Author: Alton Williams

  • The Best And The Brightest

    The Best And The Brightest 
    I think this is the first pic released from The Best and The Brightest, a new comedy starring Neil Patrick Harris, Amy Sedaris, Bonnie Somerville, Peter Serafinowicz, John Hodgman, Jenna Stern, Kate Mulgrew, Steve Park, Kelly Coffield, Bridget Regan, Nina Lisandrello, and Chris McDonald. 
    Looks interesting…

    © BRWC 2010.

  • So What Are You Waiting For?

    So What Are You Waiting For?

    Reviews by walt.

    Whenever a film is released to the fanfare of hype surrounding James Cameron’sAvatar, there will always be a percentage of the cinema going public who will stubbornly resist being lured in by the rave reviews and good word of mouth. So the film got the five star treatment in Empire and Total Film – so what? All your friends are telling you it’s a must see – what do they know? The fact that everyone else in the world has seen it seems like a perfectly adequate reason why not to watch it – after all, I’m an individual, not one of the herd.

    Despite tumbling box-office records and Oscar nominations galore, there are some of us who think that the rest of world’s gone mad, and we’re the only ones left with a modicum of good taste. So we formulate a list of reasons why we’re not going to get pulled in like every other sucker. Top of the list, we have James Cameron himself. OK, so he may have made Aliens and the first two Terminator films, but he also madeTitanic and frankly the memory of his “I’m the King of the World” Oscar acceptance speech still makes my teeth itch. If that’s not enough, you may have an aversion to CGI-laden 3-D blockbusters, or perhaps Dr. Manhattan’s giant schlong in Watchmen put you off all things blue. Or maybe it’s simply because, like me, you like your movies to be character driven films, about real people, experiencing real emotions, living in the real world.

    It’s probably no surprise to you that I was amongst the naysayers who have been avoiding the movie since it’s release last December. However, as a self-respecting film blogger I finally decided I had a duty to watch the film. I’m constantly telling off my 5 year-old daughter for saying she doesn’t like mushrooms, when I know for a fact she’s never even tried one. So without wanting to sound like a hypocrite, I at least owed it to myself to watch the film first to know exactly what it was I didn’t like about it. It’s all about informed opinions. So 3-D glasses perched on the end of my nose, I prepared myself for two and half hours of abject misery at my local multiplex.

    For all of you like-minded cynics who are avoiding seeing this film let me attempt to dispel some of your pre-formed prejudices. Firstly, this isn’t just another blockbuster movie. This is cinema as an event, the likes of which I don’t think has been seen since the original 1977 release of Star Wars. Like Lucas’ film, this movie has to be experienced in all its glory on the cinema screen. The world that Cameron has created by blending motion capture and 3-D visuals is probably the most remarkable visual entity I have ever seen. So those of you waiting for the more bladder friendly DVD release, stay off fluids for a couple of hours and get yourself down to your local cinema.

    Secondly, this film isn’t all about the CGI effects and 3-D experience, as impressive as all that is. There is a depth to the story, themes and characters that ensures this is not another case of Hollywood style over substance. For me, the real moments of pure beauty in this film derive mainly from the characters. We experience the joy, wonder and fear of Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) as he is introduced to the Na’vi world by his alien guide Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). Impressive visuals can only take you so far. What sustains the audience and ensures their engagement for the entire journey is the emotional empathy we are made to feel with the characters. Despite Avatar being a science fiction film about an alien world, it’s these real, human emotions that strike a chord with the audience. There’s an endearing naivety about Jake as he explores this new world through his avatar body, and a touching tenderness between Sully and Neytiri as she teaches him the ways of the Na’vi people.

    It’s not all perfection. Cameron’s writing, especially the dialogue, is prone to cliché and a tendency towards the absurd. There’s a regurgitation of themes and scenes fromAliens and Titanic which brings into question the film’s originality. Whilst Jake and Neytiri are fully rounded characters, some of the supporting roles are ineffective. Giovanni Ribisi is wasted playing the superficial corporate bad guy, and Michelle Rodriguez is limited to rehashing the iconic role of Pvt. Vasquez from Aliens. Worst of all is Stephen Lang’s portrayal of Colonel Quaritch, a badly written, over-acted cartoon caricature whose descent into madness for the film’s finale is as predictable as it is unsubtle.

