Author: Megan Williams

  • Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 4

    Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 4

    Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 4

    Every Halloween, I always make sure to watch specific horror films: ‘Saw’, ‘Trick ‘r’ Treat’, ‘Jeepers Creepers’ and ‘Tusk’ are all watched every year to the point where I probably know the script by heart. However, I wanted to do something different this year, and step out of my comfort zone a bit. 

    One of the horror subgenres that I dislike the most are Possession films. Films like ‘Devil’s Due’, ‘Amityville Horror’ and ‘The Last Exorcism’ never seem to hold my interest, and even a classic like ‘The Exorcist’ took me a few days to finish because I kept losing interest. So, I want to give myself a challenge: at the end of each week this month, starting today, I will be watching all of the ‘Paranormal Activity’ films, with the last four acting as a double upload on the last two weeks of October.

    ‘Paranormal Activity 4’ was released in 2011 and takes place in the same year. After a mysterious woman and her adopted son move opposite Alex, strange things start to happen in her family’s household after they look after the son for a few days.

    After feeling extremely underwhelmed by Part 2 and 3, this entry was well needed. This continues the story left off from Part 2 and shows us what happened to Hunter and Katie. Hunter was adopted in the new family that the film focuses on, and renamed Wyatt, while Katie lives opposite them and has a son called Robbie. Part 4 even starts with the ending to the second film, a detail which seemed a little strange. However, if someone was watching this separately, and not back-to-back like I am, then this prologue makes sense. At the same time, the issue would’ve been resolved by completely erasing Part 3 altogether like previously mentioned in my last review.

    This film was also a welcome addition: the acting and characters were a lot more charming and likable. Alex (played by Kathryn Newton – Detective Pikachu) and her family seem like a typical family who are unfortunate enough to get involved in the supernatural encounters that the franchise brings. Newton carries the film comfortably too and has a good relationship with her adopted brother Wyatt, which is how the exposition is given to its audience. The dialogue and exposition never felt forced; the conversations felt natural, even if the subject matter of those conversations would delve into the unnatural. The child actors are also fantastic. This was not mentioned in the previous review because, while the acting was fine, it was ultimately forgettable. However, in this case, the spotlight shines on Brady Allen, who plays Robbie. Robbie is the definition of the creepy child cliché in horror films, and Allen’s performance is fantastic as the quiet adopted son of Katie Featherston. The only issue is that Robbie seems to act as a red herring; the audience are led to believe that Robbie is Hunter, the child who was kidnapped in the second film. However, this is proven false as it is revealed that Wyatt is actually Hunter. 

    The story structure is slightly different than the previous entries; the security camera-style sequences don’t start until 30-40 minutes into the film, meaning that the first act is essentially introductions to the characters, a mystery subplot revolving around Robbie and his friend Toby (yes, the demon is still called Toby), and why strange things have started to occur in Alex’s house the second her family take care of Robbie. This is also the first film in which we’re following a family that has no relation to Katie Featherston which was a momentary breath of fresh air. However, the scares were problematic, with only two in particular standing out. The film uses volume increases and fake jump scares to scare its audience, which becomes frustrating very quickly. An example of this is when Alex is outside and it’s quiet then, when she turns round, someone’s right in front of her and speaks loudly to her. It’s a cheap tactic that I didn’t expect to see in the franchise, and it was tiresome to see. While the previous film didn’t have many jump scares, they were effective when they did occur and they gave the audience something interesting to look at, as well as being shocking or scary at the same time.

    However, the scenes that stood out is when Wyatt is cycling round the kitchen and a chair suddenly moves in front of him, blocking his pathway. He then changes direction, moving out of camera view, and the sound of another chair moving is heard. This is simple but extremely effective, since no other sound appears, making the scene tense. It also lets the audience’ imagination run wild as they try to fill in the gaps, visually, of what Wyatt’s reaction or next move could be. Another scene that was effective was when Alex, Wyatt and Alex’s friend Ben use the Xbox Kinect and link it up to the camera’s night vision to create tracking dots in the shot. This stood out, not because of any scares, but because this is the best, but also most blatant, use of product placement I’ve ever seen. The best use of product placement is when it’s blended into its environment seamlessly due to it being part of the story.

