Author: Alton Williams

  • The Hole – Released Today On Blu-Ray & DVD

    Released today, just in time for “Blue Monday”, is Joe Dante’s return to the horror genre he thrives in so anarchically. Having brought us cult classics like Piranha, The Howling and Gremlins, it’s been sometime since Mr. Dante gave us something new to grit our teeth over (he made an episode for the Masters of Horror TV series but this is cinema!).

    Initially released in theatres as a kids film back in September parents were quick to point out with some irritation that this film is not for children. Brothers Dane and Lucas discover a bottomless pit in the basement of their new house. They soon discover that the pit, or “Hole”, will manifest your greatest fears and make them a reality. Needless to say, a very creepy clown pops up. 

    Featuring a plot-line similar to one of the better X-Files episodes and with uncredited script work by Guillermo Del Toro, Joe Dante returns with his best films in many a year. That’s not even meant to sound like a poster sound-bite it’s the truth. He has always achieved the great feet of making entertaining films which appeal to both adults and children and injecting them with a undercurrent of menace and lots of mayhem. The Hole is out today from Way To Blue on Blu-Ray and DVD. Let’s see what pissed off the parents so much!

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – The Green Hornet

    The Green Hornet 3D ***
    The Green Hornet 2D ***

    The first of numerous superhero movies to be released in 2011 (and the first ever superhero movie to be released in 3D, three others following this summer), The Green Hornet (not to be confused with this summer’s Green Lantern) finds its original inspirations in a very different source than most superheroes.

    Whereas most superheroes start their lives in the pages of comic books, The Green Hornet was originally broadcast on the airwaves in a radio series that ran from 1936 to 1952 – although the character has since made the transition to the world of comics as well. Created by George W. Trendle and Fran Striker with input by radio director James Jewell in 1936, the titular American pulp hero and masked vigilante has appeared in a number of serialised dramas in a wide variety of media since his creation, including film serials in the 1940s, a TV series in the 1960s – starring Van Williams as the titular hero and Bruce Lee as his sidekick Kato in what is perhaps the best known incarnation of the character – multiple comic book series from the 1940s onwards and, of course, now a big Hollywood movie. The Green Hornet’s 2011 incarnation, however, has been a very long time coming and the journey to its release has been an uphill one. The issue about who would play the film’s two main roles has been on the mind of many a Green Hornet fan for a very long time and the question as to who would actually direct the film has been a case of what goes around comes around ever since a film version of the character was first contemplated in the 1990s by Universal Pictures. With George Clooney and Jason Scott Lee originally being considered for the roles, the job of direction was going to go to then commercial director Michel Gondry but, alas, the project wasn’t meant to be. In the time since numerous actors have been considered to play the parts of the Green Hornet and Kato, those being considered for the former including Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Wahlberg and Vince Vaughn while those considered for the latter have included Jet Li and Stephen Chow. Additionally, the film has passed through the hands of several film directors and writers, with Kevin Smith coming on board after the rights were bought by Miramax but departing because he felt insecure making something with a much larger production budget than he was used to. Smith, however, did stay on as writer, writing two drafts, but with no further progress on the script – which has since manifested itself in the form of a comic book series – the rights lapsed and were purchased by Columbia Pictures. At this point the film began to gain some momentum with Seth Rogen, fresh off the success of his comedy Knocked Up, being hired to both play the lead role and co-write the script with frequent collaborator Evan Goldberg (who is also an executive producer alongside Rogen), although Hong Kong star Stephen Chow, who had been set to direct as well as co-starring as Kato, eventually left due to creative differences. It was at this point that original director Michel Gondry, now having made a name for himself with the brilliant Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and the charming indie film ‘Be Kind Rewind’, returned to the director’s chair, all those years after the original attempt at the project had failed to come to fruition. And when Chow also decided to not play Kato anymore, the role went to Taiwanese popstar Jay Chou, finally setting the film in motion after so many years in development hell. The casting of Jay Chou has proven rather popular with The Green Hornet’s fanbase since it was first announced and the same has been true of the casting of Christoph Waltz, fresh off his Academy Award win for his role in Inglourious Basterds – his presence bringing some real pedigree to the film – as the villain (a role which was Nicolas Cage was previously in negotiations to play – and also Cameron Diaz as the love interest type role but the involvement of Seth Rogen has received a considerably less favourable reaction, not aided by the fact that the star, who seemed like a red hot comedy property in 2007 after the huge success of Knocked Up, has seen his popularity crumble massively in the years since with comedies such as Observe and Report being unanimously rejected by paying moviegoers. The decision to approach the film as a comedy rather than taking a more serious stance also hasn’t proven popular with the fans and the reaction at a screening of the film at Comic Con – where the fans actually walked out – certainly suggests that this is not an adaptation of The Green Hornet really made with the fans in mind. Also not helping the film’s buzz is the decision to convert the film to 3D, a la Clash of the Titans, The Last Airbender, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader and Gulliver’s Travels. Following the poor 3D seen in all these films, much concern has been raised regarding the 3D here and understandably so. But, this is not just another cash in 3D conversion. For one thing, all of those films were converted either without the consent of or with the active opposition of the directors who actually made them while The Green Hornet was not only converted to 3D with the full support of director Michel Gondry with the active participation of him in the conversion process, the director actually being rather excited about the prospect of making the film 3D when the decision to convert it was first announced. What’s more, Gondry’s filmmaking style seemingly lends itself almost perfectly to 3D – there has been some speculation that he originally envisioned the film in 3D and, despite not being allowed to film it with 3D cameras, still shot the film with 3D in mind (whether this is true or not remains to be seen) – and, because the decision to convert was made pretty much straight after shooting had wrapped – and the film was pushed backed to allow more time for conversion – far more time has been available for the conversion job to be done. This, coupled with the extra effort put in to the conversion process and the fact that the reshoots were carried out – using 3D cameras if rumour are to be believed – and the visual effects were all done in 3D as well, certainly suggests a conversion job far superior to any seen yet and certainly one that is as much creatively motivated as it is done to make extra money out of moviegoers. So, does the film deliver on its promise of 3D that will make 3D conversions respectable and, more importantly, does the film overcome some of the bad omens and truly deliver something that is worth the long wait?

