find much about the production of this one, or how he ended up on it. Indeed, the fact that it exists was a bit of trivia in itself. He’s Nicolas Coppola here, same as Ridgemont. This would be his only tv performance for the longest time.

    As A Cage Film

    How much of the motion picture is he in?

    Quite a fair chunk. And indeed, I would say just the right amount. Being the best part of the show, it would be tempting to just stick him on the whole time. But instead, he’s used sparsely enough that it’s exciting each time he crops up without relegating him to the sidelines.

    8/10

    Could anyone else have played this role?

    Nope. The role is literally “Nicolas”. Given how much he sticks out and excels with limp material, it’s pretty clear he was an excellent choice.

    4/5

    Does he get Uncaged?

    Not entirely, but we see it peeking through. His weird expressions when making custom percussion, his intimidating sexual energy with Warren Zevon, his awesome one-handed press-ups. We don’t see him smash up a bathroom in his pants, but there’s enough to suggest it in the future.

    3/5

    Would it suck without him?

    Yes, probably. Jackie Mason and Crispin Glover give it something, and Jill Schoelen and Janet Robin are characterful enough to not be boring. But really, take Cage out of this and there’s no point to watching it to the end.

    3/10

    Cage Fight – Could Nicolas beat Brad’s Bud in a fight?

    Yes. Obviously we have two men of near identical age and build, but Nicolas has that crazy edge here. We see him training to fight. We hear how much he wants to break ribs like Rocky. Where we have to infer about Brad’s Bud, Nicolas is obviously deranged.

    3/3

    Cage Score

    After totalling each category with equal weight, this one comes out as being a fairly decent Cage film. Maybe the metric needs work. Or maybe not. We’re not judging quality here, we’re judging whether this is a good watch if you want something Cage. And if you want something Cage, that means you want unusual, off-beat and showcasing the man’s oddball chops. This is a nice one for that.

    72%

  • Hollywood’s High Rollers: An Expert Analysis of 2025’s Premier Movie-Themed Slot Games

    Hollywood’s High Rollers: An Expert Analysis of 2025’s Premier Movie-Themed Slot Games

    Hollywood’s High Rollers: An Expert Analysis of 2025’s Premier Movie-Themed Slot Games

    The glitzy lights of Hollywood have never ceased to take viewers by storm, and in 2025, this screen magic is rotating on a different platform in the online slots world. The combination of giant entertainment and big-stakes gaming is finally at its peak, with the software developers collaborating with big studios to develop immersion around the most anticipated movies of the year. Be it in epic space operas or gritty superhero sagas, these slots based on a film are not a mere fad; they are highly advanced digital games that allow players to revisit their favourite moments on-screen in search of huge jackpots. The present analysis will explore the best movie-themed slots of 2025, their mechanics, bonus systems, and how accurately they are adapted into the source, and which of them can be truly identified as worthy of a standing ovation.

    The Pantheon: Enduring Classics for the 2025 Enthusiast

    This section provides an in-depth analysis of the foundational games that continue to define the genre, evaluated against the established framework.

    Action & Adventure Icons

    Jurassic Park (Microgaming)

    • Profile: Based on the 1993 film. Features 5 reels, 243 Ways to Win, high volatility, and an RTP of 96.67%.  
    • Analysis: Being widely considered as the example of what cinematic immersion should be, Jurassic Park, created by Microgaming, takes great care to recreate the ambience of Isla Nublar. The jungle background has a convincing 3D depth achieved by the use of parallax scrolling visuals, which is also a striking technical success. The primary characteristic of the game is the T-Rex Alert Mode, which is triggered randomly and provides an additional 35 wild symbols to the reels during six spins. This mechanic is a bright masterpiece that reflects the atmosphere of sudden, unpredictable danger of the film, and may result in great payoffs. The game also adds replayability through five different free spin modes, each with a dinosaur theme, the T-Rex, Velociraptor, and Triceratops, and has its own set of mechanics, such as multiplier wilds or running wilds. 

