Author: Alton Williams

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – The Last Exorcism

    Film Review with Robert Mann - The Last Exorcism

    The Last Exorcism **½

    Seeing the words “Eli Roth presents” in the marketing for The Last Exorcism will no doubt give many people a certain sense of expectation from this film. But you may as well throw away many of those expectations right now. While Roth has developed a reputation for filmmaking of the most sickeningly gruesome and violent, his films Cabin Fever, Hostel and Hostel Part Two being clear examples of this, this film (which carries his name but it not actually made by him) is a horror movie of much more the psychological kind, in fact being awarded an American PG-13 rating, something that should be good news to any more squeamish horror fans out there. Following in the footsteps of films such as Cloverfield, Diary of the Dead, [Rec] and Quarantine among many others, this is the latest film to adopt the documentary/found footage approach to horror filmmaking, with the intention here obviously being to make us believe that what we are watching is actually real, even if, unlike The Blair Witch Project, we clearly know this not to be the case. After underwhelming exorcism themed films like Exorcist: The Beginning and Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist, can this latest attempt at an exorcism themed film follow in the footsteps of The Exorcism of Emily Rose in providing both a fresh take on the exorcism movie and being a genuinely good one at the same time? Both yes and no apparently.

    Arriving at the isolated Louisiana farm of Louis Sweetzer (Louis Herthum), the charismatic preacher Reverend Cotton Marcus (Patrick Fabian) is expecting to perform his usual fake exorcism on a disturbed religious fanatic. An earnest fundamentalist, Sweetzer is certain his teenage daughter Nell (Ashley Bell) is possessed by a demon. Facing his conscience after years of parting desperate believers with their money, Cotton plans to have his film crew record a confessionary documentary of his last ‘exorcism’. But when they see the already blood-drenched farm, it’s clear that true evil is at work. With no turning back, Reverend Marcus’ own beliefs are shaken to the core as he and his crew must find a way to save Nell – and themselves – before it is too late.

    The Last Exorcism could almost pass for a real documentary such is the level of realism on display here. While often proving somewhat annoying and distracting, the shaky camerawork, the out of focus shots, the poor lighting and the conversations taking place off screen really do create a sense that what we are watching is in fact real. This is aided considerably by dialogue that sounds completely authentic and acting that is so uniformly excellent that it is easy to forget that we are watching actors at all. Patrick Fabian’s on-screen charisma makes him completely believable as a smooth, confident preacher who is convinced that he knows and is doing what is right. Ashley Bell’s transformation from innocent Christian girl to violent, foul mouthed possessee is shockingly realistic. Louis Herthum is perfectly unhinged as the mentally unstable father. And all the bit players never fail to completely convince either. All this realism serves to make what happens on screen all the more scary and, while this is not the most gut wrenchingly terrifying film you will see about exorcism (or anything for that matter), it is still a very chilling film to sit through and one that has its fair share of scares. So, why the low rating, you’re wondering. Well, while the film starts out as an interesting exposé of the hoax behind exorcism and even seems headed back in that direction at one point, when the (apparent) supernatural element is introduced the film heads into more familiar and predictable territory. Also, the presentation of the film almost like a complete finished documentary with footage edited together and interviews included destroys the illusion of the film being real footage that has been found, thus detracting from the impact of the overall film. The real crime on the part of the filmmakers, however, is the lame tacked on ending which completely ruins the film, both ending it on a needlessly predictable note and destroying the integrity established by the more interesting content that features earlier in the film. If only the film came to an end five minutes earlier an extra star on the rating may have been warranted but, as it is, The Last Exorcism is a decent horror film that suffers because it promised to be different but has ended up too much like many others.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Cherry Tree Lane: Paul Andrew Williams Interview

    Cherry Tree Lane: Paul Andrew Williams Interview

    By The_Reaper.

    I was lucky enough to get you guys a great little tit-bit on upcoming horror movie Cherry Tree Lane with a nice interview and an awesome trailer! Now what is this here Cherry Tree Lane you ask? Well according to some resources and a plot synopsis it’s about the following:

    “Christine and Mike are normal parents living in a semi-detached house on suburban street Cherry Tree Lane. They don’t realise it, but a desperate and terrible situation is just minutes away. They sit and eat their evening meal, discussing the day’s events at work. Christine answers the door to a group of three teenage boys asking after her son Sebastian for a kick around. Telling them he is out, she closes the door and returns to her meal. The door goes again. This time, as Christine opens the latch, a sudden unexpected attack leads to a terrifying house invasion. Striking at the heart of the deepest suburban fears and played out in real time, Cherry Tree Lane explores what happens when a living nightmare bursts into the home you assumed was safe.”

    Sounds good, no? Well maybe if you see the trailer you’ll see what I mean with how awesome it looks:

    As for the interview, upcoming directors and writers might find some wisdom out of the following one from award winning writer/director Paul Andrew Williams (London to Brighton” and The Cottage) quite invigorating.

