Author: Mark Goodyear

  • Normal People: The BRWC Review

    Normal People: The BRWC Review

    Sally Rooney’s “Normal People” is one of those tales of two people who always find their way back to each other no matter where life takes them. The best way to describe it would be to compare it to another bestseller, David Nicholls’ “One Day”. One Day is another time-travelling story, and it and Normal People are so alike that Rooney’s novel could act as a prequel with the events of One Day acting like everything that happens after Normal People ends. Of course, the contexts are very different, and the diverse casts of characters are not so clearly paralleled, but the passion is still there; the evocative nature of the central couples pours from every moment of both narratives, and therein lies their correlation.

    I would go so far as to say that the major difference between the two is their respective screen adaptations. The One Day adaptation made its way to the silver screen in 2011, resulting in an effort that, in my eyes, can only be considered a tragic failure. The book details intense emotional damage and repression of deep longing between the leads, none of which made it to the screen, leaving only a shell of what was a genuinely special literary experience. Normal People, on the other hand, received a much better treatment which released earlier this year courtesy of the BBC and Hulu

    The titular Normal People are Marianne and Connell (Daisey Edgar-Jones & Paul Mescal), whom we meet going to highschool together in Sligo where they lead drastically different lives. Marianne is a loner, one ostracised and bullied because of her coldness and affluent background. Connell is a sports star; popular but quiet and firmly working class, so much so that his mother works as a cleaner for Marianne’s family. They are both smart, and despite Connell not appearing so, they are both dreadfully lonely. Slowly but surely they find each other and begin a passionate, but misguided love affair— one hampered by fatuous school ground politics, yet also one that changes them forever.

    They go on to weave through each other’s lives like water through a riverbed, with a constant flow that cannot escape the finality of ending in something larger. Time changes them, wearing them down and sparking them up as it sees fit, the only constant throughout being that they clearly feel so much for one another; they just never say it. More than anything else the pair form themselves over our years with them, they learn to express themselves, even if only to the other. It is a beautiful expression of growth so eloquently brought to life on the screen, a fact realised by the unbelievable talents who lead the show. 

    Edgar-Jones and Mescal embody their characters with such intimacy and zeal that they often become utterly absorbing. The only other on-screen couple capable of generating this much pure chemistry that I could not move my eyes off them are James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain in “The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby”, another tale of fate intertwining people. Both sets of performances face the constant turbulence and weight of life taring them apart, and it is in the moments between, when they struggle to pick up the pieces, that their performances become works of devastating genius. Those moments of silent passion or silent despair, moments of inescapable lonely reflection, where the only acting to do is located entirely within the face, in those moments these performances are immortal. 

    The enormous talent behind the camera deserves praise too. Lenny Abrahamson and Hettie Macdonald split the series down the middle and direct six episodes each, both do an excellent job. The show knows the exact pace it needs to go at every episode, which is usually rather slow, but never methodical. All 12 episodes are perfect concoctions of what it is like to be a young adult, with all the awkwardness, excitement, sentimentality, love, and despair that period of life has to offer. There is so much poured into the show that your just as likely to catch yourself smiling are you are to cringe or cry, it is one big loveable rollercoaster. 

    And yet for every bit of youthful lust and love the show has something to say, and at times it can be quite confronting. Fitting in is never easy, and it is not easy for Marianne or Connell, causing them great distress. There is a certain inexplicable agony Normal People touches on detailing how people can surround you and yet you can still be alone, whether it be at home with family or away studying. It makes your very soul decay, and both our leads go through that on their journeys, as even with friends coming and going they remain emotionally crippled and often despondent.

    Ultimately Marianne and Connell come to find life’s cruellest blow is that as time heals old wounds, new ones emerge, and the inevitability of that often smothers Normal People, but it manages to become the shows greatest asset because when you follow people through the depths of despair, you earn the reward of seeing how they make it out the other side.

    I think if Normal People teaches anything, it is that going through life alone will break you, and if you are lucky enough to find someone, hold on for as long and tightly as you can. Just remember to let go when it comes to the end of the line. Who knows, maybe you will meet again, life is funny that way.

  • Bianca: Review

    Bianca: Review

    If anything was going to survive the epidemic currently plaguing the world, it was the art of filmmaking, and slowly but surely, we are seeing the products that attest to that. Italian director Federico Zampaglione’s “Bianca” is one such product. 

    Shot entirely on an iPad, running for 10 minutes, and starring only the director’s daughter and partner, Bianca is the perfect example of a quarantine film, and as such, is all about style over substance. The story follows Bianca (Linda Zampaglione) and her mother (Giglia Marra), on a night where Bianca is being kept from going to a party on account of being too young. In a testament to how easy tension can be to build the thrills flow from there. 

    It becomes apparent very early on that someone is in the house who should not be. Becoming aware of this, the mother prepares to call the police but finds the phone to be disconnected. A man then rings the doorbell wearing a surgical mask to cover his face in the peephole, and things being to feel quite sinister. All of this happens at a rapid pace and soon Bianca’s mother is brandishing a knife and fearing the worst for her daughter. The rest you can find out watching yourself, but I can offer my thoughts on how it is all pieced together. 