    The son of newspaper mogul James Reid (Tom Wilkinson), Britt Reid (Seth Rogen) drifts through life with little purpose, spending his nights partying and his days sleeping, caring about nothing but his own selfish desires. Everything changes, though, when his father is killed and he meets a personal employee of his father’s called Kato (Jay Chou), who lets him in on some of his father’s secrets. Kato’s job for Britt’s father was to fix up his cars and make coffee and an unusual friendship immediately sparks off between the two. Realising that the city in which he lives has fallen prey to crime and corruption and that his father wanted to make everyone realise the truth, Britt realises that he hasn’t done anything good in his entire life and decides to make a change, asking Kato to join him on his adventure. Thus, using a staggering cache of weaponry and just about the coolest car you’ve ever seen – all designed and built by Kato – they turns themselves into masked crime fighters, Britt under the alias The Green Hornet with Kato as his nameless not-so-sidekick. Utilising a different approach to crime fighting, they decide to pretend to be the bad guys in order to get close to the good guys, a plan which unfortunately brings them to the attention of Benjamin Chudnofsky (Christoph Waltz), a man who has just succeeded in uniting an entire city’s criminal gangs under his rule and who is not about to tolerate a masked hero getting in his way. Also taking the reins on his father’s media empire, much to the annoyance of editor and colleague of his father’s, Mike Axford (Edward James Olmos), Britt also hires a secretary in the form of Lenore Case (Cameron Diaz) who becomes the unwitting mastermind behind the duo’s missions when Britt asks her to do research on the Green Hornet to help him and Kato know what to do next. With Britt providing the money, Kato providing the muscle and gadgets and Lenore unknowingly telling them what to do, the three of them just barely make for a passable crime fighting team. Will it be enough to end Chudnofsky’s reign of terror though?

