Author: Alton Williams

  • 5 Awesome Comic Book Adaptations

    5 Awesome Comic Book Adaptations

    By Si Lewis.

    The jury seems to be out on the up and coming Watchmen adaptation from visionary director Zack Snyder. While fans of the novel are adamant no mere mortal is capable of successfully translating the revered work of Alan Moore to the silver screen, followers of Mr Snyder (myself included) are confident the 300 helmer can bring his visual prowess to the alternate 1985 Alan Moore so expertly crafted and produce a film capable of emulating Christopher Nolan’s undoubted success off the back of Batman’s last outing. So will Snyder pull this seemingly impossible task off? Or will his attempt to adapt the most adored graphic novel ever fall into an abyss of over expectation and bear bating fan boys? In the lead up to Friday’s eagerly anticipated release, I am going to reflect on past attempts to adapt much loved comical heroes and determine whether they “Biffed”, “Boffed” and “Thwacked” their way to saving Gotham City or let Metropolis die in a Krypton based explosion of God awful cash ins on the comic book genre.

    Having shared five of the worst, it is now the turn of the heroes to step up. The films and their film makers that have embraced the source material, translating breathtaking imagery, complex story arcs and unforgettable characters from page to screen with aplomb. These films not only illustrate the importance of staying true to the original tome itself but having the ability to make it accessible to the general film going public. Where many before have failed to turn truly great works of art (yes they are art) into great movies, these five achieved what Snyder should hope to emulate on his release of Watchmen.

     

    5. Road To Perdition

    More American reimagining than basic comic to film realisation,Road To Perditionnot only succeeds in being an exceptional adaptation but a breathtaking film to boot. Based on the graphic novel by Max Allan Collins, Road To Perdition is very similar in story and tone to that of the brutal Manga Lone Wolf and Cub replacing feudal Japan with Prohibition-era America. From the outset this film is beautiful to say the least. Thomas Newman’s gorgeous melodic score compliments the Oscar winning cinematography from Conrad Hall perfectly. Together with expert performances all round the canvas of Mendes’s vision is spot on. Tom Hanks, Daniel Craig and Paul Newman are all on top form but it’s the frightening portrayal of Harlen Maguire (who didn’t appear in the original graphic novel) played by Jude Law who pretty much steals it.

    This film had me gripped from start to finish, both on a narrative and technical level. I don’t feel it got the credit it deserved however, despite winning a few Oscars for its technical prowess it was never really embraced at the flicks. Go and buy it on DVD, you owe that much to Mendes.

     

    4. Sin City

    The first of two Frank Miller novels which makes an appearance on many people’s list, not just mine. Taking 3 and a quarter of Miller’s Sin City episodes, Robert Rodriguez pretty much lifted the shots straight from the black and white pages of the books. Many frames are identical to the illustrations which must surely make it a great adaptation of an already superbly brutal series. What makes Sin City even more effective is the bold palette Rodriguez uses to paint the bar room backdrops, hundreds of hookers, yellow bastards and a cannibal Frodo with. Using the whitest of whites and darkest of blacks really emulates the feel of the comic, there is no doubt Rodriguez was true to the tome. What Sin City also did was bring together a fine collection actors to take on the huge number of roles for the scum of Basin City. All the women look as gorgeous as the film does and the geezers are all nails, especially Mickey Rourke who seems the only person who could’ve pulled off the look and feel of Marv.

    Although awesome throughout, this isn’t the best of Miller’s works to make it to the screen…

     

    3. 300

    …This is. If Sin City was Jennifer Aniston then this is Angelina Jolie. My word it just looks so damn good…and no, I’m not referring to the half naked dieseled Spartans complete with CG six packs. Following a merry band of brick outhouses as they help protect the city of Sparta from an imminent Persian invasion, 300 is by no means historically accurate but certainly is a Frank Miller gore fest complete with countless one liners and iconic leading men. For some reason it has attracted criticism for not being a true depiction of the Battle of Thermopylae but that detracts from what makes 300 so good. For starters, it never tries to be a historical epic, it’s pure testosterone fuelled action at its very, very best. Like Dawn Of The Dead before, Zack Snyder manages to make an original story even better with jaw dropping visuals, an incredible musical score and the run of a superb cast all on top form. Gerard Butler puts in a performance worthy of earning him superstar status as the hard as nails Leonidas. Convincing from his epic facial whiskers to the sheer arrogance of his presence, Butler pulls off the role as the Spartan leader with natural ease leaving the audience (well me at least) in awe of his leadership of the 300.