    In other circumstances, there is not a lot to note here, but considering this is more of a symbol of art surviving strife than anything else, it is quite brilliant. Yes, there have been better examples of filming on apple products, and there will likely be more inventive quarantine films.

    Still, thanks to some striking work with shadows and an excellent, almost comic use of slow-motion violence, this gets a big old tick from me. I was even on edge briefly as the pace makes things challenging to grasp, and the edit convinces you someone is coming. 

    Making films in times like these is perfect for making art for art’s sake, the need for deeper meaning or technical prowess is not as urgent, just create. For that matter, in normal circumstances, things are the same, YouTube will always have a place for content like this, and it’s as good a place to share as any.

    Would this short film get into a film festival, probably not, but it has eyes on it and passed the time when there was far too much time available to pass.

  • Sometimes Always Never: Another Review

    Sometimes Always Never: Another Review

    Sometimes Always Never: Another Review – Loss is our most bitter pill to swallow in life, and it only becomes worse when the loss is avoidable or unable to be fully explained. Carl Hunter’s “Sometimes Always Never” deals with this kind of loss, the kind that tares you apart as you look for answers. We follow Alan (Bill Nighy) and his son Peter (Sam Riley) on a search for the other son of the family, Michael, who an indiscriminate amount of time ago, ran away from home during a game of scrabble. 

    Instantly the tone of what one would assume to be a sombre film is proven to be instead somewhat quirky and eccentric, much like Alan himself. When we first meet him, he stands solitary at a beach, before beginning to wander around handing out missing person posters and muttering to people who are not there. This strangeness lasts throughout the film, but it becomes more channelled, mainly towards scrabble, and more proactively finding Michael. 

    Soon Peter and Allen are off on the road, and ironically, neither of them can find the words to express how daunting a trip they are taking. The sinister reason they are travelling begins to become apparent to us as the two of them bicker. They are heading to a morgue to potentially identify Michael’s body. However, they refuse to discuss it, instead opting to rehash long-held resentments and bitterness from childhood. Only making things worse is the fact that Alan hustles a couple staying at the same inn as them by convincing them he isn’t any good at scrabble, then promptly beating them. 

    From here, a beautiful and poignant story plays out about connecting through words you can’t bring yourself to say. We meet Alan’s daughter in law Sue (Alice Lowe) and grandson Jack (Louis Healy) who form the basis of another dysfunctional parental relationship. It is only when grandad decides to stay with them that we begin to see his unique talent for bringing people together through words in scrabble, which is the films greatest asset provided by the work of Bill Nighy. 

    In portraying Alan, Nighy is perfect. He brings to life the character’s idiosyncrasies with uncanny consistency. There is no one out there who could have quite played the role this way and thanks to that he steals the show. As we learn more about him, and how deeply broken losing Michael has left him, all his strangeness shines in a new light and Nighy nails this transformation. Come the credits he produces a character who is so easy to empathise with genuinely, and whom you want nothing more for than to reconnect with his remaining son. 

    However, outside of the fantastic central performance, the film can often fail to stick the landing in other aspects. The story, for the most part, balances the light humour with the dark concept, but there are times where the full weight of things fails to become apparent. The most jarring instance being the couple Alan hustles in scrabble and how they too are heading to the morgue to see if their son lies waiting for them. There is one line that mentions the concept of Alan hoping it’s their son because that means it isn’t Michael, but it just isn’t enough to explain their haunting presence, and makes their characters seem totally out of place when they appear later in the film. Sue and Jack, whilst likeable, are also simplistic and aloof for the most part. They had the makings to be so much more if the film offered an element of depth.

    Sometimes uneven, always endearing and never unlikeable, Sometimes Always Never evolves into an enjoyable dramedy thanks to the work of Bill Nighy and a family unit you can’t help but love.

  • Da 5 Bloods: The BRWC Review

    Da 5 Bloods: The BRWC Review

    There may never be a timelier film than Spike Lee’s newest joint, “Da 5 Bloods”. With the United States more lost and divided than it has been since the civil war, Lee has made a film sure to fuel the fires of change.

    We follow the four surviving members of a team of five African American Vietnam soldiers, who during the war came across a massive amount of gold and lost their commander. 

    Paul (Delroy Lindo), Otis (Clarke Peters), Eddie (Norm Lewis), Melvin (Isiah Whitlock Jr.) and Norman (Chadwick Boseman) make up the original five. It was Norman who didn’t make it home, and it is for his remains, and the gold, that they return to Vietnam in the present day. What they find is so much more than gold and bones, they find a catharsis cinema has been looking for ever since the Vietnam War ended, and a rallying cry for a people who fought to end their persecution, only to find things worse when they came home.

    The Vietnamese being voiceless in films more about their history than anyone else’s has long been a point of criticism for any endeavour into the tragedies of the Vietnam War. It has always been a more than fair argument, but one hard to substantiate due to the high amount of quality most directors produce within the genre. It’s also a contentious point because Vietnamese filmmakers have the right to tell their own stories and not have them cannibalised by westerners. Thankfully I can safely say in the hands of Lee I don’t believe that has happened and instead I think he has made something never seen before from an auteur of his calibre.

