Author: BRWC

  • Review: Freak Show

    Review: Freak Show

    Freak Show: well-meaning but half-baked teen drama. By Fergus Henderson.

    Billy Bloom (Alex Lawther) is different. He is a preternaturally talented teen drag queen, fully out, transferred by his buttoned down father into the most aggressively hetero normative private school in North America. Amongst the mean girls and jocks of his new school, he dresses like Adam Ant and performs book reports in character as Zelda Fitzgerald. He quotes Oscar Wilde in witty voiceover and idolises his untameable, ever-absent diva mother (Bette Midler), channelling her spirit when applying make-up in his show-biz mirror. Before long he will be fighting against the homophobic slings and arrows of conservative America in microcosm. 

    Freak Show, the directorial debut of long time producer Trudie Styler, is a film that knows what films like it are supposed to do. It is a coming of age dramedy about the value of acceptance and the necessity of questioning gender norms. Styler uses her extensive experience to ensure that the film constantly hits all the right notes as its races through its narrative. All the characters you might expect are here: the closeted bully, the jock with a sensitive side, the bible thumping mean girl, the macho gym teacher, the estranged father, etc. We are never in doubt as to what kind of film we are watching.

    It has three distinct sections in the manner of three separate films, charting Billy’s trials and victories in his new environment, each section ushered in by a dramatic set piece. At first it is a tale of bullying and individuality, then it is a drama about family estrangement and friendship, then a comedy about Billy’s bid for homecoming queen.

    I draw attention to this because it is rather noticeable, and in the abstract this is what films generally do, progressing through a variety of emotional terrains. Freak Show, however, seems to rush through each new section, doing what it expects itself to do in order to reach the next one. Thus it is never fully any of the films it is trying to be. Aside from the aforementioned set pieces it never truly allows any one scene to breathe, its focus somewhat lacking throughout. After a while the film starts to look like a series of tropes, strung together to form a coherent but lightweight narrative. It becomes a little performative.

    //www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KhzVIY895Y

    This is all rather disappointing, as its source material is the novel of the same name by infamous Club Kid James St James. St James’s own story is a wild and salacious one, and yet whatever wicked energy might have been in the original script seems to have been toned down, presumably so that the film can reach a wider audience. From recent teen films like The Edge of Seventeen all the way back to pensive stoner classic Dazed and Confused we know that teen films can take risks, can use strong language, can be frank about sex and drugs. Why, then, would this film, based on a book written by one of the all-time party animals, be so tame?

    Luckily for us, the main players are strong.  Lead actor Alex Lawther is a unique screen presence, sliding gracefully around the frame, coy yet charismatic. He draws from a deep emotional well, bringing dignity and nuance to his character. As a Brit with a background in more underground fare he is naturally at odds with the rest of his brash, straight-ahead American cast. He floats above and through the film, always one step ahead.

    Brief turns from Bette Midler as Billy’s boozy mother and a feisty Laverne Cox as a local new reporter breathe life into the film. It says something about the tepid script that these sadly truncated characters move the story along more than the other main characters, who are left to tread water, doing what they can with their formulaic arcs.

    When the film cannot rely on its frequently expository dialogue to clue you in to how you should be feeling, a bland soundtrack descends, utilising the EDM-lite sounds of inspirational adverts to move things along. With the exception of the film’s strongest scene, in which Billy is violently attacked to the haunting ‘Queen’ by Perfume Genius, the soundtrack is uninspired and overbearing. This, in a film whose aesthetic is rooted in drag culture, is baffling.

    Once the film enters its third act it picks up some steam, the film finding a good if generic antagonist in cheerleader cum religious zealot Lynette (Abigail Breslin), who explicates the film’s larger political relevancy (a certain odious American politician may be invoked). Unfortunately this sudden clarity of narrative purpose arrives too late for it to feel consequential.

    This is certainly a film with an important message, and a much stronger film might emerge in a re-edit which emphasised longer scenes and more defined characterisation. Unfortunately it is too slight and non-committal to hit its marks, and save for a wonderful lead performance from Alex Lawther it does not have enough to recommend.

