Author: BRWC

  • Enfant Terrible: Review

    Enfant Terrible: Review

    Enfant Terrible: Review. By Will Steele.

    Enfant Terrible is a title more than befitting the infamous Rainer Werner Fassbinder. A pioneer of German New Wave Cinema, Fassbinder was a bona fide genius who cut his teeth in the theatres of Munich before transitioning into feature filmmaking where he directed 41 films within a 14 year period. His prolific career saw his celebrity rise and his reputation grow immeasurably controversial due to the boundaries he pushed in his work and his personal life. 

    Whether his work was broadcast, staged, taped or screened, every tale tended to focus on isolated and vulnerable characters caught up, out of their depth and exploited by cruel facets of modern society. The transparent distillation of Fassbinder’s turbulent personal life into his writing enriched his work hugely despite the tragic circumstances of its creation. If art is said to imitate life, then Enfant Terrible is the imitation of an artist. So does this portrait of Rainier Werner Fassbinder do justice to the life and legacy of one of the most controversial and renowned European directors of the 20th century?

     Director Oskar Roehler’s biographical approach to Rainer Werner Fassbinder attempts to emulate Fassbinder’s style within a meta-commentary of the artist’s career. Enfant Terrible is staged like a play paying reverence to the early Brechtian efforts of Fassbinder: a deliberate choice which initially works but soon wears thin. The exorbitant 134 runtime feels inappropriately padded for the rapid pace at which Fassbinder lived. Any potential for nuance or ambiguity is promptly squandered by way of clunky expository dialogue and an immediately shallow caricature of our titular artist. 

    Oliver Masucci portrays Rainer Werner Fassbinder and naturally his performance is the lynch-pin by which the film shall succeed or fail. Despite a valiant effort, Masucci cannot overcome the melodrama of the piece and one wonders why the 52 year old actor was cast to portray the baby-faced Fassbinder whose life we follow throughout his 20s and 30s. The supporting cast similarly play to the rafters resulting in an unpalatably hammy rendition of Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s relationships. 

    If the recent oversaturation of biopics has taught us anything it is that this particular sub-genre has the dangerous tendencies of deifying their protagonists and retroactively glamourizing the past. Refreshingly Enfant Terrible largely avoids both by way of casting an unflinching eye across the murky and taboo elements of Fassbinder’s life which earned him so much controversy. Roehler distils the dramatic excess of Rainier Werner Fassbinder’s life into drug and alcohol abuse so frequent that it becomes casual and commonplace thus replicating the haze of addiction which Fassbinder worked and ultimately perished in. 

    The intersection where these abuses meet the shadowy underworld of the burgeoning gay nightlife in Europe certainly make for the most compelling scenes of the film. Unlike many biopics of LGBTQ+ artists, Enfant Terrible delves into the complex and unconventional sexuality Fassbinder exhibited through his numerous affairs with both men and women, many of which were fraught with violence and cruelty. However the film fails when it comes to the more predatory inclinations of our lead in his professional life. Roehler seems irksomely neutral when portraying Fassbinder’s tortuous and predatory behaviour towards his cast and crew. So whilst Enfant Terrible avoids the tired trappings of the modern biopic, it excuses the bad behaviour of a male director for the sake of the art which came from process: an all-too common injustice in the way male artists are portrayed. 

    Enfant Terrible is a manic and muddled tribute to the life and work of one of Germany’s greatest directors. Oskar Roehler has intentionally captured the cinematic language of Rainer Werner Fassbinder whilst perhaps unintentionally mirroring Fassbinder’s talent for alienating his audiences. It is ultimately the failure of the film to find an intimate or refined approach to Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s life as a whole which makes the project feel tragically redundant. 

  • Dinner In America: Review

    Dinner In America: Review

    Dinner In America: Review. By Alif Majeed.

