Author: Alton Williams

  • Classic Scene :Death Proof (2007)

    “This car is 100% death proof. Only to get the benefit of it honey… you really need to be sitting in my seat !”

    The least successful film by Quentin Tarantino (in terms of profit) is still highly entertaining in style, well acted and always room for a ‘Classic Scene’. Stuntman Mike (a dynamic Kurt Russell) is a scarred psychopath who uses his ‘Death Proof’ car to murder young women for his sadistic pleasure.


    SETTING THE SCENE : Mike picks up Pam (Rose McGowan) at a bar and charms her into giving her a lift home. They stop at a crossroads as Mike asks Pam which direction she wants to go…

    INT. MIKE’S CAR. NIGHT


    Mike : Well Pam, which way you going ? Left or right ?
    Pam : Right.


    Mike : Arrh, that’s too bad



    Pam : Why ?

    Mike : Well, because it was a 50/50 shot whether you’d be going left or right. You see, were both going left. You could have just as easily been going left too, and if that was the case, it would of been a while before you started getting scared. But since your going the other way, i’m afraid… your gonna have to start getting scared… immediately.


    Mike puts his foot down and drives off like a maniac while Pam is thrown around like a rag doll in the car’s ‘unsafe’ side where the passenger seat is.


    At first Pam abuses Mike but is thrown around so much she nearly loses consciousness and is bleeding in more than one place. She then begins to realize the danger she is really in…


    Pam : Okay. Here’s the thing. I get it. I know it’s a joke and super funny. Um, but if you just stop right now, you know and let me out, i’ll never tell anybody because i know it’s a joke. I know all about jokes. I promise everything will be fine. Just, just, just let me out. Please ? And, and..



    Mike : Hey Pam ! Remember when i said this car was death proof ? Well, that wasn’t a lie. This car is 100% death proof. Only to get the benefit of it Honey… you really need to be sitting in my seat !


    Mike slams on the breaks and Pam flies forward brutally smashing her face open against the windscreen.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Animals United

    Animals United 3D **½
    Animals United 2D **

    The first of two computer animated family films (the second being next week’s Arthur and the Great Adventure) being released this Christmas that you may have never even heard of (both distributed by the same company – UK based distributor Entertainment Film Distributors), Animals United is a film that clearly seems set to try and capture some of the Christmas family moviegoing audience yet an apparent lack of marketing or publicity inevitably means that it will likely pass by ignored in favour of the bigger features on release.

    On one hand this is a shame as it will be a classic case of the small film being overlooked in favour of the big blockbuster and this isn’t a film without some distinct strengths in its favour but, at the same time, if you don’t see it you probably won’t be missing much, it being a film that manages to live up to those films released by the big animation studios in some areas but not necessarily the ones that matter most. This doesn’t stop this from being an interesting film on some levels though. The inspiration here is from a much more unexpected source (for us at least) than many other computer animated films, being inspired by the 1949 children’s novel The Animal’s Conference (originally titled Die Konferenz der Tiere before it was translated to English) by Erich Kästner, the dean of German writers for children who won an international audience with a long series of stories of which ‘The Animal’s Conference’ is perhaps the funniest and the most serious. Produced for once not by a major American studio but by a German production company, following in the footsteps of last year’s Planet 51 in being made by a European production house, Animals United may well be on the cutting edge of CG animation for its home country but how is it likely to be viewed by moviegoers here in the UK?

    Set in the Okavango Delta in Africa, a group of animals – including little mischievous meerkat Billy (voiced by James Corden) and his family; Billy’s best (and only pal), friendly lion Socrates (voiced by Stephen Fry); elephant Angie (voiced by Dawn French); giraffe Giselle (voiced by Joanna Lumley); and oracle monkey Bongo (voiced by Omid Djalili) – find themselves in a struggle for survival when the annual flood that normally arrives at a certain time every year fails to do so. With the water being essential to all the animals that live there, including the highly aggressive rhinos and buffalos, who find themselves in a fight every time even the slightest bit of water is found, Billy decides to find out what has happened to the water and, along with Socrates, set outs through the valley of death, discovering in the process the shocking truth about who is responsible for the water not coming – man. Meanwhile, all around the world the harm being caused by mankind to the environment is endangering many animals and some of them – including wise 700 year old turtles Winston (voiced by Jim Broadbent) and Winifred (voiced by Vanessa Redgrave); polar bear Sushi (voiced by Bella Hudson); French cockerel Charles (voiced by Andy Serkis); kangaroo Toby (voiced by Jason Donovan); Tasmanian devil Smiley – have set out on a journey to find a rumoured paradise where they will be safe from the wrath of humanity, a paradise that just happens to be the Delta. Realising that mankind is responsible for endangering all of them, the animals all decide to unite in an act of opposition to humanity’s treatment of the environment and those creatures that live within it, taking on first those responsible for damming the water in the Delta and then the world as they head to New York City to show the world that they won’t stand for man’s actions any longer.

