Category: REVIEWS

Here is where you would find our film reviews on BRWC.  We look at on trailers, shorts, indies and mainstream.  We love movies!

  • Muscle: Review

    Muscle: Review

    Craig Fairbrass has long established himself as a hardman amongst hardmen, stealing scene after scene with his bristling intensity. Muscle, the third film from Gerard Johnson, is the best realisation yet of Fairbrass’s imposing screen presence, in what is an ominously powerful character study of manipulation and psychopathy.

    Our focaliser is Simon (Cavan Clerkin), a disillusioned office worker whose cold-calling sales job is slowly killing him. He cuts a sorry figure, draped in a loose jacket as he shuffles along the alleys of Newcastle, his balding head held low. His wife and home offer no sanctuary, either. It’s a sexless marriage of excess drinking, long silences and snide remarks.

    Shortly before attending some awful sales seminar, Simon is stopped in his tracks by a broad-shouldered man leaving a city centre gym.  He makes a strong impression on him, triggering some remaining impetus – “I don’t feel the same anymore, I want to shake it up a bit, I want to change myself”, he explains to a colleague.

    His first session at the gym is an awkward one, moving limply from machine to machine, including the pull-down, which he pulls behind his neck rather than towards his sternum – a cardinal sin to many lifters. Terry (Craig Fairbrass) makes this clear, bounding over to him with an aggressive tirade. This is followed, however, by a welcoming gesture, albeit one designed to coerce Simon into accepting his personal training service ­– “Fuck fit, you wanna get big and you wanna get strong.”

    This manipulative combination of fear and positive reinforcement is a harbinger of what’s to come. When Simon’s wife leaves him, he goes to Terry for support, lamenting how he can’t afford the bills by himself. Terry sees an opportunity and asks to become his lodger, which he achieves with little resistance.

    With this encroachment complete, Terry’s controlling behaviour confirms him as an abject psychopath. He pushes boundaries, inviting people to the house without permission and throwing parties that devolve into grimy spectacles of drugs and escorts. Eventually, Terry has a live-in girlfriend, taking over the living room as Simon stews upstairs.

    Although Terry is clearly a bully ­and a second-rate human being, the full extent of his past is as unclear to us as it is to Simon. There is no dramatic irony here, just frightening mystery. Terry claims to have been a soldier, mentioning a collection of ‘trophy pictures’ that would ‘get him a life sentence’. However, later in the film, there are comments suggesting that Terry is much worse than anyone could imagine. Perhaps the only thing we can be sure of is that Terry is a nomadic psychopath, with Simon his latest victim in a life of roving crime and exploitation.

    The depth of the script is matched by the stark, monochrome and occasionally experimental aesthetic. This style reaches its peak during an orgy scene that sees the frame warp and blur as Simon observes the violation of his home, with Matt Johnson’s evocative score casting an aura of gloom, menace and sin in equal measure.

    Muscle is Gerard Johnson’s third film in 11 years. It’s also his best. One can only hope that his next project comes sooner rather than later, for Johnson has proved himself as a director of real force, intelligence, and explicit reality.

  • Choir Girl: Review

    Choir Girl: Review

    Choir Girl: Review. By Hugues Porquier.

    “Choir Girl” is John Fraser’s first feature film released in Australia in December 2019. In this movie, entirely in black and white, we follow Eugene (played by Peter Flaherty), a photographer who lives with his sick father and leads a mediocre life. 

    He photographs the dark corners of Melbourne in the hope of getting a shot that could bring him fame and change his life.  Between drugs, prostitution and corruption, Melbourne is a goldmine for the photographer who seeks to capture the plight of people forgotten by society.

    After several refusals from magazines to publish his pictures, Eugene’s life will change completely with an encounter.  In the first part of the film, Eugene’s distress is palpable. The mediocre life in which he is locked up gives us shivers down our spines. He seems to be rejected by society, lonely, his sick father as only friend. Moreover, the dark and quite oppressive atmosphere works really well. 

    But the film takes a completely different direction when he meets Josephine (played by Sarah Timm). Josephine is a 15-year-old immigrant sex-worker who is a victim of a prostitution network led by Daddy (played by Jack Campbell). At first, Eugene will try to save Josephine. He wants to get her out of this awful network.

    At this point the film seems to begin to develop the birth of a father-daughter relationship, which could be very interesting, between a man who has always been alone and a young girl abandoned by everyone. Instead, we witness a very common history of mafia guys, but with bad guys who are not scary at all and whom we don’t believe in. 

