Author: BRWC

  • First Shift: Review

    First Shift: Review

    First Shift: Review. By Ayrton-Lewis Avery.

    The first film directed by Uwe Boll in eight years is surprisingly light-hearted for a crime drama. Probably expecting it to be as much of a flop as his previous movies, he wanted to parody himself as well. Surprisingly, First Shift is not so bad. The entire first part is dedicated to the veteran NYPD officer (played by Gino Anthony Pesi) getting to know his young, newly recruited partner (Kristen Renton). Even though the staunchly conservative Deo and his progressive new friend Angela clash politically, eventually their chemistry converges quite nicely. 

    From the very first scene, we see this is not an accurate depiction of the fast-paced life of a NYC cop. Instead, we see a scene from Deo’s domestic life: him making coffee in the morning in his spacious city studio. Besides that, we have a few out-of-place images of the local crime scene, set against an over-glorified and idealized city background. This is probably how we imagine a crime thriller would be in real life: bureaucracy, sarcastic humour, some occasional violence thrown in, and most noticeable of all, over-exaggerated caricatures of personalities we all are too familiar with.

    Though Boll himself claimed to have wanted a carefree movie, perhaps to offset the depth of other recent releases, he probably went too far on this one. None of the characters live in the universe we do, and it is difficult to empathize with them. Boll purposely ignores all the societal issues related to crime and policing, and instead gives us a deep look into their intimate lives, which should hardly interest anyone. The last part of the film, with its strange melodrama and emotional inconsistency, is disconnected from the film and its thematic content.

    Several times throughout First Shift, I averted my eyes because of the ghastly violence and gruesome blood. These are probably the only scenes that make quite an effect on the viewer. In fact, they made me start to love the characters that at the beginning were so annoying. Deo is the extremely traditionalist, uninteresting middle-aged New Yorker, and Angela is a parody of the young, wealthy liberal. Even the supporting characters (such as Oliver Stafford, who plays the duo’s first case, as well as the mob involved madman Logan, played by Aaron Berg) are poorly developed. However, after filmmaking that is as human as it is absurd, I can start to, in fact, enjoy the film.

    This is the most Boll can do, as a filmmaker. Overall, there are some beautiful scenes, several powerful moments, and some characters are built. Pesi’s acting draws us in, and Renton establishes a pleasant contrast that keeps us occupied for the 89 minutes. Critically speaking, though, is there that much to talk about? He set out to make a film purely for the pleasure of the viewers. He succeeded, and his career will continue. Boll has apparently already finished shooting another thriller Run. God knows how that will turn out.

    Rating: 3/10

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTN8nVL-pdc
  • Dennis Flippin – Flatters Interview

    Dennis Flippin – Flatters Interview

    Dennis Flippin – Flatters Interview. by Joe Muldoon.

    Particularly during the pandemic with most of us having extra time on our hands, we spent a lot more time on the internet than ever before; was this inspired by interactions with the Georgias the world, especially during that period?

    Dennis Flippin: During the pandemic, the internet was flooded with all sorts of conspiracy theories, especially about the planet. With cancel culture being so intense, we wanted to pick a topic that let us have some fun without causing too much drama. The subject we chose felt just right—something most people wouldn’t get too worked up about. And since we were all living in the RV park at the time, our set was basically right outside, no commute necessary. This project was all about making the most of what we had and just rolling with it.

      With Flatters being an impressively small-scale production, how did you go about casting and assembling your crew?

        When you’re working on a small-scale production like Flatters and the payment is credit, it’s really about finding people who are eager to get involved. For example, our neighbor Mike Sena stepped up to handle sound, even though he had no prior experience. Raven Krogstad took on the role of Production Designer, bringing her own unique flair to the project. The lead roles of Lenny and Georgia are played by Doug Wyckoff, who also wrote Flatters, and his wife, Teresa Wyckoff. Doug and Teresa are both stand-up comedians, and their chemistry really brought their characters to life.

        I should also mention that while directing, I made it a point to guide and teach the crew along the way, especially since some were new to filmmaking. My girlfriend played the news reporter, which was a fun addition to the cast. As for the role of Bob, we have Teresa to thank. She’s an amazing producer with a knack for getting things done. She searched the internet and found Maurice through Backstage, and his talent truly stood out from the rest. We were fortunate to have a small support crew for a couple of days, including AC Ian Taylor and PA Olivia Cade. While some of the crew were relatively inexperienced, what mattered most was their willingness to learn and their dedication to telling the story.

        You were heavily involved with the cinematography and editing; what did you consider during the planning process? The opening sequence has an LED-infused palette that’s almost cyberpunk.

