Author: Alton Williams

  • Justin Bieber: Never Say Never – REVIEW

    Justin Bieber: Never Say Never - REVIEW

    Justin Bieber has a movie out.  The lovely Natalie Hinman attended the European premiere in London yesterday evening. Here is what she thought…

    I cannot stress enough how skeptical I was about seeing Justin Bieber: Never Say Never. 
    As someone initially apathetic and, in truth, attempting to avoid the inexorable Bieber-bandwagon, I was expecting a sycophantic, precocious and somewhat nauseating account of the Canadian child’s rise to stardom. I will only tell you ‘One Time’ – see it for yourself before you judge.

    I am pleased to say that, while the film is of course a 1hr 45min engineered example of PR expertise; if you can free your mind of the overriding feeling you are being brainwashed into Belieberism, and take the docu-film with the pinch-of-salt that is, on many levels, intended, there is a lot of scope for enjoyment – especially if you have an ‘ironic’ predisposition for corny pop-music.
    Every element of the film and the Bieber story is so cleverly, almost cunningly, cut together – there is just enough irony and tongue-in-cheek humour to encourage a rapport with Bieber and thaw any frosty preconceptions that he may be spoilt, vacuous and impossible to like. He’s not.
    The film opens with vox-pops from the stereotypical young girl fans, hyperventilating with excitement and making excessive, albeit disturbingly believable, affirmations: “I think about Justin Bieber, like 99% of my life.” And this, almost self-satire, sets the tone that the film may just be capable of appealing to an audience outside of the Belieber-bubble.
    The movie traces Bieber’s rise to success, from his small-town beginning in Stratford, Ontario – growing up with single-mum, Patti Mallette, in a close-knit family with a particularly heart-warming bond between Justin and his grandfather. 
    His mum has an unassuming grace and strength that should not go unnoticed. While many parents would be lambasted for allowing their child into Bieber’s surreal lifestyle; the prodigious home-videos of Justin performing clarify that fame and success was not pushed onto him, but was simply destined.
    In one video, a barely post-toddler Justin is seen mimicking a visiting friend on the drums; beating a chair with near-implausible timing, rhythm and intuition. His singing is similarly raw – it becomes more difficult to resent his success after hearing his unedited, unmixed vocals that are so rare in this era of auto-tune, and see he has a charming and engaging swagger from the outset. 
    The ‘hook’ is that Justin is portrayed as the anti-hero – a grass-roots underdog, unprocessed by Disney or Nikelodeon and ergo a success in his own right. 
    The film depicts the struggle to retain a degree of normality on his whirlwind journey from busking and talent shows, to his YouTube fame – where he was discovered by now-manager Scott “Scooter” Braun – to becoming a global phenomenon. The specific climax of the film is the dramatic countdown to his performance at the prestigious Madison Square Gardens, as he battles against exhaustion and throat infection. 
    Many milestones in his journey to success, and specifically to The Garden, are interspersed with ‘live’ performances from his tour – glaringly fundamental for a film about a musical superstar! But this is where the 3D element really comes into play – it is probably unnecessary on the whole, but definitely an enthralling component for the younger ‘Beliebers’. 
    The use of 3D also works well as a representation of Justin’s new-media/social-network roots and reliance; with him being the original YouTube phenomenon and reigning so supremely over Twitter. 3D icons pop-up with cut-and-pasted fan ‘tweets’, YouTube virals and informal, cartoon-like text to ironically caption feelings in the video. The graphics are an extension of Justin’s 16-year-old self – fun, young and engaging; while the immersion and feeling of participation induced by a 3D Justin Bieber depicts the relationship he has (or indeed would like to be seen to have) with his ‘Beliebers’.
    All in all, a piece of PR strong enough to make skeptics into Beliebers – to paraphrase Drake; just one of Justin’s famous – and credible – pals. 
    It is an eye-opening depiction of a globally-known but not wholly-understood teen-sensation. If you can forget initial reservations and preconceptions, you can expect laughter, a lot of cringing, perhaps even a little tear. If you have been converted, you will leave the theatre with a warm feeling of happiness and positivity about life.
    At the very least, if you are determined to remain a cynic, the Justin Juggernaut is a fantastic education and insight into the power and potential of social media.

    Thanks Natalie!