    Conceptually, there was always the possibility that The Green Hornet might come across to many as some sort of Batman rip off – after all, there are many parallels that could be drawn between the two and mainstream viewers, unfamiliar with the origins of the character, would perhaps be more likely to come to this impression. This film, however, is quite literally, the polar opposite of ‘The Dark Knight’ – and not in a good way sadly. The approach taken here is one of an action comedy rather than that of a serious adaptation, something that has annoyed the fans from the very beginning. There is nothing necessarily wrong with taking a lighter approach to a superhero movie – it worked with Fantastic Four after all – but at the very least a film needs to show respect for its source material and, more importantly, actually be good on its own terms, two things that this film largely fails to accomplish. There are a number of reasons why this is the case. For starters, the 3D doesn’t quite live up to some of the promise that has preceded the film’s release. For a conversion job, i.e. compared to last year’s four converted 3D movies, the 3D isn’t bad and, in fact, this is probably one of the better 2D to 3D conversion jobs yet…at least as far as ones that weren’t planned for conversion from the very beginning go. That said, however, this certainly doesn’t deliver anything even close to the best 3D you will see and, as a result of the fact that more attention has been paid to the conversion of action sequences than to other scenes, the 3D is rather uneven, applying some very noticeable visual enhancements to the action sequences – although it’s unfortunate that there aren’t more of them to gain from the 3D – but adding little to nothing to scenes that aren’t based around action or distinctive visuals…and there are a lot of such scenes. The 3D doesn’t work as well, for instance, in scenes that are based around conversations as it does in action sequences. It does, however, work pretty well with Gondry’s trippy visuals, being put to quite effective use in scenes featuring Kato Vision – the means by which Kato perceives the threats posed by adversaries – and also a split screen sequence featuring various levels of depth, something that provides a very innovative and different use of 3D. The film actually works best when it is showcasing director Michel Gondry’s distinctive visuals and these are something that for the most part do deliver, with Gondry delivering some very inventive and eye catching visual sequences with dazzling cinematography, sharp editing and beautifully choreographed, almost poetic, action. The trippy visuals and action sequences, both fights and car chases, are full of Gondry’s unique visual style and he also brings many really good touches to the film, from the aforementioned Kato Vision to the imaginative props and beyond. The Black Beauty, while rather overhyped in the marketing – it is just a car after all and no match for the Batmobile – is still super cool and beautifully realised in the film and Chudnofsky’s double barrelled handgun is a unique and different prop, somehow serving as an extension of the character. The way Gondry shoots everything is almost beautiful and, in particular, the way he captures the motions of a newspaper printing factory is almost enchanting. The 3D may be far from perfect and doesn’t really provide that much value for the extra cost of a 3D ticket but overall Gondry’s visuals are extremely well done, being the best thing about the film.

    Unfortunately, however, this is just one side of the coin and if the visuals are pure Michel Gondry then the comedy is pure Seth Rogen. With Rogen and frequent collaborating partner Evan Goldberg doing the screenplay, the writing on this film often seems close to Seth Rogen’s past movies than it does to Gondry’s and this is not a good thing. This is a film that lacks heavily in the writing department – it’s one of its biggest setbacks – the idea to approach the film as a buddy comedy of sorts with a bromance style dynamic at its heart failing to really work because the two leading actors are so mismatched and lacking in chemistry that it is hard to buy that any kind of friendship could ever emerge between the two of them while not enough is made of the rather different idea of a superhero pretending to be the villain. It seems like Rogen and Goldberg have tried to provide a fresh take on the superhero genre and while they may have partially achieved this, it doesn’t help to ignore the fact that plot is virtually non-existent, the story just meandering from one scene to the next and that, outside of an opening scene which shows a young Britt obsessed with superheroes to the disapproval of his father and a bit of exposition here and there, there is very little that could really be considered character development. Also, while there is some funny dialogue and some moments that do prove quite hilarious – Britt coming up with the name “The Green Bee” for instance – the humour often doesn’t hit the mark, the dialogue often failing to zing despite there being some humorous interplay between Britt and Kato and a recurring joke about the pronunciation of Chudnofsky’s name grows old pretty fast. The result of all this is a film that, even without a particularly long running time, feels a bit overlong.

