Author: Alton Williams

  • Adventureland – Review


    There’s a certain sub-genre of teen comedy currently emerging that is perhaps spawned by the likes of Juno, but – in my opinion – more clearly influenced by the likes of Empire Records or – going even further back – Slacker, and it’s a very quiet, downbeat and lo-fi type of comedy. Earlier this year we had Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist that somehow fused Empire Records with Scorcese’s After Hours – but threw in some pratfalls here and there to pad out the trailer – and was buoyed by the absolutely charming, heart melting performance of Kat Dennings, and Michael Cera on good form, to create something watchable yet surprisingly small scale. Now we’ve got Adventureland that makes sure the words ‘From the creators of Superbad‘ can clearly be seen on the poster, but this film is a very different affair, much more similar in attitude to writer/director Greg Mottola’s earlier indie gem The Daytrippers.

    The Squid and the Whale‘s Jesse Eisenberg plays James Brennan, just graduated and looking forward to a trip with friends around Europe. However his family’s finances crumble and he winds up working at the titular theme park. There he falls for the troubled Em (played by Kristen Stewart) and generally hangs around dealing with the park’s grumpy clientele or drinking. The film is surprisingly heavy on the drama with Stewart especially impressing in some scenes that set her in good stead for her upcoming performance as punk rock idol Joan Jett in The Runaways. Also Freaks and Geeks alumnus Martin Starr delivers an appealing turn as pipe-smoking co-worker Joel, balancing off-beat charm with laughs a tad better than the film’s lead. Eisenberg is capable of leading the film, but his character comes off as somewhat unlikable at times, to an extent that he’s never really ‘punished’ for mistakes he makes and it’s here – in some of the plot’s neater contrivances – that the film sits uneasily.

    With some characters taking very broad strokes and certain moments feeling a touch out of place the tone of the movie is, at times, at odds with its general restraint, and whilst some characters produce big laughs from the audience – especially Bill Hader’s park manager – they often only serve to heighten the film’s quieter moments in an awkward fashion. It’s not that Adventureland is particularly bad, it is a watchable and enjoyable movie, it’s just that with two tones – the aforementioned lo-fi teen comedy vying up against something a bit more Superbad – it’s a little hard to really ease into the film without finding yourself getting a tad restless.

    Adventureland is out in the UK on 11 September 2009.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • The Week in Film by Robert Mann – Week Starting 26/6/09

    My Sister’s Keeper ****½

    At a time when cinemas are packed with films aiming to give audiences an adrenaline rush or tickle their funny bones it is quite refreshing to see a film that aims to give the tear ducts a work out instead. My Sister’s Keeper is such a film. Based on the novel of the same name by Jodi Picoult, which itself was inspired by real life cases, My Sister’s Keeper is brought to the big screen under the very capable direction of Nick Cassavetes, who previously helmed such human orientated dramas as The Notebook and John Q. With a track record that shows he knows how to make films that really pack an emotional punch, Cassavetes seems a very good choice for the directorship of this film and his involvement is a good indicator that the film will have the intended impact upon moviegoers, an indication that, at least in this critic’s opinion, is proven correct.

    Sara (Cameron Diaz) and Brian Fitzgerald (Jason Patric) have just been informed that their young daughter Kate (Sofia Vassilieva) has leukemia, and that she only has a few years to live. The doctor suggests to the parents that they try an unorthodox medical procedure of producing another child in a test-tube that would be a perfect match as a donor for Kate. Sara will try anything to save Kate, and they have a new baby Anna (Abigail Breslin) to be used as a donor for Kate. The first thing they use is blood from the umbilical cord for Kate. As years go on, the doctors must take bone marrow from Anna to give to Kate. At age 11, the next thing Anna must give to her sister is a kidney. Anna has had enough of all of these medical procedures, and she approaches lawyer Campbell Alexander (Alec Baldwin), deciding to sue her parents for medical emancipation and the right to decide how her body will be used. The whole family is being torn apart by Anna’s decision because everyone knows what will happen to Kate if she doesn’t get a new kidney. However, the moral and ethical implications could be far greater.

