Author: Alton Williams

  • Wild Wild West Sussex?

    Writer-Producer Nicholas Sercombe has signed Richard E Grant to direct his off-the-wall spoof western, In With The Outlaws.


    The US$10 million dollar production will be shot entirely on location in West Sussex, in the South of England, with an anticipated Q2 start of principal photography.


    Grant has gathered his posse of actors, all of them household names, but he is being candid about their identity. “Although In With The Outlaws is a comedy, this is a bona fide Western and the action must be played by talented actors with gravitas,” says Grant. “We have lined up two of the finest performers to play the hero, Jack Macbeth and the gun slinging, rootin’ tootin’ ladette, Pandora Dallas. Both are major big screen stars. We have a magnificent principal support, a roll-call of contemporary talent suitable for a Hollywood movie. We also have an iconic rock star to play the villain, Achilles Adams.”


    Grant is in discussion with twice Oscar-nominee Patrick Doyle (Harry Potter, Nanny McPhee and Calendar Girls to do the score and with Mumford & Sons (Little Lion Man) to collaborate on the music.


    Sercombe will finance the film partially through private equity sources from the UK, USA and Canada and is currently in negotiation to find a UK distribution partner as well as an international sales agent.


    Grant said, “Nick has written and developed one of the craziest high concept scripts that I have ever read – in fact, anybody has read – and I have had a huge amount of fun corralling many of my actor colleagues into being willing to join a quite extraordinary ensemble cast”.


    Sercombe, in making the announcement, commented, “I think that it is fair to say that any resemblance between our film and the much nominated True Grit is truly hard to imagine, but In With The Outlaws is a comedy film with real substance and action. I’d like to think that we will be contending for the BIFFAS, Comedy Awards and BAFTA this time next year”.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Review: Drive Angry 3D


    Well, well, well, well, well.  I was not expecting this!  The trailer was enough to get my interest, ladies, fire, guns and muscle cars. There was some discussion after as to whether the film makers and cast had taken it at all seriously, I hope they didn’t.

    The film is all sorts of crazy, man escapes hell to avenge daughters death and save granddaughter from satanists, whilst driving cars, fast, and shooting guns, loud. Cage is by far the only man that would sign up for this and give it his maniacal best.

    Amber Heard is a truly stunning woman and can swear and fight with the best of them. William Fichtner is so close to being Christopher Walken in his role as ‘The Accountant” that he almost steals the film. If this film was made by the guys behind Crank then we’d have a sure fire hit, all be it a frowned upon one.

    However it wasn’t, and as much as i liked it and laughed at the absurdity of it all, sex-scene-slo-mo-gun-fights and dodge chargers being slung sideways every 3.7seconds, I felt that we were laughing at the film not with it.

    Films like this have to have heart or at least a nod to say “yeah this is nonsense, but it’s our nonsense”, Piranha 3D and Crank 1 & 2 are these films. Drive Angry isn’t. In short it tried too hard to be mental, and did a good job but not a great job.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – No Strings Attached

    No Strings Attached *

    With the 2011 awards season in full swing and numerous actors and actresses in line to see their careers gain a major shot in the arm as a result of their nominations and/or wins at the big awards, there is one star who seems to have gained more than most – Natalie Portman. The combined commercial, critical and awards success for Black Swan has seen Natalie Portman suddenly transformed into one of the hottest properties in Hollywood and her follow-up film to Black Swan has proven to be a major beneficiary of her increased popularity. Released in the states in January, No Strings Attached – for which Portman also gets an executive producer credit – had been virtually written off as a flop before it had even been released by its studio and it isn’t exactly hard to see why.

    After all, co-star Ashton Kutcher’s last romantic comedy, summer 2010’s Killers co-starring Katherine Heigl, was a bit of a stinker at the box office and lately romantic comedies, especially adult ones carrying the American R rating such as last year’s Love & Other Drugs which starred Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway, have been performing extremely unremarkably at the box office. Yet No Strings Attached, bolstered by Natalie Portman’s newfound status at the top of Hollywood, became a surprise hit there, turning its small $25 million production budget and earning nearly $70 million to date, not bad for a film that was expected to flop badly and also a film that received a somewhat lukewarm reception from critics – although moviegoers have been far more receptive. Box office success aside, the quality of the film is something much more dubious. As evidenced by the film’s popularity in the states, moviegoers clearly are enjoying it but such blending of the romantic comedy and sex comedy – to give an idea of what the film is actually about the original title was F*** Buddies which was changed for obvious reasons while it second title, Friends With Benefits also has to be done away with because another film is being released with the same title later this year, starring Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake – sub-genres as is attempted here, and was also attempted in Love & Other Drugs, doesn’t always work and the credentials behind the film are very uneven. For instance, Natalie Portman may be riding the wave of her awards attention right now but Ashton Kutcher, while often proving quite adept in romantic comedy roles, rarely does anything more than what we have seen from him many times before. Also, screenwriter Elizabeth Meriweather is the latest in a long line of writers with no actual film experience to do the screenplay for a romcom and director Ivan Reitman, while once being the great filmmaker behind the Ghostbusters films, has more recently been associated with 2006’s mediocre My Super Ex-Girlfriend. As you would probably expect No Strings Attached is a film that clearly aims to deliver no strings attached – apart from the cost of the cinema ticket of course – entertainment but does it achieve this?