    For an animated feature that comes from a small animation studio, Animals United really doesn’t look bad at all. The animation on display here, which is a sort of blending of photorealistic and cartoony styles, actually looks quite striking and is certainly very pleasing to the eyes, being appropriately colourful, having plenty of texture and detail and delivering some extremely beautiful and realistic looking sweeping shots of wilderness, various types of landscapes from all over the world being depicted at various points in the film (including the cityscape of New York at the end). These sweeping shots gain much as well from the 3D, the application of 3D here actually being rather good. You can tell that this isn’t a poorly done conversion job but a proper 3D film with environments depicted on screen appearing to be right in front of you and the sweeping shots looking far more spectacular as a result of the extra dimension. This isn’t to say that the 3D is the best you will see as while certain parts do gain from it – the aforementioned sweeping shots and the occasional instance of gimmickry are examples of this – the extra dimension doesn’t add that much to the film as a whole and wastes lots of opportunities for 3D gimmickry, some things seeming so obvious yet apparently not to the filmmakers. That this film looks good is pretty much a given but sadly, like many other animated features from smaller companies, the film is missing the key ingredients that could make it really stand out. A Pixar movie isn’t considered a masterpiece simply because it boasts great animation but because it comes complete with a great story, a terrific sense of humour and real heart, all things that are low in supply in this film. At times it really seems like this film is unsure about what it is really trying to be, at some points coming across like a wacky animal based comedy complete with musical numbers, although low on gags that are actually funny, while at others the film takes on a very dark and doom laden tone and comes across almost preachy in the way it depicts the ways in which mankind damages the environment and puts across its message that what man is doing is wrong in the most unsubtle of fashion. With a concept that is hardly original and slapdash execution, the storyline is also lacking, the uncertainty of focus between its two contrasting aspects along with generally underwhelming writing robbing us of anything that is truly compelling or engaging, the plot we get creating a clear sense of been there-seen that. What’s more, the characters mostly seem to be stereotypes, the animals being cast in roles that are very familiar and nothing being done to shake things up at all and, with dialogue that is also rather weak, the rather impressive voice cast distinctly fails to impress, most of them barely featuring much at all anyway and when they do failing to add anything that couldn’t have been achieved with some unknown voicing the character. In particular, following in the footsteps of TV’s Compare the Market adverts which have made meerkats some of the most lovable of animals, James Corden’s stint as Billy just seems like a huge let down when compared with the character of Aleksandr Orlov from those adverts. The film also fails to be particularly funny, most the gags coming in the form of some very bad puns or Smiley farting, and is also only occasionally exciting, the overall film being one that will only really entertain younger viewers and leave many older ones rather bored. So, Animals United is definitely not a must see family film this Christmas but is it watchable enough that if you do decide to give it a go, it won’t be a particularly hard to watch film either.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Fred: The Movie

    Fred: The Movie NO STARS

    If a trial is ever held for those who have committed the biggest crimes against entertainment, YouTube will have a lot to answer for, in particular the creation of Fred Figglehorn. A fictional character created and portrayed by American “comedy” actor Lucas Cruikshank, Fred is the star of a series of videos on the popular video-sharing site, a teenager with a dysfunctional home life and anger management issues, not to mention the most squeaky high pitched voice your likely to ever hear come out of anyone’s mouth.