    In a human orientated drama such as My Sister’s Keeper one of the key measures of success is always going to be the quality of its central performances, and in this regard the film certainly does not disappoint, with both of its two key characters being excellent. Abigail Breslin is on top form as usual, delivering a very mature performance that sees her character convincingly attempting to balance her own apparent desire to not have her kidney taken away from her with her love for her sister who will die without her help. Breslin here further demonstrates that she is a serious actress who will have a long lasting career and not just the fifteen minutes of fame experience by many young stars. As good as Breslin is, however, she is completely outshone by a powerhouse performance from Sofia Vassilieva who is heartbreakingly honest and sincere in her role, making for a truly believable and moving portrayal of a young girl whose inner strength and bravery motivates her to keep fighting her cancer but at the same time knows that she cannot go on much longer and openly accepts it. She expresses a whole range of emotions, demonstrating everything from anger with the predicament she is in to tolerance, particularly when her character forms a relationship with another cancer patient, ably played by Thomas Dekker. The two share a sweet romance with a sincere on-screen chemistry that makes us feel all the more for their predicament. As far as the older actors are concerned, cast members like Alec Baldwin and Joan Cusack (playing the Judge in Anna’s case) are as reliable as ever, while Cameron Diaz and Jason Patric are decent as the parents, although they don’t really stand out that much. Cameron Diaz, typically seen more in popcorn fare than more serious roles, is perfect as the obsessive mother, convincingly portraying the character’s obsession with saving her sick daughter, even at the expense of her well one, but at the same time she is too unsympathetic in the role. Maybe this is the point of the character but it is hard not to feel that a more capable actress could have still captured the perspective of the character whilst also creating a persona who we as viewers can actually empathize with. On the director’s part the film is consistently of a high standard with only a few small exceptions. At times the multiple elements of the storyline get in the way of each other and the jumping back in forth between present and past events does get slightly confusing. However, for the most part these little flaws don’t get in the way of what is a very well made drama. The almost documentary style at times in which we see the perspectives of different characters regarding the situation is effective us in giving an insight into how everyone is being affected by what is going on. We see the inner turmoil of each of the family members from their perspective, enabling us to see the big picture of the implications of Anna’s decision on everyone, not just her. We also get to see the effects her decision has on certain other characters. Considering the serious nature of this film’s themes it would be easy for it to have turned out very depressing and hard-going for viewers but Nick Cassavetes and Jeremy Leven (who wrote the screenplay together) successfully deal with the issues at hand, notably the ethical and moral implications of what is expected of Anna, whilst also managing to factor in joy and hopefulness in some of the film’s lighter moments, with some instances of humour as well. Cassavetes has crafted a film that manages to be thought provoking but more importantly is extremely moving, and thanks to some quite beautiful cinematography it also quite pleasing visually as well. Overall, like any other film My Sister’s Keeper has its flaws but it has such charm and warmth that makes it a truly delightful viewing experience. I dare you not to cry as this film is guaranteed to make even the most hard hearted of individuals draw a tear.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Blood: The Last Vampire **

    Blood: The Last Vampire is a multimedia Japanese manga series that began with a 2001 anime film and has since spawned a number of follow-ups including a manga comic book, a trilogy of novels, a video game and a 50 episode spin-off anime series which itself has led to the creation of numerous multimedia tie-ins. Now, comes the latest addition to the series in form of a live action English language movie brought to the big screen by the producer of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Hero and the director of 2001 Jet Li martial arts flick Kiss of the Dragon. Coming in pretty much under the radar at a time when cinemas are dominated by big budget Hollywood blockbusters it is a safe bet that Blood: The Last Vampire will be overlooked on its theatrical release but does this mean that it will be underrated or is it worthy of being ignored by moviegoers?

    On the surface, Saya (Gianna Jun) is a stunning 16-year-old, but that youthful exterior hides the tormented soul of a 400-year-old ‘halfling’. Born to a human father and a vampire mother, she has for centuries been a loner obsessed with using her samurai skills to rid the world of vampires, all the while knowing that she herself can survive only on blood like those she hunts. When she is sent onto an American military base in Tokyo by the clandestine organization she works for, Saya immediately senses that this may be her opportunity to finally destroy Onigen, the evil patriarch of all vampires. Using her superhuman strength and her sword, she begins to rid the base of its evil infestation in a series of spectacular and elaborate showdowns. However, it is not until she forms her first human friendship in centuries with Alice (Allison Miller), the young daughter of the base’s general, that Saya learns of her greatest power over Onigen may well be her ability for human connection.

