Blog

  • Hoodman: Review

    Hoodman: Review

    Ariana Chandler (Madison Spear) has recently lost her husband and is left to look after their six-month-old son. Unfortunately, when Ariana gets involved in a car crash, the police tell her that her son died in the crash. However, Ariana believes that just before the crash occurred, a hooded man appeared in front of the car and that in fact her son is still alive and was taken by the hooded man.

    Ariana goes back to her parent’s house to stay while she tries to pick up the pieces of her life once again, but when she starts dreaming about the hooded man and having visions of him, she starts to believe that her sister, Missy (Skye Roberts) may be in danger.

    The only person that believes Ariana is Frank Hackman (Jack James) who has been investigating the disappearances of children all over the world after his daughter went missing and he believes that Hoodman is responsible.

    There’s also Detective Lenny Briggs (Brock Morse) a rather insensitive detective who’s trying to ensure that Ariana forgets the nonsense of the urban legend of Hoodman so that she can move on with her life.

    Hoodman is a supernatural horror written and directed by Mark W. Curran which takes inspiration from other films that have inspired urban legends and tries to create a new one. The problem is that Hoodman as a character isn’t well enough thought out, so the lore of the character is never really fully explained.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJnxzsrJQIw

    For most of the movie, the audience is told that Hoodman takes children and that’s just about it. However, it seems that everybody Ariana meets seems to know the legend and some are very afraid. There’s also an aspect that runs through most of the movie where Ariana is plagued by dreams and visions although Hoodman is said to only take children. Although this is eventually explained, a lot of the audience may consider it to be a plot hole, because there seems to be no reason as to why Ariana is in direct danger.

    The movie isn’t of the highest budget and the cast do their best with a bad script, but even then, the acting isn’t all that great either. Maybe a horror movie to watch just to tick off the list of failed villains.

  • Wrath Of Man: The BRWC Review

    Wrath Of Man: The BRWC Review

    Wrath of Man Synopsis: H (Jason Statham) is a cold and mysterious character working at a cash truck company responsible for moving hundreds of millions of dollars around Los Angeles each week. After disposing of an attempted robbery, H sets his sights on revenge for the loss of his son.

    The careers of Jason Statham and Guy Ritchie will forever be intertwined by their spirited indie days. With sharp and brazenly idiosyncratic efforts like Snatch and Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, Ritchie exhibited a singular voice due to his penchant for verbose vulgarities and oft-kilter storytelling. The material’s lean-and-mean energy also made a perfect canvas for Statham’s stern-faced charisma, setting the ground floor for the star’s sturdy career as a poised killing machine.

    After a few decades apart, the two distinct personas re-team in Wrath of Man, a taunt-heist picture made in the image of Statham’s traditioned action formula. While some may be disappointed by the film’s modest appeals, Wrath of Man assuredly scratches that shameless genre movie itch.

    The pair’s well-documented relationship gives this action title a sizable advantage over its peers, with both possessing a finite understanding of the other’s distinct strengths. Statham has rarely been better as the vengeful H, portraying the character’s blind vengeance with dramatic weight and his typical action star charisma (few deliver vulgar one-liners with such effortless disdain). I also appreciate how the actor’s typically steely-eyed persona is incorporated in a newfound sense of purpose.

    Ritchie’s screenplay (co-written by Eric Besnard and Nicolas Boukhrief) allows H to become more than another amalgam of action hero cliche. The script’s substantive undertones, while fairly routine for an action film, wisely delve into the character’s questionable moral compasses amidst the hyper-masculine, dog-eats-dog setting (I love Ritchie’s use of dramatic irony, as he’s always finding satisfying ways to pay off even the smallest of character arcs). His sharp writing also skillfully elevates the tertiary meathead roles. Beloved character actors like Scott Eastwood, Holt McCallany, and Josh Hartnett propel their bit parts into meaningful contributions (Hartnett has a blast as a skittish man with a “tough guy” complex).