    With an amazing 47 videos (that’s four seasons worth) of “official” (mini) episodes along with numerous other videos, among them music videos, Fred’s antics have attracted as many as 25 million (yes, you read that right) viewers at its very highest peak and his YouTube channel is the most popular and subscribed of all time on the site. If ever there was a bigger sign that good taste in entertainment has gone out of the window I have certainly yet to see it. In preparation for this review I decided to take a look at some of Fred’s videos on YouTube and what I found there was some of the most downright annoying and creatively bankrupt drivel I have ever seen, Fred’s voice grating more than a cheese grater being rubbed against human skin and the show so unfunny as to make even the “jokes” themselves painful to watch. Just why anyone would want to watch this even for free is beyond me and now they’ve gone and made a movie out of it – that’s what reaching 25 million viewers gets you. Although British viewers, prepare for some shocking news: you’re being ripped off – apparently, Fred: The Movie was actually made as a TV movie and in the states it has already aired for FREE while here any ‘Fred’ fans (if there any of you out there you appal me) in the UK will have to pay full the price of a cinema ticket to see it. Of course, I wouldn’t recommend that anyone see this film even for free – the popularity of stuff like this is the reason why studios continue to invest in rubbish movies over quality films. In short, Fred: The Movie sucks just like the YouTube shorts that have preceded it.

    Fred Figglehorn (Lucas Cruickshank) is a socially awkward 15 year old who no one seems to be able to stand, not even his own mother (Siobhan Fallon Hogan), and who has a mad crush on his beautiful and popular next door neighbour, Judy (Pixie Lott), who barely seems to be aware of his existence. Fred repeatedly tries to woo Judy but finds his attempts thwarted at every turn by his nemesis, local bully Kevin (Jake Weary), and when he finally does get up the courage to approach Judy about his attraction he discovers that she has moved away and thus Fred, spurred on by his forceful imaginary father (John Cena), sets out on a journey across the city to find here. And when he finally makes it to her new house he crashes a party she is hosting, only to publically ruin her evening. After Kevin posts a video on YouTube showing the incident, Fred cooks up a revenge plan with friend and fellow social outcast Bertha (Jennette McCurdy), which involves faking a party of his own to make him look super-popular at school. All along the way Fred never misses an opportunity to completely humiliate himself or throw one of his infamous temper tantrums.

    Oh my god, I think my brain just melted. If you think Fred is annoying in his short videos on YouTube, just try sitting through 1 hour 20 minutes of him – that’s 1 hour 20 minutes too long. There really is nothing funny about Fred Figglehorn and with that nothing funny about Fred: The Movie. As Fred, Lucas Cruickshank’s voice is so high pitched that it cuts through you like a knife through butter and it is so painful to hear that I almost felt like my ears were going to bleed. And if you think it is bad when he is just talking to the audience – something which would prove annoying here anyway even if it weren’t Fred doing the talking – just imagine what it is like when he is throwing a temper tantrum – which is basically all he really does throughout the film – or screaming out loud or singing so badly that he wouldn’t even get past the audition stage on The X Factor. His voice really is almost torturous to hear and we really can see why virtually every character in the film can’t stand him as we certainly can’t either. His voice isn’t to blame for this though as Fred isn’t even an especially likable character, coming across like a stalker for much of the duration and only really earning our sympathy in one scene, which is not enough to make up for how annoying he is both before and afterwards – and he really is annoying, Lucas Cruickshank really not talented at all, just irritating. Essentially, the entire film considers of temper tantrums, screaming and bad singing and all linked together with little that actually resembles plot, abysmal dialogue, secondary characters that often aren’t that much less annoying than Fred himself – okay, they are a lot less annoying but still annoying nonetheless – and one gag after another that completely fails to raise a single laugh, only make you cringe and squirm like you may have never before done at a cinema, the film coming across like a very bad sketch stretched out to feature length. The writing is plain bad, coming across as amateurish and you may even think that Cruickshank himself is behind it but in actuality the writing comes courtesy of David A. Goodman, who actually has a decent track record as a TV writer having written for such shows as Family Guy, Futurama and Enterprise – what on earth possessed him to even be involved with this film is beyond me. Additionally, god only knows why Pixie Lott would choose to make her acting debut in this, a film where she gets thrown up on or why the likes of John Cena and Siobhan Fallon Hogan would choose to appear, or even Jennette McCurdy for that matter. Lott displays some potential as an actress but here is completely wasted and the same is true of McCurdy who has shown much potential on TV show iCarly, none of which is really evident here. Add to all this amateurish TV style production values – it was made as a TV movie after all – and you have a film that isn’t entertainment, rather torture, the only thing that even comes close to redeeming the film being the occasional song performed by Pixie Lott but even this can’t save such a turd of a movie. To say that the film outstays it welcome would be an understatement – just five minutes of Fred would be outstaying its welcome and with this running 1 hour 20 minutes you may well feel brain dead upon leaving the cinema if you do foolishly choose to see it. The only thing positive that can be said about the film is that perhaps on some level it actually realises how bad it is. At one point Fred says to us “Why do people even watch other people on YouTube…I don’t get it, I just don’t” – I couldn’t have put it better myself, I certainly don’t get why anyone would choose to watch Fred Figglehorn online and definitely don’t understand why anyone would actually pay to see something so mind-numbingly stupid on the big screen. Is Fred: The Movie the most awful thing you might see on the big screen this year? Without a doubt.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • SALT