    Some of the blame for this, however, can also go to the acting. In the leading role, Seth Rogen is just Seth Rogen. Sure he lost 30 pounds to play the role – something that at least means he is in more suitably physical shape for the part – but aside from this, and the fact that, with this film carrying a 12A rating compared to the usual 15 his films receives, he is freed from the usual crudeness that is present in his films, he doesn’t really seem any different from any of his other films. He is the wrong choice for the role, period, and his casting really lets the whole down, his lack of acting ability and even comic timing making for a character that is lacking in charisma and charm and who only works on any level at all because the character of Britt has been retooled as an egotistical doofus and not a very likable one either, i.e. what Seth Rogen plays in pretty every movie he is in. Effectively, Rogen ruins the movie. Despite not speaking much English, Jay Chou is the real star, displaying far more charisma and proving far more entertaining and, with his character getting most of the stuff to do – Kato is the real hero, being both the brains and the brawn, doing most of the fighting while Britt, who cannot fight for most of the duration (although he does get to kick some ass himself later), just tags along and does little, making Kato a not-so-sidekick – he steals the show from Rogen again and again. With little of note to do, the rest of the cast don’t fare very well. Aside from the fact that her character is presented as a non love interest who is actually repulsed by the titular hero – a bit of a change for superhero movies where the female lead is often there for romantic entanglements of some sort – Cameron Diaz has very little to do and this reflects in something of a non-performance, while Christoph Waltz tries his best but, saddled with an underwritten and poorly developed character, his performance ends up being just okay, far from the brilliance on display in Inglourious Basterds. He is slumming it here. This movie doesn’t deserve him. As for other cast members, Edward James Olmos is completely wasted in a role that offers him little to do although there is an excellent cameo appearance at the start of the film by James Franco as a criminal who makes the mistake of crossing Chudnofsky. Unfortunately, this one great cameo appearance is not enough to save what is a very underwhelming film. Rogen and Gondry’s styles just don’t go together and less emphasis on comedy and more on action might have yielded better results. Quality wise, this is a superhero film owes far more to 90s superhero movies like The Shadow and The Phantom (which themselves were based on classic pulp characters) than it does to some of brilliant superhero flicks seen in more recent years. So sadly, while not an entirely bad film – it does prove reasonably watchable and deliver moments that are very entertaining – The Green Hornet is a superhero movie that lacks sting.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • The Brave – Trailer

    Whilst I was watching A Serbian Film the other day I got to thinking about Johnny Depp’s directorial debut The Brave.


    Again, a very bleak story of a man who agrees to “star” in a snuff film in return for a large sum of money which will set his family up for life. It’s one hell of a premise and quietly upsetting throughout as Depp’s character spends his final days cherishing moments with his loved ones and taking revenge on those he feels has wronged him.
    Gut-wrenching in places, but sadly I never felt it added up to the sum of its parts. A grandiose cameo from Marlon Brando aside the acting is a tad wooden and there is so much more drama to be squeezed from the tale.

    If you’ve not yet seen it, it is worth a look and a classic example of a great premise/alright movie.

    Here’s the Japanese trailer for it!

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Review – A Serbian Film

    *** stars


    Milos is a former porn star. But not just any porn star. He is “the best there ever was”. Now retired and living a quiet life with his beautiful wife and precocious young son, he spends his days drinking Jack and admiring his old films. A pleasant, yet underwhelming existence is also soured by money issues until an old friend brings Milos a proposition. Come out of retirement for one last big score and the money worries will be over. So far so heist movie. Expect the women bringing Milos the proposition fits into a PVC dress better than Marlon Brando could have done in The Score.


    Enter the enigmatic producer/director of the piece Vukmir. An artist who greatly admires Milos’ talents and wants to utilize them to create an adult film of epic proportions. Agreeing to the job Milos descends into a nightmare world of mystery and depravity that makes Blue Velvet seem like An American Tale.

    Currently available for viewing at indiemoviesonline.com (a fantastic site for some harder to find films), A Serbian Film is a must see for enthusiasts of extreme cinema. Don’t get me wrong that is not a glowing endorsement of the film itself, but when it comes to extreme cinema most of the fun comes from watching the boundaries being pushed and the gall of the filmmakers to put some of this stuff on screen. In short A Serbian Film probably will make even the most seasoned viewer wince a few times.

    Having caused a storm in the festival circuit last year it hit the headlines in the UK after being cut by over 4 minutes. What may surprise some viewers is the craft with which the film is made director Srdjan Spasoievic is certainly not out to make a simple shock and splatter movie. Visually stark, filled with cold blues in contrast to the bright and seedy production of the porn movies shown within the film. Memories of 2008s Martyrs creep in now and then, mainly because of the mystery behind the purpose of the film itself.



    Slow burning for the first half the film, we are given clues to the dark nature of Milos, his cop-brother and the director. Come the half way mark things hit the fan as it were. I thought about listing the horrendous gore, violence and sexual degradation involved but part of the films allure is the shock from these scenes as they happen. Awaking from a drug induced stupor Milos slowly uncovers the horrors he has been involved with. As he learns them we learn them. The audience feel the same revolution as he does. Although the film does feature scenes of sickening sexual violence they are dealt with in a way that we too are meant to feel repulsed. Whether or not that gives good reason to feature these scenes is where the wider debate comes into it and thats a debate that is better served for another discussion. Indeed, most of the cut the BBFC made were to eliminate most of the sexual violence (which was the primary reason Grotesque was banned two years ago).

