Ghostbusters Afterlife Synopsis: When a single mom (Carrie Coon) and her two kids (Mckenna Grace and Finn Wolfhard) arrive in a small town, they begin to discover their connection to the original Ghostbusters and the secret legacy their grandfather left behind.
Few throwback titles exude the effortless cool of Ghostbusters. Director Ivan Reitman and his quadrant of talented stars, Bill Murray, Dan Ackroyd, Ernie Hudson, and Harold Ramis, crafted an effortless melding of playful genre sensibilities. From the spooky allure of lurking spectrums to Murray’s satirical reflections on brand cynicism, Ghostbusters still serves as a fitting reminder of what goes right when creative talent is allowed to play in the sandbox.
Where fans of the original see an anomalous blend of sci-fi, horror, and comedy, Hollywood studios view the franchise’s passionate fanbase as another source of blockbuster income. After the unfairly maligned 2016 Ghostbusters reboot (fans never gave the charming comedic rift much of a chance), Sony has tapped Ivan Reitman’s acclaimed son Jason to spearhead the latest reboot, Ghostbusters: Afterlife.
The Juno director approaches the property with sincere respect for its roots. After a fittingly spooky opening, Afterlife starts with scientific wunderkind Phoebe and smart-ass Trevor, two kids moving to their grandfather’s abandoned house. They soon discover that their hermit grandfather was Egon Spangler (the recently deceased Harold Ramis), a member of the iconic Ghostbusters team that saved New York City from a larger-than-life Stay Puft marshmallow.
Reitman’s film finds its spark when allowing the new protagonists to spread their wings. Star Mckenna Grace imbues charisma and star-making presence as Phoebe, spotting the nerdy look and precise intelligence of her elder. It would have been easy for her role to exist as a dollar store version of Ramis’ aloof charm, but the actress exhibits skill beyond her years in creating a character that feels distinctly her own.
Wolfhard makes for a fitting comedic foil as her angsty older brother, while Logan Kim’s affable sincerity makes Phoebe’s best friend Podcast a beloved scene-stealer. Afterlife’s older cast also elevates the proceedings. Few can convey down-on-their-luck goofballs with Paul Rudd’s skilled comedic touch, with the comedic stalwart sharing a breezy rapport with Carrie Coon’s sarcastic presence as Phoebe and Trevor’s mom.
I jived with the patient plotting and breezy simplicity behind screenwriters Reitman and Gil Kenan’s first half. The duo effectively establishes a new face for the ghostbusting brand, using a medley of time-honored coming-of-age tropes to represent a welcomed youthful edge. Unfortunately, the playful, albeit slightly formulaic, universe eventually reduces to the cheap appeals of nostalgia pandering.
Reitman has always been an unappreciated voice in my eyes (The Front Runner and Men, Women, and Children never received proper recognition), but the director’s inexperience in blockbuster cinema shows as the narrative starts to unravel. His skills in methodical character-building assist the first half tremendously. However, it’s a shame Reitman never possesses a strong grip on the chaotic action frames. The director’s competent yet stylistically stagnant visual touches only work to cheaply pay homage to its predecessor, with the director lacking the imaginative eye to build upon the brand’s beloved foundation. Added with a poorly paced finale that rushes to the finish line without proper resonance, Reitman never truly feels in control of the narrative that he’s steering.
Unlike 2016’s Ghostbusters, which spiritedly trod new ground despite some mixed results, Afterlife desperately wants to carry the torch of the 1984 original. Well-earned nostalgic tributes can often warm the hearts of fans and franchise newcomers alike, but Reitman and Kenan struggle to create a meaningful sendoff. Afterlife’s numerous attempts at brand synergy represent unwarranted distractions, with the film’s narrative coming to a screeching halt when introducing needless lore and unsurprising cameos. Without well-earned sentimentality, the nods feel like another tacky reminder of Hollywood’s desperate desire to commercialize the beloved brand.
Afterlife is never joyless and holds some of its own distinct charms. It’s just a shame that Hollywood reboots fail to represent what made their source material so significant in the first place.
Ghostbusters: Afterlife is now playing in theaters.
We hope you’re enjoying BRWC. You should check us out on our social channels, subscribe to our newsletter, and tell your friends. BRWC is short for battleroyalewithcheese.
Comments
8 responses to “Ghostbusters Afterlife: The BRWC Review”
[…] the writer/director can’t quite walk the tonal high-wire act he attempts. In an attempt to infuse dramatic undertones within his energetic espionage formula, Vaughn finds himself in a bizarre middle ground. The […]
[…] There seems to be a theme currently running through mainstream horror films, which could be dubbed as the ‘nostalgia’ genre. Just this year has seen a new ‘Ghostbusters’ and ‘Paranormal Activity’ film, a ‘Chucky’ series and even the new entry in the ‘Scream’ franchise commentates on this idea of returning icons and cast. And, with original lead character Sally Hardesty returning, this entry looks to join in with the current trend. But that’s not to say that’s a bad thing; if these aspects hold an importance to the film, then the nostalgia grab could be worth it, like in ‘Ghostbusters: Afterlife’. […]
[…] It seems that there is a theme going on in horror movies, which can be called a kind of ‘nostalgia’. This year we have just seen the new film ‘Ghostbusters’ and ‘Paranormal Activity’, the series ‘Chucky’ and even a new one in the “Scream” franchise is about this idea of restoring images and throwing. And, with former director Sally Hardesty back, this legacy seems to fit in with what is happening. But that doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing; if this is the most important part of the film, then a nosebleed would be appropriate, as in ‘Ghostbusters: After Life‘. […]
[…] not, horror remakes remain a viable commodity to Hollywood executives. Most remakes implement the same methodical approach, often meshing nostalgic homages alongside an undercutting modern edge. Several of these endeavors […]
[…] drama that audiences expect to escalate on somewhat unrealistic ways. However, its performances and slice of life approach makes it feel like something to which everyone can relate. Particularly as it focuses on […]
[…] drama that audiences expect to escalate on somewhat unrealistic ways. However, its performances and slice of life approach makes it feel like something to which everyone can relate. Particularly as it focuses on […]
[…] comes from a personal place filled with ruminations about the existence of the soul and where we go after we die. Some may also love the artistic visuals and use of a vivid colour pallet to tell such an intricate […]
[…] well as the main cast from ‘Afterlife’ returning, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Ernie Hudson will be returning too! I’m very intrigued […]