    The film also moves towards a rather strange relationship between Eugene and Josephine, which is very badly written, quite disturbing and seems awkwardly inspired by “Lolita”. The main problem is that the characters are not credible, whether in their writing or in the interpretation of the actors. Mafia guys and journalists are just clichés, not original at all. 

    The actors do not succeed in convincing us of the opposite. The only suitable performance is the one from Sarah Timm.  This lack of credibility leads to the fact that the stakes don’t work, we don’t believe in this story and the fate of the characters doesn’t matter. 

    So the really dark and captivating universe presented in the first part is inevitably ruined by this fumbling development of the characters.  The photography is embellished by superb black and white images, which is the real strength of the film. We feel that the director has really made an effort on this aspect, trying to make an homage to photography through his film and through the character of Eugene.

    “Choir Girl” by John Fraser is a clumsy attempt to take us into a world that seemed very interesting and inspiring but which is very badly exploited.

  • Anything For Jackson: Review

    Anything For Jackson: Review

    Audrey (Sheila McCarthy) and Henry Walsh (Julian Richings) are a sweet couple nearing their retirement years. Henry works as an obstetrician, loved by his community and his patients and Audrey looks after their house while he’s at work. However, when their grandson, Jackson dies they see no other option than to kidnap a pregnant woman and use satanic incantations to put the spirit of their dead grandson into her child.

    Henry finds the perfect candidate in Becker (Konstantina Mantelos) a single expectant mother and so using his position at the hospital, Henry and Audrey tie Becker to a bed they’ve prepared for the occasion and start looking into how to do the ritual correctly. The trouble is that when they attempt their first attempt unleashes a lot more than they intended.

    Anything for Jackson is a satanic horror coming exclusively to Shudder. With a mixture of ghostly scares and everything cinema knows about Satanists thrown at the screen, Anything for Jackson delivers on its promises.

    Although a slow burn horror, audiences will come to realise that the movie has only lulled them into a false sense of confidence before giving them a scare just when they least expect it.

    The imagery of those apparitions come from a great imagination and a little bit of influence from some other creepily moving horror icons, but each seem unique and equally scary as they close in on Audrey, Henry and even Becker herself.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqgGOQ-7V4g

    The chemistry between McCarthy and Richings really helps the audience believe that they’re a loving couple that have been together for a long time. The script also helps, bringing up some deadpan moments of comedy as the pair discuss what they’re going to do with Becker in much the same way that they’d discuss what they’re having for dinner. Although there are times when perhaps the script could have leant into this a little more often as these times were the most fun.

    Unfortunately, Anything for Jackson may be an inventive horror that relies on the cliches that have gone before it, but it doesn’t really know how to end which may leave its audience with more questions than answers.

  • Mank: The BRWC Review

    Mank: The BRWC Review

    There’s a universe out there where the name Herman Mankiewicz (Gary Oldman) means very little to anyone, and we were dangerously close to living in it. Had Mank himself not come forth and demanded Orson Wells give him credit for his own work then his name would be only an unread footnote in the expanse of film history. Instead, Mank did confront the wunderkind, and now David Fincher tells his story, a story which mixes the alcohol-induced creation of Citizen Kane with the life lived that drove the man to write the classic tale.

    This film is a complex mind map approach to capturing the life of a genius and Mank the man is witty, endearing, and undeniably talented. Mank, the film, on the other hand, is almost a war. A war both within the title character and amongst the forces surrounding him. Primarily Mank is a studio hack, bound to MGM by contract and expected to do everything Louis B. Mayer (Arliss Howard) asks of him.

    Yet concurrently, he is a budding socialist witnessing a time where the United States, and Hollywood in particular, was in desperate need of some fairness. This comes to a head when it becomes clear MGM will be the cause of the Democrat’s undoing by releasing propaganda starring paid actors, all by command of the infamous William Randolph Hearst (Charles Dance).

    Most of the film revolves around these two in one way or another, often indirectly, but consistently. Mank is almost the justification for lampooning Hearst with Citizen Kane. Their relationship plays as an analysis from every angle throughout, from its unassuming beginning to a drunken rage that sees their relationship finally sour. However, as mentioned it isn’t Hearst who takes centre stage, it is his long-time mistress, and friend of Herman Mankiewicz, Marion Davies.

    Played by Amanda Seyfried with enchanting poise, Davies is utterly swoon-worthy as she flutters her charms and matches wits with Mank. Ultimately, she becomes a tragic character, an unfair victim of Mank’s scorn for Hearst, but her friendship and kindness glow. And whilst Fincher continues the line that Davies is not depicted in Citizen Kane, as many believe she is, he nonetheless offers her a glorious revival and catharsis in this film.

