Author: BRWC

  • Adrift In Tokyo – Review

    Adrift In Tokyo – Review

    Adrift in Tokyo follows the touching tale of a disillusioned young man, steeped in debt, who dwells incessantly on the abandonment of his parents. Wallowing in self pity Fumiya’s life quickly worsens when a debt collector arrives to give him a quick beating and a reminder that he needs to pay up astronomical sums in a matter of days.

    Desperate and despondent Fumiya wanders listlessly around Tokyo trying to think up ways of making money when the debt collector returns and makes him a proposition; he will cancel the debt and give Fumiya one million yen if he walks with him across Tokyo, for as long as he chooses.

    As they wind across Tokyo visiting places of importance and nostalgia the pair slowly form a bond and the tone of the film moves from the tense set-up to a meandering and heart felt tale of friendship. Mr Fukuhara quickly confides his terrible guilt in Fumiya, explaining to him that he wishes to cross Toyko to the police station, where he will turn himself in for accidentally killing his wife. Despite this early confession the two become closer and closer en route, with the older, wiser Mr Fukuhara becoming like a surrogate father for the wayward student, guiding him back to the correct path and helping him to come to terms with who he is.

    Along the way the pair see some of the stranger sights of the city and the film becomes like a modern-day Japanese odyssey as they stick together through thick and thin and catch glimpses into the peculiar lives of the urbanites. Warring families, old school friends, random guitar players and cantankerous old watch shop owners are some of the many hilarious characters of dipped into scenes, which make this film varied, entertaining and comically brilliant. These clever injections of insanity balanced with the serious tones of loss and abandonment keep the film both lively and grounded.

    It is easy to grow to love Mr Fukuhara, despite the things he’s done and his guidance of the younger man is truly moving. On top of this the film’s side story of the discovery of Mrs Fukuhara’s body has some fantastic scenes and three characters who are comically brilliant as they are continually distracted from finding the corpse. Meanwhile the hints and indications of the role of luck, chance and fate are a masterstroke; keeping you interested until the very last.

    Adrift in Tokyo is a great film and it was a genuine surprise, far and away above my expectations when I sat down to watch. The beauty of Satoshi Miki’s films is that they seem to be completely unpredictable each time without ever becoming too absurd. Beautiful cinematography and clever filming are a real homage to the beauty and diversity of Tokyo, the perfect setting for a very human, urban film.

  • 11 Questions with Margaret Cho

    11 Questions with Margaret Cho

    Ok, so this time it’s more like 10 Questions with… But, it’s only cause I asked 2 questions in a row on a similar subject and things of a sort happened.

    Anywho, it is time once again to dive into the inner workings of one of my favorite celebrity folk, this time the exciting, controversial, sexy, vivacious and hilarious Margaret Cho!

    As always, for those who may not be in the know, I’ll fill in on the details of Ms. Cho.

    Margaret Cho is a Korean-American stand up comedian, best known for telling it like it is in oh-so-humorous ways. She is also a Gay Rights and Political Activist. And, she dated Quentin Tarantino, worked with John Woo and survived growing up with her Mother (fans know about that one.) Anything else in general you might want to know, go here: http://www.margaretcho.com/

    No frills.

    Some fluff.

    Little functionality.

    11 Questions, and 11 Questions Only.

    This interview took place via email between myself and Ms. Cho’s publicist last week.

    As per the format of ’11 Questions’ I submitted my questions cold and let the interviewee do the answering. Any “conversational awkwardness” is because of this and is unintentional.

    (The interview has not been edited in any way (for grammar, spelling or otherwise) to make either of us look better.)

    Enjoy!

    DS- In an effort to, hopefully, be a touch different in my line of questioning, I figured I’d start off with something hypothetical… I know that you essentially got into comedy as an escape from or defense against various abuses and prejudices you faced growing up as a very different kid in the strange world of 1970’s San Francisco Counter Culture. Do you think that if you had been born and raised, in Korea, in a more traditional setting, around children like you, at least racially, that you’d have turned out entirely differently; or would comedy, and the need to speak for those who don’t necessarily have a voice have come to you, or from you, regardless of upbringing?

    MC- actually, the sf counter culture is what saved my life. the experiences i had with bullying came mostly from the korean children that i went to church with, and the children of families that emigrated to the us around the same time as my parents. i also had a lot of problems in the conservative religious schools that i was in later – in any case, being a kid was hard for me, and i am not sure if it would have been better somewhere else.

