Author: Matt Conway

  • The Tax Collector: The BRWC Review

    The Tax Collector: The BRWC Review

    David Ayer has morphed into an enigmatic force in Hollywood, one who has endured his fair share of highs and lows in the industry. Promising offerings like Fury and End of Watch have displayed Ayer’s ability to infuse humanity into machismo conventions, yet the director’s recent run of lackluster blockbusters (Suicide Squad and Bright) have left a sour aftertaste for his fans. Returning to his crime drama stomping grounds with The Tax Collector, Ayer’s latest falters as a vapid shoot-’em-up exercise that fails to hit its mark.

    The Tax Collector follows David (Bobby Soto), a family man working as a collector for a Los Angeles crime lord alongside his loyal companion Creeper (Shia LaBeouf). When a new threat Conejo (Jose Conejo Martin) comes to town, David prepares for all-out war while trying to protect his sacred family dynamic.

    For all his misgivings, Ayer still displays assured technical craftsmanship. His tight, kinetic framing portrays the dingy streets and their unnerving dangers with visceral impact, building a sense of place that brustles with life and uncertainty. His world-building is aided by The Tax Collectors’ core leads, who command the screen with ease. Bobby Soto earnestly conveys David’s confliction with dramatic weight, displaying David’s efforts to build a sense of normalcy in his familiar bonds to right-the-wrong of his tumultuous, crime-oriented upbringing.

    Perhaps the biggest spotlight has derived from Shia LaBeouf’s presence as a Chicano crimelord (Ayer’s revealed the character to be a Jewish man indoctrinated into the LA lifestyle, though the movie could do a better job articulating that). While his performance will likely be divisive, I could not help but be drawn into his magnetic screen presence. Playing Creeper as a man overcompensating for his fears with a coldly callous presence, LaBeouf deploys a restlessly twitchy energy that bursts through the screen like a Tony Montana wannabe. He also forms a genuine comradery with Soto onscreen, which propels some of the film’s quieter earlier frames. Despite the shellacking Ayer has received for this project pre-release, I do think the director had noble aspirations to promote much-needed diversity on the screen.

    Good intentions do not birth a satisfactory film though, with The Tax Collector drowning under the surface of its self-serious exterior. Ayer’s screenplay is stuck in a murky middle ground between grounded crime-drama and low-rent actioner, often dancing between the two tonalities without much grace. This confused delivery significantly hinders any dramatic potential, as the script crafts simplistic, one-note caricatures that feel ill-fitted in its contemporary landscape (Conejo feels like he’s thrown in from another film, especially considering the ritual scene where he’s dowsed in the blood of human sacrifice). This approach creates an abhorrent portrait of the film’s female character, who thanklessly range between subservient victims to over the top henchman.

    Similar to some of Ayer’s previous projects, The Tax Collector features a vicious mean-streak that is never imbued with much-needed purpose. The violence here is as gratuitous as it gets, with Ayer dreaming up some sickening kills that only stand to shock audiences. Both sides turn to all-out bloodshed under the simplistic guise of family and honor, embracing archaic ideas without an ounce of self-awareness. A more astute narrative could have observed the conditions behind our characters’ casualty cruelty, whether it’s influenced by family lineage or as a byproduct of a disenfranchised environment. Without a substantive throughline, the abrasive violence just feels like a tacky inclusion.

    The Tax Collector highlights David Ayer’s worst tendencies as a craftsman, fixating on shallow style and noise over substance.

  • Radioactive: The BRWC Review

    Radioactive: The BRWC Review

    While their presence in Hollywood may be overly-pervasive, biopics offer filmmakers a paramount opportunity to explore relevant and often overlooked chapters in history. In the genre’s latest entry Radioactive, the life of scientist Marie Curie is viewed under a microscope, sadly straddling the vivacious pioneer with a standard-issue big-screen treatment.

    Radioactive chronicles the history of Marie Curie (Rosamund Pike), who discovered radium alongside her husband Pierre (Sam Riley). Even after her remarkable triumph, Marie finds herself battling against the gender stereotypes of the era, while also coming to terms with the multifaceted nature of her world-changing discovery.

    Star Rosamund Pike recommences her prosperous run of reviving real-life figures here (A Private War and Beirut), imbuing energy and agency into Marie’s restless pursuit for progress. Pike thankfully balances the character’s sharp attitude with resonant humanity, with her brash persona acting as a shield from the harsh critiques the figure often faced. Sam Riley makes for a fitting on-screen counterpart as Pierre, developing lived-in chemistry with his co-star that effectively displays the couple’s complicated dynamic. Perhaps Radioactive’s greatest strength lies in Marjane Satrapi’s visceral direction choices (Danny Boyle’s frequent collaborator Anthony Dod Mantle shot the film), as her use of colors and subversive imagery extenuate the character’s emotive states while infusing much-needed vibrancy into its biopic framework.