    Overall, ‘Paranormal Activity 4’ is a welcome improvement after the two previous disappointing entries. The new set of characters are, for the most part, charming and likable as well as being a welcome relief, even if it’s short-lived. However, while the film is tense, and the plot progression is interesting, the fake jump scare tactics that are used are frustrating and annoying, which is a shame. 

    Apologies that the quote section of this article did not appear for Part 2 and 3; I didn’t have much to say, or I felt that anything I did say wasn’t anything worth mentioning here. However, here are two notable quotes that I did want to place a spotlight on:

    -At the 49:40 mark: (Wyatt says ‘he looks like his mum’ after meeting Katie, Robbie’s mum): ‘oooh no, Don’t like that! They’re both demons!’  

    -At the 1:18:30 mark: (Ben pulls the laptop lid down and Katie is behind him): ‘OH NO! LOOK BEHIND YOU!’

  • Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 3

    Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 3

    I Dislike Paranormal Horror Films…So Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 3

    Every Halloween, I always make sure to watch specific horror films: ‘Saw’, ‘Trick ‘r’ Treat’, ‘Jeepers Creepers’ and ‘Tusk’ are all watched every year to the point where I probably know the script by heart. However, I wanted to do something different this year, and step out of my comfort zone a bit. 

    One of the horror subgenres that I dislike the most are Possession films. Films like ‘Devil’s Due’, ‘Amityville Horror’ and ‘The Last Exorcism’ never seem to hold my interest, and even a classic like ‘The Exorcist’ took me a few days to finish because I kept losing interest. So, I want to give myself a challenge: at the end of each week this month, starting today, I will be watching all of the ‘Paranormal Activity’ films, with the last four acting as a double upload on the last two weeks of October.

    ‘Paranormal Activity 3’ was released in 2011 and takes place in 1988. After a supposed earthquake disrupts the family of Katie and Kristi Featherston, Dennis, their guardian, puts up multiple cameras around the house. He also speculates that the girls’ imaginary friend, Toby, is actually real.

    This is yet another prequel revolving around sisters Katie and Kristi Featherston, which is extremely disappointing to see, considering the last entry’s ending set up an interesting plot point. This film’s only goal is to tell its audience why the demon has clung to the Featherston family. And, while this may sound interesting on the surface, Part 2 already gave viewers a theory on why they probably should’ve called an exorcist ages ago. 

    Which brings this article onto its second point: there is hardly any subtly in this film. While some foreshadowing is given via dialogue, e.g.: the grandma, Lois, wanting her daughter to have another child, in the hopes that it’ll be a boy, most of the information given are things that would’ve worked better had it been left for speculation and theorizing. The ending which reveals that that Lois had, in fact, made a deal with a demon (like Ali suggested in the previous film) was interesting and answered some questions that fans may have had. However, I would’ve preferred if these questions had not been answered at all. Whether the detail about Lois and her coven of witches comes up in a later film, we will have to wait to find out. But, for now, this was a detail that I did not need to know. 

    This film also didn’t make sense motivation-wise and production-wise. While I didn’t enjoy ‘Paranormal Activity 2’, the motivation behind the security cameras made complete sense; the family were trying to catch, what they thought, would be a burglar and happened to film something supernatural instead. This film, however, had an extremely weak motivation: after a small earthquake hits their town, Dennis notices something in the tape that he’d been using to test out his new camera. Compared to the previous films, this was a somewhat lazy explanation as to why the cameras had been set up around the house. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90r3CnPI0AM&list=PLIEjQ77b3P_PyC6rndVGtvmO9VMtmFW-Z&index=50

    The editing towards the end made no sense either. The film is edited because Dennis edits the footage that he films as he goes along. However, he’s killed at the end, which begs the question: who is editing the third act to the point where there are random jump cuts when there shouldn’t be? This sound like a nitpick, however, if a found footage film wants to fool its audience in believing it is found footage, then it needs to be filmed and edited as if someone found it and is piecing it together. One positive that can be taken from the cinematography is a scene in which Dennis attaches his camera to a broken electric fan stand. This means that one of the cameras is constantly moving left to right and back. This camera is where the tension really shines; the audience may not want to look around that corner, but they’re going to whether they like it or not!

