Author: Alton Williams

  • Shutter Island – A Review by Trevor Smith

    Director : Martin Scorsese

    Starring : Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Max Von Sydow, Michelle Williams, John Carroll Lynch, Patricia Clarkson and Elias Koteas.


    Four words within the film industry probably give the majority of movie lovers a bigger buzz than anything else – ‘A Martin Scorsese Picture.’ Just seeing the words on a gigantic screen at your local cinema can make the hairs on the back of your neck stand on end. Add to that an adapted screenplay from a Dennis Lehane novel – after the brilliant book to screen conversion Mystic River (2003) and equally as good Gone Baby Gone (2007), and you unequivocally have a mouth watering combination.

    Few Directors no matter what film they make will give you urgency and excitement more than any other prior to a release. In addition to Scorsese, Spike Lee, Terence Malick, Quentin Tarantino and Clint Eastwood may bring you similar enthusiasm as they do for me. I am literally counting down the days to see one of these masters unveil their work on the big screen, after all there will be no more new releases from Kubrick, Leone and Hitchcock.

    Shutter Island is a mental institution for the criminally insane – of the most heinous kind. It is split into three sections – A, B and C. With the latter housing some of the most dangerous people on earth. Federal Marshals Teddy Daniels (DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (Ruffalo) arrive on the island investigating the disappearance of an inmate but find it increasingly difficult to access files and speak to the necessary people – made possible from Doctors Cawley (Kingsley) and Naehring (Sydow). Teddy begins to experience vivid hallucinations and truly horrifying dreams… But what is going on here ? And is all what it really seems…

    There is no build up – Scorsese grabs you from the opening shot and you are locked in for over 2 hours and 15 minutes… there is no escape for the audience and perhaps no escape for the Federal Marshals either. Scorsese opts to chill you psychologically with a gripping, thought provoking, well lit post war stylish approach to film noir. The screenplay from Laeta Kalogridis enhances this, with some considerable amount of bizarre dialogue for dramatic effect along with some seriously intense acting by DiCaprio – on his fourth instalment with Scorsese. He is yet to top his finest work to date though, as American icon Howard Hughes in The Aviator (2004).

    Even someone who is considered by some the best Director alive will not get it right all the time. Mark Ruffalo is a fine actor – What Doesn’t Kill you (2008) and Reservation Road (2007) is full proof of that. However his character here doesn’t allow him to act as there is not enough depth to him – perhaps for good reason – but still, this is a little disappointing. CGI (I’m almost certain) is used for the ocean in the opening sequence while Teddy and Chuck are on the boat, which considering this is a Scorsese film is most peculiar and it may leave you feeling a little ‘ripped off’. In terms of the story, you do get the feeling your being ‘led up the garden path’, so the outcome is definitely not the surprise it is attempting to be – however this is rescued with a nice touch just before the credits begin to roll.

    Sergio Leone was the master of extreme close-ups but Scorsese must use more in this movie than the entirety of Leone’s filmography ! Certainly used to ramp up the tension and create paranoia in the mind of the viewer. Michael Mann is perhaps the only other director who can elevate anxiety and fear out from the mind of one of his characters into the mind of the audience – but Scorsese is the master of it. Think Cape Fear (1991) was his great thriller ? Wait till you see Shutter Island.

    Warning : There are countless shots and scenes of dead children, which some viewers – particularly parents, will ultimately find disturbing…. But this is precisely what Scorsese is aiming for.

    Rating 4 / 5 stars.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • The BAFTAS 2010


    I did pretty good with my predictions.
    The winners are in bold, the blue ones are my picks.