    Freak Show is out now and available to buy now on DVD and Blu ray.

  • They Shall Not Grow Old: The BRWC Review

    They Shall Not Grow Old: The BRWC Review

    By J Simpson.

    Peter Jackson’s impressive new documentary on The Great War, World War I, transports you across yawning expanses of time, for a first-hand glimpse of the atrocities committed therein.

    In a world of 24-hour news cycle and constantly refreshing social media feeds, it can be difficult to remember what life was like two days ago, let alone years, or decades. In this current temporal climate, 100 years might as well be a million. Continuing that analogy, Peter Jackson’s documentary about the lives of British soldiers during World War I is like witnessing perfectly restored footage of Triceratops and T-Rex. It’s awe-inspiring as a time capsule and porthole into a very different world, which helped birth our current society.

    There’s no shortage of war documentaries and dramatisations out there. While WWI is not as talked about as World War II or even Vietnam, there’s still plenty of documentation out there. There was even an epic 26-episode miniseries made back in the ’60s. What does Peter Jackson’s depiction of the British front of World War I add to the conversation?

    The Significance Of They Shall Not Grow Old

    They Shall Not Grow Old goes so far beyond the “talking head” style of documentary it belongs in a separate category. It’s also leagues apart from your usual newsreel-style historical deep dive, drawing out scratchy old footage from eras past. Jackson’s film lies somewhere between the two forms, creating something entirely new and utterly breathtaking.

    For the 100th anniversary of the Great War, Peter Jackson and his team of technicians embarked upon a nearly impossible journey. They delved into the archives of actual footage from World War I, predominantly of life of British soldiers in the trenches of the French front. Jackson and his team then first completely restored the footage and then colourised it using the most cutting-edge photography. The results are beyond belief. The bright, bold, lifelike colours are vibrant and vivid, looking fresh off of a Hollywood soundstage rather than from the mud, blood, soot, and ashes of 100 years ago.

    This modernisation achieves two main results.

    1. The high production values and contemporary pacing make They Shall Not Grow Old more approachable and engaging for modern audiences.
    2. Being more relatable, things hit closer to home. The horrors of war are in your face, inescapable and undeniable.

    This second point hits at one of the more subtle issues of war films, as a genre. Are these movies glorifying war? Or are they a cautionary tale? Sometimes, they may be the former masquerading as the latter.

    Here’s where Peter Jackson’s documentary finds its humanitarian footing. 100 years ago seems impossibly distant and difficult to imagine. To paraphrase the common cliche, when we forget history we are doomed to repeat it. World War I is a unique moment in history, acting as a boundary between the classical world and the crashing immanence of modernity. World War I, itself, is like the trenches of France, dug in and defending a way of life that would never be seen again.

    Most significantly, World War I was the last war fought predominantly on the ground and hand-to-hand. World War II and beyond would become increasingly mechanised, distant. These days, you don’t even have to be on the same continent as someone to kill them.

    This was not the case during The Great War. While most of the war was fought at an impasse – trench warfare – huge climactic surges were fought in No Man’s Land, in a hellish landscape of barbed wire, mustard gas, mud, and corpses.

    Many of these scenes are recounted with excruciating detail by actual World War I veterans. They speak of rivers of rats gnawing on the bodies of their fallen friends. They talk of vomit and shrapnel, of fire and fury. They also speak of honour, bravery, and courage, even of their enemies. In fact, many British soldiers refused to kill their German captives due to admiring their grit during combat. This is a far cry from today’s dehumanising, sociopathic lack of empathy for The Other.

    They Shall Not Grow Old

    Instead of glorifying war, Peter Jackson and the veterans of World War I are warning against it by showing it for what it is. War is not noble. It is not exciting or admirable or advisable. War is hell. Seeing it in its pure, raw, unadulterated state shows that in all its infernal agony.

    Final Thoughts

    No matter where you fall on the political spectrum, it’s worth a look, to help make sense of the past and the role it played in creating our current world. It’s a hard scrutiny, however, make no bones about it. People truly do the most terrible things to one another. If we forget the hundreds and thousands and millions who laid down their lives in the mud and trenches of World War I, it may happen again, but with today’s technological capacities, that could make World War I look like a game of playground tag.