    DS- Moving to fluffiness for a bit; your small part as an FBI Agent in John Woo’s over the top, action blow out, FACE/OFF, from 1997, how did that come your way and what was it like working with known perfectionist Woo?

    DS- From the same film set, any interesting stories about working with Travolta and Cage?

    MC- cage was in character the entire time, but it was confusing because he actually switches characters in the middle of the movie, and he also had a very large trailer that housed his own personal gym, which looked super fancy but i never went inside. travolta was really fun and nice, quite the bon vivant and very witty and flamboyant. theyre both so famous it is strange to talk to them and be around them. it’s like being in a wax museum all the time.

    DS- I like to consider myself a film connoisseur, not only film in general, but porn too… I know Jeff Stryker is your favorite porn star, never been too huge a fan myself.  He looks nice, has an impressive package, gives a good show in the sack, AND was in some really horrible Italian Horror films as an actual “actor”, I really should love him but, he’s never really blown my skirt up. Where did your obsession come from?

    MC- i think he’s a real star! also i love that particular era of porn, which is 70s/80s. it’s just a good time to be a porn star. i think he’s gorgeous and really sexy. also there’s the magnificent joey stefano who sadly is now gone. but jeff is great! he has moved from porn star to icon – which is wonderful to see. i adore him.

    DS- In addition to your stand up, film and television credits, and your Gay Rights activism, you are also well known for being very politically out spoken… In a nutshell, I’ve not been too pleased or impressed with Obama’s Presidency so far. Better than Bush, yes, but not by a very large margin I’m afraid. Personally I was rooting for Hillary, but that’s neither here nor there at this point… With the next election looming and all of the republican candidates being bat shit insane, the current President a wellspring of mediocrity, and the country being caught between a rock and a hard place, so to speak, what are your thoughts on the whole; where do you think we should go or what should we do?

    MC- i think that we need obama in office, and although there has been a lot of disillusionment about his administration, it would be a lot worse if things went the other way. i think that there was much janitorial work to be done after bush left office, and that was largely left to the obama administration, which is patently unfair and obama shouldn’t be judged on what bush left behind!

    DS- I’m a Gay man, I was born and raised in the South, North Carolina specifically, in the US. I am also a nerd, I used to have a pretty bad weight problem and have definitely had more than a few ups and downs in my life because of this. I’ve also seen the world change quite a bit in my short life. Just a scant few years ago, in my mid-teenage years, I did get into one major fight in regards to my sexuality. I was jumped by 8 guys, managed to kick the ass of 7 of them, but was nearly killed by the 8th. Fortunately a friend was there to intercede. Then, just recently, we had a major campaign for the amendment of our state constitution to allow same sex marriage. We didn’t win it, didn’t even come close really, but there was a large swell of support from a lot of surprising places… Basically, what I’m trying to get at is, a lot of positive change seems to have taken place in a short amount of time. Do you think this is true all over, or is it still in just a select few, more progressive areas?

    MC- oh my goodness you are such a fighter! good for you! never stop fighting! seriously. it’s awesome. i was saddened that north carolina didn’t win, but at the same time, what is normally viewed as a fairly conservative state did very well in showing its diversity and strength in the face of homophobia and hypocrisy. i do believe a lot of positive things have happened all over, not just in a few areas, and that north carolina is getting there, as the rest of the country gets there! hang in there!

    DS- In the same vein, if it really is happening all over, as it seems to be, what areas do you think we could strengthen up our resolve in further and where can we push harder to show the world it’s not so bad to be gay, different, or just not like the status quo?

    MC- i think that just participating in pride, talking about our lives, blogging/writing/recording our experiences – this is what it is all about. we need to share with each other and the world at large what it is like to be us – and not have any worry or shame about telling the truth. we are the world  – and we just happen to be the gay world, and that is fantastic!

    DS- Switching gears again; in 1995 you had a small role in Gregg Araki‘s whacked out, bisexual, Bonnie and Clydesque, Doom Generation. Considering the figure for liberation and out spokenness you’ve become since that time, why haven’t you worked with the similarly minded Araki again?