    Jumanji (NetEnt)

    • Profile: Based on the 1995 film. Features a unique 3-4-5-4-3 reel layout, 36 paylines, low volatility, and an RTP of 96.33%.  
    • Analysis: Jumanji is a genius in thematic combination. The unconventional reel design is meant to resemble the form of the iconic board game in the movie and make the gamer instantly transported to its realm. The main attraction of the game is the Board Game bonus, which is used when three or more scatter symbols appear. In this mode, the player rolls dice to move a token on a virtual board and unlock one of the four different free spin features (Vines, Monsoon, Monkey, Stampede) or other prizes. The given mechanic is an ingenious adaptation of the main idea of the source material into an engaging and enjoyable slot game. The volatility of the game is low, which makes it quite accessible, with bigger and more frequent winnings and longer play hours.

    Grit, Glory & Gangsters

    Rocky (Playtech)

    • Profile: Based on the Rocky film series. Features 5 reels, 25 paylines, medium-high volatility, and an RTP of 95.02%.  
    • Analysis: This game has mastered the underdog spirit of the boxing movie, incorporating real-life film clips, photos of the characters, and soundbites in its victory and win bonus games. Its best offerings are directly related to the identity of the franchise. The ROCKY bonus will award the prize at 5x the total bet in case of spelling the name on the reels. The most immersive feature is the Knockout Bonus, where the player will pick one of the classic battles in the history of Rocky (Apollo Creed, Ivan Drago, or Clubber Lang) and will be offered a cinematic battle. The game will run the movie fight videos, and the gamer will get a cash prize whenever Rocky wins a round, and thus it is an absolutely powerful and captivating narrative tool in the list of its fans. 

    Superheroes & Sci-Fi Sagas

    The Dark Knight (Playtech)

    • Profile: Based on the 2008 film. Features 6 reels, 50 paylines, a progressive jackpot, and an RTP of 95.96%.  
    • Analysis: Being one of the giants in the genre, The Dark Knight owes its longevity to its association with the expansive DC Super Heroes Jackpot network. The game manages to replicate the brooding images of the film by Christopher Nolan. Its major attraction is the randomly generated progressive jackpot game. Any spin, no matter what the size of the wager is, can put one into a bonus screen in which a win on one of four jackpots (Mini, Minor, Major, or the multi-million-dollar Grand) is assured. Other than the jackpot, the game has serious action with options of Batman and Joker Respins as well as regular free games with the options of the Agent of Chaos and Gotham City rounds, which is well-rounded and high-stakes. 

    Terminator 2 (Microgaming)

    • Profile: Based on the 1991 film. Features 5 reels and 243 Ways to Win that expand to 1,024, with medium volatility and an RTP of 96.62%.  
    • Analysis: This title was ahead of its time in terms of its smooth combination of movie clips and classic soundtrack. The most creative is its T-800 Vision mode, which can activate randomly whenever a spin is not winning. The screen goes red when the Terminator searches the reels of symbols of high-value characters, giving an immediate cash reward and increasing the possibility of activating the free spins round. In the event of the free spins bonus, the reel set grows to provide 1,024 Ways to Win. In this case, the T-1000 symbol can evolve into any other character symbol to make the ultimate win, a mechanical version of genius, a symbolic shape-shifting form of the villain in the movie. 

    Comedy & Cult Favorites

    Ted (Blueprint Gaming)

    • Profile: Based on the 2012 film. Features a 5×3 reel layout, 20 paylines, medium volatility, and an RTP of 95.80%.  
    • Analysis: Ted manages to show that the irreverent comedy could be translated into an interesting slot. There are 11 bonus features loaded into the game. In base gameplay, the titular character will occasionally awaken, to the couch, to assign one of six modifiers, including Laser Gun Wilds or a Psychedelic Super Spin. A combination of three scatter symbols that are known as Thunder Buddies Bonus will activate a bonus wheel that grants one of the five main bonus games, such as Bar Crawl Bonus and Ted Big Money Bonus. It is a very entertaining experience because of the sheer quantity of the features, humorous animation, and voice-overs, which make it enjoyable to the audience who are fond of the film. 

