Blog

  • Free Guy: The BRWC Review

    Free Guy: The BRWC Review

    Guy (Ryan Reynolds) is an ordinary, every-day bank teller. He wakes up every morning, says hello to his goldfish and heads to work where the bank is routinely robbed by the people in sunglasses. Guy is also unlucky in love and is just waiting to find that one person that will completely change his life.

    That person is Millie, otherwise known as Molotovgirl (Jodie Comer), a kickass hero who wears sunglasses just like all the best people in Free City. Without the sunglasses people, life would be so boring, but when Guy decides to stand up for himself and to take somebody’s sunglasses, that’s when his world changes.

    Free Guy is a movie that delves into the video game world and puts it on the big screen. Directed by Shawn Levy who has directed such family movies as Night at The Museum and Real Steel, Free Guy is Levy’s same brand of crowd-pleasing blockbuster, but with a heart and some surprisingly existential moments. A mixture of Groundhog Day, The Truman Show and The Matrix; Free Guy gives its audience a great feeling that will surely make them forget about the real world for a couple of hours.

    However, outside of Free City in the real world where Millie is playing Free City so that she can uncover proof that the code that she wrote is being used by Antwan (Taika Watiti), a maniacal creative director working on Free City. However, when she meets Guy, she gets distracted by fantasy meeting reality.

    Although a heart-warming, feel good story about the little guy triumphing against the odds and defeating an evil corporation, there are a few problems with Free Guy. The movie does indeed manage to successfully integrate gaming culture, but at times it does feel like it may lose its wider audience with its terminology.

    Also, as a gamer myself, it feels like some of the solutions could have been solved in different ways whilst still being accessible to the mainstream. Its base story is also not all that original either considering the wide success of The Lego Movie. So, after a while, a certain song may pop into people’s heads when Guy says in a round about way that ‘everything is awesome’. Also, it does feel through Taika Watiti’s performance that perhaps he feels a little uncomfortable playing a villain as his portrayal fails to become truly unlikeable.

    Saying all that though, Free Guy is a bright and colourful, action-packed family movie with great laughs and even a couple of surprise cameos which will surely raise a smile.

  • Language Lessons: Review

    Language Lessons: Review

    Language Lessons Synopsis: A Spanish teacher (Natalie Morales) and her grieving student (Mark Duplass) develop an unexpected friendship during their virtual meetings. The film was made on Zoom during COVID-19.

    While studios fight over blockbuster profits, Duplass Brothers Productions have keenly dug their nitch in the marketplace. Mark and Jay Duplass have transformed intimate low-budget indies into a legitimate brand, utilizing their success to produce similarly spirited efforts from other talents. Films like Blue Jay, Tangerine, and Skelton Twins resonated deeply with me through their intimate exploration of human dynamics. 

    The trend continues with Language Lessons – a modest Zoom-based drama filmed in the heart of the pandemic. As a labor of love from Mark and Natalie Morales (Morales wrote, directed, and stars in the film while Duplass co-writers and stars alongside her), the feel-good dramedy strikes enough genuine notes to mask its inherently slight appeals.  

    Several COVID-filmed efforts have tried (and mostly failed) to convey the isolating times without feeling mawkish in their pursuits. Language Lessons is one of the few to nail the challenge. Morales and Duplass’ screenplay intelligently dances away from the contrivances that plague indies of this elk. Whenever the script displays overly cutesy dynamics, the pair find honest ways to subversive the subgenre’s false cheerfulness (including a strong critique of the “manic pixie dream girl” trope).  

    The duo’s reliance on free-flowing, improvisational dialogue also helps build a genuine rapport without significant backstory. Few can create lively conversational energy like Duplass and company, with the deft screenplay allowing dynamics to play out in their own raw, naturalistic manner. Morales’ firm direction further encapsulates the film’s breezy charms. Her subdued touch, both in terms of steady framing and patient delivery, hits just the right notes during the film’s poignant frames. 

    The joys of Language Lessons come from its well-paired leads. Morales imbues Cariño’s instructive role with a radiant glow onscreen. It’s a joy to see the sturdy character actor take center stage in a role that showcases her impressive range and charisma. Mark Duplass delivers yet another tender performance as the down-on-his-luck student Adam, riding the character’s roller coaster of emotions through his intimate touch. Both actors play off each other like well-matched tennis partners, comfortably volleying sharp exchanges without missing a beat. 