    © BRWC 2010.

  • DVD Review: Amer

    Amer is… odd. Inspired by Italian ‘Giallo’ films from the 1970’s, it is a richly sensory and complex film; one that your average cinema goer may find more than a little challenging.


    Conceived by two directors – Héléne Cattet and Bruno Forzani, Amer takes place over three chapters, following a young girl called Ana as she moves from childhood to her teenage years and then on to adulthood.
    The film contains little narrative, instead guiding us slowly through the it’s loose story with image and sound. As a young girl Ana is apparently stalked by malevolent forces – including her parents scary, witch-like housekeeper, before walking in on her parents having sex. In her teens she becomes surly and pouting (didn’t we all?) and appears to be leered at by men from every angle. And as an adult, Ana returns to her parents now dilapidated house, but there still seem to be dark forces at work.


    It would be very easy to consider Amer to be a pretentious mess. It feels very art-house, though some of this may be down to it’s two directors aping the style of the slew of 70’s European slasher and exploitation flicks that proceed it. It arguably does a more convincing job of this than the recent combined efforts of Rodriguez/Tarantino with Grindhouse. Taking visual cues from the likes of Dario Argento, the film looks sumptuous. More impressive though is the sound design – even the most inconsequential sounds are magnified to an almost uncomfortable level. The cracking of a leather jacket or the brushing of skin are layered on the pulpy 70’s electronic soundtrack, creating a sensory experience.


    While the film looks and sounds impressive, it’s not without fault. The middle chapter, which sees teenage Ana and her mother essentially taking a trick to her local shop, is long and drawn out. While the scenery is beautiful, it starts to feel self indulgent very quickly. The third section delves into the most familiar Giallo territory, with a masked assailant threatening an adult Ana.


    Mostly, Amer feels like a film that will divide audiences. Some will see it as a searingly sensual piece of art, and others will think it’s a mess of pretentious art-house imagery. Despite that, even those who think the latter will likely find it a hard film to forget. There just seems to be something about it…

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Quote of the Week : GO (1999)

    “Wow, i didn’t know we’d become such good friends, because if we had, you’d know that i give head before i give favors and i dont even give my best friends head, so your chances of getting a favor are pretty fucking slim.”

    Suave drug dealer Todd Gaines (Timothy Olyphant) tells customer Ronna Martin (a gritty Sarah Polley) exactly what he thinks of her request, in Doug Liman’s fast paced and highly entertaining film – told from several points of view from a bunch of hedonistic L.A. youngsters.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • BAFTA 2011

    The BAFTA’s took place last night in wonderful rain-soaked Covent Garden, London. Somewhere between all the fashion magazines scrambling over themselves to ask Emma Watson who did her hair and the presenters fluffing their auto-cue, some awards were given out.
    Few surprises in terms of who won what. The King’s Speech proved that even after more than a hundred years of cinema being a populist medium that you can’t beat a good story of personal achievement told with great acting. It would have been nice to see Inception recognized a bit more, winning the expected technical awards. Writing guru picked up his richly deserved writing award (if only for the West Wing he should be continuously showered with awards). Good to see Roger Deakins awarded for his stunningly beautiful, as always, photography.

    The only major surprise I found of the evening was Tom Hardy picking up the Rising Star award. I was pretty certain that would go to either Gemma Arterton or Andrew Garfield but richly deserved. Mr. Hardy has shown over the last couple of years that he is going to be a force to reckon with for sometime.

    The highlight of the evening was Sir Christopher Lee appearing to accept his fellowship. I was taken aback by how frail he appeared as he took the stage, granted he’s 88 but he always looks so commanding on screen. Giving a touching speech (Kevin Spacey seemed to well up) he took in the applause like a man who knew he didn’t have many more opportunities to do so. A charming finisher to a lackluster award ceremony.