    SALT
    On the 21st, the Deluxe Unrated Edition of Salt on Blu-ray and DVD takes you in-depth behind the making of this summer’s hottest movie starring Angelina Jolie and directed by Philip Noyce.  And available only on the Deluxe Unrated Edition, you get some amazing content including:

    The Ultimate Female Action Hero: No limits.  No fear.  Kickass.  These are the words that director Phillip Noyce, the cast and crew used to describe Angelina Jolie, the ultimate action hero.  Go behind the scenes and watch how Angelina sets the new standards for action movies starring women through her passion, determination, and most definitely, guts.

     SALT
    Salt: Declassified – An Undercover Look at the Secrets of Making Salt: This expanded look at the making of Salt goes deeper undercover to expose the many sides and guises of Evelyn Salt; examine the heart-pounding mission undertaken by director Phillip Noyce; and reveal some of the technical, physical, visual and editorial secrets that simply couldn’t be revealed prior to this point.
    False Identity: Creating a New Reality:  How do you create Washington, DC when the film was shot in Long Island?  How do you create a spectacle with thousands of people when there are only 2,000 extras available?  Robert Grasmere, Visual Effects Supervisor, helps to explain how these amazing visual spectacles are achieved in Salt through state-of-the-art technology and the intricate effects of the Visual Effects team.

    SALT

    Give or get the movie that Pete Hammond of Boxoffice Magazine called, “Sizzling Hot! It’s an explosive, nail-biting ride that doesn’t slow down.” Also check out the official website at www.salt-themovie.com for more including a FREE game app and a create-your-own video that lets you “out” your friend as a sleeper cell agent on international news!