    Fear not action fans, as Ritchie’s film still delivers the satisfying genre mechanics audiences crave. Wrath of Man works patiently amidst the heist genre’s slow-burn plotting before unleashing setpieces that sing with real-world tension and agency. Ritchie’s vibrant touch as a director remains very much intact, employing a range of smooth tracking shots and steady framing to intensify the close-quarters gunplay. Bullets fly by the dozens while characters are slaughtered in an unpredictable fashion, keeping audiences on their toes until the satisfying finale hammers the film’s thesis home.

    Wrath of Man certainly scores above its B-movie action paygrade, but not all of Guy Ritchie’s trademark touches are welcomed. His dialogue still ranges from bitingly clever to painfully juvenile. The latter category includes a bevy of cringe-inducing barbs that transport audiences to the stone age of chauvinist action cinema (Ritchie’s struggles writing well-defined female characters are well-documented). I can see where these touches could purposefully reflect toxic masculinity and men’s primal instincts, but Ritchie doesn’t go deep enough in the conceit to truly sell the idea.

    I also wished Ritchie pushed the envelope more from a visual perspective. Similar to The Gentlemen, Wrath of Man lacks the unhinged creativity behind the director’s signature projects. It occasionally feels like he’s conforming too much to Statham’s well-versed action formula rather than pushing the envelope with his trademark sensibility.

    Issues aside, Wrath of Man is the brutal and brazenly badass action film audiences have sorely missed on the big screen. It’s a blast to see Statham back in his barebones action formula (2016’s Mechanic: Resurrection was his last project of this elk), so here’s to hoping more starring vehicles are on their way for him.

    WRATH OF MAN opens in theaters on May 7th.

  • Pipeline: Review

    Pipeline: Review

    Shay (Ashley Ballard) and her friends have rented a house for the weekend from a kindly old man called, Merlin (Marc Goodman). They settle in and the couple all go to their separate rooms and look forward to having a relaxing time.

    Little do they realise that a monster is lurking in the pipes and it’s waiting to kill them just at the right time. However, the longer they stay at the house, the more they realise that there’s something they’re not being told and just when it’s too late, the survivors of the monster attack are in even worse danger than they imagined.

    Pipeline is a horror movie written and directed by Emily Aguilar which has a somewhat generic, but intriguing premise. The idea that something or someone is in the house with a group of people has been seen time and time again through horror, but every so often an idea comes that makes it more interesting.

    At least it sounds more interesting at the time. In this case, a monster or spirit that dwells in the plumbing of the house sounds so simplistic and yet has the potential to work. It could be a tongue in cheek horror comedy, or there could be some underlying social commentary. However, as much of the premise sounds a little different, the movie itself doesn’t seem to know what it wants to be.

    The set up for the movie is very typical and the first death which leads the audience into what kind of movie this may be does set the tone perfectly. It’s just unfortunate that it decides about halfway through to change tack entirely and the twist ruins any tension and potential for excitement completely.

    Also, for a horror movie with such an absurd premise, a bit of humour wouldn’t have gone amiss, because the first death is probably the best and the funniest, whether the humour was intentional or not.

    The cast and the budget are both of the lowest quality, however sometimes in situations like this it’s the premise and script that can carry a movie. Unfortunately it seems like another example of a good idea gone to waste.

  • I AM: Review

    I AM: Review

    I AM: Review. By Julius Tabel.

    This is a German short film about a lonely woman, who lives in the woods and who finds a weird robot in form of a beautiful young woman in the forest.

    This construction seems pretty interesting, and I loved how the short film managed it. There is not much explanation, and as a consequence, “I Am” provokes many questions and it involves the viewer. Sooner or later, you will find out that it is a little study of the protagonist that unfortunately doesn ́t pay off at the end, especially because the film feels unfinished.

    Although she isn ́t very much introduced, the protagonist seems charming in her nice-looking home, but you can also feel the loneliness immediately, since there is no sign of society. Furthermore, “I Am” is very well made. When the protagonist dreams about a dark event in the forest, it really takes you with it and scares you. As a result, the scarier these events are, the more intimidating is this robot-girl.