    Who cares if there were really more than 300 Spartans, who cares if the Persians didn’t really look like mangled Frankensteins. If it was accurate we would have been treated to a very graphic pre-battle Spartan tradition involving the drinking of bodily fluids. I don’t know about you but I’d much prefer seeing a fight with a big chained behemoth. 

    2. Batman Begins

    Suffering a severe personality disorder after Batman And RobinThe Dark Knight himself really needed saving from feature film abyss. Being kept on life support by some really good animated outings, he needed a live action makeover to show the world Batman was still top dog in the world of superhero. Spiderman was taking far too much undeserved credit and Chris Nolan thought it was time to stop Peter Parker and his absolute schmaltzfest outings being number 1. My god did he succeed, not only did Batman kick Spiderman‘s blind horse riding ass but he maimed everything being churned out by Marvel Studios…and still does.

    Nolan gave the franchise a much needed refresh and brought Batman into the real world. Far away from Burton’s Neo-Gothic wonderment, galaxies ahead of Joel Schumacher’s candy coated kiddy pleasers, Batman Begins was real and was here to save people sick of seeing Batman being ridiculed over 1960s camp TV shows and nipple suits. Christopher Nolan is possibly one of the most talented directors of this generation and his exploration of Batman with the help of the Year One graphic novel, was certainly a revitalising addition to the Batman machine. There are some quarters who believe the mystery of Batman shouldn’t really be revealed to the extent we see in Begins, but I think it’s dealt with incredibly well and fully justifies why Wayne feels the need to don a bat mask and cape and crusade against good for nothing gangster wannabes. The inclusion of more low-key villains from the comic book is excellently executed, Ra’s Al Ghul, Falcone and the Scarecrow are intertwined with precision yet are never overused nor trivialised. Each played with individual and unique precision by Liam Neeson (is that a spoiler?), Tom Wilkinson and Cillian Murphy respectively. Despite a few quibbles about his brooding vocals, there’s no doubt Bale is the best in the bat suit and it’s good to see Gary Oldman be a good guy for once. The thing I loved most about Begins is seeing the world of Batman unravel into the story we are so familiar with; identifying his weaknesses, seeing the invention of the bat signal, the subtle explanation of why there’s so many nutjob villains, the growth of Gordon etc etc. All this ties together a wonderfully crafted popcorn action movie, and despite the occasion of pure Stilton in the script (ie the use of the word “fear” an infinite amount of times and some cheesy and repeated one liners) Nolan delivered an excellent cornerstone for a new Batman saga to not only rival but better Burton’s efforts. 

    1. The Dark Knight

    Much like Begins, The Dark Knight maintains the brooding tones and adult themes but goes even further into the complexities of the Bruce Wayne and his occasionally maligned alter ego. Taking Gotham out of the studio and into an actual city was a much required change from Begins as it fully sees Batman as a believable character in the real world. The vast majority of superhero films are self conscious of being fictitious and born of fantasy but with The Dark Knight, Nolan meticulously crafts a world where we believe Batman could exist thus making it all the more effective when he faces his villainous equal and resident psychopath; The Joker. Not much has to be said of Heath Ledger’s truly frightening portrayal of the Clown Prince, as everyone knows the level of brilliance he brings to the screen. From his reveal in the Michael Mann-esque prologue, we know we have to prepare for one of the greatest on screen performances. His series of posthumous awards only justify the level Ledger managed to reach on his way to pulling off this iconic role. The rest of the cast emulate what Ledger brings to the film by filling their respective roles with spot on performances. Bale manages to switch from Batman to Wayne effortlessly and really does create a separate character for both. Rather than just playing Wayne with a mask on, Bale really puts his heart and soul to create two characters who are essentially completely different. He is convincing as a millionaire playboy as much as he is convincing as a husky voiced vigilante. Michael Caine is the perfect Alfred, bringing both humour and emotional support to Wayne, he is more father figure than mere butler. Maggie Gyllenhall, stepping into the vacated shoes of Katie Holmes, does what Gyllenhall does best and is a far more convincing DA. Many scenes however, were stolen by Aaron Eckhart playing the White Knight of the piece, Harvey Dent. Utterly convincing as the only one brave enough to tackle Gotham’s plight, Eckhart is consistently superb as Dent. Being a character more in touch with the audience, it makes it far more emotionally effective when Dent becomes a victim of his own bravery, losing his mind (and half of his face) in the process.