    Right from the beginning, Dinner in America comes across as a definitive Gen Z version of Hal Hartley’s wonderful Long Island trilogy. Specifically, the misfit lovers from Trust and The Unbelievable Truth found a present-day counterpart in Simon and Patty. And every time Patty breaks into a dance, you get taken back to that iconic dance scene from Simple Men with a dash of Reality Bites thrown in. However, unlike the passive, introspective nature of the lovers in the Hal Hartley movies, the duo here are dying to explode at the slightest provocation. Even if their interactions as idiosyncratic as their predecessors.

    I mean, Simon is undoubtedly an angry man and wants to be seen as a rebel. That much is certain. Who is his anger directed at, or why is he mad? Even he is unsure as he comes out as just confused and trying too hard to be a nonconformist despite the threat of jail time looming large. It starts right with Kyle Gallner’s character Simon and his explosive introduction when he burns the front lawn of a girl who had invited him to dinner. Right after being chased around by her family for hitting on her mom. 

    That first scene was almost a misdirection, as that family doesn’t show up later even though what he did would come back to haunt him throughout the movie. We move on to Patty (Emily Skeggs) and her family, with their first interaction almost a callback to American Beauty. They have gone to great lengths to make her look as plain as possible. Still, her character is interesting enough (or weird as per indie movie standards) to keep Simon curious. When Simon pulls a Freddie Prinze Jr from She’s All That in the middle of the film by removing her glasses and shaking her hair, she remains plain. And he remains interested. 

    You almost think Simon would show up with the boom box at the house again, proclaiming his love by the end. Thankfully, that didn’t happen, but the ending works because the chemistry between Kyle and Emily is brilliant and you remain invested in them. 

    They sell the fact that these two misfits are made for each other and even buy into their fantasy of being a suburban Bonnie and Clyde duo. (Their first interaction is also very similar to the first time Warren Beatty and Fay Dunaway meet in that classic). 

    But this is not a road movie as you realize they just keep driving around their local suburbs and never really go anywhere. The grand delusions they have of a crime spree extend to creating a ruckus and pulling a couple of fast ones on some local kids. When she asks him if they are going to jail, he deadpans, “Probably”. His hesitant expression when Patty wonders alond if he is her boyfriend also says a lot about his confused state of mind.

    It is ultimately the tale of three suburban meals. Maybe the director Adam Rehmeier was shining light and providing a broader light on suburban America. Many important details are revealed during their interactions with their families and others they meet with during mealtime. Like the zinger about Kyle’s family was a delightful surprise. 

    That is when you realize that, though they like to believe they are a couple of star-crossed lovers on a spree, they are just a couple of normal suburban kids. Or as Patty puts it, trying to get through the best day of their lives. Before things get worse and they lose their chance at a decent dinner in America. 

    And pastiche or not, Dinner in America is an adequate tribute to all the movies it tips its hat to. It might come across as an imitator to all lovers on the run movies that came before it. But Kyle and Emily give the movie enough personality to make you want to take that ride with them. Or on second thoughts, maybe walk away in the opposite direction in case they decide to get you to pose with a dead racoon after knocking you out.

  • Promising Young Woman: Review

    Promising Young Woman: Review

    Promising Young Woman: Review. By Will Steele.

    Promising Young Woman touted its arrival as a motion picture event which would ignite a conversation. Safe to say, it has delivered on this promise with the film sparking debate amongst casual viewers and cinephiles alike. So successful was Promising Young Woman at tapping into a public discourse that its writer and director Emerald Fennell’s screenplay triumphed in perhaps the most competitive category – that of original screenplay – at this year’s Academy Awards. 

    But upon further inspection, does Promising Young Woman exist as an excellent film on its own merit rather than simply a perceptive screenplay tapping into an ongoing contemporary debate surrounding sexual abuse towards women? Prominent films with accolades and acclaim have the dangerous tendency to build hype so tall that it builds insurmountable expectations amongst audiences. Will Promising Young Woman stand the test of time? I believe it will continue to ignite debates for decades to come. 

    This dark comedy centres on Cassie (Carey Mulligan) a med school drop-out whose seemingly aimless life sees her working as a barista whilst still living with her parents despite being on the cusp of her thirties. Unbeknownst to family and friends, Cassie is driven by a dark past and her purpose is one of slow and deadly revenge. When Cassie’s past begins to catch up to her, she confronts those who have led her down this path and we the audience begin to understand just why she seeks solace in vengeance.