    Putting the violence to one side though; as Milos, Srdjan Todorovic wonders through the film world-weary and clueless to the mayhem. For many of the films darker elements he walks threw wide-eyed and unnerved, much like the audience. A main criticism would be to say that the relationship between Milos and his son never feels entirely convincing. As the director Sergej Trifunovic has the plum role. Always compelling when he is on camera, he brings a pantomime quality to the role which in some cases could be over-the-top but in a film as bleak as Serbian it comes as a welcome escape.


    Director Srdjan Spasojevic has done a great job of turning a film which could easily have become shock exploitation in to something shock art-house. Whilst Spasojevic does try to give us meaning behind the horrors on show it becomes lost in the overall product. As though a quick explanation is reason enough to excuse away all the messed up shenanigans. But like I said people who will ultimately want to watch A Serbian Film are perhaps not concerned with solid metaphor – it essentially has to do with Serbia being a decadent, violent society, eating and defiling itself from within. As a film experience it will leave you feeling unclean, unrelentingly bleak it is a film that deserves to be seen just to witness the gall of the production. It is also an experience that does not live quite as well in memory as it does having just finished it. Like a roller coaster you will feel your heart race as it finishes but once you calm down the memories are not as enthralling.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – The Next Three Days

    The Next Three Days ***½

    Paul Haggis is a screenwriter with a truly enviable list of credits behind him. An award-winner who, in 2006, became the first person to write two Best Film Oscar winners back-to-back – 2004’s Million Dollar Baby directed by Clint Eastwood and 2005’s Crash which Haggis directed himself and for which he also won the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay as well as receiving an additional four nominations, including one for Best Direction –

    his previous writing credits also include the screenplay for Clint Eastwood’s Flags of Our Fathers, the story for that film’s companion piece, Letters from Iwo Jima, 2007’s In the Valley of Elah (which Haggis both wrote and directed) and the two most recent James Bond movies, Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace. With such an impressive track record for excellent screenwriting and superb direction, you could easily expect his latest film, The Next Three Days to be another superb addition to his resume, with him once again taking on both writing and directing duties. The successes of his previous films, however, seem to be out of reach for his latest effort. A failure at the box office in the states where Russell Crowe seems to be box office poison, The Next Three Days has also failed to generate the kind of critical acclaim that Haggis has become used to with his previous works and looks set to be all but ignored in this year’s awards race. Is this because Haggis has lost that spark he once had, however, or is it simply that, based on his previous works, the level of expectation on this one is perhaps a tad too high?

    John Brennan (Russell Crowe) is a professor of English at a community college who leads an idyllic life with wife Lara (Elizabeth Banks), a career woman, and son Luke (Ty Simpkins). John’s entire life is turned upside down, however, when Lara is arrested for murder and sentenced to 20 years in prison. John is convinced of her innocence but with all the evidence stacked against her and everyone else certain that she is guilty of the crime it looks as though she will never get out. Struggling desperately to hold his family together and enlisting some help from Nicole (Olivia Wilde), the mother of one of Luke’s friends, he pursues every means available to prove she didn’t commit murder but to no avail. After three years, and with the rejection of their final appeal, Lara becomes desperate and attempts suicide. John decides there is only one course of action: he must break her out of prison. Enlisting the help of Damon Pennington (Liam Neeson), John embarks on a dangerous and elaborate plan to save his wife. But he wants it too much and as things begin to go wrong and strains are placed on his relationship with both his wife and son, it begins to look as though his plan might not pan out as expected. To make matters worse, in just a few days time Lara is scheduled to be moved to another prison, meaning that if John is to act it has to be now. Whatever happens, the next three days are going to be the most crucial of both John and Lara’s lives.

