Author: Alton Williams

  • Out Now On DVD – Circle Of Pain

    If you’re in the mood for a piece of trashy as hell action tomfoolery you could do at lot worse, or maybe you couldn’t who I am to say, than Circle Of Pain.


    Released this week, the outline reads like a throw-back to those powerhouse 80s fighting flicks like No Retreat, No Surrender and No Holds Barred. Circle Of Pain brings together a bevy of UFC stars in a story about one older warriors reluctant return to the ring so that an old rival won’t beat his record – I’m not entirely shore what record he holds.

    It promises doses of Rocky and Karate Kid drama mixed with all manner of martial art skills on show. UFC alumni Heath Herring, Kimbo Slice, Roger Huerta, Frank Mir and Miguel Torres bring their fighting prowess to the screen once more. 


    Breaking down the door with their considerable acting skills are Dean Cain – who will always be MY Superman – Bai Ling from Crank: High Voltage and The Crow and Louis Herthum, most recently seen in The Last Exorcism. 


    If you like your throwaway action fare with a bit of hammy acting and the occasional, random sex scene in this should be for you. So before you buy the eighth Steven Seagal that’s been released this month – why not give this a try. It’s called CIRCLE OF PAIN!!!

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – The Dilemma

    The Dilemma *

    While it could hardly be said that he is one of the greatest directors working in Hollywood today, Ron Howard has nonetheless developed a reputation for directing quality movies, only occasionally slipping up with a dud and then one that still has its fair share of redeeming qualities.

    Comedy actor Vince Vaughn’s reputation, meanwhile, is somewhat less impressive, films from the peak of his career such as Dodgeball and Wedding Crashers proving to be laugh riots but more recent efforts like The Break-Up and Couples Retreat not proving very successful in the laughs department. Kevin James, too, has a somewhat mixed track record, having starred in really good comedy films such as Hitch, okay ones such as Grown Ups and not very good ones like I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry. Despite each of these guys having some blotches on their resumes, however, their names still bring a certain level of credibility with them. Certainly, on paper, the combination of all three sounds like a recipe for success. So, by all means, The Dilemma, the first collaboration of these three and Howard’s first comedy film since he directed The Grinch, should be a really good film. But somewhere something went very wrong…

    Since college, confirmed bachelor Ronny Valentine (Vince Vaughn) and happily married Nick Brannen (Kevin James) have been through thick and thin. Now they’re trying to get their auto design firm off the ground with a big project under Susan Warner (Queen Latifah), a high up representative at a major car company. With Ronny’s girlfriend, Beth (Jennifer Connelly), and Nick’s wife, Geneva (Winona Ryder), by their sides, the pair is unbeatable. It’s all shaping up nicely until Ronny makes a discovery that threatens to ruin everything – he spies Nick’s wife with another man, a total doofus named Zip (Channing Tatum). With Nick already completely stressed out over their work project, Ronny finds himself faced with a terrible dilemma: tell Nick or keep it to himself. Either way, he risks losing everything – including his best friend. First he needs to know the truth. His amateur investigation begins to descend into comic chaos as he tries to do the right thing.