    Everything from the gripping musical score, first class stunt work, visually stunning cinematography and phenomenal script are straight from the top drawer leaving anyone watching in awe of this mind blowing piece of entertainment. To put it simply, there are not enough superlatives to actually describe how good The Dark Knight is. The film clocks in at around 2 and a half hours, but the fact this time frame feels like mere minutes is only a testament to how Nolan can pace a film to perfection with both equal quantities of action, characterisation and glorious set pieces. Everything, and I sincerely mean everything is pulled off with perfection. It’s a crime that Nolan was overlooked during Oscar season but seen as The Dark Knight broke all sorts of records at the box office, he can cry into the mounds of cash his deeply complex portrayal of the caped crusader made for him.
    Not only the best comic book adaptation, but one of the most accomplished pieces of film ever made.
  • Milk: A Review

    Gus van Sant’s latest film Milk is a bio-pic of the political activist Harvey Milk – famous as the first openly gay man to win a position as a city supervisor in San Francisco. Harvey Milk was assassinated by a fellow colleague Dan White (an incredibly performance by Josh Brolin). The film has recently won at the Academy Awards. Yet, far from being a standard Hollywood issue movie, Milk is an often hilarious and flirty movie with some vivid acting from the likes of Emile Hirsch, Sean Penn, Josh Brolin and James Franco.

    Gus van Sant has often flirted with Hollywood over the years – making such features as Good Will Hunting, a dreadfully ill-conceived remake of Psycho and Finding Forrester. Along the way, this Portland-based auteur has crafted one genuine masterpiece in 2004’s Elephant and a raft of experimental and provocative films, often using mainstreams actors who are attracted to the offbeat material.

    Sean Penn should play likeable people more often as his performance in Milk is gentle, playful and very funny. Whether Harvey Milk was like that in real life is open to debate – there does seem an odd strain of misogyny in the film…but maybe that’s how it was back then, and Gus Van Sant acknowledges this – that Milk’s team are suspicious of him hiring a lesbian as his campaign manager seems allude to it. Also, there is only one female character of prominence in the entire film.

    Was Harvey Milk killed by a homophobe? This question is left open for debate. Milk’s killer, Dan White is played with a quiet and disturbing intensity by Josh Brolin. White’s seeming all-American morals and friendliness are but a mask hiding a very troubled individual. Milk’s assassination is seemingly the culmination of a love/hate emotion. In one scene in the film, Milk senses that White is secretly homosexual and troubled by this fact. Although Milk jokes about it,
    in the end, nobody is laughing.

    The death scene – after two hours of righteous drama and some wonderfully amusing scenes is very shocking. The inevitability is hard to take. The final panning shot taken from archive footage of a night-time procession and candlelight vigil after the murder of Harvey Milk and the Mayor, is breathtaking.

    Gus van Sant’s recent offerings have been clinical, detached mood pieces inspired by dead rock stars, Samuel Beckett and high school massacres – and the films of Bela Tarr. His return to the mainstream should truly be heralded, and it has been, picking up many awards.

