Author: BRWC

  • The Adored: Review

    The Adored: Review

    ‘The Adored’ is a drama about an intense love triangle. Largely the story revolves around Franky (Laura Martin-Simpson), A photographer who has been hired to do a homely and intimate shoot with Maia (Ione Butler), A beautiful and rather reserved model. During the course of the shoot we learn more about the back-stories of each character as Franky tries to get Maia to relax and open up. As the story unfolds at the cosy cottage they are photographing in, it begins to intercut with a man, Adrian (Jake Maskall), in therapy about a violent incident involving his wife, Maia. As the weekend moves on Franky struggles to keep her growing lust and obsession with Maia in check but as Maia opens up about her troubled marriage the pair grow closer. The story builds steadily to a violent crescendo where the three finally come face to face on a clifftop.

    This movie is your average straight to DVD drama, the pacing and story are good and the cast manages to give performances that are at least watchable and save the lacking script and bad direction. The main problem that becomes apparent is that none of the characters are likeable, Franky is bat-shit crazy, Maia is needy and dull and Adrian just seems to have two emotion states, Violent and Vacant. All in all I just didn’t really care what happened to any of them and when the credits rolled I got on with my own little life.

    4/10

  • Wake In Fright – Review

    Wake In Fright – Review

    You’ll never want to drink alcohol again. Unless you don’t already, in which case, good for you.

    Peter O’Toole, excuse me, Garry Bond stars as restless teacher John Grant who is embarking on a Christmas trip to Sydney. Forced to work in the one-horse town of Tiboonda as part of terms of a government deal he is looking for some rest-bite from the teeny town with a trip to Sydney. Before he gets there though there is a stop over at the town of Bundanyabba (“The Yabba” as locals call it). Deciding to get himself a quiet drink he winds up getting drunk with a policeman (Jock Crowford), introduced to a simple came called two-up Mr. Grant sees a way out of his financial strangle hold but shockingly things don’t go his way and he ends up loosing what little money he had. Hungover and essentially stranded he takes to another local pub where a man in look of conversation offers to buy him a drink, thus continuing what ends up being a five day cycle of being hungover, drinking, getting into ridiculous situations and repeating until John finally breaks.

    For anyone who has lived the cliched life of a uni student, been on an extended drinking holiday or has even faced alcoholism they is much that will be uncomfortably familiar and something nostalgic about the films treatment of booze. The title Wake in Fright seems to be a comment on the action itself. Suddenly coming to in a panic about where you are and what you’ve done the night before. The trajectory of teacher John Grant from well spoken and well-to-do to abject misery is quick but never feels rushed. He quickly falls down the rabbit hole of despair all brought on the inviting locals who all just want to drink.

    If you’re the sort of person who feels ill at ease meeting new people, especially if your a bookish type being introduced to confidant sporty types the uncomfortable first meeting is perfectly summed up in the films unsure meetings between Grant and the locals, you can talk to anyone when you’re smashed. The film runs with a constant feeling of unease. Every time Grant finds himself in a new situation with a different person, who eye’s him up to get the measure of him, there is always a sense that violence is not far behind. It’s that underpinning theme that have led some people to label Wake in Fright as a horror. A social horror film absolutely. Instead of avoiding a killer’s blade though Bond has to avoid an inviting beer.

    The unrelenting heat of the Australian outback sizzles through every frame. Every sip of a first quenching beer, every dry gulp of a sick inducing hangover beer is perfectly realized. The photography is beautiful. The opening shot reminiscent of the opening of Once Upon a Time in the West, a train track, a saloon and nothing for miles around. In all seriousness Garry Bond could be Peter O’Toole’s brother in both look and voice. He manages to convey Grant’s frustration, struggling dignity and eventual collapse with aplomb. Donald Pleasance, everyone’s favourite go-to crazy from the 1960/70’s plays crazed alcoholic this time round. A constant reminder to Grant that what he could become if he let’s himself go to drink. Pleasance is amazing as a doctor and and intellectual who has simply given in and accepted that he is an alcoholic. One moment eloquent, the next destroying windows whilst screaming for no reason.

    Their are graphic scenes in the film of an extended kangaroo hunt that some may find problematic. To be honest I got a little tired of seeing kangaroos getting bullet riddled for real and the general treatment of them seems to go to far. Story-wise it shows Grant’s increasingly messed up surroundings but did so many kangaroos have to die on film? That aside Wake in Fright is a lost gem that has finally and thankfully been unearthed. Terrifying, funny, well acted, well shot. It could very well be the Film of the Year so far, made in 1970.