    Coming out of The Dilemma it really is hard to believe that what you’ve seen actually is a film directed by Ron Howard. All the normal signs of quality that you would expect to find in one of his films are completely absent and this film actually manages to establish itself as a new low for the director. The reason why this is the case is simple – the film just isn’t funny. As easy as it is blame Howard for this, however, the blame really belongs to screenwriter Allan Loeb whose screenplay is simply abysmal. Lacking any jokes that actually raise any laughs, the script is so completely devoid of humour as to make it that the film barely even qualifies as a comedy. Even the worst comedies usually manage to raise a few laughs but this film completely failed to make this critic laugh even once and to make matters worse there isn’t even much redemption to be found in other key areas. With an extremely flimsy premise to work with – there really isn’t a dilemma, Ronny should have told Nick – Loeb crafts a minimal plot that struggles to make an engaging or entertaining story out of the extremely limited concept, even with things getting quite complicated for the characters – something that is not reflected in Loeb’s writing – and, while there are clearly attempts to make us emphasise more with the characters by showing us that they all have their baggage – Geneva is a blatant cheat, Ronny comes off almost stalker-ish at times and even Nick isn’t as faithful in his marriage as he first appears to be, with only Beth coming off clean, her one negative trait being a secret that she keeps from Ronny – this really just makes the characters less likable and I personally found myself losing sympathy for all but Beth before the film had even reached the halfway point. Every now and then a moment of tenderness raises the game slightly but sadly these occasional moments are not enough to salvage the overall story. The dialogue also proves very poor and this, combined with the poorly constructed characters, means the cast members have nothing to work with. Vince Vaughn is just Vince Vaughn and here he doesn’t even have any decent material to work with and Kevin James really doesn’t fare much better. Jennifer Connelly and Winona Ryder perform somewhat better but still find themselves hindered by the weak material, although, at the very least, they do have pretty chemistry with the leading men. The real shock here is that the best thing about the film actually turns out to be Channing Tatum. Tatum, an “actor” who I have often criticised for his lack of acting ability in the past is the one thing in the film that even comes close to being funny. As the overly sensitive and extremely crazy Zip, Tatum finally seems to have found a role that he can play without looking like an emotionless zombie the whole time. This isn’t to say that he is great, of course, but he certainly does prove amusing and far more so than either Vaughn or James. So, The Dilemma is a bad film full stop. A comedy is supposed to be funny but this isn’t and this film has already established itself as a frontrunner for worst comedy of 2011. When deciding whether or not to see this film, you should have no dilemma – DON’T.

    ———————————————————————————————————————————–

    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Black Swan

    Black Swan ***

    2011 is a very big year for Natalie Portman. She’s co-starring in one of the year’s big superhero movies, Thor, starring alongside Ashton Kutcher in adult romantic comedy No Strings Attached and co-starring in the new comedy from the director of Pineapple Express, Your Highness.

    The one role that everyone is talking about right now, though, is her performance in Black Swan, a film which has already positioned itself as one of the frontrunners in this year’s awards race and has won Portman the award for best actress (drama) at this year’s Golden Globes. With a core concept that can undoubtedly be considered fresh and original – who would ever have thought that there would one day be a psychological thriller (or horror/or drama – it’s hard to say which) based in the world of ballet dancing? – Black Swan certainly is one of the more intriguing films that Portman is starring in this year. With a concept that director Darren Aronofsky conceived from two completely different unconnected ideas – he connected his viewings of an actual production of Swan Lake with an unrealized screenplay about understudies and the notion of being haunted by a double, similar to the folklore surrounding doppelgangers – the idea behind the film is one that is so bizarre that the film really has to be seen just to see what on earth it is actually about and with Aronofsky’s last film The Wrestler – which was highly overrated in this critic’s opinion – having also been a major awards contender, receiving two Oscar nominations (for best actor and best supporting actress) and best actor (drama) at the Golden Globes, Aronofsky’s involvement alone is something that is bringing a lot of attention to this film. What’s more, Aronofsky has said that he considers Black Swan to be a companion piece to The Wrestler, recalling one of the early projects that he developed about a love affair between a wrestler and a ballerina which he eventually separated into these two movies because he thought that the words of wrestling and ballet were “too much for one movie”, and with both films involving demanding performances for different kinds of art. With the incredible word of mouth surrounding Black Swan you would expect something truly sensational. Depending on your own personal taste in film, you may or may not get this.

    Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman) is a ballerina in a New York City ballet company whose life, like all those in her profession, is completely consumed with dance. She lives with her obsessive former ballerina mother Erica (Barbara Hershey) who exerts a suffocating control over her. When artistic director Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel) decides to replace prima ballerina Beth MacIntyre (Winona Ryder) for the opening production of their new season, Swan Lake, Nina is his first choice. But Nina has competition: a new dancer, Lily (Mila Kunis), who impresses Leroy as well. Swan Lake requires a dancer who can play both the White Swan with innocence and grace, and the Black Swan, who represents guile and sensuality. Nina fits the White Swan role perfectly but Lily is the personification of the Black Swan. As the two young dancers expand their rivalry into a twisted friendship, Nina begins to get more in touch with her dark side – a recklessness that threatens to destroy her

    Black Swan is a very difficult film to classify. Is it an insightful psychological drama exploring the tough world of ballet dancing, an intense psychological thriller about the darkness that can exist within even the most innocent of individuals, a twisted psychological horror with firm supernatural undertones or a combination of all three. It really is hard to say but, whatever the case, it is a film that frequently shocks, whether it be in the form of extremely suggestive dialogue and visual imagery, a rather graphic lesbian love scene involving Nina and Lily, numerous scenes depicting Nina experiencing an orgasm, a scene showing Nina tripping out, scenes that verge on body horror – with Nina pulling off her own fingernail and Beth stabbing herself in the face with a knife – or the film’s warts and all depiction of the brutal reality of the tough competitive art form that is ballet dancing – something that this film shares in common with ‘The Wrestler’, that film every bit as graphic and intense in its depiction of the wrestling art form as this one is in its depiction of ballet. If shock value equalled pure quality then this film might be great – and in the eyes of some the film may well be – but, just as with Aronofsky’s last film, I can’t help but feel that the whole thing is extremely overrated and that many of the same flaws that were present in that film are also present here. It’s not that the film is badly made as this certainly isn’t the case and the acting, in particular, deserves all the accolades it is getting. The acting really is sensational. Natalie Portman starts out sweet and fragile, at first embracing the virginal innocence of the White Swan and, as the film progresses, undergoing a transformation into a more sinister and seductive individual, embracing the darker nature of the Black Swan. Portman’s metamorphosis from virginal innocent to deranged seductress is convincing, shocking and terrifying and she proves completely believable as her character becomes more and more mentally unhinged, the look of terror on her face as paranoia sets in seeming completely authentic. Her performance is truly excellent and carries the film but the rest of the cast excel too. Mila Kunis’ performance is a bit more one sided, her role lacking an outright innocent side, but, in creating a character who genuinely seems like a credible threat to Nina, she does an excellent job, embodying a feel of pure passion in her performance and making her character’s rise seem completely effortless. Portraying Nina’s overly obsessive mother, Barbara Hershey has a calmly sinister vibe about her and often seems very creepy and occasionally borderline psychotic, something that it makes it very easy to see why Nina is so fragile and damaged. As the emotionally damaged and extremely fragile former star who is being forced to retire, Winona Ryder is also appropriately unhinged in her performance. And Vincent Cassel comes across as perfectly suave and charming but with a slightly darker, perhaps even perverse, side that he manages to capture well. In addition to the acting, the dancing is also superb. The dance sequences are choreographed to perfection and the fact that it actually is the actors doing the dancing in many scenes makes it all the more impressive – although scenes involving more complex dance moves were done with professional dancers.