    Best Film
    Avatar
    An Education
    The Hurt Locker
    Precious
    Up in the Air

    Outstanding British Film
    An Education
    Fish Tank
    In the Loop
    Moon
    Nowhere Boy

    Director
    Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker
    Neill Blomkamp, District 9
    James Cameron, Avatar
    Lone Scherfig, An Education
    Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

    Actor
    Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
    George Clooney, Up in the Air
    Colin Firth, A Single Man
    Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker
    Andy Serkis, Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll

    Actress
    Carey Mulligan, An Education
    Saoirse Ronan, The Lovely Bones
    Gabourey Sidibe, Precious
    Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia
    Audrey Tautou, Coco Before Chanel

    Supporting Actor
    Alec Baldwin, It’s Complicated
    Christian McKay, Me and Orson Welles
    Alfred Molina, An Education
    Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones
    Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds

    Supporting Actress
    Anne-Marie Duff, Nowhere Boy
    Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air
    Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air
    Mo’Nique, Precious
    Kristin Scott Thomas, Nowhere Boy

    Original Screenplay
    The Hangover
    The Hurt Locker
    Inglourious Basterds
    A Serious Man
    Up

    Adapted Screenplay
    District 9
    An Education
    In the Loop
    Precious
    Up in the Air

    Film not in the English Language
    Broken Embraces
    Coco Before Chanel
    Let the Right One In
    A Prophet
    The White Ribbon

    Animated Film
    Coraline
    Fantastic Mr Fox
    Up

    Cinematography
    Avatar
    District 9
    The Hurt Locker
    Inglourious Basterds
    The Road

    Costume Design
    Bright Star
    Coco Before Chanel
    An Education
    A Single Man
    The Young Victoria

    Editing
    Avatar
    District 9
    The Hurt Locker
    Inglourious Basterds
    Up in the Air

    Make-Up & Hair
    Coco Before Chanel
    An Education
    The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
    Nine
    The Young Victoria

    Music
    Avatar
    Crazy Heart
    Fantastic Mr Fox
    Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll
    Up

    Production Design
    Avatar
    District 9
    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
    Inglourious Basterds

    Sound
    Avatar
    District 9
    The Hurt Locker
    Star Trek
    Up

    Visual Effects
    Avatar
    District 9
    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    The Hurt Locker
    Star Trek

    Short Animation
    The Gruffalo
    The Happy Duckling
    Mother of Many

    Short Film
    14
    I Do Air
    Jade
    Mixtape
    Off Season

    Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director or Producer
    Lucy Bailey, Andrew Thompson, Elizabeth Morgan Hemlock, David Pearson (directors/producers, Mugabe and the White African)
    Eran Creevy (writer-director, Shifty)
    Stuart Hazeldine (writer-director, Exam)
    Duncan Jones (director, Moon)
    Sam Taylor-Wood (director, Nowhere Boy)

    Orange Rising Star Award
    Jesse Eisenberg
    Nicholas Hoult
    Carey Mulligan
    Tahar Rahim
    Kristen Stewart

    Outstanding contribution to British cinema
    Joe Dunton

    © BRWC 2010.

  • #BAFTAS

    YES!

    The Baftas are a bit later today. Here are my predictions and these guys are blogging and taking pics from the red carpet, as we speak.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – The Lovely Bones

    The Lovely Bones ***

    Probably one of the big losers among the hopefuls for this year’s Academy Awards, not receiving a single nomination, The Lovely Bones is also perhaps the most surprising film to be overlooked. After all, it’s directed by Peter Jackson, whose The Lord of the Rings received massive critical and public acclaim and whose final instalment The Return of the King was a massive Oscar winner; it’s based on the also critically acclaimed bestselling novel The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold; and it boasts a fairly impressive cast line up. So, why has it been snubbed by the Oscars? Well, apparently because it isn’t actually that good. Released back in the states on limited release way back last year and nationwide earlier this year, the film has not only received lacklustre at best reviews from critics but generated poor word of mouth among moviegoers (and consequently flopped at the US box office), suggesting that The Lovely Bones might not actually be all that lovely. And the assessment of movie critics isn’t entirely wrong on this one.