    Milk is an important story that shows that civil rights is not primarily a colour-based concern but encompasses sexual orientation. Homosexuality is not a crime or sin. It is a moral or legal problem. Gus van Sant’s film is a reminder of how far the movement has come…and how far there is still further to go. Add this to extremely committed performances by Sean Penn, Emile Hirsch, James Franco, Diego Luna (the one terrible note in the film) and Josh Brolin, one is left believing in the power of cinema and the power of hard work to change minds and opinions against the often ridiculous ideas of the moral police.

    © BRWC 2010.

  • Will Heath Make It To The Big Screen ?

    Recent news around Hollywood is that Heath Ledger’s final film, The Imaginarium Of Dr. Parnassus, is struggling to find a US distribution deal-but why? In the year since Ledger’s death he’s proved to be quite the commodity in marketing. From securing The Dark Knight‘s place in blockbuster history to winning the Oscar last month, you would think there would be a bidding war over the rights to showcase the actor’s final performance.
    Have distribution companies become frugal in the wake of a universal recession? Can they not agree on an appropriate fee? Or, as some reports claim, are they finding it hard to market the Terry Gilliam flick to an American audience?
    The independently financed film, with a budget of $20 million, wrapped last August and tells the tale of a traveling circus magician who makes numerous pacts with the devil, with Ledger playing a mysterious outsider traveling through a dream world. Hmm. Not your typical summer time flick, but then again- high profile cast, crazy effects and weird makeup. Perhaps it is.
    Either way I guess only time will tell whether Heath will make one last appearance on the silver screen or if his tragic story will end with his last performance going to straight to the DVD shelves.

    What’s your thoughts? Would you see Imaginarium if it were released in theatres?

    © BRWC 2010.

  • The Week in Film by Robert Mann – Week Starting 27/2/09

    Gran Torino ****½

    Snubbed not only by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences but all the movie awards bodies, Gran Torino is a film that has not merely exceeded but totally obliterated expectations, winning rave reviews all round and achieving a stellar haul at the US box office where it has even outperformed virtually all the films that received Oscar nominations. Following up last year’s The Bucket List, this is a film that has also been wrongfully overlooked by the Academy (and the rest) but has been quite rightfully appreciated by moviegoers. Gran Torino is apparently to be the last film featuring Clint Eastwood as an actor and is this indeed true it certainly looks to be one hell of a swan song and a fantastic end to an incredible career.

    Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood) is a disgruntled Korean War veteran who has just lost the love of his life. A grumpy, tough-minded, unhappy old man, his own kids want nothing to do with him, and he doesn’t much get along with his neighbours either. This isn’t helped by the fact that the neighbourhood is inhabited by more Asians than Americans, and despite the changes that have taken place in the world and his local community, he still holds on to his old prejudices. He tries to live his life irrespective of all that is taking place around him but he finds himself dragged into the lives of his neighbours when Thao (Bee Vang), a young Hmong teenager who lives next door, tries to steal his prize possession, a 1972 Ford Gran Torino, under pressure from a local gang. Following his failure, Thao and his family are harassed by the gang and Walt steps in, becoming a local hero in the process. To regain the family’s honour after his attempted theft, Thao is forced to work for Walt. Despite his initial reluctance, Walt agrees and takes Thao under his wing, in the hopes of reforming him. Soon, an unlikely friendship between the two develops, and Walt gets close to Thao’s family, including his sister Sue (Ahney Her), and he begins to view his neighbours and his local community in a whole new light. As Walt learns to enjoy life once more and begins to adapt to a changing world, however, he soon finds himself taking steps to protect Thao and his family from the gang that is terrorizing the neighbourhood.