    Like several of its contemporaries, Radioactive ultimately struggles to reinvent the genre’s stale structure. Jack Thorne’s screenplay focuses more on covering bullet points of Marie’s timeline rather than deriving proper depth into each chapter, jumping recklessly in an attempt to convey her full life story. The best biopics often capture their subjects through a finite memoir (Steve Jobs and The Social Network), mainly because the over-ambitious nature of truncating someone’s life work in a two-hour movie rarely breeds a fulfilling experience. This rushed approach impacts the film’s second-half the most, with interesting factoids like Marie’s personal affairs and her involvement in World War I lacking proper attention.

    This could be forgiven if Radioactive rendered a substantive throughline with its plethora of thematic concepts. Thorne’s script occasionally wrestles with the tricky nature of scientific discoveries (a battle between the desire to produce positive change versus the commercialization of progress into something potentially dangerous), as well as the still-lingering sexism present in the workplace. What could have been exceedingly relevant to our current ecosystem ends up being woefully underbaked, with Throne’s script offering a few moments of heavy-handed explanation rather than dealing with the complicated implications (a flashforward to nuclear bomb testing during a speech about radium’s danger feels clunky at best).

    Radioactive fails to subvert its formulaic delivery, resting on Hollywood conventions to tell a pertinent and exceedingly relevant slice of history.

  • The Big Ugly: Review

    The Big Ugly: Review

    Acting as a modernization to the nitty-gritty pulp of classic westerns, The Big Ugly operates as an old-school throwback that proudly wears its genre influences. Despite its earnest approach, the film ironically lives up to its ill-fated name, offering an expired experience that never distinguishes itself from the crowded pack of actioners.

    The Big Ugly follows Neelyn (Vinnie Jones), a violent enforcer who’s spent his life loyally working for the London crime boss Harris (Malcolm McDowell). While assisting him on an oil deal with old-time friend Preston (Ron Perlman), Preston’s son Junior (Brandon Sklenar) unknowingly murders Neelyn’s girlfriend in the process. Friendships are then put to the test as Neelyn embarks on a relentless pursuit for retribution.

    The Big Ugly isn’t without some shameless pleasures. Ron Perlman and Malcolm McDowell continue to display their assured acting ability, developing a lived-in relationship despite rarely being a central focus. McDowell’s quiet presence bodes well in depicting Harris’ controlled menace, while Perlman personifies Preston’s frontiersman charm with personality and depth. Perlman is the sole actor who is able to unearth a semblance of humanity from his role, offering a resonant third act speech that packs a potent punch. I also can’t deny my satisfaction with the film’s action-oriented finale, as director Scott Wiper thankfully grounds his setpieces with a refreshing quaintness that enhances the character’s internal conflicts.

    While it may end with a proper bang, much of The Big Ugly’s runtime lingers in machismo conventions. Similar to other actioners (looking at you Force of Nature), there’s a reliance upon conventions that show their age, especially female characters utilization as mere victims of male destruction or gratification. Scott Wiper and Paul Tarantino’s screenplay never imbues its characters with proper dimension, substituting a contrived “code of honor” as the only motive behind their actions. Some actors are able to hold their own with the lackluster material (Vinnie Jones is a competent straight-laced action star), while others suffer substantially from the lack of help (Brandon Sklenar’s mustache-twirling villain never captures the magnetism of his intended purpose).

    All would be forgiven if The Big Ugly was infused with a semblance of originality. Unfortunately, Wiper’s direction lacks a much-needed creative spark, flatly developing visuals that never breathe life into the action at hand. I appreciate the director’s dedication to creating an authentic Appalachian landscape (the general concept was based around his family history), yet his stylistic identity relies upon an overused soundtrack to infuse some sort of pulse into the material. Its clear Wiper desperately wants this to be a swaggering noir in the vein of a Guy Ritchie or Martin McDonagh film, but his effort never reaches those lofty aspirations.

    Wasting a promising set-up, The Big Ugly never rises to the heights of its genre counterparts.

  • Archive: Review

    Archive: Review

    High-concept science fiction films have taken a backseat to the spectacle of bombastic blockbusters. Thankfully, there’s still been a fair share of gems that have captured the genre’s weighty, throwback appeal. Efforts like Ex Machina and Her have used their inventive settings to offer deft commentaries on our relationship with technology, while also flexing the strength of the genre’s minimalistic origins. The latest iteration of the subgenre Archive offers another satisfying low-key experience despite an inability to reinvent its framework.

    Set in 2038, Archive follows George (Theo James) a scientist working in an isolated base trying to create a new AI prototype. After crafting a few successful robots, George secretly sets his eyes on creating a human equivalent, one that would replicate his deceased wife Jules (Stacy Martin).