    Growing up in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan) has loving parents, Jack (Mark Wahlberg) and Abigail (Rachel Weisz), as well as her wise and kindly Grandma Lynn (Susan Sarandon). There’s also a budding romance between Susie and Ray (Reece Ritchie). But tragedy strikes, and Susie is just 14 years old when she is horrifically murdered on December 6th, 1973. Finding herself in the ‘in-between’, a world that is neither Heaven nor earth, Susie, guided by one of her killer’s past victims, Holly (Nikki SooHoo), is able to watch over those she has left behind – among them acquaintance Ruth (Carolyn Dando), who seems to be able to see through to the next world – and try to help them catch her killer and rebuild their lives, unable to move on to the next world until her killer has been caught and justice achieved and her family and friends have found peace. Her father has all the pieces of the puzzle but can’t put them together, while detective Len Fenerman (Michael Imperioli) questions neighbour Mr Harvey (Stanley Tucci), and Susie’s sister Lindsey (Rose McIver) embarks on her own dangerous hunt for the truth.

    There is definitely validity in criticisms that have been made of The Lovely Bones. Is the film a masterpiece? Absolutely not. But on its own terms, is it a good film? Mostly yes. The Lovely Bones doesn’t actually seem like one complete film but rather two very different films glued together – one a CG heavy fantasy and the other a murder thriller – and one of the big things that lets the whole down is that the two don’t entirely gel together. On their own, either could have been great (though that would be besides the point) but together they don’t entirely work in unison, often getting in the way of each other. This isn’t to say that neither aspect delivers, though, simply that neither delivers at 100% efficiency. Both aspects undoubtedly have their strengths. The CG realized fantasy world of the ‘in-between’ is breathtakingly, enchantingly and stunningly beautiful, providing a feast for the eyes and a truly delightful glimpse at what may lay in the world beyond this one, as well as providing the perfect visual representation of everything positive about Susie. Meanwhile, events in the world of the living effectively create suspense and tension as Susie’s family attempt to expose her killer. The real world also gains from terrific attention to detail with the look, feel and sound of 1970s America being perfectly captured in locations, costumes, cars, props, the soundtrack and little details that only the most observant of viewers will notice. In fact, the film gets off to a very strong start, with voiceover narrations by Susie telling who the killer is before her murder occurs and allowing a sense of impending dread to build up, effectively creating tension leading up to the event. Sadly, however, the event itself fails to capitalise on this. Director Peter Jackson’s decision to not show the murder itself detracts tremendously from the emotional impact the event should have and consequently much of what follows also lacks the emotional punch that it should effortlessly create. The film as a whole is quite strangely lacking in emotion, with scenes that should bring you to tears failing to do so and thus one of the greatest assets of Alice Sebold’s novel is lost in the translation from page to screen. Certainly, anyone who has read the book is likely to feel somewhat cheated. The film is also hit and miss in other aspects. Even on its own terms, the storytelling is far from perfect and due to inconsistent performances from the film’s cast the characters don’t all come across the way they should. For instance, Mark Wahlberg is rather miscast as Susie’s father and despite a very good performance from Rachel Weisz as her mother, there really isn’t enough of a chemistry between the two. Meanwhile, Susan Sarandon is quite excellent but is extremely underused, while Stanley Tucci is suitably sinister as Susie’s killer but perhaps a bit too obvious in his portrayal of the evil neighbour lurking in the shadows. On the upside, Saoirse Ronan is simply outstanding as Susie, acting well beyond her years, delivering a mature and completely convincing yet also extremely adorable performance that truly captivates us and almost makes us cry at times in spite of the shortcomings resulting from Peter Jackson’s direction. So, overall, The Lovely Bones is indeed a film that has many flaws, but it nonetheless has more than enough strong elements to make it worth seeing, proving to be a quite uplifting viewing experience, even if it won’t change your life. So, good but not quite lovely.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • A Quartet Of Posters




    I have a few posters for you. You lucky pup.

    Here is the UK quad for Chloe, the poster for the documentary Phyllis And Harold, the latest one sheet for The Secret Of Kells, and a film I cannot wait for – SuicideGirls Must Die!

    Enjoy.

    © BRWC 2010.