    War is hell. Don’t forget it.

  • You Want Helen Mirren To Play Theresa May In Brexit Film

    You Want Helen Mirren To Play Theresa May In Brexit Film

    The first Meerkat Movies Annual Cinema Index has been released today, revealing the latest cinema-going trends amongst the UK public. Amongst other findings, a survey* of 3,000 people found that almost half (43%) prefer to watch new films at the cinema, almost twice as many as those who prefer to see the latest releases at home (26%).

    70% of film fans say that the cinema is the only format that gives blockbusters the ‘full experience they deserve’. For over half of those surveyed (58%), this is due to the impressive visual quality and sound effects, key factors that for them set the big screen apart from at-home viewing.  

    2018 delivered a larger selection of diverse talent in both on and off-screen roles, something clearly noticed by the cinema audience. Over a third of movie-goers (37%) agreed that they had seen an increase in female representation on their screens in 2018, whilst 35% saw more characters from ethnic minority backgrounds and 31% acknowledged a greater presence of LGBT characters.

    Musical films were a firm favourite with Meerkat Movies customers in 2018, with Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again! the number one film, swiftly followed by Bohemian Rhapsody at number two. A Star is Born also made it into the top ten, taking ninth place (full top ten in notes to editors).

    Celebrating the life of Queen’s legendary frontman Freddie Mercury, Bohemian Rhapsody is a prime example of the growing demand for stories that bring together music and biography. Looking ahead, ground-breaking pop icon David Bowie tops a list of those the public would like to see brought to life on screen (33%). When movie fans were asked what films they would most like to see a sequel to, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of GrindelwaldDeadpool 2 and Avengers: Infinity War came in as the top three.

    When it comes to iconic characters, 75% of consumers polled say they feel James Bond should remain as a male lead, ruling out a similar move as seen by Jodie Whittaker in Doctor Who. With cinema often viewed as a form of escapism, the majority (57%) would have little interest in watching a film on Brexit. But as the theory quickly looms into reality, Brits are still upbeat that Helen Mirren would top our shortlist as the best actress to play determined Theresa May.

    When it comes to cinema snacks, popcorn is a non-negotiable for 41% of cinema-goers. And on the long-debated topic of sweet vs. salty, the survey reveals 45% of the nation embrace their sweet tooth over a salty (20%) and sweet and salty mix (24%). Over a third (36%) of movie fans say that they have upgraded to VIP seating to take their comfort to the next level before settling into the movie. One in ten say they do so ‘often’.

    When considering improvements in technology, cinema-goers show a great appetite for exploring new developments with 68% keen to experience 4D and VR in the future.

    Showing that film continues to be one of the most influential and dynamic media of our time, nearly a third of respondents (32%) say that a film has impacted their views on ethical issues such as use of plastics and veganism. Indeed, 32% say that they are using less single use plastic as a result of watching a film and 25% reveal they now eat less meat.

    The top ten most-watched films by Meerkat Movie members in 2018

    (based on Meerkat Movies redemptions)

    1.      Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again!

    2.      Bohemian Rhapsody

    3.      Incredibles 2

    4.      The Greatest Showman

    5.      Avengers: Infinity War

    6.      Black Panther

    7.      Deadpool 2

    8.      Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom

    9.      A Star is Born

    10.    Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

    Top five sequels that the public can’t wait to see:

    1. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
    2. Deadpool 2
    3. Avengers: Infinity War
    4. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
    5. Black Panther
  • Why You’ll Never Have To Worry About An Invasion Of Undead Zombies

    Why You’ll Never Have To Worry About An Invasion Of Undead Zombies

    By Alex Goldberg P.H.D.