    Gremlins (Red7)

    • Profile: Based on the 1984 film. Mechanical data, such as RTP and volatility, are less prominent in available documentation, suggesting it may be an older or more niche title.  
    • Analysis: The game is mostly based on the element of nostalgia, with the characters that the film fans adore having turned into symbols on the screen as a way to attract customers. The main attraction of it is the ability to unlock bonus rounds that make one feel as if they have been included in the movies themselves, and there is a joyful and direct connection to the original content and its specific mixture of horror and comedy. Gremlins belongs to the significant group of cult classics that are reborn and acquire their own market and fan base in the online slot market.  

    The New Wave: Notable Releases and Market Shapers of 2025

    The market in 2025 is defined not only by the classics but also by the new wave of releases that emphasize the major strategies of the industry and the changing preferences of players. These games reveal the efforts being undertaken by developers to refresh franchises with new mechanics and to draw in the content of high-end television shows.

    Franchise Reimagined: The Power of New Mechanics

    The Goonies Megaways (Blueprint Gaming)

    • Profile:  In March 2025, the original hit is set to receive an update with the popular Megaways mechanic, licensed by Big Time Gaming. It has 6 reels, an adjustable payline of 15,625, medium-high volatility, and an RTP of 92-95 percent.
    • Analysis: This launch is an excellent example of an important industry approach: updating a successful and popular IP with an established, updated game engine. The Megaways mechanism, in which the size of the symbols on each spin varies with every spin, also introduces an element of uncertainty and thrill that the modern player craves. By doing so, Blueprint Gaming can ride on the recognition that The Goonies enjoys among people, but provide a new gameplay experience to both new and existing slot players.

    Wizard of Oz: Over the Rainbow (Light & Wonder)

    • Profile: A new exclusive slot for BetMGM, launched in March 2025 to coincide with the cultural buzz surrounding the Wicked musical.  
    • Analysis: This game highlights the strategic significance of cultural timeliness to the contemporary market. The outstanding feature of its design is the dynamic bonus structure, which means that Glinda the Good Witch can appear randomly on any spin to replace two to five spins with a complete wild reel. It is also evident in the fact that the game demonstrates an advanced knowledge of the IP upon which it is based by incorporating characters and other elements of the larger Oz universe, rather than only the source 1939 film. It is one of the best examples of a moment-in-time release and is designed to resonate as much as possible with a particular cultural phenomenon. 

    The Rise of Television Epics: A New Source of Premium IP

    Squid Game Gganbu (Light & Wonder)

    • Profile: Released in late 2024 or early 2025, this game is based on the global Netflix phenomenon. It features a 5-reel, 5-payline setup with low volatility, a 96% RTP, and a maximum win of 2,500× the bet.  
    • Analysis: The introduction of Squid Game Gganbu is important in two crucial aspects. First, it validates the idea that the very high-end television series is now viewed as having the same value as blockbuster movies to be adapted to premium slots, which is opening up a new and bountiful source of IP to developers. Second, its low-volatility format of high winnings that occur often, and four jackpot tiers are also a strategic design. It is also designed to attract the casual, mass audience that viewed the show, as opposed to just attracting experienced and high-risk slot players. Good thematic fit is shown by the presence of the so-called Ddakji Bonus, which is a tile-flipping game presented in the series. 

    Peaky Blinders (Pragmatic Play)

    • Profile: Based on the gritty BBC series, this slot features a 5×3 reel set with 20 paylines and high volatility.  
    • Analysis: Unlike Squid Game, the slot appeals to a different audience with its mathematical profile as a plot device. The volatility of the game is indicative of the show having a gritty vibe and the high-risk, high-reward lifestyle of the show’s characters. The random modifiers completely fit the story of the show; the triggering sticky symbol to respin with the help of By Order Of The Peaky Blinders, and the Shelby Betting Shop feature to win the instant cash prizes. This shows the advanced design strategy in which the mechanics of the game support the thematic identity of the game.
  • Dream Machine: Review

    Dream Machine: Review

    Dream Machine: Review. By George & Josh Bate.