    Unfortunately, it can’t be denied that ‘Paranormal Activity 3’ is a boring and unnecessary prequel. Not only was the plot not needed, as part 2 gave its audience all the information it needed, but it’s a confusing film, production-wise. A pattern had also started to form: all three films have gotten interesting in its last 15-20 minutes. While the first film had interesting story and character development, it’s undeniable that the first film falls under this comment too. However, ‘Paranormal Activity 3’ does not need to be part of the franchise, and I would’ve happily avoided it.

  • Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 2

    Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 2

    I Dislike Paranormal Horror Films…So Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 2

    Every Halloween, I always make sure to watch specific horror films: ‘Saw’, ‘Trick ‘r’ Treat’, ‘Jeepers Creepers’ and ‘Tusk’ are all watched every year to the point where I probably know the script by heart. However, I wanted to do something different this year, and step out of my comfort zone a bit.

    One of the horror subgenres that I dislike the most are Possession films. Films like ‘Devil’s Due’, ‘Amityville Horror’ and ‘The Last Exorcism’ never seem to hold my interest, and even a classic like ‘The Exorcist’ took me a few days to finish because I kept losing interest. So, I want to give myself a challenge: at the end of each week this month, starting today, I will be watching all of the ‘Paranormal Activity’ films, with the last four acting as a double upload on the last two weeks of October.

    ‘Paranormal Activity 2’ was released in 2010 and takes place before the first film. After they’re convinced someone broke into their home, the Rey family install security cameras around, and outside, the house hoping to catch the perpetrator. However, what they encounter is anything but human.

    The three-year gap between the two films implies that ‘Paranormal Activity’ was supposed to be a one-off film. However, due to its unexpected success, Paramount Pictures were scrambling to find a way to continue the paranormal success.

    After I surprised myself by enjoying the first film, I was ready to continue the tension and shocks. But, while the first film had good pacing and displayed a slow progression that made it feel like the events were getting worse, this film felt like a chore to get through. The pacing was extremely slow, and any interesting events occurred in the last 15-20 minutes. While this is a prequel, so the story is going to be a little slow paced, the film was promoted as a ‘terrifying’ follow up. And terrifying it is not. The film can be summed up by an hour and 10 minutes of waiting for something to happen and being disappointed that nothing happened. If this film served as a prequel, it should’ve been released before the first film, because it would’ve felt like an actual story progression.

    Because this is a prequel, Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat make an appearance and serve as the interesting plot point, revolving around Katie and sister Kristi’s grandmother making a deal with a demon and dealing with the consequences of that. This particular story arc appears in the third act and is the most interesting part of the film because it explains how Katie got possessed by the demon. The ending where, after the events of the first film, Katie comes back for Kristi’s infant son, Hunter, is also interesting. Hopefully the third film continues this plotline.

    Another aspect of the film that I liked, once again, is the motivation behind the way that it’s filmed. This time, security cameras are set up around Kristi’s house after their house gets partly destroyed. It makes sense that this would be the family’s response to this dangerous scenario, since they think someone broke into their house. As well as this, there are more characters that appear. Like previously mentioned, Hunter is Kristi’s infant son, and their dog, Abby, also features mainly during the nights scenes where we see footage from the security cameras. It is often said that dogs and young children can sense or see things that adults can’t, so these two characters are interesting additions that do give its audience some tense moments. Unfortunately, one of the characters that could’ve been taken away or replaced was Kristi’s teenage daughter Ali. Her only purpose in the film is to see the strange happenings on the security cameras and find out why they’re happening.