          When planning the cinematography, I had to be really intentional because I was juggling so many roles—Director, DP, Operator, Gaffer, and Key Grip all at once. I often thought back to Roger Deakins’ advice about being selective. When you’re managing multiple things on your own, you’ve got to be clear about your objectives. Every shot, from the actor’s positioning to the camera angles, had to be planned out in advance since we didn’t have the luxury to experiment with different setups.

          For example, in one of the bathroom stall scenes, you’ll notice a pair of boots positioned to make the space look more crowded, even though no one’s actually in the stall. It’s a tiny detail, but one that needed careful thought.

          Lighting was a particular challenge. I’d often start setting up 4 or 5 hours before anyone else arrived, so we could hit the ground running once the crew showed up. Everything had to work smoothly, and if something didn’t, I’d adapt the script on the spot to make it fit. I approached the project as a challenge to see what we could pull off with a skeleton crew. Take the bathroom scene, for instance—there was no crew at all, just the actor and the sound guy.

          For the look, I wanted something cinematic with a gritty edge, which is where that LED-infused palette comes in. I used this old LED light that had a nasty green tint —normally something I’d avoid, but it gave the shower scene this perfect cyberpunk vibe. I paired it with a tungsten key light with a CTS gel to get the mood just right. Being a one-man band was definitely a lot of work, but it was rewarding too. Of course, I’d prefer a larger, more experienced crew in the future, but this project was all about planning ahead and being adaptable.

          Without giving it away for audiences who have yet to see the short, what inspired *that* finale?

            The finale? That was all Doug—he came up with that wild idea. We had a lot of conversations about how to wrap things up, and we both agreed it needed to go out with a bang. Like, we wanted the audience to be sitting there thinking, ‘Wait… did that just happen?!’ It’s the kind of ending where you need a minute to process what you just saw. We figured if people left in disbelief, we’d done our job!

            What’s next for Lenny?

              What’s next for Lenny? Well, he’s still dead set on supporting his wife and, believe me, he’s willing to go to the ends of the earth—literally—to prove his love for her. We’re actually working on a feature where that dedication gets put to the ultimate test. Without giving too much away, it’s turning into a road trip movie, packed with dark comedy and some seriously bizarre characters along the way. Buckle up—it’s gonna get crazy!

            1. My Brilliant Friend: Season 1-3: Review

              My Brilliant Friend: Season 1-3: Review

              My Brilliant Friend: Season 1-3: Review. By Christopher Patterson.

              Taking a Look Back at a Marvelous Adaptation Before It Cements Itself in History

              I finally rewatched, after quite some time, the My Brilliant Friend series. And took another dive into the books with the tenth anniversary of the final book underway. And… I was missing out. To be blunt: what a great series. From the top to the bottom, it is just brilliant. A reflection of the human experience through an empowering story of girlhood and womanhood based in an oppressive society that illustrates usually how each character was almost molded into their roles, even our leads, by the oh so vast world around them that can be as beautiful as cruel and sometimes be so vast it could be better for some to simply sit and just imagine.

              My Brilliant Friend, at its simplest, is about a life. Elena’s. But while the book is more cut and clean about it, the series is more ever-ranging. Thanks to it being television, it takes the tale one step further. Making each person live the story in a way.

              The sauce of My Brilliant Friend is the mechanics of it. Sure, for instance, the books prose are dull and stinted and overly arranged in their affect to gather anything but recap value, even if really good recap value, and sure, sometimes the series can miss out on key discussion and simplify things from, almost understandably, the books narrator, but in the show this feels less personal and more wide thanks to the writing. Simply, this show doesn’t miss. When they’re are depressing moments, it doesn’t just show it but rather makes you feel it to a point that can make you stop and just take in what you just saw you can’t unsee. It’s something your not sure how you feel about. You won’t be the same. But that’s stimulating art.

              For all its highs, Elena and Lila’s life has its lows. And lows they are. One thing My Brilliant Friend makes clear is that this is not a fairy tale. The world of My Brilliant Friend has this realism that strikes no balance. Italy is never really framed in a positive light, if ever, and mainly it’s corruption and horror that World War II brought afterwards are shown barley near always. Even the joyous moments in the series we barley get are still aware of all it took to get here. That can’t and won’t be forgotten.

              One of my favorite elements of this series is exploring the complexities of how people live their lives. Their flaws. Despite her efforts to the contrary, Elena did have help to get her where she did: the teacher who believed in her. Though, what if someone didn’t have that step up, rather a push back? Then we have Lila. Aside from this simple demonstration, our leads have a real relationship, meaning a complex one: jealousy, cruelty, empowering yet possessive are just a few words to describe the indescribable since it feels like a real relationship. This kind of writing helps do something, perspective, but also challenges its audience to revisit their own life and get a better perspective of others better than possibly any show I’ve seen before.