    Q: Where did you get the idea for Cherry Tree Lane?

    I wanted to make something that was more real than Hollywood. Something that the studio system would be too scared to make, but that I knew I could as a British independent filmmaker.

    I wanted to make something about genuine fear, something that cinema-goers could connect with. It’s a big fear of my girlfriend’s and we’ve talked about it a few times. It’s a classic human fear – the fear of what is outside your front door. Of the unknown coming inside your home.

    Q: How does it differ from your previous films, London to Brighton and The Cottage?

    They’re all different. It’s just its own thing. There’s going to be elements from both of those films in this film, but I think it’s just different in the sense that it’s got it’s own style. The only thing you could send that was similar is the quality of the acting, that’s the same that’s gone through all of them.

    Q: How long was the process from initial concept to filming Cherry Tree Lane?

    The concept was ages ago, but I wrote the script about 3 months ago. It was a very quick process, and I trusted my instincts. We achieved it by saying to everyone “we want you to do it, but if you want to do it you got to let us know by the end of the week,” rather than “do you want to do it, we’ll wait for 3 months for you to say yeah.” You start pushing very hard and go “right we’re doing this, we’re doing this, we’re doing this” and then hopefully people sort of follow on from that. But the industry’s so slow that sometimes you just need to push everyone to say “we’re doing this thing, are you going to do it or what?” And then some people said yeah, which is good.

    Q: Which did you want to be first, a writer or a director?

    Probably a director, I find writing can be tedious.

    Q: Can you imagine being one without the other?

    Yeah, I could be a director without being a writer, but I couldn’t be a writer without directing it. Because I’d be like, that’s not how it is. I’m too much of an egomaniac.

    Q: As you’ve watched the script play out have you made any changes to the original?

    No, not really. The odd line here or there, because I don’t know street speak as much as I’d like to. The odd line, but that’s it.

    Q: How did you go about casting the film?

    It was quite difficult because of what the parts call for, it’s intensive. It’s an emotional journey. First of all we’d meet everyone and we’d start doing a bit of improve, then on the next meeting we’d go through the script, break it down. There was a lot of different processes, to make sure that they; one were comfortable in what I wanted to do and I was comfortable in what they wanted to do.

    Q: What would you like viewers to take from Cherry Tree Lane?

    I approached the film with a very definite thought process, but I don’t think people who watch this film need me to tell them what to think. I’d encourage people to watch it, and draw their own conclusions.

    Q: There are some violent scenes in the film…

    No there’s not! There’s violent scenes around the film. I don’t think it’s that violent at all.

    Q: Implied violence then… did you find these hard to direct?

    I think sometimes they were difficult, but then when you see somebody in distress, obviously performing in distress, it can be quite difficult. You’ve got to try and do it as sensitively and as professionally as possible.

    Q: You’re now on the last day of the shoot, how do you think it’s gone?

    Long. Just intense, so intense being in such a small place for so long. By the time tomorrow morning comes, it’ll be an adjustment to go back to normal life. I’ve got shit loads of bills and crap I’ve got to fix at home. Thank the lord for coco pops.

    Q: What were the greatest challenges on set?

    All being in the same location! Having twenty people in one single room! Which is incredibly claustrophobic. It’s good for the film, but it’s stifling and it’s hard to concentrate when you’ve got fifteen voices going on.

    Q: The location you’re shooting in is in north London, which happens to be very close to your home, was that coincidence?

    It’s 100% coincidence. We did look at other places, but this was just the best one.

    Q: Over the last few years there has been quite a lot of press around gang violence and street crime. How relevant is this film to that agenda?

    I think that will be up for other people to judge how relevant it is. I think this is just an eighty minute story and, I think if anything, hopefully it highlights the difference between the lack of understanding between both class and generation with a lot of people. Also, the desensitisation of some of the youth today, where nothing really means anything anymore, good or bad.

    Q: Do you think Cherry Tree Lane is as relevant to audiences outside the UK?

    It’s a story, it’s not a statement. It’s not trying to cast light or exercise a judgment on someone. It’s just like a moment. It would translate anywhere.

    Q: How hard it is to have an independent film made in the UK today?

    As hard as you want it to be. It depends what you want to make. Making films is not easy. Look at the state of me, I’m knackered

    If you’ve read all of that, then you’re good little minions and I shall reward you with the location and time of the free screening of Cherry Tree Lane which will be showing at The Alibi in Dalston on Monday 6 September 2010. The doors open at 8 pm and the film starts at 9 pm. If you aren’t able to make it, then rest assured, I’ve worked my magic and the movie will be available on DVD from the 13th of September 2010.  See, even horror can be kind.
  • Tassha 3D

    Tassha 3D
    Today is my lovely mate Tassha’s 23rd birthday!