    From the inception of the genre, science fiction has used technological advancements and fantastical storytelling elements to comment on contemporary, real-world issues. In literature, George Orwell explored surveillance and totalitarianism in his seminal sci-work 1984, while Ray Bradbury examined censorship and the growing influence of technology on society in Fahrenheit 451. In cinema, the likes of Ex Machina, Minority Report, and even Jurassic Park have toyed with tenets of the sci-fi genre to provide poignant messaging about real-world problems that demand our attention presently. In the new short film Dream Machine, filmmaker Dan Egan follows suit in blending a grounded story with a heightened concept to shine a light on a long-standing yet increasingly relevant problem.

    Dream Machine follows Marco (Javier Ronceros), a veteran autoshop mechanic who struggles to make a living in a near-future dominated by the commercial success of flying cars. Marco’s occupational struggles bleed into his marriage with wife Isabela (Rosa Delgado) and lead him to consume excessive alcohol to help numb the stress. As the rift in his marriage widens, Marco is presented with a novel opportunity that may save him from his troubles.

    Writer/director Dan Egan fuses high-concept sci-fi with a grounded aesthetic in a manner similar to Rian Johnson’s Looper and Michael Felker’s Things Will Be Different. Initially, the world in which Dream Machine takes place looks and sounds exactly like ours, featuring a run down mechanic shop that will look all too familiar to anyone who has ever visited the U.S. But it doesn’t take long for the camera to pan out and reveal that this isn’t our contemporary world – at least not yet. A string of flying cars journey throughout the sky far above and away from the autoshop, both literally and figuratively. 

    The aesthetic Egan arrives on in Dream Machine is delightfully retro-futuristic. The visual effects from VFX supervisor Texas Loveday don’t aim for realism, rather they are purposefully old-fashioned and even surreal looking. The flying cars themselves look like the crimson red Christine from John Carpenter’s classic horror film, while the VFX that brings these cars to life have a Tim Burton, almost stop-motion quality about it. It’s an interesting juxtaposition to the otherwise grounded world Marco and Isabela live in, one that blends our real world with a flavor of retro futurism not dissimilar from Tomorrowland and even this summer’s The Fantastic Four: First Steps. 

    This juxtaposition speaks to just how unnatural the development of flying cars are and how deleterious this development is for the livelihoods of people like Marco. Although the short features barely any dialogue from any character, including Marco, our protagonist is an instantly relatable character with a disturbingly relatable plight. Marco’s struggles serve as a simple, yet effective allegory for the ways in which technological advancements swallow up certain occupations and people, leaving them behind to fend for themselves. History has seen this happen with assembly-line workers, switchboard operators, lamplighters, travel agents, video rental store clerks, and so on and so on. Currently, the dawn of AI is already seeing certain occupations, such as drivers, legal assistants, and proofreaders, dissipate before our eyes. Dream Machine taps into this dread of a looming future through Marco, who sees his role as a mechanic slowly slip away. Again, like the very best sci-fi stories, Egan’s short film manages to highlight an issue that demands our attention through a more fantastical storytelling lens.

    As the short progresses, the story becomes even more heartbreaking as the depths of Marco’s difficulties are revealed to the audience. His turn to alcohol to drown out his pain has an effect on his wife and co-worker Isabela, but, as seen in so many marriages, she hesitates to name the elephant in the room. The way their relationship is conveyed by Egan speaks to the short’s more solemn, quiet, even minimalist tone, which fits well for a film of this length (~18 minutes) in that it doesn’t overstay its welcome. If Dream Machine were to be expanded into a feature film, one would expect it would have to stretch beyond its current tone, but, as it stands, Egan finds success with how he tells this story.

    Ultimately, the story unfolds in an emotional and admirable manner that inspires, even if it doesn’t offer some profound message to the issue it examines. This may be Egan’s point, however. The problems caused by rapid technological advancements don’t have a readily available solution and, as such, Marco’s problem does not have a readily available solution. Instead, Marco is only in control of the decisions that lay before him, which may not solve the problem, but at least can allow him to adhere to his moral code. 