    It transpires that there is good reason why Blood: The Last Vampire has been released in cinemas with little fanfare. While the series clearly has a pretty big following based on the success of everything that has come before, this film is highly unlikely to win over any new fans and frankly I wouldn’t be surprised if it costs the franchise a few. While there is clear potential on display here very little effort seems to have been made to capitalise on it with the film turning out to be little more than a by-the-numbers martial arts flick that is heavy on the CGI. This wouldn’t be so bad if the CGI at least looked good but sadly the visual effects are extremely poor, the quality being something that might have impressed twenty years ago but now just looks cheap. And the fact that much of the stuff could have been done much more effectively using practical effects only makes it all seem extremely unnecessary. With the poor effects the film wears its low budget on its sleeve but even with visual effects costing more than ever many low budget films still come up with footage that far surpasses anything this film has to offer. The fight choreography is actually quite good but it is so heavily buried beneath the shoddy CGI, not to mention some rather slapdash cinematography that it is hard to really appreciate it. Consequently, the action sequences fail to deliver the level of thrills that they really should do. This is a fatal flaw as the action has clearly been done at the expense of scares, with virtually no attempt having been made to make this film work as a horror movie also, aside from a few (admittedly quite effective) jump scares. The film doesn’t deliver much better in other areas either with the acting getting the job done and nothing more, the plot being rather incoherent thanks to a weak script that delivers mediocre dialogue and fails to provide sufficient plot or character development, and the generally shaky camera work that seems quite amateurish in its execution. All these things add up to a film that, even with its short running time, fails to really capture the attention, meaning that Blood: The Last Vampire manages to be a fairly watchable but instantly forgettable viewing experience.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Reviews by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • 35 Rhums (English Title: 35 Shots Of Rum)

    35 Rhums (English Title: 35 Shots Of Rum)

    By Martyn Conterio.

    French filmmaker Claire Denis’ latest film 35 Rhums (35 Shots Of Rum) is a wonderful return to form after the ponderous L’Intrus (The Intruder).

    35 Rhums is loosely based on Ozu’s Late Spring, and is the story of a father and daughter living in a working class Parisian district. The daughter, a university student is on the verge of leaving the family nest, and making her own way in the world, yet feels obliged to take care of her father. Lionel and his daughter Josephine are joined by neighbours, Garbrielle and Noe to form an unconventional family that is at once close and intrusive. All are lonely and sad in their own way, yet they are all alone together.

    Refreshingly, the working class set-up is not one of disfunction and filled with drugs and all sorts of abuse usually found in social realist film settings. As Denis said herself in the Q&A after the screening, “Being a train driver…it’s working class, but it’s a good job, well paid…there’s responsibility for other people”.

    Claire Denis’ career has been quite adventurous…from Djibouti setting of Beau Travail (Good Work) to the horrific cannibal movie Trouble Every Day, to the tender relationship drama Vendredi Soir (Friday Night).

    The adventurous qualities here, see her make a film that involves black and mixed race, working class Parisians and managing to skillfully avoid stereotypes – their socio-economic set up is the least interesting thing about them.

    35 Rhums is a subtle piece of work. At times, melancholic, and at other times, joyous. The stand out scene is a late-night cafe sequence set to The Commodores classic ‘Nightshift’.

    The film does take a while to get going, yet its slow pace is, again, deceptive…it is a film of silence and movement. The dialogue is sparse.

    It isn’t all doom and gloom however. The scene in which Noe discovers his cat has died, and proceeds to put it in a black bin bag along with the cat’s toys as if he’s putting out the rubbish, is hilarious…revealing Noe’s eccentric nature and also his pragmatism. His apartment is a like a museum filled with junk that he cannot relate to…as he’s often away working.

    Not everything works in 35 Rhums: the character of Rene, his retirement as a train driver and his eventual suicide, deserves a movie of his own…he works symbolically…yet it feels stretched. And the detour to Germany doesn’t match the tone of the rest of the film…it reveals backstory that doesn’t need revealing. The dead mother is a presence throughout the film.

    Claire Denis’ latest film is a return to form; it is funny, sad and a subtle piece of filmmaking. Every actor inhabits their characters well…offering an array of emotions that are very poignant.

    Agnes Godard’s cinematography is outstanding too. The film’s exploration of railway lines, rain-drenched streets at night and grey high-rises are shot in a fresh way that looked poetic and fresh on the big screen.

    After the film, Claire Denis discussed the film and her career in a Q&A session after the screening. She has a whimsical, inquisitive nature…as she said regarding 35 Rhums:

    “For me the film (35 Rhums) was vast and epic…as real life is…there is no closure…only death. With this film, every day life was under observation…and we can all relate to that. I know how to use a washing machine, I know how to use a dishwasher, a vacuum cleaner…I can drive a car”.