    It really is quite criminal that Gran Torino failed to receive a single nomination at any of the movie awards. This is Clint Eastwood on top form, both in front of and behind the camera, and those who overlooked it should be ashamed of themselves. Clint Eastwood delivers one of his finest performances in a very long time, channeling his old Dirty Harry persona into a pitch perfect portrayal of a man who is alone in the world while everything changes around him. The sheer amount of emotion put into the performance makes for an entirely believable portrayal of a character who we can’t help but sympathise and empathise with, even when he is being prejudiced. His character is one that could and probably does exist in the real world and it is a truly moving, yet also very entertaining portrayal. Eastwood’s direction is just as excellent, with him making a film that is more than just the average slow-burning drama. This is a film that, with the help of an excellent script, entertains as much as it moves, thanks to some subtle, smart and witty humour. Rather than outlandish situations, the film’s humour comes directly from the heart, with the dialogue and the way it is spoken being the main source of the film’s lighter side. The humour never detracts from the more serious stuff, though, with the issues being presented in a convincing and thoughtful manner, and the film never failing to be moving when it needs to be. It also has a lot to say about the changing face of race relations and the clashing of cultures in an increasingly multicultural society, and everything it says rings true. It isn’t just Clint Eastwood who shines though, as the acting is excellent all round. Most of the Asian cast members aren’t even real actors, but they deliver great performances nonetheless, with them in fact adding to the authenticity of the film. While it is unlikely that many of them will be seen in films again it is hard to deny the power of their performances. Overall, Gran Torino is an outstanding film. Just as with the recently released Slumdog Millionaire it shows that great cinema doesn’t require a big budget or lots of spectacle, it just takes a gripping and engaging storyline, sharp direction and good acting. It is extremely easy to see why this film struck a chord with American moviegoers but extremely difficult to understand why it didn’t garner even a single awards nomination. If you were impressed with the film’s that actually got nominated, just wait until you see this film – you haven’t seen anything yet.

    ————————————————————————————————-

    The International ***½

    Postponed from its original release date last August, The International is a film that stands to either gain or lose from the decision to do so. It is also one of a number of films in cinemas at the moment that are likely to see their attendance affected by the current economic crisis. Its central theme of a corrupt bank that is financing war and terrorism could strike a sour note with many viewers due to the fact that it is banks that are largely responsible for the economic recessions that the country is currently experiencing, even though the film’s bank bosses are represented as corrupt and evil individuals who finance the murder of innocents, in contrast to real-life bank bosses who are really just greedy and incompetent. However, the trailer for this film also shows another side that could win it favour with moviegoers, in that Clive Owen’s character apparently gets to kick the asses of the corrupt bank bosses, something that many people probably wish would happen to the real-life bankers responsible for the recession. As such, there could be a certain appeal for moviegoers who are sick and tired of the greed of selfishness of real world bankers.

    Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) is an Interpol agent investigating the illicit activities of the International Bank of Business and Credit, an organisation that is believed to be involved in a number of criminal activities, ranging from money laundering for organised crime to providing military regimes with weapons. For some time he has been working with Manhattan assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) in an effort to bring the IBBC, under the leadership of Jonas Skarssen (Ulrich Thomsen), to justice, but every time they have a lead, their contact either is killed or disappears. Desperate to prove what the bank is up to, Salinger uncovers a major arms deal that is about to go down, and despite pressure from their superiors to put an end to the investigation, he and Whitman head all over the globe following every lead that they can find, but the bank seems to be one step ahead of them at all times, leading Salinger to realize that there is only one way that such an influential organization can ever be brought down. Thus, he sets out on his own, outside the system, in a bid to bring the organization to justice once and for all.