    With a distinct visual style blending our real world with retro-futuristic, old-fashioned VFX and a story that is as relevant today as it would have been 50 or even 100 years ago, Dream Machine makes for an aesthetically interesting and thematically poignant short film.

  • Sound Of Falling: London Film Festival Review

    Sound Of Falling: London Film Festival Review

    Sound Of Falling: London Film Festival Review. By Jordon Searle.

    Have you ever wondered what your family experienced over the years and whether they shared any of the same moments as you? Is there a narrative thread that spans generations and keeps us all on the same journey? German filmmaker Mascha Schilinski explores this theme in her acclaimed second feature, using stunning, technical cinematography to depict four generations of girls living in the same farmhouse across a hundred years.

    Sound of Falling is set in the Altmark region of Germany, on a farmhouse beside the river Elba. Alma (Hanna Heckt), a young girl, observes All Souls’ Day, honouring her family members who have passed by looking at their ‘death photo’ on the mantelpiece, a common practice at that time. Alma is fixated on a picture of her deceased sister, who bears an uncanny resemblance to herself. A generation later, a young woman named Erika (Lea Drinda) watches Fritz (Filip Schnack), a family member with an amputated leg. When all of the women attempt to escape the farm during WW2, she is unable to leave. 

    Set in the 1980s, Angelika (Lena Urzendowsky) is a teenage girl desperately trying to mature and leave the farmhouse while discovering her sexuality. She is exploited by her uncle, and her cousin becomes increasingly attracted to her as well. In the present day, Lenka (Laeni Geiseler) is a teenage girl who moves to the farmhouse with her parents and younger sister. When she meets Kaya (Ninel Geiger), a girl of a similar age who seems very cool despite her standoffish ways, she tries her best to emulate her. All four generations grapple with trauma and pain, both within themselves and those around them, all on the grounds of the old farmhouse.

    The story is non-linear, switching between eras scene by scene, which can be quite startling when it happens for the first time. No warning, no title card, just the start of a new scene with a new family, but the same farmhouse location. This style of storytelling can be slightly exhausting at times; you are left feeling that you would have preferred a film centred on each era, as they are all incredibly interesting. The most engaging period was the oldest, which had an eerie and compelling performance from Heckt, who continually looked down the lens of the character, unnerving the audience in every scene. As the film goes on, the eras become less and less interesting, but the performances from all of the girls are equally phenomenal.

    Sound of Falling is one of those films that showcases utterly perfect cinematography. Not a single frame is wasted, and everything seems carefully planned. The camera glides around like a haunted, voyeuristic spirit, peering through keyholes at grieving mothers and couples making love. It is one of the best shot films of the year, a triumph in cinematography that uses the 4:3 aspect ratio to great effect, creating some scenes that are intensely claustrophobic and horrifying. Schilinski and DoP Fabian Gamper have succeeded in crafting a flawless film that also features some of the best use of montage seen in years.

    With a more refined story, Sound of Falling could have reached the heights that the technical aspects of the film set, but the non-linear style makes this more of a head-scratcher than it needs to be. All we know for sure is that whatever Schilinski does next will undoubtedly be one to watch.

    Rating: 7/10

  • One Battle After Another: The BRWC Review

    One Battle After Another: The BRWC Review

    One Battle After Another: The BRWC Review. By Daniel Rester.

    One of the greatest and most versatile American filmmakers is back with a new film that couldn’t be more timely. Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another holds a mirror up to the divisiveness and hypocrisy surrounding various views in the United States, managing to satirize and seriously examine its topics at the same time. It has some rough edges, and isn’t quite on the Mount Rushmore of Anderson masterpieces, but One Battle After Another remains gripping, entertaining, and thought-provoking throughout. 

    The set-up of the film involves the actions of the members of a group called the French 75. They have goals such as freeing locked-up immigrants, bombing political offices, and more. Two of the members, explosives expert Pat (Leonardo DiCaprio) and strong-willed Perfidia (Teyana Taylor), have a child. While Pat wants them to become responsible parents, Perfidia digs deeper into the causes she believes in. 