    Something else that the film achieves successfully is creating a realistic look and feel. The shaky camera style lends the film a documentary-esque look and feel, something which gives the film a raw and real look, which heightens the sense of realism, and the film’s considerable insights into the tough life of a ballet dancer all prove to be very authentic, showing us close-up detail of the daily routines of the ballet dancer characters along with the injuries they sustain in the pursuit of their art. We hear the sound of toes and bones cracking – one scene, in particular, involving a physical therapy session is actually real as Natalie Portman had sustained an injury during filming and needed therapy to recover, the actual session she underwent being the one in the film – as well as seeing all the broken toenails and fingernails, cuts and scrapes, all things that may make you wince. The brutality shown really does seem authentic. Another thing the film is successful at is creating genuine chills. A chilling and unnerving sense of malevolence is established from the outset and there is a feeling that things are off kilter throughout, something that is never better visualised than in a shot showing a music box with a ballerina figure that has had its arms and legs broken off. Additionally, there are some very chilling effects using mirrors, a sequence involving a wall of sinister looking paintings coming to life creates some real menace and, all dolled up as the Black Swan, Natalie Portman really is quite a frightening vision. Every glimpse of Nina’s doppelganger in the background creates chills too and this element really adds an extra layer to the story. Like appearances of Nina’s doppelganger herself, the doppelganger element largely features in the background of the story, the primary focus being entirely on Nina and her increasingly fragile and damaged emotional state, of which the doppelganger element is of course a part. As much as I found myself enchanted by Natalie Portman’s incredible performance, however, the overall film just did not have the same impact. I can’t escape the feeling that the plot here is one that is very lacking and that Darren Aronofsky seems far more focused on trying to shock than actually delivering an all round great film. Perhaps I just don’t really get it and the whole thing is open to interpretation but for all the film’s strengths it just left me cold. Some will consider this high art but personally I don’t see what all the fuss is about. Like all art it certainly isn’t for everyone. Black Swan is a film that only a rather twisted mind could possibly have conceived and while it is certainly different, I found it to be an extremely deranged and twisted (in this critic’s opinion) non masterpiece that is highly overrated.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • DVD Review – The Hole

    * Spoiler ahoy!*

    Dane, 17, and Lucas, 10, are uprooted for the dozenth time by their mother as they try to keep out of reach of their abusive father. Moving into a small town where the diner still appears to be the hot spot of activity Dane and Lucas discover something much more interesting in their basement – a bottomless hole.

    Accompanied by neighbour Julie, who Dane develops a quick crush on the boys attempt to unlock the secrets contained within the hole. Once opened the hole begins to spew forth horrors directly relating to the fears of each of the group culminating in a battle which will force each of them to confront their greatest terrors.


    It is fantastic to see director Joe Dante do what he does best. The Hole brings you with the notion that you’re going to sit back and watch a pleasant, spooky kids drama. All the ingredients are there – broken family, sibling rivalry, falling for the girl next door. But what Dante has always been masterful at is subverting audience expectation in this most delightfully anarchic way. Like Gremlins, The’ Burbs and even the Eerie Indiana series before it The Hole presents us with a seemingly straight forward set up which becomes increasingly twisted and dark.

    I can honestly say that I was genuinely unnerved by several moments in the film. After the last few years of horror films going direct for the visceral gore and bloodshed it is refreshing to find a film that enjoys going for some good old fashioned chills. That damn clown which was plastered over the cinema posters and the DVD cover does manage to induce jumps even though you know it’s going to pop out – the clown also provides a couple of Gremlin-esque moments. Other moments where ghostly faced little girls creep out of The Hole provide chills that you wouldn’t expect and perhaps that’s why it is an effective horror. When released in theatres last year, in 3D the DVD is the 2D version, it was advertised as an all round family entertainment film. This film is rated 12 and it really is designed for 12 year olds and over (well maybe 10 year olds). The scares contained within are surprisingly intense. Even the notion that the family is on the run from an abusive father feels to dark to be made a plot point in a children’s film, especially as Dane reveals his greatest fear to be his Dad.

    In a film that deals directly with teenagers greatest fears it does seem appropriate to find the subtext somewhere. Dane stands up to his father thereby becoming his own man in the process. Julie must confront an event from her past that has never fully let her be the person she wants to be. The two of them confronting these fears allows them to step into maturity on their own terms with no fear of the future. And Lucas… well he has a punch up with a clown doll.

