Author: BRWC

  • Cuties: The BRWC Review

    Cuties: The BRWC Review

    Cuties: The BRWC Review. By Alif Majeed.

    A few years ago, I watched a movie with my cousin and her family about a serial killer who had a thing for children. The killings were mostly happening off-screen, and a lot of it was ambiguous. As the movie progressed, my niece kept asking questions about the film. Questions like what exactly is happening with ‘that uncle’ and the children or where do they go off to etc. To my utter surprise, my cousin was explaining everything in detail to her in an extremely patient and objective way. After the movie got over, I couldn’t help it and ask, “Was that necessary?”. To that she just said, “Of course it is. She needs to understand and be aware of what is going on.”

    Cuties is getting a lot of flak for how the protagonists were portrayed and objectified on screen. A lot of it has to do with its unfortunately erroneous marketing campaign. The uneasiness also gets amplified when you realize how young these girls are. 

    The main character of Cuties is Amy, a Senegalese Muslim, living with her mother and brother in Paris. Her family is waiting in gloom for her father’s impending second wedding while her mother is secretly crumbling, trying to maintain a semblance of outward dignity about the situation. Fascinated by a group of schoolmates who have been practicing privately for a local dance competition, she desperately longs to be part of their gang. 

    Inspired by the suggestive twerking videos they see online, they misguidedly believe that they should emulate those routines to grab eyeballs and possibly go all the way in the competition. As Amy is slowly succumbing to peer pressure and desperation, she steals a phone to secretly practice the video routines. When the owner catches her with the stolen phone, she takes a compromising picture of herself and posts it online, believing it would get him into trouble. As expected, instead of having the required effect, it makes her a social pariah and gets blocked by not just her friends but also her entire school. All this leads to a mighty explosive climax that shouldn’t be spoiled here.

    There is a certain innocence in these children when you see them gawking at the school cuties and even with their awkward attempts at flirting with their much older schoolmates as that’s what they believe they should be doing. They also vaguely know what they do might get them into trouble but are so influenced by what they saw online that they think it is acceptable behavior. Maïmouna Doucouré, the director, also makes it pretty clear of that fact. That maybe it WAS the idea, and we are supposed to be uncomfortable at what we are seeing. Not just what they do on screen. But also why and what influenced them to do it. 

    At one point, the girls ostracize Amy for posting that dirty picture, as they fear they would be labeled sluts if they continue to hang out with her. It does not even occur that somebody might judge them for all they have been doing so far already. 

    It causes a throwback memory of all those childhood birthday parties, where one kid inevitably dresses up, and how many parents reacts to it. The child may be living the princess dream and having the time of her life. But she doesn’t realize some of the adults around her have already possibly started to judge her.

    Fathia Youssouf is a gem as Amy, and it is hard not to be moved by her incredible performance. From the moment she first comes on screen, to her fascination and longing gazes at the gang’s antics and her awestruck reaction at her neighbors’ using an iron to straighten her hair and her trying to do the same with disastrous results.  

    In a stunning sequence that shows her state of mind, her mother and omnipresent, all-knowing matriarchal aunt conducts a purge on her to quash her rebellion. In an ultimate act of defiance, the way her dervish dance morphs into an involuntarily twerking dance routine that she has been practicing so hard is an image that sears into your head and stays there for a very long time. 

    Médina El Aidi-Azouni playing her sympathetic friend Angelique, the group’s de facto leader, also portrays her character with remarkable aplomb. I also genuinely appreciate the bond Amy shared with her mother, played by Maïmouna Gueye. When they finally come to terms with each other and their decisions, it feels earned and not shoehorned for the climax’s sake.

    The fact that the movie is making people uneasy is not that surprising. Some scenes in the film genuinely make your skin crawl. But you realize that part of the discomfort you feel watching Cuties also comes from the fact that the kids do not wholly comprehend the consequences their actions may have. It is a movie that needs to be understood and watched, no matter how uncomfortable it makes you feel.

  • Love Express: Review

    Love Express: Review

    By Alif Majeed.

    One of the first interviewees in Love Express is Andrej Wajda, the legendary Polish director who was a batchmate of Walerian Borowczyk at film school. He is narrating a story about his teacher, who acknowledges that the most talented student after the first year is Borowczyk. The expression on Wadja’s face is filled with a mixture of pride and despair. As if saying that while he recognizes his genius, he is sad thinking of his classmate’s wasted potential.

    That pretty much sums up the narrative that the documentary Love Express: The Disappearance Of Walerian Borowczyk takes throughout its short run time. What he comes off across as in the end is more of an underachiever than a misunderstood genius that the movie tries to project him as. 

    It also has a lot to do with his career trajectory. Borowczyk is a guy who followed his real passion and did make some inventive animation shorts and movies, but then somehow took a left turn by being relegated to directing soft porn towards the end of his career. That is the kind of stuff that lends itself some dramatic narrative. But how this transition happens is never adequately explained. 

    There is some incredible set of talking heads taking us there, though, including filmmakers like Terry Gilliam, Neil Jordan, Bertrand Bonello, and the late Andrzej Wajda. Watching the documentary, you can see the influences Borowczyk might have had on them. Especially with Terry Gilliam movies’ fantasy elements or his work on Monty Python and even the early films of Neil Jordan like The Company of Wolves. 