    Years later, Pat and his now-grown daughter Charlene (Chase Infiniti) are lying low and using fake names when Pat’s past catches up to them. It comes in the form of Steven Lockjaw (Sean Penn), a military officer who was against the French 75 but had an obsession with Perfidia. After Lockjaw abducts Charlene (going as “Willa”), Pat (going as “Bob”) must put his irresponsible and lazy behavior aside and tune into his past radical side in order to get his daughter back. 

    Though it is loosely based on the 1990 novel Vineland by Thomas Pynchon, One Battle After Another mostly takes place in modern times. By jumping from the past to the present in the plot, Anderson shows how fights for causes can move up and down and in a cyclical fashion. As one character states, battles and revolutions for freedom “move in waves.” 

    Anderson explores a lot of subjects in One Battle After Another, from racism to xenophobia to fatherhood. While the film is politically charged and not too subtle, it also isn’t preachy. Anderson instead opts to show instead of tell most of the time, with the film containing a lot of moving pieces and action. When he does have characters share information and views, it is often with dialogue exchanges that contain hilariously absurd touches. For example, a white supremacist group in the film has a secret codename that is “The Christmas Adventurers Club.” The film shouldn’t be mistaken for a comedy, but Anderson’s use of levity at times is welcome. 

    One Battle After Another favors plot momentum over deep character dives (this isn’t Anderson in There Will Be Blood (2007) or The Master (2012) mode), but the characters who are here are still well drawn. Pat/Bob plays like a variation of “The Dude” from The Big Lebowski (1998), Charlene/Willa is a teen who has to learn to grow up fast and could teach her dad a thing or two as well, and Lockjaw is a complex villain full of contradictions. Those three are by far the most interesting, but supporting characters like a sensei named Sergio (Benicio del Toro) and a rebel named Deandra (Regina Hall) get their moments too. 

    These characters come alive from a terrific cast. Top to bottom, everyone is great. Penn and DiCaprio might dominate the spotlight with their stardom, but newcomer Infiniti and even the bit players don’t shirk their roles. I do wish some of the supporting actors had more to do at times though, as some excellent actors like Wood Harris and Tony Goldwyn only show up briefly. 

    DiCaprio gets to be loose and funny here a lot of the time, unafraid of his character being the butt of the joke in many scenes. An ongoing bit about Pat forgetting a password is endlessly amusing. DiCaprio also knows when to get dramatic and heartfelt though. It’s a wonderful “dad mode” performance all around. 

    Penn is arguably the standout of the film. He finds a perfect balance in making Lockjaw both pathetic and terrifying. Taylor and del Toro have some killer moments too, but it’s Penn who will probably get the lion’s share of supporting awards attention in the coming months. 

    Anderson directs the hell out of One Battle After Another, as to be expected. He has had a handful of action scenes throughout his filmography, but never this many or at this level. Audiences know he can handle chaotic character interactions, but it’s welcome to see him put his stamp on visuals like large protests and intense car chases since those are not normally in his repertoire. 

    Cinematographer Michael Bauman, editor Andy Jurgensen, and composer Jonny Greenwood are all essential in delivering Anderson’s vision here. Bauman shot the film using VistaVision cameras, which lends the wide images plenty of texture; he captures both gritty urban interiors and sun-baked, Western-esque landscapes with a great eye. Jurgensen makes the 162-minute runtime fly by with his precision, and his work especially shines during a car chase involving a road going through rolling hills. Greenwood electrifies the movie with his score, which has both offbeat and rich sections with pianos and strings. 

    The first act of One Battle After Another can feel choppy at times as it rushes through the actions of the French 75 and Pat and Perfidia’s relationship. Some of the plot threads involving supporting characters like Sergio and Deandra are also left dangling by the end of the film. A few extra minutes added in the right places would have been useful in order to iron out the kinks. Those complaints are just small flaws in a magnificent film though. 

    One Battle After Another is yet another daring entry in Anderson’s filmography. It gives the audience laughs, thrills, and plenty to chew on as it portrays both ugly and hopeful aspects of American culture both past and present. It’s one of the must-see films of 2025. 

    Rating: 9/10