    Zombies are THE most popular movie monsters in history. Since Night of the Living Dead came out in the 60s, way too many movies have focused on hoards of the undead taking over the world and mindlessly eating anything with a pulse (my personal favourite of the last few years was Zombeavers, a film where—you guessed it—deadly zombie beavers terrorise some kids in the woods). It even spawned The Zombie Survival Guide, a national bestseller, with some believing that there could eventually be a zombie apocalypse in the near future. Well, I’m here to tell you that’s hogwash and you all should be ashamed of yourselves. What gives me the right to shame you like that? I know enough about basic biology to tell you why there could never be such a thing as a bloodthirsty, undead mammals. Remember, undead is key here, as there are plenty of bloodthirsty mammals in this world (lawyers, for instance). 

    So, where to start? The most noticeable thing about the undead is that they don’t breathe or circulate blood, yet some of them seem to move even faster than healthy people. These two things run counter to each other in obvious ways: we need oxygen to breathe and we need to remove carbon dioxide in order to remain alive. These two molecules circulate through our blood and our lungs, taking in oxygen and removing carbon dioxide. In zombies, none of that occurs, so oxygen never gets to the cells and carbon dioxide is never removed. In normal humans, lack of oxygen can affect the body in many ways, but the worst way is by killing your brain cells, the same ones that coordinate thought and movement. 

    Why does the lack of oxygen kill brain cells in the first place? Well, oxygen is used for a very specific function in the cells: its main purpose is to donate electrons to the electron transport chain, which generates something called adenosine triphosphate (ATP). ATP is the primary molecule used for energy in every cell of your body. So, no oxygen means very little ATP generation. There are ways, such as glycolysis, which make ATP but don’t require oxygen, but your brain can’t subsist on glycolysis for long. It needs oxygen and, if it doesn’t get it within minutes, cells start to die. But they don’t just slowly whither away because they don’t have enough energy to perform their basic tasks. Some of these cells actively kill themselves via something called apoptosis—a coordinated cellular program that involves multiple factors signalling to the cell to cut it up into little pieces. 

    After all that, you’d be left with a zombie that’s pretty well braindead. I mean, it goes along with what they are, but how would you coordinate even basic movement without a brain? All functions run through nerves that link your muscles to your brain, which dictates movement. But suppose for the sake of argument that a poorly functioning brain could be induced via virus or something to stimulate enough nerves to move your body parts. Early on, those body parts would be way too stiff to move, and later, once they’re relaxed, you’d never generate any force to move them. Another funny side effect of having very little ATP is rigor mortis. In your muscles, there are proteins that work throughout your muscle fibres, called actin and myosin, that form something of a molecular lever. The actin-myosin complex generates force on its own, and it releases its stiff posture through ATP binding. So, ATP binding is actually needed to relax your muscles, and when there isn’t any, your muscles just seize up. Eventually, your proteins will just degrade without any ATP to make new ones through RNA and protein synthesis. 

    And there you have it. There will never be any undead human zombies in your or my lifetime (or ever). You can now frame that survival book and sell your intricately designed and well-stocked zombie shelter because you don’t need it. It was all in your imagination. Now, when it comes to LIVING flesh-eating human zombies, you may want to stay indoors. 

  • Jack McHenry FrightFest  Q&A

    Jack McHenry FrightFest Q&A

    Ahead of the World premiere of the stand-out period horror comedy HERE COMES HELL at Arrow Video FrightFest Glasgow 2019, director Jack McHenry tells us about the challenges of a £22,000 budget. casting his mum and why nothing beats puppets and real blood.

    HERE COMES HELL is to receive its world premiere at Arrow Video FrightFest Glasgow. Excited or what?

    It’s amazing! I made this movie for people like me, people who like horror movies and crazy genre films. It’s the perfect place to premiere this kind of movie, as horror audiences are the most open minded movie-goers, they’re not turned off by low budgets or films made by first time directors.  They just want an exciting cinematic experience.

    The film started life as a Kickstarter campaign. Were you pleased with the outcome?

    We shot a short trailer and a pitch video. That was the worst part for me, having to talk in front of a camera. I feel much happier behind the lens.  When we posted the Kickstarter I had no idea it would turn out so well, I was a nervous wreck all the way though the campaign, I was terrified we wouldn’t make our goal. But it was really encouraging to see people getting behind the project. I’m so grateful to everyone who donated, without them we wouldn’t have a movie.