    Happy birthday dear, hope you’re having a great night.

    She saw Piranha 3D the other day and she’s jotted down what she thought below.

    Put any preconceptions aside, this film is not one to miss. Think constant laughs, mixed with scantily clad women and pure gore. Piranha 3D is two hours of total cinema enjoyment, and it’s not just one for the lads. Possibly THE film of the year.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Avatar: Special Edition

    Film Review with Robert Mann - Avatar: Special Edition

    Avatar: Special Edition 3D (Re-release/Extended Version) *****

    At the global box office, James Cameron’s Avatar has already earned a staggering $2,740,405,721 – that’s the highest amount ever earned by a single movie, the highest by a massive margin. Apparently, though, that amount just isn’t enough, as is evidenced by this week’s release of Avatar: Special Edition, a re-release that really seems no purpose other than to get even more money out of paying cinemagoers. Sure, it contains nine minutes of extra footage but the question has to be asked, why not just include those nine minutes in the original release of the film?

    It is the year 2154 and Earth is a dying world. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is a paraplegic ex-marine who is dispatched to the distant jungle world of Pandora where a sinister corporation, run by corporate boss Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi), is mining a rare and extremely valuable mineral called Unobtanium. However, the native Na’Vi, a humanoid race who claim Pandora as their home, both physically and spiritually, are none too happy about the damage the humans are causing to their world. So, under the leadership of Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver), the Avatar Programme has been created to negotiate with the Na’Vi, the Avatars being genetically engineered beings made up of both human and Na’Vi DNA. However, while sharing similar appearance, the Avatars are not trusted by the tribe and the situation is rapidly deteriorating. Thus, Jake, the newest member of the Avatar Programme, is recruited by the gung-ho Colonel Quaritch (Stephen Lang) to get on the inside of the Na’Vi tribe and obtain intelligence that will be used against them. Initially, Jake is focused on his mission but everything changes when he encounters Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), a member of the Na’Vi tribe who believes there is something special about him. As he is brought into the tribe and begins to learn their ways, Jake finds himself falling in love not only with Neytiri but also the tribe and the entire world. Meanwhile, the restless Colonel moves forward with his ruthless extermination tactics, forcing the soldier to take a stand. Enlisting the help of the increasingly embittered Dr Augustine, along with fellow Avatar participant Norm Spellman (Joel David Moore) and pilot Trudy Chacon (Michelle Rodriguez), Jake brings together all the tribes of Pandora for an epic battle for the fate of the world once and for all.

    If you saw Avatar on its initial release in cinemas then it is fair to say that you will know exactly what to expect from Avatar: Special Edition. Just like the original version of the film, it still boasts the best 3D effects to date (and helps to banish from memory the crime against 3D that was the other Avatar movie – The Last Airbender), the visual effects never fail to dazzle and astound, the action sequences are both superb and epic, the acting if virtually faultless and the writing is strong if unoriginal – this is basically Pocahontas transposed to an alien planet. Suffice to say, the film is still brilliant. But what about the much touted extra nine minutes of footage? Well, depending on how observant you are they will either strengthen the story slightly or go by unnoticed altogether. The extra sequences are relatively insubstantial, not really standing out in any significant way, but this is not because they are irrelevant, as is the case with the extended editions of many movies, and rather because they blend so organically into the film as to make them seem as if they were part of the movie the whole time. This additional footage includes a scene in the abandoned school that was referred to but not shown in the original version of the film, an additional action scene involving an aerial hunt of animals on the ground below, a Na’Vi love scene, a scene where the Na’Vi attack and destroy the human bulldozers followed by a scene of the humans inspecting the wreckage, and a scene featuring the death of a prominent Na’Vi character as well as a variety of scenes featuring new animals that were not seen in the original version of the film and a number of extensions to scenes that did feature in the original release of the film. None of this necessarily adds a substantial amount to the film but there is distinct strengthening of the plot with certain story and character developments gaining new insight and the additional pieces of action help to make an already thrilling movie a bit more so. So, the extra footage does add something to the film but may well not be noticed by less observant viewers. Avatar: Special Edition is still a movie going experience to behold and is certainly worth checking out for the opportunity to see the film once again in the medium it was meant to be seen in but there isn’t anything truly special about this extended cut to make it a must see for anyone but the most devoted of fans and those who didn’t get the chance to see the film first time around.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Michael Cera’s Favourite Films

    The awesome Intervals of Awesome managed to speak to Mr Pilgrim himself, Michael Cera.  They pinned him down, for two hours.  Cera a handwritten list of stuff to see.

    The list is very good indeed, and he has included my favourite and the best film ever made – Rear Window.  Well done sir.

    Inspired, I have stuck a quick list below.  Perhaps you could do the same?  Email us?

     Michael Cera's Favourite Films

    © BRWC 2010.