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Tron Legacy

    Tron Legacy 3D *****
    Tron Legacy 2D *****
    While it may seem hard to believe considering how dated it looks now, 1982’s Tron was once a film on the cutting edge of visual effects, the then state of the art visuals boasting the first extensive use of computer generated imagery in a movie with about 20 minutes of footage featuring digitally created visuals including, among many other things, early attempts at facial animation.
    As dated as the visuals look now, however, they still have a certain power, being rather impressive for the time in which they were produced, so much so that, rather than vanishing into obscurity, the film still has a substantial fanbase now twenty eight years later. Not only that but the film was also very ahead of its time in a number of ways and seemingly foresaw the shape of things to come, a video game that features in its initial scenes bearing remarkable resemblances to 3D graphics game engines that would not be invented for another twelve years and many Disney animators refusing to work on the film because they feared computers would put them out of business, something that seemed set to actually happen twenty two years later when Disney closed its hand-drawn animation studio in favour of CG animation (although it was eventually reopened by new creative director John Lasseter, ironically also the head of a computer generate animation company in the form of Pixar). Tron was not very successful upon its original theatrical release, grossing just $33 million at the US box office at the time (although when viewed in contrast to its $17 million production budget the film could perhaps be viewed as a moderate success) and going on to become more of a cult hit than a commercial one, with the video game that followed it actually proving to be far more lucrative than the movie itself. You might wonder then, why Disney would even consider making a sequel to a film that itself was hardly considered to be successful – the $33 million gross still only equates to $89 million in today’s money when adjusted for inflation – and then why would they make one with a production budget in excess of $200 million (the fourth film released by Disney this year to carry a $200 million+ budget, or the fifth in the case of America), $13 million of that amount alone going on the wardrobe with one custom suit alone costing $60,000. The answer to this is simple – the cult following. Disney clearly believes that the film boasts a substantial enough fanbase to justify the creation of a Tron sequel and the reuniting of original stars Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner (although other original cast members are conspicuously absent from this sequel) seems like a pretty good indication that they want to deliver something that pleases the fans. Arriving twenty eight years after the original film, Tron Legacy has become one of the most hyped up, although perhaps not most eagerly anticipated movies of 2010, and seems poised to be this year’s answer to Avatar in terms of its 3D visuals, utilising the new F-35 Sony camera system, the latest generation in 3D cameras, one generation newer even than the ones used by James Cameron for that film, and perhaps being one of the films best suited to the 3D medium ever made. Some may perhaps be concerned about the presence of first time director Joseph Kosinski at the helm but fear not as his effects background – he previously produced several CGI television commercials including the “Starry Night” commercial for videogame Halo 3 and the “Mad World” commercial for another videogame, Gears of War – makes him a prime candidate to do justice to the unique visual style of the Tron world and Disney are so pleased with his work that they have already signed him to remake another of their classic live action sci-fi movies, The Black Hole. Is what Kosinski has made a truly worthy legacy to the original Tron though or, after twenty eight years of waiting, will fans feel cheated?
    Twenty years ago, Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges), one of the world’s leading videogame developers, disappeared, leaving behind his son Sam and a billion dollar business empire in the form of computer company Encom. In the following twenty years, Encom’s one time mission to share its creations freely with the world has been corrupted in favour of massive profits and, despite the pleas of Kevin’s long time friend, computer programmer Alan Bradley (Bruce Boxleitner), for him to take over the running of the company, Sam (Garrett Hedlund) has stayed out of the company’s way aside from a yearly act of opposition to the corrupt policies of its board of directors. Everything changes for Sam, however, when Alan informs him that he has been paged by a phone number long disconnected – that of Kevin’s old amusement arcade, Flynn’s. Believing that the page may have originated from his father, Sam investigates, and his actions lead him to be pulled into The Grid, a digital world created by his father almost thirty years earlier, the same digital world where his father has been trapped for the last two decades. There, Sam discovers that the world has been taken over by sinister forces headed by Clu (Jeff Bridges), an artificial creation of Kevin’s that has turned bad in his pursuit for perfection and that if he is to make it to his father he must first survive a series of life challenging games. Eventually tracking down his father with the help of the fearless Quorra (Olivia Wilde), Sam learns that his father is being hunted by Clu for the knowledge he possesses, knowledge that would give Clu the means to cross over into the real world, and that his mere arrival in The Grid may well have given Clu the means to carry out his fiendish plan. Realising that it isn’t just his and his father’s lives that are in jeopardy but also the very existence of The Grid and even the real world, Sam tries to get himself, his father and Quorra back to the safety of the real world where dealing with the super powerful Clu will take little more than the push of a button. But to get there they must take on the full power of Clu’s army and deal with duplicitous programmes such as night club owner Castor (Michael Sheen) and his associate Gem (Beau Garrett). With the odds heavily against them their chances of survival of remote but perhaps the reappearance of an old ally of Kevin’s might turn the odds back in their favour.