    Performances are surprisingly strong throughout. Teri Polo, as Susan the mother, makes a role which could have been dull into something sardonically entertaining. Susan is presented as the work-weary, but oh-so-loving mother, she makes mistakes and perhaps at times things mainly about herself. Chris Massoglia and Haley Bennet who play Dane and Julie are occasionally a bit lifeless. Massoglia particularly has such a laid back style of delivery it can sometimes be interpreted as wooden. Bennett on the other hand is much more overt but in moments of real emotional drama seems to shrink back inside herself. Nathan Gamble on the other hand who plays Lucas is the shock of the bunch. I’m usually a man who cannot stand kids as the lead actors in films but Gamble is thoroughly watchable throughout. He’s able to convey the moments of real terror and bring some light comedy touch when needed. Veteran Bruce Dern pops up as ‘Crazy Carl’ who used to live in the boys house – it’s the classic “you’re all gonna die!” role put Dern seems to have fun with his short screen time.

    Dante shows that despite having been largely absent in recent years, and his last couple of films being decidedly average that he still has creativity to spare. The Hole is a horror with old-fashioned scare sensibilities updated for todays audiences. Please bare in mind that this is not a kids film, this is a horror for lovers of Where the Wild Things Are and it is nice to find a genuinely creepy horror that’s rated 12!

    The Hole is out now on DVD and Blu-Ray through E1 Entertainment.

    The Hole – **** stars

    © BRWC 2010.

  • J. Van Auken Interview

    J. Van Auken Interview

    J. Van Auken has been making movies his entire life. He was trained as a cinematographer at Columbia College Chicago, and recently signed to direct his first feature, due out in 2012. Until then he is in the midst of making his short film, The Last Cosmonaut.

    The Last Cosmonaut is the story of the last secretly launched Soviet space pilot in 1958. His existence has never been acknowledged by the Russian government. Every record of his launch was destroyed. He was last detected by the Torre Bert observatory in February, 1961. It is believed he now stands as the first and only person to ever leave the solar system.

    J. Van Auken hopes to raise the remaining half of budget in order to pay for costume rentals, set construction, food, equipment, and transportation. He is using crowd funding on Kickstarter.

    I was lucky enough to chat to J. Van Auken, and below are the results.

    What prompted you to come up with the idea for the film?

    The Last Cosmonaut is part of a larger idea I’d written the screenplay for about a year ago. I had the idea when I read a series of articles about the soviet space program involving new information that had come forward since the collapse of the USSR. I find the whole era fascinating, and with so much information missing, it was a prime topic for dramatic license. I also love the idea of the first cosmonauts. They weren’t glamourized unless and until they succeeded, and they were doing something literally no one had ever done, and they were at no point expected to survive, yet did it anyway. It’s such a polar opposite of the way things were done in the U.S., it comes across as very macabre to me, which is a lot of what I enjoy in the material.

    What were you doing before deciding to make The Last Cosmonaut?

    Before TLC, I’d been working in development for a feature film I’ve signed on to direct, called Sanitarium. You’ll likely see more about it as the release approaches. I also went to college.

    How is it all put together?

    As a small side project, TLC is just the combined efforts of an amalgam of talented individuals I’m lucky to call my friends. The joke with every project I do is that it’s “just me and my buddies making a movie.” The caveat being that my friends all happen to be the best at what they do. You could say it came together after a short series of phone calls, each beginning with, “How’s your Friday look?”

    Why are you using Kickstarter? How’s that going for you?

    Kickstarter is an interesting new tool. For me, it’s not about the money, but rather making a project inherently more valuable. By that I mean that if a project is funded through, let’s say, 100 people over Kickstarter, then what you have isn’t just 100 people who like your movie. Rather you have 100 people with a vested interest in the success and popularity of your movie. You have a built in audience and fan base. Everyone likes feeling a part of something, and if it’s something they’re proud of, then they act as a de facto publicity department. They tell their friends, they share the link to their own IMDb page. Kickstarter is insurance against you sitting alone in the basement jacking off onto celluloid. You have a responsibility now, and a standard that potentially hundreds of people will hold you to. So far it’s been working very well for me. I have friends and strangers donating. I have people that want the film to get made, and have offered money to back that up. It’s great.