    MC- i love working with gregg araki – and we have done other things together, although not in film!!!!! i love him!!!!! i would do another movie with him anytime!!

    DS- I know you’ve been the brunt of a lot of hatred due to your stance on a lot of heated subjects, any particular bits of hate mail or death threats stand out to you, that you haven’t shared before?

    MC- i think that mostly people said that i was ugly, and they called me a ‘pot bellied pig’ and that really upset me, because i didn’t understand what that had to do with my political views. i don’t get why people have to try to insult my appearance when they don’t agree with what i have to say. that is terrible and really evil. i wouldn’t ever want to attack people for something that they can’t control. we look the way we look because that’s the way we are, and there shouldn’t be judgement about that.

    DS- Speaking of heated subjects; One thing I’ve noticed all of my life, and even to this day, is there isn’t a lot of love for the Asian community in the entertainment industry or even America at large. If it isn’t a martial arts expert, or tech geek, it’s still fairly uncommon to see an Asian actor on screen in a film or on TV. There are a few exceptions to that rule of course, yourself included in that, but still, it’s fairly limited. Why do you think that is? Could it really be just some hardwired, left over mentality stemming back to World War II and before, as I sometimes think it is?

    MC- i think it is because there is this idea that asian american is less than american and still very foreign. it’s depressing and difficult – as not seeing ourselves out there in the media leads to not feeling like we exist, or that we are invisible. i think that if i was white i would be a lot more successful! i mean i truly believe i am talented, and many times more gifted than a lot of people i see out there, but my race excludes me from things – yet that could just be my own perception. it’s also possible that i am not (but not likely!)

    DS- I really hate to end our talk here, but I suppose I have to. You’re currently co-starring on Lifetime’s hit Comedy/Drama, Drop Dead Diva. How does the project fit into the world of Margaret Cho and can we expect to see any new original specials, or works from you in the near future?

    MC- i love drop dead diva. it’s a fantastic show and a wonderful job to return to – it’s my 4th year playing this character and i love it. there’s a great deal of challenge learning to live inside a character for that length of time. i am proud of my work there and i also enjoy the people i get to act with. we all have fun together.

    yes! there’s lots of new things – coming soon – a new live standup show which i am very proud of! MOTHER – all about my mother, motherhood – all the ins and outs of it – pun intended.

    also i just shot a show for the food network called Blind Dinner Party, which is a great reality project all centered on inviting guests with very different points of view to share food and ideas. it’s amazing.

    and there’s another album of songs – some duets and awesome collaborations. i am taking my time with it but i feel really great about this record!!

    Well, there we have it gang! That was my verbal toe-to-toe with Margaret Cho! Hope you enjoyed as much as I did!

    As promised, this is going to be a special month for 11 Questions with, a double dip if you will, as you’ll be getting the long whispered about interview with the fabulous scream queen and former Mrs. John Carpenter, Adrienne Barbeau on Friday as well!

  • Haywire – Review

    Haywire – Review

    Usually before I watch a film I’m about to review I’ll always read up about it. I’ll check out the plotline, possible spoilers and other reviews to try to gage the overall opinion. However I decided not to with this film!

    Directed by Steven Soderbergh, this action thriller follows Mallory Kane (Gina Carano) a black ops ‘super soldier’ as she and her team rescue a hostage. During this operation she’s betrayed by someone close to her and to say she’s pissed off is an understatement. Revenge is a dish best served cold, and boy does she serve it!

    The film is sometimes a little confused and hard to follow but it has so many things that make it amazing! The fight scenes are brutal, fast and believable and Carano really kicks ass! Michael Fassbender is charming and mysterious but unfortunately not in it for long and finally…. Channing Tatum. I do not need to say anything apart from eye candy!

    The one thing that did annoy me is the choice of Ewan McGregor as the ‘bad guy’ Kenneth. It just doesn’t work for me and it isn’t a believable character. In my opinion it would have worked better if McGregor and Fassbender had switched roles.

    All in all a really good film that I wasn’t expecting to like very much. It’ll have you on the edge of your seats and wanting to learn MMA so you can kick ass like Carano does!

  • UPDATES! New 11 Questions with… Coming Soon!

    UPDATES! New 11 Questions with… Coming Soon!

    Sorry I’ve been away so long gang, but times they is be a changing!