    Language Lessons isn’t short on charm, but the film doesn’t quite nail its dramedy balance. The narrative, especially towards the latter half, forces a sense of melodrama that juxtaposes the first half’s easy-going appeals. The third act gets especially busy with its dramatic revelations, so much so that the conclusion feels bizarrely rushed in the whirlwind process. The lack of impactful emotions prevents the pleasant film from elevating its barebones shell compared to other Duplass efforts. 

    Language Lesson still won me over despite some inconsistencies. Morales and Duplass’s naturalistic collaboration elicits a relaxed deviation from the indie dramedy formula. 

    Language Lesson hits theaters on September 10th. 

  • Ma Belle, My Beauty: Review

    Ma Belle, My Beauty: Review

    Bertie (Idella Johnson) and Fred (Lucien Guignard) are happily married, they’re both in a band together and after some time getting very close, they got married and are now living in the south of France. Then one day Lane (Hannah Pepper) arrives unannounced and it starts to cause tensions, not only between the married couple, but between Bertie and Lane especially.

    This is because Bertie, Lane and Fred were once in a polyamorous relationship and there are still strong feelings between the women. It’s not long before passions reignite between them either, but Bertie is happy with her life and although they once had something strong between them, she wants to move on. However, with Lane being there, it’s a constant reminder of what she had and how things could have been different.

    Ma Belle, My Beauty is a romantic drama written and directed by Marion Hill in her feature debut. Set in the south of France, the tone of the film is light and breezy, like a Sunday afternoon movie over a glass of wine, however there are still issues with the script which may make it hard to follow which forces the audience to sit up straighter.

    Firstly, the set up for the film is intriguing, but despite a few encounters between Bertie and Lane, there’s not really anything else for the audience to go on. There’s an obvious rift between Bertie and Fred, but the audience doesn’t really understand the tensions until quite late into the film.

    Whereas when these are revealed, it turns out to be an understandable grievance, it perhaps could have been introduced a lot earlier. This also means that there is very little plot.

    As mentioned earlier this is a light and breezy Sunday afternoon film, but it seems that director Hill has been overcome by the beauty of the French landscape and there may be a little too much sightseeing which slows down the pacing. All the cast do a great job with their characters and there’s a good chemistry between Idella Johnson and Hannah Pepper, but it still feels a little like a showcase for their talents rather than anything substantial.

    Ma Belle, My Beauty may show an unconventional relationship in a different light, but it never really goes much deeper beneath the surface.

  • Cube: Trailer Talk

    Cube: Trailer Talk

    Cube: Trailer Talk

    Back in the early 2000’s, Hollywood loved to take classic J-Horror films and remake them for Western audiences. ‘The Grudge’, ‘The Ring’, ‘Dark Water’ and ‘One Missed Call’ amongst others all received the remake treatment to varying degrees of success. However, it’s rare to see the vice versa happen. But this has happened because a 1-minute teaser for the Japanese remake of ‘Cube’ was released a few days ago. 

    The original film was released in 1997 and revolved around six strangers trapped in an endless maze of deadly traps. It’s an underrated classic and had the tension and gore that would be expected from a premise like this. And, if the teaser is anything to go by, it does look like a near shot for shot remake, this time involving seven strangers.

    However, I’m looking forward to this; I’m a huge fan of J-Horror and know that Japan can definitely deliver when it comes to gory, and unique, horror films (just look at 2008’s ‘Tokyo Gore Police’ and 2005’s ‘Meatball Machine’ for just a couple of examples), so I’m curious to see Japan’s version of the film. Like previously mentioned, it also looks as if it won’t stray too far from the source material which is also a plus, considering what the premise is. 

    Overall, I’m looking forward to the Japanese remake of ‘Cube’. It’s a film that came out of nowhere but one I’m glad to know about. 