    Revenge thrillers are nothing new to moviegoers who have witnessed the evolution of the genre fronted by the likes of Lee Marvin and Charles Bronson up to present stars like Liam Neeson and Bruce Willis. Where Promising Young Woman excels is in its manipulation of this cinematic sub-genre which yields countless male-fronted iterations each passing year. Emerald Fennell has pulled a Trojan horse trick by packaging this searing social commentary as a violent Hollywood revenge thriller. Don’t be fooled by the kitsch and camp aesthetics on the surface. Hidden beneath the bubble-gum pop soundtrack, floral wardrobes and rainbow colour palette lies a story of deeply repressed emotional trauma. Albeit initially jarring, the deceptively infantile aesthetics of Promising Young Woman allude to traumas the screenplay masterfully unravels.  

    Meta-textuality is rife in modern media, but here it is so gloriously utilised that one can only be impressed. Fennell’s directorial debut takes you on an emotional rollercoaster which may leave you flummoxed, vindicated, or just plain mystified. This is the sign of a truly effective thriller which is fully realised onscreen by way of ingenious casting. Promising Young Woman is populated with a cavalcade of familiar faces; most of whom we may recognise from sit-coms and stand-up specials. Allowing performers like Bo Burnham, Alison Brie and Max Greenfield to play into and against their comedic personas allows for intricate nuance in how audiences will perceive characters. Promising Young Woman is remarkably refreshing in its characterisation of irksome characters who are not out-and-out evil, but rather recognisable variations on seemingly good natured people betrayed by their self-serving intentions.

    Future audiences will continue to revisit Promising Young Woman to bask in this dynamic for the simply sad fact that ill-intentions are often subtler than most films tend to portray. Your typical Hollywood thriller traditionally pits gallant saintly hero against hand-wringing dastardly villains. Unlike those films, Promising Young Woman never spoon-feeds its audience. The bevy of symbols and motifs that are present only add to this respect for the audience. Motifs are delicate and messages are never wielded like batons to beat us over the head. Whilst many may argue over the debate raging at its heart, many others will find ripe conversation in debating the meaning behind the ambiguities of the film. 

    The bold claims that Promising Young Woman would ignite debate have been met, but whether this discussion will rage on is a question only time will tell. However it is the ugly truth at the heart of the film – that of misogyny, violence towards women, and moral accountability – which are so sharply felt now more than ever in the wake of #MeToo movement. It taps into more than just a hot topic; it speaks to an issue which spans centuries of injustice. Promising Young Woman will stand the test of time because it may always be relevant, even though it shouldn’t be. 

  • Which Star Wars Planet Is The Best To Live On?

    Which Star Wars Planet Is The Best To Live On?

    Which Star Wars Planet Is The Best To Live On? – Coronavirus, World Hunger, Climate Change…

    Maybe it is time to leave Planet Earth and move elsewhere…  After devouring the Star Wars saga, there are plenty of options throughout the galaxy!

    The many worlds of Star Wars are beautiful and vibrant, from the seas of Kamino, to the lush sands of Tatooine.  With the research carried out by folks at Betway we can go through a selection of the more interesting ones to live on.  Who needs Rightmove?!

    ENDOR

    Endor is the location of the last scrap in Return of the Jedi as well as the home of the cute little Ewoks.  In addition, the stunning Speeder Bikes pursuing through the woods will be a tourist spot.  Plenty of forests to visit I would imagine.

    NABOO

    Now this is a planet to visit.  A planet packed with culture, with gorgeous scenery including the countryside, lush meadows, and waterfalls and of course the animals.  Naboo is also the birthplace of Emperor Palpatine, so I would imagine there’ll be monuments etc. to visit if you’re into that sort of thing…

    ALDERAAN

    Similar as Naboo, Alderaan is known for the gorgeous views and mountains.  Imagine the Instagram posts!  Also, home of Princess Leia and the Organa family.  It would have been the ideal spot to visit. 