    While this is an arc that must happen in some form with these types of films, this particular arc could’ve been given to the nanny Martina, who believes in the good and bad spirits to begin with. Whether this would’ve worked or not is arguable, but the film should’ve gone in this direction. Either that, or remove Ali from the film altogether; it’s a bad sign when an exposition, and main, character isn’t onscreen much!

    Overall, ‘Paranormal Activity 2’ was a boring prequel. It’s placement in the franchise is completely wrong and should’ve been the first film. If there was anything to recommend, it would be the last 20 minutes, as that is the important part of the story.

  • Lilo & Stitch: 18th Anniversary – Disney+ Talk

    Lilo & Stitch: 18th Anniversary – Disney+ Talk

    I remember seeing ‘Lilo & Stitch’ when I was 11. I went to see it at the Odeon cinema with my cousin, and it was the first time I had gone to the cinema with someone other than my parents. Not only is this a vivid memory that I have, but it also revolves around a film that I love.

    ‘Lilo & Stitch’ was released on the 4th October 2002 and follows sisters Lilo and Nani who live in Hawaii. After an alien experiment crash lands near them, younger sister Lilo adopts it, mistaking it for a dog. The alien, whom she names Stitch, starts as a mischievous and chaotic creature, but soon learns what it means to have a family and to be loved.

    Despite Disney labelling this as a classic, this can still be viewed as underrated. This isn’t a film that comes up a lot when people think of a Disney film, which is a shame. The way that this film deals with family loss and what it means to be a family is beautiful. Lilo’s older sister Nani is suddenly pushed into the role of a parent when they lose their biological parents, and the film displays how she deals with this situation in a caring and sensitive way. However, they are siblings, so they also have their fights and arguments. And, when Lilo adopts Stitch, she immediately accepts him as part of the family because she wants a friend.

    Stitch’s journey from a mischievous creature who was created to destroy everything, to a loving and caring family member is also charming and, at times, emotional. Because he was created in a laboratory, he’s never known love or kindness; it’s a foreign thing to him. But, through Lilo’s ongoing love and trust in him, he learns what it means to be part of a family.

    That doesn’t mean this film is without its humour. The film has a lot of slapstick and visual jokes, mainly coming from Stitch as he tries to understand this new world around him, and it’s fantastic. The scene where he creates a model of San Francisco from anything he finds in Lilo’s room, only to subsequently destroy it will always get a chuckle out of me. That, and when Lilo discovers that if she places Stitch’s finger on their record player and opens his mouth, he essentially becomes a speaker (a scene that was used in the trailer). The film is perfectly balanced between its humour and the more serious side of their living situation.

    Overall, at 18 years old, ‘Lilo & Stitch’ is still an underrated Disney film that deserves more attention. It’s not only funny but also has great animation and tells us that a family can be anyone whom we feel close to; in this case, Stitch. Like Lilo says in the film ‘Ohana means Family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten’.

  • Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 1

    Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 1

    I Dislike Paranormal Horror Films…So Let’s Watch The Paranormal Activity Franchise: Part 1

    Every Halloween, I always make sure to watch specific horror films: ‘Saw’, ‘Trick ‘r’ Treat’, ‘Jeepers Creepers’ and ‘Tusk’ are all watched every year to the point where I probably know the script by heart. However, I wanted to do something different this year, and step out of my comfort zone a bit. 

    One of the horror subgenres that I dislike the most are Possession films. Films like ‘Devil’s Due’, ‘Amityville Horror’ and ‘The Last Exorcism’ never seem to hold my interest, and even a classic like ‘The Exorcist’ took me a few days to finish because I kept losing interest. So, I want to give myself a challenge: at the end of each week this month, starting today, I will be watching all of the ‘Paranormal Activity’ films, with the last four acting as a double upload on the last two weeks of October.