    My “career” hath been breaking my back, also deep in production on a new film, suing someone for remaking my film Psychotropica without my permission, yadda, yadda, yadda!

    Just every little thing has been keeping me from writing new silly for you all to enjoy (was gonna do a whole spread on the Marvel Comics films, up to The Avengers with the WONDERFUL title “A Marvel Idea” but just haven’t had the time.)

    I have not been kept sooooooo busy, that I haven’t been able to keep seeking out Celebrities with which to blather on with however.

    Monday, 6-4-2012 we’ll have an 11 Questions with the Fabulous, Talented, Sexy and Super Funny, Margaret Cho!

    Then, just to make up for my lack of being around we’ll finally post the much talked about Adrienne Barbeau special on Friday the 8th ! (And trust me, Ms. Barbeau’s interview is the finest I’ve had so far.)

    So a double penetration of celeb info, straight from the horses mouths (or in this case, gorgeous, talented ladies mouths) coming very soon!

    Hope you’re ready for it!

    Love,

    D

  • Prometheus – Review

    Prometheus – Review

    Prometheus, presumably at this point, needs no introduction. It is Ridley Scott’s long awaited return to the sci-fi story telling that began his career with Blade Runner and Alien. It follows the titular spaceship and it’s crew embarking on a mission to explore a planet whose co-ordinates were divined from a series of art works occurring independently throughout early human civilisations. What they find there may have startling implications on the origins of human kind, and also on our future.

    Scott and Lindeloff (and the rumour mill) have been skirting around the issue of Prometheus’s Alien franchise relationship since early production, originally it was reported that this would be a straight up prequel to Alien, then it was unrelated, then it related was but it would be distanced, perhaps a reboot, or a tangential storyline. What was clear was that Scott was trying to distance himself from repeating the use of the original H.R. Giger designed biomechanical xenomorph.

    So is it a prequel to Alien or not? Here’s where it gets interesting, and occasionally irritatingly divergent; in reviewing The Book of Alien (HERE) I mentioned that it would be noteworthy to see what if any of the unused concepts and removed scenes from Alien would crop up in Prometheus. The answer of course is all of it, at least in some form. Prometheus is in part Scott going back to the same universe, with the budget, the tools, and the creative self indulgence to be able to explore things that he couldn’t in 1979. Without spoiling too much, there’s a fairly large sequence from Alien’s original script that, in addition to the derelict, explored the possible origins of the Alien itself and this whole concept has been taken verbatim, including Giger’s basic designs for it, and expanded into the basis of the movie with the addition a whole new, and debatably successful, slew of information.

    Other similarities arise in the appearance of the ship Prometheus, which not only borrows heavily from how the Nostromo looked, in elements like doors, corridor panelling, and ceiling set monitors, but is actually akin to some of the concept artwork created by Ron Cobb and Chris Foss for Alien before they changed to become the more cramped Nostromo. But whilst these elements are all indicative of Alien, they come via the 21st Century and make no mistake there’s a lot of gloss, shine, and the transparent interactive projections that seem to be the sci-fi movie (or indeed any movie with a computer) CG cuisine de jour.

    Parallels between Noomi Rapace’s character and Sigourney Weaver are also going to be completely unavoidable, though really she is the antithesis to Ripley. Elizabeth Shaw is an explorer, a ‘believer’; she wants to collect, to catalogue, to study, and bring back – all things Ripley decidedly does not want. Shaw, whilst showing a remarkable tenacity and lack of squeamishness, is not as independent as Ripley, being part of a pair with Logan Marshell-Green’s Charlie Holloway and whilst the movie doesn’t overplay their romantic relationship it is certainly present in a way that makes her a dependant character. She’s no Ellen T. Ripley, but this isn’t a bad thing. Also present is Charlize Theron playing an icy bitch-queen Meredith Vickers (not to be confused with her role as the bitch Queen Ravenna in Snow White and the Huntsman, also opening this week), and Theron plays the role well, if occasionally a bit too intensely. Idris Ebla also deserves a mention as the down to earth, gutsy ship Captain. But star of the show goes to Michael Fassbender as the disquieting android David. Fassbender’s portrayal of the emotionless, yet human mimicking, and ambiguously motivated David is bang on the money; it’s equal parts naivety, brilliance, and down right creepy.