    The International is a film that has shown a lot of potential through its marketing and publicity. The concept of a film where the villains are bankers is very timely considering that bankers are pretty much viewed as the bad guys in the current economic crisis, and whatever your view on the state of the economy at the moment, it is hard to deny that it is a very interesting idea for an action thriller. Sadly, however, the film fails to wholly live up to this potential. Also, it transpires that the trailer isn’t entirely representative of the film. Whereas viewers were promised an action packed thriller where Clive Owen kicks the asses of corrupt bankers, what the film actually delivers for the most part is a slow-paced thriller focusing on the investigation into the illicit activities of the bank. Much of this investigation seems rather mundane and fails to be nearly as interesting or engaging as it could be, and the film’s use of locations is also somewhat disappointing. While globe-trotting around the world, the film meanders from one location to the next, and fails to make the most of any of its settings, and this feels like a very wasted opportunity. However, while the film does have its shortcomings, it isn’t a bad film by any means. It is in the final third of the film that things really begin to liven up, and we finally get to see some action. While the film is mostly action deficient, and a few more action scenes would have been very welcome, what we do get is worth the wait. The climactic shootout in New York’s Guggenheim Art Gallery is easily the film’s most impressive sequence, being one of the best staged and most thrilling action sequences seen in any film for quite a while. This scene is worth the price of admission alone. It’s just a shame that there isn’t a bit more action like this and also that the part of the film where Clive Owen turns renegade agent and begins a personal war against the bank comes so late and last so short a time, and that it leads to a rather abrupt and not wholly satisfying conclusion. Most of the negative aspects can’t be leveled at the director. Tom Tykwer, whose previous credits include European fare such as Perfume: The Story of a Murderer and Run, Lola, Run, delivers a film that is technically excellent for the majority of the duration. Excellent cinematography combined with good editing make for a film that constantly looks good and polished, and while he fails to make full use of the locations at his disposable he does manage to deliver some quite spectacular scenic shots. Most faults with the film are more due to less than spectacular writing on the part of script writer Eric Singer who fails to make as engrossing a story out of the concept as could be done. The performances make up for any problems with the story, however, with the entire cast delivering to a high standard. Clive Owen is extremely believable and highly watchable in the lead role while Naomi Watts also delivers a strong performance, even though she is really underused. Meanwhile, the villains of the film are convincing and realistic and expertly portrayed thanks to strong performances from all, notably that of Ulrich Thomsen as the head guy at the bank. There is also a strong performance from Armin Muller-Stahl. All in all, The International is a watchable and fairly interesting thriller, just one that fails to fully capitalise on the true potential of its concept.

    ————————————————————————————————-

    New in Town *

    Going in to see New in Town it is desperately hard to feel any level of anticipation for the film. Its release shelved after being filmed several years ago, all the signs have been bad for this romcom, and a mediocre trailer has done nothing to change any preconceptions. However, you can’t always judge a film by its trailer and it is unfair to condemn a film without seeing it, so I gave it a fair chance. So, are the bad omens right on the mark or does the film manage to be one of the rare films that actually turns out to be a pleasant surprise. Regrettably, New in Town isn’t one of them, and what the trailer sells is exactly what you get.

    Lucy Hill (Renee Zellweger) is a Miami businesswoman on the fast track to the top at the corporation where she works. To show the head of the company what she is capable of she takes on the assignment of overseeing the restructuring of a blue collar manufacturing plant. What she doesn’t realize is that the plant is in Minnesota. Going from the high life in Miami to the bitter cold, snow, and icy roads of small town Minnesota, she immediately fails to fit in and receives a frosty reception from the locals who view her as an outsider. She also clashes with the head of the local workers union, Ted Mitchell (Harry Connick Jr.). However, Lucy is a fighter and is determined to win at any cost. As she strives to carry out her assignment and thus advance her career, however, she finds herself getting to know the locals, particularly her overly friendly secretary Blanche Gunderson (Siobhan Fallon Hogan) and plant foreman Stu Kopenhafer (J.K. Simmons), and begins to develop a fondness for them and their community. She also develops a romantic relationship with Ted. However, when the plant decides that the plant is a lost cause and order her to shut it down, Lucy must decide what is more important to her – her career or her new found friends – and fight for what she really wants.

    One of the saddest things about New in Town is that there are some genuinely talented people involved in it. It really is a shame to see people like Renee Zellweger, Harry Connick Jr. and J.K. Simmons associated on any level with such a (more than) mediocre cinematic entity. Here, these very talented and usually very reliable actors are completely wasted, with their characters being reduced to little more than stereotypical caricatures in what is little more than a by-the-numbers romantic comedy. The majority of the acting on show is pretty horrendous, with the stereotypical representations of small town America being almost insulting to those whom they are supposed to portray. This isn’t wholly the fault of the actors though, but rather the director and script writers who fail to provide them with any decent material to work with. The storyline and humour are tired and predictable, most of the gags are cringe-worthy and completely unfunny (although alarmingly some people at the screening I attended seemed to find it hilarious – there’s clearly no accounting for taste, or, in this case, lack of it), and the ending is so obvious that it may as well be revealed right at the start of the film. The plot is extremely unconvincing, failing to be engaging, interesting or entertaining, and it doesn’t flow very well, with many things seeming to be completely skimmed over, yet the film still managing to be a drag to sit through. Also, while there isn’t necessarily anything wrong with a romcom being quite predictable, the film fails to do anything remotely original or clever to make it seem fresh, different or even enjoyable. Overall, New in Town is a complete waste of time that is not worth the price of admission. Where it aims to be romcom it is more none-rom and none-com, and it fails to be funny or even particularly romantic. Unless you are an extremely undemanding viewer, give this film a miss.