    All of the above is shown to us in flashbacks removing us from the room in which an injured Mank wrote his magnum opus. Unable to walk and needing an in-house nurse and an assistant to type up his diction Herman, restricted from his vice, is given 60 days to provide Wells with a script. He spends most of this time befriending Rita Alexander (lily Collins, his assistant) and Frieda (Monika Gossmann, his nurse) as they slowly but surely become gateways to reveal a truly tender and loveable man who rises above his alcoholism as best he can, only truly needing it to write. Of course, this is a deeply romanticised view of Mank’s drinking, even for a clearly very high-functioning alcoholic it cannot have been this pretty.

    In fact, according to the film, the hiccups in his life don’t even come from alcohol, bar a particularly dramatic stoush with Hearst, which results in him winning an Oscar in the long run. Strangely it is mostly good moments that are marked with alcohol, like his entire relationship with Davies and his ability to finish the script by the deadline, it makes for an odd sensation when the closing text reads that his alcoholism was the death of him.

    Regardless Fincher has created something exceptional with his efforts here, and while it won’t be for all tastes, it will be delightful for lovers of cinema, thanks to an abundance of references that with soar over the heads of the general audience. Oldman’s performance alone is worth the price of admission and will see him firmly in contention at the academy awards. Together they have worked to resurrect a long-since-forgotten name, and I think they have done so better than anyone else could.

    Mank is a tribute to a man history almost forgot. For all its many wonders, its true gift is allowing people to know that while a genius did direct Citizen Kane, it’s a completely different one who wrote it.

    Mank
    Mank
  • Fatman: Another Review

    Fatman: Another Review

    Christmas’ jovial cheer is welcomed by most, but some seek a bit more ingenuity from their holiday offerings. Whether it’s the foul-mouthed tirades of Bad Santa or the macabre ruminations of Batman Returns, certain films aptly utilize the holiday season to trailblaze their own territory amongst the crowded subgenre. In the latest Yuletide detour Fatman, Eshon and Ian Nelms construct a spirited genre picture from the season’s familiar themes.

    Fatman follows a rowdy, unorthodox Santa Claus (Mel Gibson), who is fighting to save his declining business. Meanwhile, Billy, a neglected and precocious 12-year-old, hires a hitman (Walton Goggins) to kill Santa after receiving a lump of coal in his stocking.

    I was a supporter of Eshon and Ian’s last feature Small Town Crimes, an overlooked neo-noir defined through the brothers’ quirky voice. Fatman‘s strongest allures are a byproduct of that sensibility. The duo take our preconceived notions towards Santa Clause’s jolly image and flips them on their head. Their screenplay slyly comments on the holiday’s superficial elements by cutting away the sentimental veneer, with Santa and his merry band of elves mainly working under the pretenses of making a living. It’s a refreshing change of pace, a direction that the Nelms further bolster through clever world-building devices (Santa being contracted by the US military due to his tireless workforce is quite amusing).

    At all junctures, the Nelms craft a film that relishes in its naughty nature. Nothing represents this better than Mel Gibson’s against-type casting as Saint Nick himself. Portraying a jaded Santa after years of dealing with ungrateful children, Gibson’s gruff image is a picture-esque fit for the role. He commands the screen with gravitas while slowly peeling layers of warmth from the character’s rigid exterior. Walton Goggins also has a blast as a hitman with his own eccentric verve, while Marianne Jean-Baptiste emanates a positive glow onscreen as Mrs. Clause.

    The dynamic performances perform the heavy-lifting for the character’s skeletal nature, carrying the narrative load before the climactic, western-style standoff takes place. Opinions may vary, but I appreciate the Nelms’ intimate handling of the old school showdown. The duo exhibits a steady hand while allowing the slow-burn tension to reach a satisfying boiling point.

    The base of Fatman boasts a plethora of positive traits, though I wish the Nelms built further upon their sturdy foundation. The script’s deconstruction of the holiday commercial nature could benefit from a sharper satirical bend. Dialogue-driven frames can spell out the thematic conceits with a clumsy obviousness, while numerous attempts at humor land with hit-or-miss results (Billy mostly acts as an uninteresting cliche). With another pass, the underbaked elements could have elevated the intriguing ideas into a more astute thesis.

    Flaws and all, Fatman‘s distinct voice imbues a fresh edge to its straight-forward genre formula. With a few hits on their hands, I will be first in line to support whatever the Nelms do next with their promising career.