    It’s been described as “Downton Abbey meets The Evil Dead”. True?

    Yeah, that was our “elevator pitch”. The idea came about when I was watching David Lean’s Blithe Spirit and was like:what would happen if instead of his wife coming back and it being funny, it turned into a full on horror picture? I’ve always been a massive fan of Agatha Christie and early Hitchcock, but also at the same time I love horror movies like Sam Raimi’s Evil Dead and Peter Jackson’s Braindead and this movie allowed me to combine these two elements in a really fun way.   

    The film has copious amounts of crazy carnage. How did you achieve so much gory glory on so low a budget (£22,000)? Not to mention the caviar and cocktails…

    “Gory glory” that’s cool. It was a tight budget, especially for what we were trying to achieve.  I really wanted the audience to feel as if they are watching a film from the 1930’s so it was really important to try and make if look and sound as authentic as possible, and that was hard on our small budget.  A lot of the effects we built from just joke shop stuff, like masks and fake arms. I wanted a lot of the gore and monster effects to be in camera, and have that old school feel about them. Nothing beats puppets and real blood.

    What was the biggest challenge you faced as a director?

    This is my first feature film and biggest project I’ve ever done, so that was already really terrifying for me.  We shot the movie in 19 days, 10 of those were the main chunk of the film set in “Westwood Manor” so it was a really tight schedule. There were days were we were literally sprinting between set-ups, and at the same time I really wanted it to look as grand and luscious like a massive studio picture from the 1930’s or 1940’s. But the cast and crew were so great I think we managed to pull it off. 

    There are some terrific performances. What was the casting process like?

    The actors really make the film; without them the movie wouldn’t be anywhere nearly as engaging. I’d worked with Margaret Clunie and Tom Bailey on a short film before this and they were so great. I really wanted to work with them again, so when we started writing this we wrote with them in mind.  Margaret introduced me to Timothy Renouf, and as soon I met him I knew he had to play Freddie – he has this old movie star feel about him. Then I saw Charlie Robb doing a stand up show and he was so funny and I thought he would bring something interesting to the part of Victor. Jessica Webber was acting in a play that the composer of Here Comes Hell, Ben Pearson, was working on. When I saw her she really reminded me of Joan Fontaine, which was perfect for the role of Elizabeth. Then finally my Mum plays Madam Bellrose, so that was really fun working with her.

    It looks like you all had a lot of fun. How tough was it balancing the comedy with the horror?

    Like any horror comedy you have to make sure you get people to laugh at the funny bits and be scared at the horror moments, and that can be a hard line to tread.  I looked to movies like An American Werewolf in London and Ghostbusters to the way they deal with the tone.  I never wanted it to feel as if we were making a “spoof” or poking fun at the movies we were referencing, instead I wanted to make a love letter to genre movies. 

    Who are your genre influences?

    For this film the influences were people like Sam Raimi, John Carpenter, Hitchcock , Argento and James Whale. Francis Ford Coppola’s Dracula is one of my favourite movies, I love the visual style, and that was a massive influence on this film. But there’s also Peter Jackson’s early works in there and some of the Ealing comedies, as well as some elements of Rosemary’s Baby and The Shining

    Tell us a bit about the ambitions of your company Trashouse,

    To make good movies! We’ve got a great crew of people together and we’ve got plenty of ideas. When we were making Here Comes Hell our pitch was always that we can make really original, entertaining films on a really low-budget, and we think that sums up Trashouse. We wanted to show, “hey, look what we can do for £22,000, imagine what we could do with £200,000!”

    Finally, what’s next?

    We’re developing a couple of scripts at the moment. One is a horror-adventure set in medieval times, and the other is an 18th century smuggler movie.  Think The Departed meets Treasure Island

    HERE COMES HELL is showing at the Glasgow Film Theatre on Fri 1 March, 6.30pm, as part of Arrow Video FrightFest Glasgow 2019.  Jack McHenry will be attending.