    Why this franchise? Firstly, because it’s a long-running horror franchise and I want to bring a weekly horror feature to Battle Royale With Cheese. And, secondly, this is one of the highest grossing Found Footage films in recent years. From its $15,000 budget, it has grossed over $193 million worldwide, thus spawning its 5 sequels.

    ‘Paranormal Activity’ was released in 2007 and written, directed, filmed, edited and produced by Oren Peli. It follows a couple, Katie and Micah, as they move to a new home in the hopes that they’ve outrun a demon that haunted their last house. However, as Micah films on and places a camera in their room, they discover that the demon has far from vanished.

    My first viewing of this was less than praising; after all the hype that the film had received, my Dad and I watched it, but ended up switching it off at the halfway mark. Therefore, I was a little unsure about how this viewing would go. But I was pleasantly surprised. 

    While I wouldn’t call this film scary, it was definitely tense and had its shocking moments. The build up of events per night was extremely effective at making it seem that things were getting progressively worse. While there weren’t many jump scares present, it definitely got me when they did occur because they were unexpected. 

    Two aspects that Found Footage films struggle with is the reason why the camera is still rolling, and the motivation behind the filming in the first place, even when nothing’s gone on. Even a classic like ‘The Blair Witch Project’ struggles with this at times. However, the motivation here makes sense. Because Micah and Katie have moved to a new house to try and run away from a demon, Micah wants to film in the hopes that he’ll catch evidence of whether the demon is still following them or not. Whereas, with other Found Footage films, the events don’t start until a quarter of a way into its running time, this film is different because the demonic events are already occurring. This also means that Micah and Katie’s relationship is a little strained from the beginning of the film; they’re frustrated, and they want the demon to disappear.

    The lead actors, Micah Sloat and Katie Featherston, carry this film perfectly. Their onscreen chemistry is fantastic, and they trick the audience into thinking they’re an actual couple right from the start. The divide between the two character’s reactions to the situation, plus their thoughts on how to fix it, also make this gripping. Katie has known this demonic presence throughout most of her life and she’s scared and just wants to get rid of it. Micah, on the other side, doesn’t take the situation seriously despite their unseen past with this entity, and decides to agitate and provoke the demon. It isn’t until near the end of the film that he tries to actually help Katie, by which point, it’s too late. Because the audience is with these two characters throughout the film, the casting was the most important aspect to get right and they definitely succeeded in getting fantastic actors who have great chemistry. 

    The film does drag in the middle, despite it having a strong start. With films like this, the paranormal events have to start small and build up, showing the audience that the entity is slowly getting stronger or, in this case, angrier. However, this one takes a little too long, in places, to get to where it wants to go narratively. The film wouldn’t have suffered too much from another cut in the editing room. But, because the film was edited at the same time as the next scene was being filmed, it’s understandable that this was not possible.

    Overall, ‘Paranormal Activity’ was a surprise re-watch. It’s not necessarily scary, but it has its tense and shocking moments. The lead actors carry this film comfortably on their shoulders from the start and it’s an impressive film, production-wise, due to its tight filming and editing schedule. While this won’t be for everyone, I would consider this a Halloween must-watch for fans of the Possession subgenre. 

    To finish the article, I wanted to add in another aspect to the weekly experience: during each film viewing, I will be writing down any quotes that I said that I think stand out. Enjoy!

    -At the 8:52 mark: ‘Oh, I forgot how quickly this film gets going. We’re at the first night!’

    -At the 26:10 mark: ‘Wait, you never told him about the demon until you both moved in together?!’

    -At the 38:30 mark: (Katie stands up and stares at Micah for about an hour on the camcorder timer): ‘No thank you! Don’t like it!’

    -At the 41:25 mark: (Micah has just asked Katie come inside the house after a loud noise has occured) ‘She’s not coming inside after that loud noise!’

    -At the 1:16:05 mark: ‘Micah’s the real villain here!’