    ‘Cube’ will be released in Japan on 22nd October 2021. Release dates for the rest of the world have not been confirmed yet. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzQ8S_Jn4BA

    And here’s the poster:

    Cube: Trailer Talk
  • The Meaning Of Hitler: Review

    The Meaning Of Hitler: Review

    Director Petra Epperlein’s latest documentary, The Meaning of Hitler, wrestles with some thorny dilemmas.  The first of these dilemmas involves the use of images.  The written word moves slowly.  Words require time to be composed by an author and contemplated by a reader.  Images seduce the masses much faster.  The Nazis were well aware of the power behind images—uniforms, rallies, swastikas, Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will.  Therein lies the problem confronted by Epperlein:  How to make a documentary about Hitler without expanding the Nazi visual universe, without adding to Hitler’s mythology.  The second dilemma—the one dealt with by the source material used by Epperlein, Sebastian Haffner’s book, The Meaning of Hitler—is contained in the title; it involves Hitler’s meaning as a human to other humans.  Was Hitler a success, a failure, a bit of both?  

    Hitler was a failure for most of his life—art school reject, quasi-Incel characteristics, and political obscurity.  Sure, there would be eventual political success and many Germans even attributed Germany’s economic revival to Hitler.  But this “success” was quickly erased after his murder of millions and his reckless foreign policy—a foreign policy resulting in the destruction of Germany and its eventual division.  On a balance, one can say that Hitler was a loser.  That, however, leads Epperlein to a third dilemma:  Correctly labelling Hitler as a loser runs the risk of minimizing the atrocities he committed.  

    The next dilemma is perhaps the one most familiar to any who have thought about Hitler even in passing:  Was he suffering from some type of psychopathology or was he within the spectrum of what can be labelled “normal?”  This may be the toughest dilemma to solve.  It is impossible to diagnose the dead.  Sure, there were many documented instances of Hitler displaying suicidal ideation, but this is far from being a psychopathology.  Was he a narcissist in the clinical sense?  Perhaps.  Historical records indicate that even Mussolini found Hitler insufferably full of himself.  The problem is that we can assign a degree of narcissism to any public or political figure.  Epperlein does not aim to definitively solve these dilemmas.  What The Meaning of Hitler does very effectively is ask questions in a clear and direct manner.  By asking the right questions, and admitting that ultimate answers may never be had, Epperlein at least clears a path for us inside the forest.    

    One could hypothesize that Hitler’s failures were projected onto others—Jews, communists, women—in the form of hatred and violence.  What we do know for certain, and what Epperlein does a great job of reminding us, is that Hitler came onto the scene precisely when certain technologies were becoming widespread.  Microphones and radios allowed his words to project at rallies and come into homes.  Films and cinemas allowed for the dissemination of Nazi propaganda.  Hitler hit upon the right messaging for segments of the German population desperate for their identity to be reaffirmed.  Nationalism was a resonant message for a country humiliated by its WWI defeat.  Also, conservatives, the elite, the professional class, and even segments of the working class found comfort in his promise to eradicate communists.  The Meaning of Hitler certainly reminds us of philosopher Hannah Arendt’s insights into the banality of evil.  Germans did not suffer from mass psychopathology. 

    They were just everyday people seduced by someone promising order and a return to greatness for Germany—an unfortunate and too common phenomenon that seems to recycle itself, as in the case of Make America Great Again.  The Meaning of Hitler also reminds us of psychologist and theorist Erich Fromm’s diagnosis of twentieth-century society.  Pre-Industrial societies certainly lacked freedom, but at the same time, found identity anchored within religion, guild, and profession.  Post-Industrial-Revolution societies gained freedom, but with that freedom, felt anxiety over their loss of meaning and identity.  Nationalism and race offered perverted identity anchors and eased anxiety.  By stigmatizing others, Hitler provided a sense of identity for an in-group.                      

    The Meaning of Hitler is absolutely not in the same category as shows on The History Channel that deal with WWII.  Those stale shows present history as compartmentalized segments that occurred long ago in faraway places.  Epperlein’s documentary continually brings us to our present; it examines the contemporary revival of far-right extremism.  Holocaust deniers, Holocaust denial tours, pilgrimages to Nazi sights, new far-right parties, Charlottesville, and the role of Twitter and Facebook in the dissemination of hate are all considered by Epperlein.  Perhaps thinking about the meaning of Hitler is a crucial first step in identifying future authoritarians and warding off their seductions.