    ————————————————————————————————-

    The Unborn *

    One of a number of horror movies released so far this year that have proven surprisingly successful at the US box office, The Unborn is quite possibly the one that had the most going for it. An intriguing concept based on an ancient Hebrew legend. One of the co-writers of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight as writer and director. Gary Oldman playing an exorcist type role. All this certainly sounds like a very promising combination. However, the bigger the promise the bigger the disappointment if the film is a failure, and word from its US release has been less than encouraging, and with good cause.

    Casey Beldon (Odette Yustman) is a normal teenager who is being plagued by merciless dreams, visions of strange looking dogs, and an evil child with bright blue eyes. After being hit with a mirror by her neighbor’s son, Casey’s eyes begin to change color and she learns that she had a twin brother who died in the womb. Casey begins to suspect that the spirit haunting her is the soul of her dead twin, being possessed by a Dybbuk, an entity from an ancient legend that is apparently a spirit that has been prevented from getting into Heaven and is now trying to reenter the world of the living by being born once again. Casey meets a woman named Sofi Kozma (Jane Alexander), who explains that what is happening to her is part of a curse that began years ago in the concentration camp at Auschwitz. Sofi refers Casey to Rabbi Sendak (Gary Oldman), who can perform a Jewish exorcism to remove the Dybbuk that is haunting her. However, the spirit is determined to make its way back into the real world and it will stop at nothing to get what it wants.

    To call this film a disappointment would be a huge understatement. The Unborn was one of the few examples of a horror movie that actually showed real promise, but despite everything it had going for it, it just ends up being the latest badly made and barely watchable horror flick, with nothing to distinguish from the countless other poor excuses for film that the horror genre is packed full of. For starters, there isn’t an ounce of originality. Shamelessly ripping off numerous other, much better, horror movies (The Omen and The Exorcist to name just two), the film ticks off virtually every cliché that you have come to expect from the genre. Eerie music. Check. Spooky rumblings. Check. Jump scares. Check. Creepy crawlies. Check. Creepy children. Check. Old curse. Check. Rotating heads. Check. Unsettling mood and atmosphere. Sadly absent. Such a lack of originality might not matter too much if it was executed with a sense of flair, but writer/director David S. Goyer does nothing of the sort. The film is desperately short on scares, with even the most basic attempts to make the audience jump out of their seats failing miserably. Quite crucially, the film is also extremely dull and uninteresting. It really is hard to see how a man who was co-writer on the recent Batman movies could fail to make anything out of an interesting concept like the one for this film, but somehow he has managed it. He doesn’t even provide us with some decent visual effects to at least make it appealing to the eyes. The acting is also dire with Odette Yustman only appearing to be in the film to provide eye candy rather than to provide a convincing performance and even Gary Oldman disappoints, being criminally underused and not even delivering that good a performance himself. The poor performances may be as much due to the by-the-numbers script that gives its actors nothing of note to do, though, than any fault of the actors themselves. After making you sit through nearly an hour and a half of (way below) mediocrity the film doesn’t even provide a decent pay-off with the ending being an unsatisfying anti-climax that is both tired and predictable and leaves things wide open for the inevitable sequel. Here’s hoping that the studio sees fit to pass on it, because a sequel to The Unborn would be a truly horrifying thought.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————

    Reviews by Robert Mann BA (Hons)

    © BRWC 2010.