              Some could describe My Brilliant Friend as a coming-of-age tale; some would call it one of those all-life stories like Marcel Proust that examines life itself, not what coming-of-age is identified with, teenage to adulthood. To my perception, I see it as an understanding of the world narrative. What I mean by that is the stages. In your youth, you are naive and open-minded; innocence runs freely. In teen life, you are spent in the trials of being one with society and fitting in, and all the tribulations and impossibilities that you uncover seem forgetful when you see the glory of fitting in. In adulthood, you are free to do whatever it seems. Consequences really be damned. You are not in the teenage wasteland no matter, rather, just, quite morbidly, the life expectancy one. You start by uncovering triumphs and love and unburdening the curtain, and soon you realize life itself has a lot more in store for you that is all up to you. Later, you accept your role as a parent, possibly, and are burned and not so with the fear of now being not just expected but seemingly forced to confirm to life despite the mere joke of that truth society forces upon you. Later, and much later, death becomes more literal and it all becomes retrospective. While the book feels contained by the death becoming more literal and never really able to capture the rawness of growing up, the series is able to envision a world through an outside lens almost and saves the biggest problem with the book. Too much perspective and too little poignant examinations.

              Now, to describe the novel: Shakespearean, yes in its many almost fated conclusions to our characters (most of which will become clear in The Story of the Lost Child (though the first half is quite a slob to get through, it’s worth it), Trevoran (William Trevor, btw), yes for the almost overly simplistic prose style and almost, kind of a bit unlike Trevor, summarizing nature of events, and just a bit of Proustian elegance in weaving the compelling lives of those we follow as time catches them. And here, we arrive kind of at Ferrante. For all her passionate passages and ever-shifting narration by Elena, one thing that became clear to me was personality, lack of regrets, and a memory-like structure. Elena tells her tale in the form of a novel and in a more conversational-like way, as if talking to a friend at night. In turn, thanks to the books being five hundred or so pages, that leaves for a lot of story. And a bit less graceful prose in respect for more nail-biting tea Ferrante probably knows we all want to see.

              One of my favorite ways this ambitious series adapted this novel, which can feel like a recap more than a novel despite my love for it, is by taking bits and making them deeper reflection than the novels were capable of. Simply, it feels like they read the books (pretty much a long summary which is how the novels read sometimes) and thought, What if we made this an entire episode rather than a long recap?

              I want to go into the themes  and parts of My Brilliant Friend, as that is kind of the bread and butter of what makes the show not just so, so good, but so, and I do mean, so literary addicting:

              Feminism and female friendship, in my eyes, are what leads these novels down the many paths they take. And quite powerfully. The world of My Brilliant Friend is a world where women are the second priority and are more of objects or toys for the male leads to play with. A sad truth of the time, which is demonstrated so precisely and focused, it’s kind of literary insane the patience Ferrante has. In book one or the first season, Lila and Elena are seen more as toys for the older male and female characters to toy with. If they’re bad, like a toy, they are damaged and put back where the older characters think they belong. If they are good, they are given a toy and told to hurry up. The world, especially in season one, is morbid but filled with innocence by our leads that, despite all the horrors, never loses its light. Season two, however, is where the teenage angst comes in. Cheating on your evil husband to get with your friend’s crush and possible boyfriend are only a small fraction of the giant fails and wins for our leads here. It is truly a teenage wasteland that is not just represented by our leads but by how the world shapes around them from their point of view. Truly, a coming into focus point. What will you do with your life or choose to lead it or, rather, just do whatever you want since it doesn’t matter? This is the question or kind of vibe season two presses into our leads heads until it reaches an answer—an almost morbid in some ways answer based on the moment and how life will follow.

              Season three, by comparison to previous seasons, feels more like a breather and a tugging on the past. Compared to other seasons that felt defined as in the moment, season three feels in a place where our leads are more reflective. For instance, Nino is more of a character now for Elena to use as grabbing onto the past she always wanted or always suspected she wanted. Whereas seasons one and two felt as though they managed both the mental and physical conflicts, season three feels directed largely at the mental conflicts: falling in love, raising children, and accepting your life. The one kind of major pushback is that it’s hard to believe our leads are actually as old as it seems. To be honest, Lila and Elena should’ve been recast this season to really demonstrate the age thing occurring, but aside from that, this season is probably the best yet. It has, compared to other seasons, stronger writing, with Ferrante really honing in on our leads flaws and acceptance of themselves. They are not kids anymore, they’re raising kids, and, in turn, there is this nature to society to accept your age, accept your place, and live in it forever and never change, never grow again. Change, in society’s eyes we see here, is a matter of becoming someone and staying that way. Rather than seeing people, it’s as if society sees them again as toys, like they were seen as children all over again, but this time they are adults. And this time, feeling forced into a place they can’t change from. We see Elena rebel from this partly by getting with Nino seemingly for this reason and possibly out of spite to Lila and possibly out of just desire.