    Emma (Natalie Portman) and Adam (Ashton Kutcher) have been friends a long time. Emma is a busy doctor with no time for romance and a major fear of commitment and Adam is, well, just Adam, a man with big dreams and an even bigger heart but whose life isn’t necessarily headed in a forward direction. Despite one near romantic encounter at camp fifteen years ago, it seems like friends is all they will ever be. Or is it? After discovering that his father Alvin (Kevin Kline) is sleeping with his ex-girlfriend Vanessa (Ophelia Lovibond), Adam goes in search of a woman to have a one night stand with and a series of events leads to him and Emma sleeping together, their sexual encounter forever altering the dynamic of their friendship. Instead of giving on their friendship, however, they decide that they are going to become “sex friends” and continue sleeping together without any emotional attachment. Adam’s friends Eli (Jake Johnson) and Wallace (Chris ‘Ludacris’ Bridges) tell him that he has got what every man dreams of having and for a while Adam believes it too. As time progresses, however, and as he witnesses Eli form a romance with Emma’s friend Patrice (Greta Gerwig), Adam finds himself wanting more and developing deep romantic feelings for Emma but, even with the impending wedding of her sister Katie (Olivia Thirlby) stirring up feelings within her, she doesn’t seem to reciprocate the feelings. Or does she? Pushing Adam away like every other man she has ever been involved with, it seems like Adam might just move on and form a relationship with work colleague Lucy (Lake Bell). Does Emma really just want sex or does she share the same feelings for Adam that he has for her? Whatever the case, time is running out for her to reach out for what she really wants.

    It really is hard to believe that No Strings Attached is directed by the same man who brought us Ghostbusters. That film was a classic that is well loved even now 27 years on. This film, on the other hand, is just another bad romantic comedy that probably won’t even be remembered 27 minutes after seeing it. Ivan Reitman – who gives himself a self indulgent cameo as a TV director here – really has lost it. All the ingredients for a great romantic comedy are certainly present here and it is even clear that some attempt has been made to do something a bit different but, alas, this film just ends up falling into the same traps as so many other recent Hollywood romantic comedies. Reitman’s direction lacks sparkle, the film largely lacking in things like charm and warmth, the ingredients that make up a truly memorable romantic comedy and he certainly isn’t helped by the writing. The screenwriter with no film experience delivers a screenplay that is entirely indicative of her lack of experience, the plot dealing with some themes that differ from the norm for a romcom but ultimately veering back onto a very predictable path, the dialogue mostly being flat and unmemorable, the characters generally being hard to really care about – so much so that scenes taking place between Adam and his father, which seem to be included in an attempt to add some emotional depth, prove to be just a rather dull distraction – and, most importantly given that this is supposed to be a comedy, there being very few laughs to be had anywhere, the humour – or what passes for it – generally being very crude (although only suggestively) as you would expect from a film where sex plays such a major role but generally not being very funny. With the sexual nature of the film also comes lots of sex scenes and lots of nudity – this definitely isn’t a film to see with your parents – on the part of both Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher and these generally seem to take the place of actual romance and genuine development of the central characters, us not seeing much outside of their bedroom antics to suggest why they really belong together and the film generally not feeling very romantic. The central romance, as a result, isn’t especially convincing and you know things are really not right when you find yourself more interested in a secondary romance between two supporting players – Eli and Patrice – that barely gets any screen time than in the central romance that is supposed to be the focus of the film. There is a general feel of unevenness to the whole thing and, despite the running time not being especially long, the film does start to drag after a while, not helped by the fact that the comedic and more serious elements never really manage to come together as one. To make matters worse, weak material makes for so-so acting. Natalie Portman is hardly in Oscar worthy form but, particularly given the weak material she has to work with here, fares very well and proves very entertaining in her role. Ashton Kutcher, meanwhile, just acts like himself as in pretty much every other romantic comedy he is in and fails to stand out in any notable way. As for the way the interact on screen, while it isn’t hard to buy them as “friends with benefits”, there really isn’t a whole lot of chemistry between Portman and Kutcher to make a more meaningful relationship truly believable – I personally thought there was more chemistry between Jake Johnson and Greta Gerwig. As for the rest of the cast, most of the supporting players are wasted but there are a few noteworthy performances. Kevin Kline is reasonably amusing but ultimately wasted as Adam’s laid back and philandering father, an oddly placed Ophelia Lovibond is well cast as Adam’s immature ex-girlfriend and Lake Bell proves quite entertaining also. Also of note are Stefanie Scott and Dylan Hayes, the young actors cast to play the younger versions of Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher, who are well cast and Scott, in particular, looks uncannily like the older version of her character. Unfortunately, though, no one in the cast really stands out and, while the film does have its moments – a scene that sees Emma and Adam go on their first actual date, for instance, proves quite sweet – it is hard to overlook the many flaws. Apart from lashings of sex scenes and frequent instances of nudity, there really is little to distinguish this film from the countless other bad romantic comedies that have been released in the past year. All the potential for a great romantic comedy is evident but the film lacks the charm that would it make it so and if you do go to see No Strings Attached you will find that there most definitely are strings attached – in addition to the cost of the cinema ticket, the 1 hour 45 minutes of your life that you will lose watching it.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Flatley My Dear I Don’t Riverdance