    Considering the pedigree of the talent behind the camera and Paul Haggis’ impressive track record in terms of both writing and direction, it is rather surprising that the one thing that seems to let The Next Three Days down is, if anything, its screenplay, the writing here being nowhere near as good as you might expect it to be based on the quality of Haggis’ past work. The problems emerge from the very beginning with an opening scene that is actually set somewhere in the middle of the story – not at the end as you might initially suspect – seemingly having no other purpose than to place the idea in our heads that John’s plan might fail, something which proves to be completely unnecessary given the handling of certain events that occur later in the story. After this rather pointless scene the words “The last 3 years” appear on the screen before the film goes on to very briefly show us the seemingly idyllic life of John and Lara before she is arrested. You might think that this part of the film would be used to really establish the characters before things really get going but, aside from establishing that John is a loving husband with a wicked sense of humour and that Lara is highly strung up and severely stressed following an unpleasant encounter with her boss – the woman who’s murder she has been accused of – we get very little insight into who the characters actually are at this point, something which proves to be a slight hindrance in terms of character development. Further development before the arrest takes place would have been very helpful but unfortunately the arrest takes place within a matter of minutes, quickly ending our view into the lives of the characters beforehand. What’s more, aside from a brief conversation detailing Lara’s encounter with her boss, we get little insight into why she might become accused of the murder, more information not being given until a (slightly clichéd) black and white flashback scene later in the film. The flaws in the script don’t end here either with all the establishing scenes feeling a bit rushed and slightly underdeveloped. After the arrest has happened, events jump ahead two years and we are just expected to accept that certain things have happened without any real insight into goings on of these two years. In particular, the fact that we only see John’s perspective – which initially amounts to a strained relationship with both his son and wife and a sense of desperation as he tries to prove his wife’s innocence – robs us of insights into exactly how Lara is coping with everything that is happening, the most we see of her time being on the inside being scenes where she is visited by John and one scene just taking place just after her suicide attempt. All these early scenes are let down by a simple lack of dramatic and emotional depth, something that really should be present here. “The last 3 months” – when John starts to plan breaking Lara out of prison, things become a whole lot more interesting, even if they are still heavily lacking. A meeting with an ex-convict who has escaped from prison seven times – played ably by Liam Neeson in a role that lasts a mere few minutes but is important enough to be considered more than just a cameo appearance – gives John all the information he needs about escaping prison and is well constructed, even if it does feel a bit like an exposition dump in some ways, while the use of YouTube in finding ways to plan the breakout seems a bit contrived and absurd but, given some of the crazy stuff on the site in real life, not entirely implausible – both things that perhaps seem a tad too convenient for the purposes of the story, a means to instruct a normal everyday man in how to escape prison without digging deeper. John’s planning of the breakout, meanwhile, while precise and all, tends to not be particularly elaborate or especially interesting for the most part and as things go wrong – in scenes that are very tense I might add – it is hardly surprising, rather inevitable. For much of the duration, the film seems to be a very muted thriller that is nowhere near as intense as it is trying to be but things kick into higher gear later on in the scenes depicting the actual breakout attempt itself – “The last 3 days”. At this point, something in the film really changes. Delivering some major tension, the execution of the breakout itself is extremely well handled and, as we see the plan come together, it actually seems quite genius, even if it is hard to believe that an English teacher working at a community college could possibly put it all together, even with three years worth of time, a meeting with an ex-convict and the full resource of YouTube at his disposal. The attempt to escape the authorities is also very intense, a climax that is a thrill a minute, an incredibly tense and thrilling 30 minutes or so and a great a pay-off to a disappointing build up. Any failings earlier in the film are virtually forgivable at this point, such is the level of heart wrenching, almost unbearable tension present in this prolonged sequence and you really will wonder if they actually are going to get away, Haggis doing a great job of keeping us guessing. And a final scene that goes back to the scene of the murder and reaffirms the guilt or innocence (I’m not saying which) of Lara is also decently handled, showing us how she became to be ‘guilty’ of the crime in the eyes of the law. Masterfully constructed, the execution of the escape is simple but actually quite clever. The built up to it, however, i.e. most of the film, is something of a letdown. Disjointed would be the best word to describe the overall plot of the film, the first two acts (or should I say days) being considerably lacking while the third is superb and goes a long way to make up for the earlier failings. On the acting front, meanwhile, the actors are good but are hindered somewhat by characters that aren’t especially well developed. We really don’t get enough development for the character of Lara in particular and Olivia Wilde’s role is relatively insignificant in terms of the big picture, her character merely seeming to be a plot convenience towards the end rather than a fully fledged part of the story. Russell Crowe, as ever, though delivers a very high standard performance and had no trouble carrying the film. So, The Next Three Days is a bit a bit generic considering the talent involved but very enjoyable nonetheless – certainly a great film to see any of the three days of the weekend. It definitely isn’t going to be winning any Oscars like Crash did but this isn’t something you’ll be likely to care about. The Next Three Days is not Crash but it is not a car crash of a film either.

    ———————————————————————————————————————————–

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.