    Winners

    Best Film
    The King’s Speech

    Outstanding British Film
    The King’s Speech

    Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director or Producer
    Four Lions – Chris Morris (Director/Writer)

    Director
    The Social Network – David Fincher

    Original Screenplay
    The King’s Speech – David Seidler

    Adapted Screenplay
    The Social Network – Aaron Sorkin

    Film Not in the English Language
    The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo – Soren Staermose, Niels Arden Opley

    Animated Film
    Toy Story 3 – Lee Unkrich

    Leading Actor
    Colin Firth – The King’s Speech

    Leading Actress
    Natalie Portman – Black Swan

    Supporting Actor
    Geoffrey Rush – The King’s Speech

    Supporting Actress
    Helena Bonham Carter – The King’s Speech

    Original Music
    The King’s Speech – Alexandre Desplat

    Cinematography
    True Grit – Roger Deakins

    Editing
    The Social Network – Angus Wall, Kirk Baxter

    Production Design
    Inception – Guy Hendrix Dyas, Larry Dias, Doug Mowat

    Costume Design
    Alice in Wonderland – Colleen Atwood

    Sound
    Inception – Richard King, Lora Hirschberg, Gary A Rizzo, Ed Novick

    Special Visual Effects
    Inception – Chris Corbould, Paul Franklin, Andrew Lockley, Peter Bebb

    Make Up & Hair
    Alice in Wonderland – Valli O’ Reilly, Paul Gooch

    Short Animation
    The Eagleman Stag – Michael Please

    Short Film
    Until the River Runs Red – Paul Wright, Poss Kondeatis

    The Orange Wednesday’s Rising Star Award
    Tom Hardy

    BAFTA Fellowship
    Sir Christopher Lee

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Just Go With It

    Just Go With It *

    Another year, another Adam Sandler comedy, and yet again it’s directed by Dennis Dugan. From this statement you should have a pretty good idea of what to expect from Just Go With It, the latest in a string of Adam Sandler disappointments starting with 2007’s I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry and including films from the three subsequent years including You Don’t Mess with the Zohan, Funny People and Grown Ups, all of which (apart from Funny People, a Judd Apatow film which suffered from an odd blending of genres and the co-starring of Seth Rogen) saw Dugan directing and failed to even come close to being decent, with the possible exception of Grown Ups which managed to be okay.

    What’s more, one of the screenwriters of Just Go With It – which has probably one of the most unusual and complicated inspirations for an Adam Sandler comedy, being based on the 1969 film Cactus Flower starring Walter Matthau, Ingrid Bergman and Goldie Hawn, which itself was adapted from a Broadway stage play written by Abe Burrows, which in turn was based upon the French play Fleur de cactus – is Allan Loeb, the man who just last month brought us the screenplay for the dreadful Vince Vaughn/Kevin James comedy The Dilemma. Throw into the mix Jennifer Aniston – in her first collaboration with Sandler despite having known him for 20 years, the two having met before either of them became famous – whose performances in pretty much everything she has done lately have been rather bland and you have a film whose credentials have never been very encouraging. But, even by those standards, this film is a huge letdown.

    Danny Maccabee (Adam Sandler) is a man, who after breaking up with his fiancé on their wedding day, discovers that pretending to be unhappily married is an almost surefire way to pick up women. Ever since, his life has been a non-stop string of one night stands and his work as a plastic surgeon has put him on the map and made him into a rather wealthy man with a somewhat selfish outlook on life. Everything changes, however, when he meets the beautiful – and much younger – Palmer (Brooklyn Decker), a schoolteacher with whom he feels a deeper connection and believes that there could be a future with. There’s just one problem – she finds his fake wedding ring and calls everything off. Desperate, Danny seeks the advice of his assistant, Katherine (Jennifer Aniston), a plain and divorced single mother with two kids, who suggests that the best way out of his predicament is to tell Palmer that she is getting a divorce, which he does, only for her to insist on hearing it from his ex. Now comes the big favour as Danny begs Katherine to pose as his estranged wife. Everything is going well, until Katherine accidentally mentions her kids. As one lie evolves into another, Danny gets Katherine’s kids, Maggie (Bailee Madison) and Michael (Griffin Gluck), involved in his deception and things take a whole new turn when Michael blackmails Danny into taking them all on a trip to Hawaii. With Danny’s cousin Eddie (Nick Swardson) joining in the act by pretending to be Katherine’s husband, the trip to Hawaii seems to be going well until Katherine encounters Devlin Adams (Nicole Kidman), her old high school nemesis. As their old rivalry erupts once again, just one word from her could unravel the whole plan but, as a connection also starts to form between Danny and Katherine, in the process creating a strange love triangle, perhaps the right woman for Danny has really been in front of him all along.