              At its worst, My Brilliant Friend feels, sadly, like literary fiction shock value. Nothing in between. When we get big moments, the show usually quite effectively examines the world around them that has gotten them here while also managing to offer a poignant examination of society’s cruelty and genuinely speak to something. At its worst, though, it feels like the show, is basing itself a bit too hard on the first-person narrative of the novel, can feel one-dimensional, and rather than showing a complex world and how people are morphed by it, it just shows careless writing choices that feel more whatever to get to the big moments.

              At its best, though, My Brilliant Friend demonstrates the life of someone in a mixture of narrative storytelling, beautiful writing that comes off low key before becoming Shakespearen and epic, and poignant meandering that comes together so nicely it feels only by fate. 

              Perceptiveness is probably what the series does best that the books never really do, or as well. Thanks to the book’s first-person perspective, we are stuck in the mind of a narrator, regardless of what is said and sometimes unsaid, but in My Brilliant Friend (the series), the world never really feels contained to Elena’s imagination, but rather full of different perspectives being tossed in at every single moment and leaving our constant and varying interpretations of every single thing to leave its way. That non-stop rush of views, hearts, and lives rather than being contained is shown for what it is. A world full of different people just trying to get by, just like Elena. Whereas the book, despite a strong love for it, can feel like that strong perceptiveness, like what happens as we age, gets lost in memory.

              VERDICT

              My Brilliant Friend is a masterpiece since it feeds into so many areas of the human psyche, followed by enough drama to keep you hooked. It really is a different ballpark compared to possibly any other television show. It is able to reflect the human experience in all sectors, followed with near-excellent performances at every turn. If there ever was a low point, it would be that there is so much more that could be expanded on, but sometimes, like the books, it never really is. Aside from that, My Brilliant Friend is not just a must-watch show, but a modern classic in the making.

              4.5/5 

            2. The Killing Of Two Lovers: Review

              The Killing Of Two Lovers: Review

              The Killing of Two Lovers: Review. By Ayrton-Lewis Avery.

              Imagine a movie about a man who keeps on running. That is The Killing of Two Lovers. The director was clearly rushing when he shot the entire film in only twelve days in a rural Utah town. The film considers the failure of a couple’s open relationship. Unlike most movies about family and love, this movie is not soothing or moralizing: instead, it is gritty and painful. Written and produced by the independent film director Robert Machoian, the plot is fast-paced as the character’s lives unravel more and more senselessly.

              The movie follows a husband in an estranged and failing marriage. David, played by Clayne Crawford, is distraught over his wife, played by Sepideh Moaf, who has been cheating on him for some time now. Despite the couple’s relationship seeming amicable (although platonic), David repeatedly considers killing his wife and her lover (played by Chris Coy). David’s only comforts are his divorced father and his family of four. But he has a lot to grapple with, as the marriage is causing his whole life to fall apart. His daughter Jess, played by Avery Pizzuto, is shattered and shaken by her parent’s separation.

              Towards the end, Jess suffers breakdown after breakdown. It becomes increasingly clear that the failing relationship is taking its toll on their children, and David, either out of desperation or out of madness, repeatedly blames his wife. He stops thinking rationally as he keeps on driving in circles around the town, contemplating his future. It seems like his long, emotional journey may never end. Eventually, David chooses his children over his wife, but not after he makes plenty of mistakes and experiences every level of turmoil.

              The entire time, the spotlight is on one haggard, bearded man: David. He is passionate about only one thing: his family. Yet he fears facing his own passions. From the first scene, he is running: running away from his passions, until they trap him in a corner. Then he gets into his pickup truck. There he stays the entire time, sometimes chasing, sometimes fleeing, but never looking back until the very end. As the acting becomes more jerky, and the beard more unkempt, the struggle for his family becomes a struggle for David’s very livelihood. Probably because he has no one else. 