    HOTH

    Featured in The Empire Strikes Back, Hoth is the home of the Rebel Alliance’s secret Echo Base, and a cold planet too, packed with microbes, bacteria and Wompa.  So an ideal destination if you’re a scientist or ski fanatic.  Don’t forget our skis and microscope!

    KASHYYYK

    Chewbacca’s home planet, Kashyyyk is a mixed bag.  We have beaches to relax on, we have the vibrant Wookie culture, and we have massive slugs and spiders.  Plenty to write home about!

    TATOOINE

    Tatooine is a harsh desert world orbiting twin suns in the galaxy’s Outer Rim.   Spaceport cities such as Mos Eisley and Mos Espa served as a base for smugglers, criminals, and other rogues.  So the property prices will be low at leaset…

    There are more planets to inhabit of course: BESPIN, CORUSCANT, and KASHYYYK to name but a few.

    Which Star Wars Planet Is The Best To Live On?
    Which Star Wars Planet Is The Best To Live On?
  • My New York Year: Review

    My New York Year: Review

    My New York Year: Review. By Julius Tabel.

    Starring Margaret Qualley and a great Sigourney Weaver, this film is about an aspiring writer who finds a job in a literature agency on her stay in New York. Her job is to read letters for legendary and retired writer J.D. Salinger, and because of them, she is inspired to write, but struggles with love and ideas.

    “My New York Year” is overall very solid with a disappointing first half, but a good development that rounds up the story very well. It fails to fully convince because of some missed chances and too easy decisions. Nevertheless, in its own style, which needs getting used to, it is always entertaining, but yet not very relatable.

    First, for a film called “My New York Year” there are only few New York-moments. This is the first missed factor. A girl in her twenties in a big city struggling to find a home and a true partner; It felt like it wanted to establish a kind of “Frances Ha” atmosphere, but never quite went for it. And so, things were left unexplained and unused. Joanna ́s (Qualley) boyfriend is suddenly there without any depiction of true love. This makes her character very raw at first, and it might be already too late when things get turned around.

    Overall, the first half is very flat. Things and even feelings are explained by breaking the 4th wall with narration, and I don ́t even listen to that anymore. When will filmmakers finally learn that narration is not a good stylistic device in most cases? Nonetheless, this is also a turning aspect. When Joanna reads the letters that admire the withdrawn writer, the writers present them straight into the 4th wall. This might first be annoying, but to be honest, you will get used to this, and at the end, this writing atmosphere becomes very authentic. If you are a fan of literature or not, like me, I think that everybody will adapt to the film ́s atmosphere.

    But atmosphere isn ́t all. The movie tries to inspire without success. You can feel a depressive mood, but not the necessary melancholia. In one scene, Claude Debussy ́s “Clair de Lune” is played, and this is the only dreamy moment. Besides, “My New York Year” tries to achieve an expression on the viewer, but doesn ́t succeed. However, the story still turns out to be all right.

    Joanna gains new traits, and we discover her struggling, naïve, and envious sides. The way I see it though, it was already too late. The character became so unrelatable and her unrealistic actions in the first half even made her partly unlikable. Finally, you will be able to accept her development, but you will never fall in love with her, as the story ends in an unsatisfying way.

    But first, I have to mention Weaver ́s character. She is Joanna ́s strict boss and while she might be the typical severe and boring superior, Weaver brings much personality to the role. It is truly entertaining to watch her. This may be irritating since the viewer actually should feel with Joanna when she interacts with Weaver ́s character, but because of good dialogue and awesome deliverance, things feel very one-sided, but still authentic.

    The story will for sure never bore you. That ́s perhaps the movie ́s biggest strength. Over the course, the plot featured a kind of suspense by hiding the character of J.D. Salinger. I think that this might intrigue some people and be a very strong part. This way, you will be able to like the ending, although it basically takes off into nowhere without telling the audience a true direction.

    Nevertheless, “My New York Year” is a good film to watch. It might be a bit flat at the beginning, but if you give it time to develop, then you will enjoy it and feel the positivity.