    After working alongside Duncan Jones in the 2009 sleeper hit Moon, writer/director Gavin Rothery offers an impressive debut with his first feature. His proficiency in visual effects significantly elevates his low-budget resources, creating a cerebral, lived-in world that features a plethora of inventive design concepts (I love the blocky practical look of the J1 and J2 robots). Working alongside Director of Photography Laurie Rose, the two craft a visual style that is equally steady and sterile, patiently allowing the camera to sit while creating an uneasy atmosphere from the start. Rothery deserves a lot of credit for exploring fresh technical avenues in science-fiction storytelling, especially through the inter splicing of mechanical specs and searing lights to display the life infused into these uninhabited machines.

    Archive soundly breathes humanity into its sentient subjects. Stacy Martin offers emotionally vulnerable work as Jules, as well as robots J2 and J3. J2 steals every scene they are in, with Martin shedding the character’s cold veneer to display a sincere sadness as a creation of George that is getting put to the wayside in favor of a newer model. The character’s arc is a sound reflection of our disposable attitudes towards technology, as our society always searches for fractional improvement to already satisfactory devices. Theo James adeptly plays off his robotic creations with ease, while unearthing a sense of danger as a mad scientist with an unhealthy dedication to his craft.

    Archive is as solid as they come, but the film ultimately does little to distinguish itself from its peers. Aside from a last-minute plot twist that leaves a potent sting, Rothery’s screenplay largely rests on the conventions of human/AI works, lacking the emotionality or thematic bite to leave a lingering impact. It’s your typical “man vs. god” battle that exists in every film of this elk, leaving me wishing Rothery did more to personify a distinctive experience aside from the well-colored visual components.

    If viewers can stomach a lingering sense of familiarity, Archive offers a sturdy, slow-burn science fiction throwback.

  • Animal Crackers: The BRWC Review

    Animal Crackers: The BRWC Review

    Sprouting from earnest beginnings nearly a decade back, graphic novelist Scott Christian Sava dreamt up an adaptation of his family-friendly work Animal Crackers to the big-screen. This seemingly harmless low-budget project sparked an arduous journey myriad with legal battles and vicious corporate moves, leaving some wondering if the film would ever receive a domestic opening (Variety soundly highlighted its lengthy behind-the-scenes history). Now seeing the light of day on Netflix (the film received a theatrical release in China back in 2017), Animal Crackers’ fascinating history sadly overshadows the middling final product on display.

    Animal Crackers follows Owen (John Krasinski) and Zoe (Emily Blunt), a couple who grew up admiring the breathtaking feats of Owen’s uncle Buffalo Bob and his audacious circus. Stuck in the daily doldrums of adult life, the two decide to take ownership of their former stomping grounds when Bob dies, discovering an antiquated box of animal crackers that transforms their consumers into wildlife creatures. The duo fight to revive the circus while fending off Bob’s vengeful brother Horatio (Ian McKellan).

    Animal Crackers isn’t without some delighting qualities. The veteran cast infuses infectious comedic energy into their distinctive voice over roles, with comedic stalwarts like Gilbert Gottfried, Danny DeVito, and Patrick Warburton having a blast with their energetic side characters (Warburton deliciously chews the scenery with a smug attitude). Ian McKellan’s posh delivery makes the most out of Horatio’s sinister intentions, while Raven-Symone impressively disappears into the role of a mad scientist.

    Sava and Harley Quinn screenwriter Dean Lorey humorously color familiar plot beats with off-kilter comedic beats. Whether it’s Owen eating dog bones for his mundane job or Gottfried’s character Zucchini, a henchman who narrates in the third person while painting himself as a criminal mastermind, there are ideas that will have audiences of all ages amused. It’s clear that even with limited assets, Sava and director Tony Bancroft put their hearts into this project, as its pleasant animated style and earnest makeshift spirit create a film that’s hard to fully condemn.

    Good intentions aside, Animal Crackers suffers from the same noisy emptiness that has plagued several modern animated efforts (Trolls World Tour comes to mind). The script throws a wide-array of gags at the screen, often missing more than it hits with bits that can’t help but feel dated. While I am thankfully the film isn’t chock-full of lame-duke pop culture references, it sadly substitutes that trapping with simplistic caricatures that sometimes drift into mean-spirited territory (several moments poking fun at a woman’s weight left a bad aftertaste).

    Worst of all, the film leaves viewers with nothing to attach to. There’s a bare thematic throughline on the feud between creativity and commercialization in business that has no room to render, while the protagonists prove to be too blandly earnest for audiences to invest in. With there being more animated films than ever, it isn’t enough to simply skate along with by-the-book narrative contrivances that have been executed with more innovation and depth by superior counterparts.

    Animal Crackers may win over some young viewers with its zany energy, yet it doesn’t do enough to eschew its standard-issue design.