  • Illumination – Review

    A problem that has plagued philosophers, scientists and artists for years is a seemingly simple one; what is truth? Instead of asking what the truth is, they instead seek to find what we mean when we say something is the truth. Is there such a thing as a universal and objective truth? in 1972, Polish director Krzysztof Zanussi went on to direct, to my mind, the definitive film to look at this eternal question.

    Illumination shows us (roughly) 10 years in the life of Franciszek Retman (Stanislaw Latallo), an inquisitive young man in search of truth. Along side this, we are shown interviews and debates with real Polish academics expanding and discussing the ideas of “illumination”. Blending aspects of documentary and fiction, we follow Retman through his search for truth in physics, spirituality and in the strangeness, grief and euphoria of life.

    Latallo carries the film fantastically, keeping the film from just being a cold, intellectual exercise. You can’t help but warm to the wide-eyed young man open to all life’s experience, equally at home in the lab as he is running through fields.

    Wojciech Kilar’s score is quite unusual. While featuring some absolutely beautiful pieces of music, it mainly focuses on ominous, a-tonal chords which interject between scenes. It works well, but I can’t figure out why. The best I could come up with is that it’s attempting to reflect the hopelessness of Retman’s mission station, to sythesise information into a universal truth (chances are I’m wrong, but it’s all I’ve got!).

    Zanussi’s decision to fragment Retman’s story is inspired to say the least. Films of this kind can suffer from being bloated and running too long on their own self-importance. With it’s fragments and real interviews, it’s as though we are switching between fact and fiction, each lending the other more importance and insight, coming as close as it is to reach any kind of insight on the search for truth under 90 minutes.

    Thankfully, Zanussi isn’t trying to answer any age old questions with empty sentiment here. Instead, he explores truth and knowledge in the most effective and thorough way I have ever seen on film. He dips into all facets of culture, from spirituality, art and religion to science and academia, but the genius in this film is that they are never in opposition. Zanussi offers us the complexities and apparent contradictions of life, which might be unsatisfying but is certainly honest.

    This is a film born of the ideas of its time, and in that way it is a relic. Those are ideas that have changed the way we see the world, and in that way, it is timeless. Illumination is a real rarity, a film that delivers exactly what it promises and perfectly balances it’s emotional power with it’s philosophical exploration. It is more than just a story, it is a statement on knowledge, truth and happiness, as complicated in it’s structure and visuals as are the ideas it ponders. In my eyes, this is a legitimate masterpiece, unpretentious and filled with humanity.

  • Interview With Peter Calandra: Composer For Film And Television

    Interview With Peter Calandra: Composer For Film And Television

    Peter Calandra is a NYC based Composer/Pianist/Guitarist/Educator. He has scored 40 films, written 2000 compositions for television and performed as a musician in the Broadway productions of Les Miserables, Miss Saigon, The Phantom Of The Opera, The Lion King, and Little Shop Of Horrors. I recently had the opportunity to interview him about his long and successful career in composing for television and film.

    Can you tell me a bit about your music education and background?

    I studied music at the ACSM at Queens College, CUNY, and have both a BA and MA in music composition. In addition to being a composer, I have had a long and successful career playing piano in a wide variety of settings from Broadway to Jazz Clubs to Carnegie Hall over the past 25 years.

    What was it like the first time you saw your music on television or in a film, and how did this come about?

    Around 1999 I was working on a project to create a library of music for NBC Sports to use during the 2000 Olympic Games broadcast. One of the producers at NBC had a special piece featuring Bob Costas she was filming to promote the event, and needed a piece written specifically for it. I was also playing piano at the Broadway show Miss Saigon at the time, and remember watching the airing of the piece down in the green room with some other people in the company on a Saturday afternoon between shows. It was an enjoyable experience.

    When given a new commission or project, what is the first thing you do?

    The first thing I want to achieve is to make sure the creative aspect can be as smooth as possible.

    This is unique for each project. That being said, some of the standard things are:

    1)    Establishing a method of communication with the other people on the team (director, producer, editor, sound mixer, etc)

    2)    Figuring out the chain of command in the project and just who you are working for.

    3)    Once the style of music is established, making sure all my technology is working properly and putting together templates of sounds. Detailed pre-production work like this can save many headaches and make it easier to concentrate on writing and not loading sounds.

    What would you say is the biggest challenge as a composer writing for these industries?