    Also breathtaking about this film is how it’s been made, the scenic views and vistas of baron or emergent worlds (particularly obvious in the opening sequence) are stunning, evoking a kind of extra terrestrial Icelandic landscape. The cinematography and the visuals are beautiful. The sets, both on the ship Prometheus and on the planet, are sprawling large scale masterpieces of design, thanks in no small way to the masterful work of Pinewood Studios. As are the costumes and props – there’s a level of detail in this movie that borders on obsessive (sadly a quality that was not shared with the narrative aspects that will come up shortly). There was not a single point where the CGI was tacky or flawed in a way that detracted from either the scene or the suspension of disbelief, and though the 3D is subtle, to the point of being unnoticeable in certain shots, what it does it create is a depth that is quite breathtaking (note I saw this at a large high quality 4K 3D projection screening that was for lack of a better description flawless, I would recommend you see it this way if possible, but again this is a movie that will be equally amazing in 2D).

    Prometheus’s tone and pace is perhaps the most divergent quality to what the trailers led you to believe (the one I watched anyway, I avoided almost everything in the run up to release), it’s a far cry from the cramped terror of Alien and Aliens and it’s not without it’s faltering moments. There are times where calamity (the obvious kind) could have been avoided by a better script, allowances are made to create action rather than the calm yet terrifying build up that could have worked so well in it’s place. There are too many crew members in Prometheus, largely consisting of people who are blatantly around to meet an early exit – the hierarchy of faceless to memorable is not in their favour in this type of movie, we don’t know them and aren’t given any time to get to know them, and so swiftly they will perish. There’s a lack of humanism in this, we knew the cast of Alien because they were few in a small space, this movie is larger, both in scale and in cast, and so diluted. While constant comparison to Alien might be slightly unfair, the movie has more than brought it upon itself. The ‘doomed from the start’ survivalism present in Alien is somewhat present here but there is a more prevalent faith element, a quest for humanity’s maker that verges on creationism and skews the whole tone. It is however by no means a mess, or a failure, it is just slightly different to expectation.

    Prometheus is fantastic, and maddening. It’s undoubtedly beautiful and well made but there are little niggles present in continuity if this is to be taken as a direct prequel to Alien – and there’s no denying that it is. It’s been stated before that Scott is primarily a visual director and that sometimes he doesn’t sweat the details (read plot) in order to achieve this, but I don’t accept that, if you’re going to do something do it right. Continuity errors are not the kind of thing that viewers, sci-fi ones in particular, appreciate. To argue that these continuity problems are inconsequential because this isn’t really a direct prequel to Alien assumes too much in the way of coincidence that it would border on monolithic stupidity (the planet is called LV-223 and not LV-426. Why when it is clearly the planet from the former film?). Do not make a movie within the Alien canon if you’re also going to make stylistic and narrative decisions that purposefully contradict established ground.

    But ultimately the movie stands up on its own, is wonderfully entertaining, powerfully visual, and the problems in crossover elements can be forgiven (even though the viewer shouldn’t have to do so). Prometheus is perhaps not quite the genre standout, triumphant return to the Alien universe that was expected, and it doesn’t suffer well from the quasi-religious hype-marketing it’s received, but what would live up to Alien? The expectation is perhaps too great. What Prometheus does, it does successfully. It’s good, damned good in fact. And that should be, and is, enough.

    Prometheus is in theatres from today.

    Addendum (with spoilers)

    I wanted to add to this review, written in the small hours of the morning having watched Prometheus at the midnight screenings, to correct my error in perpetuating the idea that the planet in the movie had to be the one from Alien. Of course it isn’t, it’s just remarkably similar – perhaps too bloody similar. LV-233 is so similar to 426 that it toys with viewers who have seen Alien, it unfortunately does play into the coincidence mentioned (and the stupidity therein). Moreover the significant similarities are likely a holdover from when the movie was in early production and was a direct prequel to Alien before a larger, tangential, and equally intriguing storyline was conceived. Accepting that this emergent planet, with a crashed ship the same as the derelict, a warning message to keep away, and it’s own xenomorph population is separate isn’t that difficult (after an initial knee-jerk reaction) and then opens up the film to it’s own mythology, sequels, and a possibility for answers to the new questions it posed. There are various strands leading away from Prometheus, one of those ends up being Alien, but what we get next is going to be something new and, hopefully, equally as intriguing.