    This relation with the robot feels very weird though in a more or less negative way. The protagonist simply accepts her and makes her live with her. She asks questions once or twice, but the robot always answers with a question. I don ́t believe that any character has any goals, and this kind of destroys the involvement of the viewer.

    However, every line of dialogue might be useful later which makes it very important to be interested. This is where the film might loose his viewer, but in my case, I followed the direction in which the film went and accepted the process. This strange robotic creature creates a bit of suspense because of some very ominous shots, and if you follow this suspense, you might get a very good insight of the characters.

    Nevertheless, the ending destroyed everything that was built up. It made the film meaningless. All the theories and questions I had were left open, but it ́s not like the film was so interesting that I have to study it all over again. The ending lost all of my interest in the film and it left m cold. There is a nice twist that the viewer could have seen coming in a suspenseful way, but “I Am” doesn ́t do anything with it.

    Overall, the look is very great. The pictures are always shot with a good and cinematic intention and the colors are also very interesting-looking, as they are partly dark and then joyful again.

    But then, “I Am” goes on with no pay off whatsoever which is very unfortunate since I cared about the outcome at the beginning. It ́s not like I hate the ending, I just don ́t care anymore. And I think that most viewer ́s, if they even get so far as being interesting at first, will have the same issue.

  • ZSJL Scoops Second Week At Number 1

    ZSJL Scoops Second Week At Number 1

    ZSJL or Zack Snyder’s Justice League holds on to earn a second week at Number 1 on the UK’s Official Film Chart!

    Enjoying its place at the top for a second week on digital downloads only, it holds off several other DC entries in this week’s Top 10 including Wonder Woman 1984 (2), 2016’s prequel Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice (3) and award winner Joker (5).

    This week’s highest new entry comes from British comedy Blithe Spirit, starring Judi Dench, Dan Stevens, Leslie Mann and Judi Dench. A writer suffering from writer’s block attends a séance, but the Medium accidentally summons the spirit of his first wife – leading to an increasingly complex love triangle with his current wife.

    At Number 6 is two-time Oscar winner Judas and the Black Messiah, starring LaKeith Stanfield and featuring an Oscar-winning performance from Daniel Kaluuya for his portrayal of Fred Hampton, the Chairman of the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party.

    Japanese classic cult shocker Battle Royale debuts at Number 7 this week following the release of a new Limited Edition 4K boxset. The Greatest Showman drops to Number 8, while Jumanji: The Next Level zooms 21 places back to Number 9, and Let Him Go finishes at Number 10.

    This week’s Official Film Chart online show features a preview of crime thriller The Little Things, starring Denzel Washington & Rami Malek, which is available to Download & Keep from 10 May.

    Now, as well as OfficialCharts.com, the Official Film Chart can also be found on FindAnyFilm.com – the ultimate site for Film and TV fans to discover all the legal ways to buy the entertainment they want on disc and digital formats.

    The Official Film Chart Top 10 – 5th May 2021

    LWPosTitleLabel
    11ZACK SNYDER’S JUSTICE LEAGUEWARNER HOME VIDEO
    22WONDER WOMAN 1984WARNER HOME VIDEO
    RE3BATMAN V SUPERMAN – DAWN OF JUSTICEWARNER HOME VIDEO
    NEW4BLITHE SPIRIT (2021)UNIVERSAL PICTURES
    45JOKERWARNER HOME VIDEO
    NEW6JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAHWARNER HOME VIDEO
    NEW7BATTLE ROYALEARROW FILMS
    58THE GREATEST SHOWMAN20TH CENTURY FOX HE
    309JUMANJI – THE NEXT LEVELSONY PICTURES HE
    810LET HIM GOUNIVERSAL PICTURES

    © Official Charts Company 2021

    VIEW THE FULL TOP 40 https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/film-chart/