              The movie makes us want to empathize with him. It is sad, but not teary. Crawford plays a convincing protagonist. David may seem weak, obsessive, and insane, but he, in fact, behaves just like the rest of us: he is a family man, possessive, unremarkable in his strength. The film’s moral and story is full of ambiguities. Maybe he tried too hard, and he was running a little too fast. Or maybe he did not try hard enough, and his demons caught up with him too soon.

            3. Alien: Romulus – Joe’s Review

              Alien: Romulus – Joe’s Review

              Alien: Romulus film review By Joe Muldoon

              Few franchises in horror or science fiction have enjoyed the longevity –and indeed popularity– of Alien. With the original having celebrated its 45th anniversary this year and fan expectations spanning a spectrum from excitement to outright apprehension, Fede Álvarez had quite a task on his hands when opting to helm the seventh direct entry into the series. And by all accounts, mission success.

              By now, the overarching plot is quite predictable; a group sets off on an expedition to explore the wreckage of an abandoned ship and find more than they bargained for. Set in 2142, twenty years following Alien and twenty years before Aliens, Cailee Spaeny stars as Rain, an orphan and sister to Andy (David Jonsson), a synthetic human. Together, they dream of living on the planet Yvaga where they can see the sun, a life beyond the Jackson’s Star colony.

              Following her Weyland-Yutani contract being extended despite having completed owed service, Rain is enticed by ex-boyfriend Tyler (Archie Renaux) to join a small crew on an illegal expedition to a nearby space vessel, whereby they can salvage cryostasis chambers and make their own ways to Yvaga. Comprising the crew are Kay (Tyler’s pregnant sister, played by Isabela Merced), pilot Navarro (Aileen Wu), and Bjorn (Navarro’s boyfriend and cousin to Kay and Tyler, played by Spike Fearn).

              With such a notably young cast of characters, Álvarez has stated that he was inspired by a deleted scene from 1986’s Aliens, speculating on what happens to children who grow up on the incomplete colonies. And the decision to focus solely on a mid-twenties cast is one of the most interesting aspects of the film; rather than an experienced team, we’re instead following a group of youths who have grown up in the colonies, hoping for a better tomorrow. But for that to happen, they have to survive today.

              Boarding the hauler ship Corbelan, they set off for the mystery vessel, discovering it to be a research station called the Renaissance, which is made up of two modules: Romulus and Remus, named for the Roman myth, the latter being an older vessel containing more primitive technology than that of its counterpart. After docking the Renaissance, the men of the group set off on what’s supposed to be a quick in-and-out trip, a quick nabbing of some fuel to get the ship’s cryostasis chambers in running order for their voyage to Yvaga. Or so they think. But in doing so, they unwittingly trigger the ship’s lockdown procedures and awaken a foe that fans by now know all too well.

              Whilst the narrative itself may not be entirely original to the series, Romulus’ callbacks to its predecessors are sprinkled throughout in a way that doesn’t cheapen their respective moments, instead offering a healthy balance between fan service and timeline continuation. New worldbuilding elements are introduced, with the notably fearsome introduction of a new xeno-being, and an extra layer of chilling intrigue is created.

              Visually, this may be the series’ most accomplished entry, both in terms of its special effects (which terrifically flirt between the terrifying and grotesque) and its cinematography, led by director of photography Galo Olivares. Every globule of xenomorph saliva and mucus is brought to life in frankly repulsive detail, testament to the work of the special effects team and the efforts of Álvarez to have Aliens’ special effects crew work on Romulus’ xenomorphs – another piece of evidence to show the importance of practical effects.

              ‘In space no one can hear you scream’ is likely horror’s most iconic tagline, and Romulus’ sound design ensures that it’s emphasised. Amplifying shrieks and squeals when they do occur, the soundscape also zeroes in on the silence of space, all at once tranquil and suffocating. Amidst the chaos onboard the Renaissance, the comparative quietness of the outside is quite startling despite the looming planetary rings that threaten to obliterate the ship – a silent, creeping death. The director stated that the universally acclaimed Alien: Isolation video game served as a strong influence for Romulus, and it shows, with the atmosphere of the two being very similar, truly accentuating the isolated crew’s immediate peril.

              Several stars continue to rise. David Jonsson (in his first film role since the charming romcom Rye Lane) shows the diversity of his acting chops, seamlessly switching between the childlike vulnerability of Andy to the reprogrammed emotionlessness of his upgraded self. Cailee Spaeny’s performance as Rain proves itself an exciting stage of her gradual rise to stardom. And Fede Álvarez further cements himself as one of horror’s hottest directors; when your filmography includes 2013’s Evil Dead, 2016’s Don’t Breathe, and now Alien: Romulus, there’s a pretty strong case to be made that a blank cheque project is well-earnt.

              By Joe Muldoon