    The Vietnamese people may still form an antagonistic front in this film, but it is unlike ever before. Here they get to state their point, that American’s butted in where they didn’t belong and killed the mothers and fathers of an entire generation. The age-old American standpoint is also still there; they were just doing what they were told and didn’t deserve what happened to them as a result. There’s no answer to be found here, not when it comes to the perspective of soldiers from both sides; neither was right or wrong. Da 5 Bloods makes that clear and instead investigates the repercussions on the men, mentally and physically. 

    Paul is the core of this. Through him, we see the toll war has on a man like never before. Lindo pours heart and soul into his performance here and produces career-best work, which just so happens to be Oscar-worthy. Tour de force would almost be an understatement his work is that physical and demanding, allowing every moment of it to be absorbing and thrilling. He’s supported spectacularly by the other four men and Jonathan Majors who plays his son David. Together they ensure the film is spectacularly well cast and brilliantly acted. 

    As the story goes on, things ramp up in intensity and violence. The tonal change isn’t flawless and the exact moment when it happens is quite jarring, but the film is far too ruthless in its approach to have any time to dwell. The impact of every twist and turn ends up feeling like a full-on frontal assault, and it makes for a wild ride. The messages derived from this are what make it all worthwhile. That friendship should come before money, that fighting for your people should come before fighting for yourself, that African American soldiers were forced to fight while their families were persecuted back home, and that despite that they found the will to keep fighting. It makes for a lot to take in, yet everything resonates and acts as a genuine call to arms, and a call for change. 

    Visually the film stuns, thanks to the work of Newton Thomas Sigel, who changes the aspect ratio throughout to significant effect and sharply captures the actors in their finest and most harrowing moments. He is supplemented beautifully by the subtle score by Terence Blanchard, which adds just enough weight to everything happening without making it all too much. All in all, the film is a technically sound as it is narratively, which makes it one of the best films to release so far this year.

    Da 5 Bloods offers powerful correlations to reality, and also marks a significant development for war films as a genre. Spike Lee’s voice is needed now more than ever, and he’s delivering the way only he can.

  • Throw Down: Review

    Throw Down: Review

    Films about hand to hand combat are almost exclusively about boxing in western culture, at the very least the popular ones are, with Warrior and The Karate Kid being the only two that come to mind outside of its dominance. Between Rocky, Million Dollar Baby and now Creed, boxing has dominated the medium without complaint, and those just scratch the surface. The east offers far more variety, and when films from the region manage to break down barriers and make it out west, they can be incredibly refreshing. In 2004 China offered a great example of this with a film about Judo called “Throw Down”. 

    Directed by Johnnie To, Throw Down tells the story of how the most unlikely of trios give one man a path to ultimate redemption. Yes, this is familiar territory, those aforementioned boxing films each follow similar themes, and each of them is probably better a film, but that doesn’t diminish the fun stylised twists To adds through his personal flair. We follow Sze-To Bo (Louis Koo) a former Judo champion turned alcoholic night club owner after an ambiguous loss in his past.

    Joining him is Tony (Aaron Kwok), an up and coming fighter of incredible talent who is an admirer of Bo who now seeks to fight him and will wait as long as it takes to get a match with him at full strength. Rounding out the trio is Mona (Cherrie Ying), a Taiwanese singer looking to make it big in Hong Kong but failing after becoming associated with an ‘agent’ who tried to make her a prostitute. 

    They make for an explosive group, one without much reason to like each other throughout. Bo only recruits them initially so he can run a scam on a gang leader in order to get some money. He needs the money to pay off a debt, but he can’t help gambling away everything he takes, abusing Mona in the process. From there the other two join him in a band in his nightclub. Mona joins because she has nowhere else to go, and Tony so he can eventually have a great fight with Bo. There’s not much substance here; in fact, Tony and Mona fail to display much in the way of substance at all. Thankfully the film manages to overcome this thanks to the sheer talent of its director. 

    Throw Down is the perfect example of style over substance. This is thanks to the fact that everything To does in this film is done to the max. From the many bar brawls and chase scenes to Tony and Mona performing in the club, everything comes across with an engrossing flair. Ultimately the visual aesthetic of the film is its defining strength, and without it, the flaws would be too much for any movie to bare. The fights, in particular, are mesmeric, they aren’t complicated dances of death relying solely on choreography like other more famous examples of the genre display. Rather, the fights are inherently simple, yet are presented so dynamically they feel impactful. 

    The second half is where Throw Down comes into its own. Bo’s path to redemption is both refreshing and familiar, making it a perfect cocktail. He serves as a timely reminder of how great the underdog story is even 16 years after release. The friendship of the three remains hollow for the most part, but it is wholesome, and the scene in which they team up to save a balloon trapped in a tree is cheesy but beautiful. 

    Throw Down doesn’t offer much in the ways of a substantial narrative, but it does offer an abundance of hard-hitting stylised violence, which keeps the film as exciting as ever 16 years later.