    Shrinking budgets and larger responsibilities. As technology becomes more sophisticated, it takes time to stay on top of it all. At the same time, even though budgets are smaller, people want to hear an almost finished product as you are working, so this means in addition to writing music, you become an engineer, software programmer, performer and many other things that were not associated with being a film composer 20 years ago.

    Do you find with such a busy schedule and a large number of projects going on at once, that it can often be a struggle to find time to write music that isn’t for film or television, and how does the experience of writing this music differ in your opinion?

    At times, yes, but a couple of years ago I built a small project studio at my upstate NY home and when I am up there it is very easy to shut out all distractions and write. In fact, my current album, Ashokan Memories, was written and recorded there in the summer of 2012. I composed all the music for my upcoming Album, Inner Circle, there in August of 2013. The biggest differences for me have to do with the function of the music. In film, you need to be very aware of how your music fits in with the dialog almost as if it were a vocal line in a song. Also how the music fits in with the narrative and supports the psychology behind the action. Everything is decided by the picture. In my own music, I get to decide the pacing and unfolding of the story the music is telling.

    In your opinion do you feel that music for television is often overlooked and requested in such volume and speed in comparison to that of film music?

    Not all the time. There are many TV shows that the music plays a vital part of. Also, some films have a very hard deadline. I scored my first feature film, 13th Child, in 5 weeks and that had almost 70 minutes of music in the film.

    How achievable do you feel would it be as a modern day composer writing for media, without the assistance of such advance studio technology, that allows music to be written at speed and at a lower cost, while still maintaining sound quality?

    I think the days of manuscript and piano demos of music are over. As I constantly tell my students, learning technology like it’s an instrument will greatly increase your odds of success in this field.

    What to date has been your favourite project?

    The 2011 feature film “Rise” produced and directed by Lookalike Productions for the USFSA. It was a very well done film with an extremely poignant and moving story line. The film was a tribute to the USA skating team that all perished in a tragic plane crash on the way to compete in the 1961 World Championships.

    What advice would you give to any young composers looking to get there work exposed, and into films and on television?

    Learn how to master the modern skills involved in creating music, but do not forget that this is an industry built on relationships and reputations. Master those skills as well.

    For more information about Peter and his music visit his website www.petecalandramusic.com

  • Boomerang Family – Review

    Boomerang Family – Review

    Boomerang Family is a South Korean dramatic comedy, or a So-Ko Dram-Com (Too much? Too much), based upon 2010 novel Ageing Family, charting the misadventures of a motley menagerie of maudlin misfits (too much. This has all become too much) and begins with the attempted suicide of its protagonist. Comparisons to Little Miss Sunshine are well founded as, during the film’s running time, the family slips further into darkness and despair.

    However, unlike LMS, Boomerang Family skews very, very strange. Elderly relatives are suspected of whoring themselves for grocery meat, uncles are found pleasuring themselves with their nieces underwear on their heads, and somewhere towards the end of the film, it becomes, for some reason, a bloody crime drama. Little Miss Guncrime? Shut up, Adam.

    In fact, as it progresses, the film shifts in tone so much that the escalation of sex and violence threatens to upend all of goodwill generated by the sweet well-observed family comedy that comes before it. It’s hard to know where asian culture shock ends and weird grotesquery starts, but the balance feels like it takes a sharp turning at Fifth and Fucked Up.

    Because, crucially, it’s a well-made film. The characters are well-drawn in their broken, individually dismal ways; a suicidal director reduced to directing pornos called Rosy Milf and Titanic Melons (I laughed at Rosy Milf for far, far longer than I should have – about twelve minutes); a double divorcee about to embark on marriage number three; her stroppy teenage daughter; a ex-jailbird brick-wielding farting manchild of an older brother. But together, their family dynamic convinces. The dinner scenes, the bickering, the quiet connective tissue moments between the big scenes, are sweetly scripted and well-performed. It creates a picture of a family that is quirky, yes, for the comedy, but ultimately recognisable.

    There’s warmth here, which makes it all the more problematic when things go a bit, well… rapey in places and the entire last act turns into Reservoir Dogs on a dime. It doesn’t feel like a betrayal of everything that’s come before, but there was, for me at least, a crucial break in empathy. What was once a strange but relatable family So-Ko Dram-Com (sod it, I’m sticking with it), became simply strange, deadening an admittedly very sweet plot development in the film’s closing moments.

    I would recommend it though. It sweet, well-intention and bizarre enough to satisfying South Korean culture tourists. It’s just a shame that the family tends to split to its weird component parts by the end. It was once so well-knit.