    Coming out of Just Go With It it is very clear that this film was made with one particular audience demographic in mind – men. Adam Sandler comedies have never really been the cleanest or most tasteful that you will see but even for him this film plunders new depths in its objectification of women, coming very close actually being demeaning to members of the opposite sex (and also sheep…don’t ask). As the primary object of affection, Brooklyn Decker seems to be present as eye candy and little more, spending most of the film with her cleavage on show, lots of shots focusing on her ‘assets’ so to speak, and wearing a variety of revealing outfits, including no less than two skimpy bikinis while Jennifer Aniston also dons a skimpy bikini in one scene and in another both Aniston and Nicole Kidman wear revealing hula girl outfits in an extremely suggestive scene. Even a lot of humour is extremely sexualised – certainly so much as to make the 12A rating awarded to this very questionable. The reason for all this – other than to appeal to horny teenagers, there is no clear one, especially as the effort that seems to have been put into making the female cast members look hot is not evident anywhere else in the film. With a lame and rather absurd premise that offers little that hasn’t been seen before and a storyline so weak that anyone with half a brain will figure out who Danny is going to end up with from the very beginning, the writing here is every bit as bad as that in ‘The Dilemma’, the dialogue being weak and unfunny and the characters being poorly developed caricatures who it is really hard to actually care about. By the time the film reaches its rushed and poorly developed – everything is explained away through some voiceover narration – conclusion, you will already have long seen the outcome coming. Some of this might perhaps be forgivable if the film at least proved to be really funny but unfortunately the predictable and obvious comic situations and mishaps, many of which seem to be recycled/stolen (delete as appropriate) from other, although not necessarily better, comedies, fail to raise more than few slight giggles. The humour is exactly what you would probably expect from a Sandler comedy, dumb and the exact opposite of smart but with a lot of humour bordering on gross out, the numerous plastic surgery related gags in particular, and dialogue that may be suggestive but rarely proves very funny, the combination of not so comic mishaps and lots of physical comedy really proves cringe worthy rather than laugh out loud funny. Of course, there is a funny gag every now and then but while some gags do hit the mark but the overall hit rate is very low. Of course, this is all just my opinion- everyone else in the screening I was in seemed to be laughing their asses off. There is little in the way of character development here, the closest we get being an opening scene set in 1988 showing us a younger Danny on his wedding day – sporting what is probably the biggest nose ever seen by man – overhearing his bride talking of cheating on him. Once how he comes to be the way he is gets established, events shift forward to the present day where the Adam Sandler of the opening scene makes way for the Adam Sandler we all know, complete with regular size nose. Here, Adam Sandler is just Adam Sandler, only with no decent material to work with. And with no real chemistry and no real development of their relationship, there is no reason to believe in Danny’s romance with Palmer – although this may be the point – and it certainly doesn’t help that Brooklyn Decker seems to have no character other than simply hot girl, the actress clearly having been cast for her looks rather than acting ability and all that is really required of her being to be tall, blonde, tanned and well proportioned in the breast department. There is considerably more chemistry between Adam Sandler and Jennifer Aniston, who actually share a few quite convincing tender moments, but even she can’t overcome the poor characterisation or the limitations of her own acting ability. Looking rather plain…for a while, at least, she is less bland than usual, faring better while her character is in plain, unglamorous mode but falling back into old patterns following her character’s makeover which transforms her right back into the Jennifer Aniston we are familiar with. The kids here, meanwhile, are merely passable, leaning on the side of irritation and Nick Swarsdon’s fake German accent is one that may really grate on you. Out of the entire cast, the only person who actually comes across in any well is Nicole Kidman who, in a very unusual appearance, is probably the best thing in the film, being suitably stuck up and actually proving rather amusing even when other characters are less so. Unfortunately, just like an amusing performance by Channing Tatum could not save The Dilemma, Kidman’s performance is not enough to overcome the many many flaws that are present in this film. Some people will undoubtedly find this film funny but really this is a comedy that is lame and unfunny for the most part. Adam Sandler and Dennis Dugan have hit a new low in what isn’t just another bad Adam Sandler comedy – it is, in fact, his worst film in a long while – but yet another bad Hollywood comedy. Just Go With It? Don’t go with it.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.