    Whether or not you hold any appreciation for Tron Legacy will very much depend on what it is that you look for in a film. If you seek complex plotlines, engaging characters and memorable dialogue it is fair to say this film will hold no appeal for you whatsoever. If, on the other hand, you crave an experience, something that will deliver a feast for your eyes and truly take your breath away then you will LOVE this movie. To get the negatives out of the way first, this is not a particularly well written film. The dialogue is clunky and often very clichéd, something that detracts notably from the performances on display although the acting still proves decent nonetheless – Jeff Bridges, playing both good guy Kevin and villain Clu, is adept at both roles, delivering a vibe of zen like cool as the former and being suitably smarmy as the latter; Michael Sheen is superbly camp and over the top as Castor; Olivia Wilde delivers a good balance of toughness and softness; and Garrett Hedlund proves to be a fairly capable leading man, although Bruce Boxleitner’s appearance sadly amounts to little more than a cameo, appearing briefly in the real world scenes as Adam and in some flashbacks as one time hero Tron – with the actors doing a pretty good job with rather weak material. What passes for exposition and character development comes largely in the real world scenes that briefly show us Sam’s childhood, the TV news reports – which look very authentic to the 80s period I might note – filling in the details about Kevin’s disappearance and the subsequent effects on Sam and Encom, and some flashback sequences that show us events preceding the film and explain why The Grid has come to be the way it is, things that fail to deliver much depth to the story or characters but prove passable in detailing the film’s plot. The storyline is neither here or there really, the plot being largely sufficient for the film’s needs but not substantial, delivering a rather predictable outcome and lacking any real depth, although all the depth that is really needed is supplied by the 3D visuals. This is a film about the visuals, after all, and the visuals do not disappoint. Just as was the case with Avatar last year this is a film that is all about providing us viewers with an experience and in this regard it is impossible to find any fault with it. These words have been thrown around a lot in the last couple of years but this film really does boast some of the best 3D effects seen to date. Rarely has there been a film that lends itself so perfectly to the 3D medium than this one and the effects here are applied effectively and stylishly, never being used in a particularly gimmicky fashion – i.e. nothing comes out of the screen – but rather to actually take us to the world of The Grid instead of just showing it to us, something that makes the experience all the more memorable (like Avatar the 3D takes us on a journey to an alien world, just different kind). This isn’t to say that the visuals don’t impress even in 2D, though, as the film still dazzles even without the extra dimension, The Grid being a breathtaking work of digital art, a beautifully realised and infinitely cool neon laden – neon style light is used to excellent effect here – world that is extremely spectacular in 2D, although obviously more so in 3D. In an interview director Joseph Kosinski said “I wanted to treat the screen like a window into another world” and this is exactly what he has done, with the film making it seem like we are looking through into a living, breathing world that exists beyond the frame of the cinema screen. A particularly effective way in which this film differs from other 3D movies is that the entire movie is not in 3D – some on screen text before the film states “The following 3D presentation contains several 2D scenes…” and while you may think wearing the 3D glasses during the 2D scenes will darken the image this is not the case at all, the effect of 3D clearly having been considered even in the scenes that aren’t 3D at all. Here only the scenes in the virtual world are presented with the extra dimension while the real world scenes are presented as old fashioned 2D, something that really provides a differentiation between the real and virtual worlds and that generally proves to be a rather effective touch, especially with regard to the seamless way that the film shifts between 2D and 3D and back again.
    So many movies nowadays feature visual effects that it is all too easy to simply get used to what we are seeing, the fantastical seeming normal after a while but this film really does do something completely different with its effects and provides a sense of the fantastic that has been absent in many recent effects based movies. Boasting, in addition to great CGI, superb set design – while they may appear to be all computer generated environments, some actual sets feature in the virtual world as well – and excellent costumes, hair and make-up, this is a film that looks distinctive, original and unique, the world seen on the screen being completely unlike anything that anyone other than someone who’s seen the original Tron has seen and even then they are a true evolution of what was seen in that film, the visuals being state of the art like for now like the original film’s effects were for the early 1980s. The de-aging effects applied to Jeff Bridges to make him look twenty years younger are largely effective, almost proving completely convincing but still retaining a slightly artificial look – this is something that could perhaps be viewed as an issue in the film’s opening real world scene but is less of a problem in the case of Clu, as he is artificial and in essence the slight artificial look actually makes the character perhaps seem slightly more convincing in a fashion. Such is the strength of the visuals that even dialogue based sequences are made to be really spectacular and in a way that doesn’t diminish from what (little) is being said on screen. In addition to looking great, the film is also exciting and thrilling, boasting numerous action sequences that are not just hugely entertaining but also quite original, making terrific use of the potential that The Grid offers, delivering us disc fights, lightcycle chases, aerial battles and fight sequences that really get the pulse pumping and are enhanced significantly by a superb techno soundtrack produced by Daft Punk – who actually appear in the film as a couple of DJs at Castor’s nightclub. It isn’t just the virtual world that looks great but also the real world with the opening scenes also boasting great design – Flynn’s amusement arcade captures the look and feel of the 1980s perfectly, packed full of classic amusement arcades, each generating an authentic 80s sound – and some very good cinematography, as well as being quite exciting in their own right. So, if you go to the cinema for a truly spectacular experience, Tron Legacy is a film that will definitely satisfy you, whether you are an older viewer looking to go on a nostalgia trip or a younger viewer looking to have your mind blown. Visually stylish and unique, Tron Legacy is an incredible 3D spectacle and still quite awe inspiring in classic 2D. Without a doubt one of the most amazing things you will see on the big screen this year this is also undoubtedly the 3D movie of the year, making some of the best use of the effects to enhance the overall experience rather than just as a gimmick. This is a film that will dazzle you, a piece of super cool 80s retro with a 21st century twist and a film that leaves behind a legacy that Tron himself would be proud of. Another cult classic in the making, perhaps?
    ———————————————————————————————————————————–
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.