    What truly disappoints about Avatar is Cameron’s lack of ambition with his story. Having taken the time to create and develop (both visually and thematically) this extraordinary world, and the relationship between Jake, Neytiri and the Na’vi people, Cameron then devotes the final third of the film to a high-octane action finale. It feels like a missed opportunity. Here was a chance to say something special about the relationship between two different races, yet Cameron opts for the road more commonly travelled, by presenting us with a familiar story about the human race entering into a war with an alien culture they don’t understand.

    These flaws aside, it remains a must-see – an essential cinematic experience for anybody who loves film. And for those of you who are scared of what Avatar’ssuccess means for the future of cinema, fear not. Many critics have claimed that this movie will change the face of film and filmmaking forever more. Yet whilst 3-D motion capture will undoubtedly be the way forward for the Hollywood blockbuster, these films will never come to represent the medium of film as a whole. In the year that spawnedAvatar, we also had the likes of (500) Days of Summer, Adventureland, Mesrine,Looking For Eric, Inglourious Basterds and Gran Torino to name but a few. All character driven films with little or no reliance upon CGI wizardry. The future of cinema will be much like it’s past, where big-budget escapist entertainment pieces co-exist with character driven personal films about life, love and society. Don’t fearAvatar – embrace it as a new development in the rich history of cinema, and then rent out the brilliant (500) Days of Summer to remind yourself that at opposite ends of the filmmaking spectrum people find different ways to give voice to human stories.

  • Watchmen 2?

    Watchmen 2?

    Brendon from Slashfilm has written something that has stunned me.  A sequel to Watchmen?  No thanks.  Besides, a sequel to the film or to the groundbreaking graphic novel?  Looks like the former would be more likely than the latter.

  • Precious, Mmh..

    Precious, Mmh..
    I’m always intrigued when a film divides the public and the audience in the way only films like Precious can do. There has been praise, awards and Oscar nominations. And equally some pretty harsh reviews like Guardian’s David Cox one, who defined it as ‘an insult to the poor’. Well, I have seen it four days ago and I still haven’t made my mind up. What I can tell for sure is that, regardless of whether you like it or not (but can anyone actually like a film of this kind?), it certainly sparks some pretty interesting debates.
    Precious, screen version of Sapphire’s novel Push, is the bleak story of an obese black 16 year old schoolgirl from Harlem who, despite gruesome abuses from both her father and her mother, still holds on to her dreams of a better life for her and her children. It’s a grim tale and I’m not sure the ending is a happy one.
    Precious is an independent movie endorsed by Oprah Winfrey. It has won several awards and shows off the likes of singer Mariah Carey as a social worker with bad skin and heart-throb rockstar Lenny Kravitz as a cute nurse. Quite uncalled for, if you ask me. Honestly, I spent a good twenty minutes wondering why these two where in the movie at all. It might have been to attract a bit of publicity around a story that, I’m sure, can’t be that appealing. Tube scenario, Man 1: ‘Oi, did u see that film with the fat black girl that gets abused all throughout the movie?’ Man 2: ‘Oh not yet, I really need to and see it!’. Mmmh, somehow I can’t see that happening.
    But, it certainly makes you think, pulls out your stomach and stamps on it a few times while you watch it, but somehow I didn’t manage to identify with the character or sympathise with her. It pains me to admit it, but it left me a bit lukewarm.
    Admittedly, though, there is a star that shines all over the gloomy reality of the story, and that’s comedienne and actress Mo Nique. Her performance as Precious’ mother is absolutely mind blowing, she’s so believable she actually scared me! Oscar winning material right there, if you ask me. Even newbie Gabourey Sidibe, who plays Precious, does such a great job and deserves a round of sincere applause.
    Overall I felt glad that such tough issues where tackled on the big screen but I’m not sure it was done in the right way. My honest opinion is, I wouldn’t see it again but I am glad I did watch it.

    © BRWC 2010.