    And that is the greatest trick she pulled in her film…making the mundane appear poetic and epic.

  • Hung Over?


    The Hangover has just hit a cinema near you and probably hearing people ranting and raving over how funny it all is. How does it weigh up?

    Here is a review:

    The Hangover:
    Dir: Todd Phillips

    Coming from the ‘Frat Pack’ school of thought, The Hangover nails dumb comedy to a Las Vegas flag pole and swings it around violently.
    When we flash back two days to their road trip to Vegas for a bachelor party where we meet the gang.

    1. Groom Doug who plays the everyman (Or the Mitch Martin seen in Old School role).
    2. Schoolteacher and maverick smooth talker Phil (The out there Vince Vaughn/Luke Wilson role).
    3. Steady, reliable dentist Stu (The worrier, the Kyle from Road Trip).
    4. Last but not least Alan who holds the film together like really strong cement (The Will Ferrell mentalist role).

    Sporting a Joaquin Pheonix beard Zach Galifianakis steps up the role of the crazed, insane and generally special character greatly. A joy to watch so far as to say this is the likes of what made John Belushi a true force to be reckoned with. He plays the clueless, special guy who holds the character well for a more sincere feel. He also pulls the best comedy lines also throughout.

    The film roars through comic situations that just what happens in Vegas when you get drunk. It is a crazy place and where these type of madcap things can happen. Phew. It is comedy a mile a minute there. It is wild. Raaaarrr.

    What you must say to this is that is is a slick production. The quality of how it is shot is there, it is well edited to make the Road Trip mad adventure all work out. Even when some of the script goes wayward, comedy situations bring it back around for the audience.

    It would have been super to see some of the happenings of the bachelor party instead of piecing together all the incidence and feels like an opportunity had been missed. We have a perfectly executed pull back and reveal in place that keeps you watching. I wasn’t convinced by the film but, it did provide solid comedy entertainment. That’s until everything worked out and lived happily ever after. The conventional ending is needed for this particular audience.
    The storyline is a definite bi-product of a Judd Apatow film warehouse whereby actors were chosen to fill the usual roles. They managed to make the roles halfway convincing, therefore the film hits the mark for its target audience.

    Todd Phillips has certainly stuck to what he knows best. Be sure to keep track of his future exploits in the next couple of years. This includes ‘Old School: Dos‘.

    “It’s not on par with Wedding Crashers, but it’s a good laugh.”
    Andy Roddick on preparing for his first round match by watching the film The Hangover.

    See if you like: Frat House, Role Models, Old School, Road Trip, Superbad, Knocked Up, Semi Pro or any of the other ones.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • The Girlfriend Experience

    Review: The Girlfriend Experience


    The Girlfriend Experience is Steven Soderbergh’s latest attempt to blend indie texture with sophisticated sexuality. Coming out the fog that was CHE, Mr. Soderbergh has created a film that sits on the opposite of the spectrum. The story of a call girl with emotional and intellectual attachments to her clients is appropriate in this modern world. Where efficiency is key in the service industry, her research to improve the business is familiar to capitalistic urges to expand.


    I saw the film in HD at my house so my impression is somewhat different than of the local cinema. There are pros and cons to this but that’s another debate for another time.


    The script is simple with few characters performing in the same settings. Beautifully shot, the film reminds me of the dreamlike scenes from Solaris. The cinematography gives the actors space, creating a hidden camera perspective but it also reminds me of the god awful show, The Hills. The casting of an Adult film star as the lead was somewhat reminiscent of the “real” people who acted in Bubble. Sasha Grey is actually cute and her manner is calm and collective.

    While she seems somewhat nervous about her future, her expression is confident, giving her more sex appeal. Her actual boyfriend is dealing with his own business ventures, selling fitness clothes and seems not too bothered about his girlfriend’s job. The contrast of the boyfriend and girlfriend is needed in the script but I feel his side is boring. Not because of its lack of sex, because of its lack of substance. The chronology is mixed up with small segments spliced throughout the film. I thought is was distracting altogether but the story needed it.


    I think Soderbergh needed to make this film to sooth his indie roots. While I wasn’t captivated by its story, the idea and drama of it seemed real enough to relate and absorb.


    Watch it if your curious about indie experiments or just a Soderbergh fan.

    © BRWC 2010.