    Yes!  It’s what we’ve all been waiting for!


    Tickets are on sale for the ground-breaking new movie project from the original Lord of the Dance, Michael Flatley. The hotly anticipated LORD OF THE DANCE 3D uses pioneering 3D technology to give cinema audiences the opportunity to experience the show as never before.

    Filmed over five nights, in two different cities, and using twenty alternating 3D camera angles, audiences are offered a truly unique viewing experience.
      
    Truly a global phenomenon, Lord of the Dance has been seen by more than sixty million people in sixty different countries, on every continent.  Michael Flatley sold out twenty-one consecutive nights at Wembley Arena, as well as thirteen consecutive nights in New York’s Radio City Music Hall. He went on to appear at the legendary Madison Square Garden, and tickets sold out within days of going on sale in Australia. 

    Remarkably, he then went onto break all known box office records in South Africa.  The show completed an incredible six-year residency in Las Vegas and performed before an audience of more than one hundred thousand in a football stadium in Budapest, Hungary.  Now, for the first time ever, fans and audiences around the world can enjoy watching the charismatic Michael Flatley dominate the stage, while experiencing the movie event of the year.

    Here is the trailer…

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Film Review with Robert Mann – Smoke

    Smoke ***½


    The product of Polish filmmaker Grzegorz Cisiecki, Smoke – or to quote its original Polish title, Dym – is the latest short film I have been sent for review and it also probably one of the strangest. The synopsis for this film reads “the story of the person who becomes the captive of surrealistic madness” and surreal this film certainly is.

    With no dialogue whatsoever – the language barrier poses no problems for anyone here – the task of telling the story – written by Cisiecki himself – is placed entirely on the visuals. What exactly that story is though is unclear and is most definitely open to interpretation. You may have a hard time figuring out what is actually going on but this is rather in keeping with the film’s surreal tone and, at only 7 minutes 13 seconds long, it is easy to overlook any shortcomings the film may have in terms of plot and just take in the visuals, which mostly prove quite excellent. 


    While a few shots do slightly fall victim to the limitations of the camera equipment utilised by the filmmakers in the making of the film, the overall look of the film perfectly puts across the surrealness that they are going for, the photography by Dawid Rymar and the editing by Cisiecki and Cecylja Pacura being excellent, the lighting being perfect and the visuals generally being out of kilter enough to create an unsettling feel without what is happening necessarily being too far out there to seem completely implausible. 


    The blending of seemingly normal shots with twisted imagery – some shots here truly are weird, in a good way that is – and wider shots with extreme close-ups works perfectly to create a sense of unease and shows terrific proficiency on the part of both the cinematographer and the editors. The atmosphere created by these visuals is superb and the feel is enhanced no end by the evocative use of sound and a breathtaking original music score by Aleksandr Porach and Rashid Brocca, both of which prove equally haunting and chilling. 


    With no lines of dialogue to speak you might expect that the acting wouldn’t be that great but the actors – Marta Szumiel, Grzegorz Golaszewski, Oriana Soika, Bartlomej Nowosielski, Katarzyna Dalek, Hubert Jarczak, Malgorzata Kocik, Mark Malak and Krzysztof Wach – simply put across everything through facial expressions rather than words, the protagonist, portrayed by Golaszewski, looking appropriately lost and unsettled in his surreal experiences and putting across a convincing sense of emotional fragility while other characters portray silent but not obvious menace and put across a generally weird and unsettling vibe quite ably. 


    With surrealness being visible in every single aspect of the film, this really is a film that should make quite an impression on anyone looking for a film that doesn’t conform to the norm and seeks to do something truly different. Breathtakingly surreal and visually stunning, Smoke is a very atmospheric and intriguing film that will keep you thinking after its short running time has come to an end, and that is always a good thing.

    Smoke can be viewed in full on YouTube.

    It can also be viewed on Vimeo.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Review by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.