    What would you like viewers to take from The Last Cosmonaut?

    The Last Cosmonaut is a visual experience, absolutely. No spoken dialogue, no bullshit homages to directors every frat guy has posters of. It’s a short journey with a man we don’t get much time to know, told in a way we haven’t quite seen before. If you come away with something I’d like it to be an image that stuck in your head that makes you feel just that certain way. It’s more sensory than intellectual. You’ll feel.

    Have you received feedback, ideas, etc on the Kickstarter website?

    Most of the feedback I get is questions regarding the concept. The page has definitely opened a route to interacting with an audience, which is very strange for me to do before the film is even made. It’s good though. Very encouraging. If people are curious, it’s at least some indicator that the film is worth making.

    How hard it is to have an independent film made today?

    I only know from personal experience, but I can say that there are two kinds of independent film; the ‘fucking-around’ variety and the ‘not-fucking-around’ variety. Now, the FA kind of film is not particularly challenging. It carries it’s own set of problems, but it is free of the worries of real financing, distribution, marketing and all the other trappings of a NFA film. When you’re fucking around, you’re making a movie for yourself, usually from a first draft, and with an expected audience of you and your grandmother. They’re self-funded, usually aided by the aforementioned grandmother, and are devastatingly common, especially during one’s twenties. Every single short film ever not made by Pixar falls right in this category, TLC unfortunately among them.

    Now, if you’re not fucking around, which I seldom do, you’re talking about a film with a reasonable budget for the material, actual financing from people who don’t call you snookums, and a distribution agreement. These are as difficult as ever, regardless of what proponents of digital technology would have you believe. More distribution avenues have definitely opened up in the last decade thanks to emerging technology, and as a result created a larger pool for content. The reality, however, is that the same rules apply now as have always applied to getting a film funded and exhibited. You have to have stars to get the money, and you need money to get the stars. Your script has to not suck to get any stars, unless you have a metric fuckton of money. Even if your script is great, no one will give you money unless you’ve already done this, and even if you have, it’s still unlikely. There is a very delicate and complicated dance you have to do, sometimes for years, just to advance one little step. I like to use the example of James Mangold when he wanted to make 3:10 To Yuma. At the time, no one wanted to give him the money, which was a conservative $30 million. Mind you, this is after Walk The Line, and he already had Russel Crowe and Christian Bale attached. Why wouldn’t they do it? Because at the time, no one wanted to do westerns. The consensus was that they were poison and couldn’t make money. It’s the seemingly incomprehensible things like that that make film so difficult to do. There’s never any set way of getting it done, and even when you think you’ve got it locked, the rug can be pulled out from under you for no good reason whatsoever. It’s a confusing and dangerous business. Fortunately I’m in love with it.

    What are you hoping for when it’s out?

    My only hope for the film is that it lives up to the expectations of the people who helped get it made.

    Can you tell about any future projects?

    My future projects include Sanitarium, which I’ve mentioned. Maybe within the decade TLC will become the full feature, Ghost in the Machine. I have a very specific slate of films I want to do in the coming years, and I’m in a unique position to accomplish them. Needless to say, I’m very excited to be doing this.

    Any films you have seen that have left a lasting impression with you?

    It’s funny the films I remember and the impressions they leave. Some for good reasons, some for bad. I remember seeing the midnight show of Inception. I didn’t cry in the theater, but I did on the drive home, right about when I could start breathing again. I later became very frustrated, thinking I’d never make a film that good. I felt the same way when the Tree Of Life trailer first played in front of the Black Swan midnight show. Both just floored me with images set to music. Very simple, but completely effective.

    Anything you want to get off your chest right now?!

    I just came back from a week and a half of meetings in LA to my home in Minnesota. In a single day I experienced a temperature shift of nearly 100 degrees. I kind of feel like Robert Patrick in T2, like I could splinter into tiny frozen cubes. It’s a nice state though.

    Thanks Sir.