    The best part of the documentary was when the various interviewees are shown clips from his movies and their reactions. To see them relive their memories of him while watching the clips shows the genuine affection they had for him. The fun element for them amplifies when many of them also acknowledge how absurd his movies can be. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8bKV-kAQpg

    It comes out pretty well to the fore by the time we get to The Beast, one of Borowczyk’s most controversial and erotic films. More than the eroticism, they focus on the absurdity, as at least some of them come off as apologetic for enjoying his movies at this point as his filmography gets more, you know, odd. Especially when describing the love scene between the female lead and the titular beast who looks like an overgrown rat. (‘No one can squirt as good as Borowczyk,’ an actual quote from one of the interviewees). 

    There is also a scene where the makers make a close inspection of the beast’s costume. The reverence shown for it comes off as a bit showy. As if to hype up a non-existent legend.

    A lot of screen time is also dedicated to his penultimate movie, Emmanuelle 5, and its troubled production. By his admission, he just directed the film within the film in the beginning. The rest being directed by one of his assistants, which is confirmed as much in the documentary. Even if based on fact, this only adds to the apologetic nature of the latter half of Love Express, coming in the light of everything they showed before.

    After watching Love Express, you tend to admire the clips from his early animation works, which look like they are truly worth seeking out. But you don’t feel the need to search out for the rest of his body of work. That in itself is one of the movie’s biggest fallacies as we don’t get a real idea of why we need to know more about him in the first place. 

    Rather than celebrating his work and craft, you just feel sorry for him for getting trapped in unfortunate circumstances. If the makers of Love Express wanted to portray Borowczyk as a genius trapped under the weight of his sordid reputation, it never clearly comes out. He just comes across as a person who was voted most likely to succeed after graduation but ends up blowing his opportunities. 

  • There’s Only One Bad Actor In The Cineworld Closure

    There’s Only One Bad Actor In The Cineworld Closure

    Cineworld – By A J Black.

    To some this seemed inevitable. To others unthinkable. To many, a genuine surprise. Cineworld, the largest cinema chain in the U.K., are closing all 128 venues across Britain with the loss of over five thousand jobs.

    It is, quite simply, a devastating blow to the cinema industry, particularly as this also affects over five hundred Regal cinemas in the U.S., with many more redundancies likely there too as a result. Commentators have been long anxious about the Covid-19 pandemic resulting in the death of independent cinemas, privately owned minnows in a sea of corporations, but for Cineworld to admit defeat, close their doors until some point in 2021, and lay off most of their workforce, proves just how badly our unprecedented situation has marked the cinematic landscape. If there was one organisation you would imagine had the reserves and resolve to battle on, it was Cineworld.

    The trigger for this has been, undoubtedly, the push back of the 25th James Bond movie No Time to Die, which in a remarkable about face – remarkable for the fact Eon & MGM were going full bore with their marketing campaign for the intended November release, including posters, podcasts, music etc… – decided to move the film’s release until April for the second time, conservatively hopeful that the pandemic will be under greater control in Europe by Easter. Cineworld, and the entire landscape, were banking on 007 appropriately coming to the rescue and now he has gone ‘undercover’ for six months, shall we say, then all hope appears to be lost. The Blofeld that is Covid-19 is too much for Cineworld, haemorrhaging profits and facing down sizeable debt as their cinemas remain open with few punters, and the result is the worst outcome: redundancies.

    Let’s not kid ourselves on who is principally to blame here, though. It’s not the public. It’s not the film studios. The blame lies with an ineffective, willowy, strategically inept government who have allowed things to get this far.

    The opening of cinemas during the pandemic has always been a scenario filled with various chickens and various eggs, since the beginning of the protracted lockdown in March this year.

    It made sense for Cineworld to close as the pandemic hit hard. And in the government’s defence, though they should have been more adequately prepared and consistently had ignored advice that such a scenario was likely, scaling back pre-emptive attempts to plan for it, Covid’s impact and how to counteract it took time in which the country, and the entire world, reeled from the reality of the situation. By the summer however, with lockdown restrictions lessening and the country slowly beginning to return to work in key industries, Cineworld took the plunge of re-opening and exhibiting ‘classic’ movies to tease audiences back in. My best mate would regale me in July of tales in going back to his local Odeon with his son, catching The Empire Strikes Back or 1989’s Batman, and having a great time. He would tell me his screenings were largely empty, they were safe. Returning to the cinema seemed a perfectly viable thing to do.

    Understandably though, the public were reticent to return. Who can blame them? In almost every other sector, the government were vacillating on rules and regulations, in everything from retail through to opening schools. U-turns abounded, ministers contradicted each other, the track & trace system was a shambles. While the Eat Out to Help Out scheme was a relative success, albeit temporarily, and the public certainly did not seem backwards in going forwards about getting back onto city streets when shops opened up, cinemas seemed a different prospect. Two hours in a ventilated room surrounded by strangers—with often only two metres social distance possible sideways and not in front or behind—with no obligation to wear face masks at first. Why would people return to cinemas with such uncertainty? In fairness, Cineworld and other chains did everything they could to keep Covid at bay, on the ground. Social distancing, sanitizers, alterations to screens etc… but the doubts remained.

    The saviour was considered to be Tenet, the big new blockbuster from Christopher Nolan that, after one or two push backs, stayed the course as a brave test case for how to open a tent pole picture during the pandemic. The result was fair to middling. More people ventured to see it—myself included, but two weeks after it debuted on a quiet Sunday morning and masked up all the way—but not enough for it to be considered the salve for the cinematic nation. Would No Time to Die have fared better in this slot? Maybe. Nolan has as many detractors as he does fans and once reports of Tenet’s wilfully bonkers, time-splicing narrative leaked, with polarising reviews across the board, that surely couldn’t have helped common or garden film fans make the journey. 007 might have led more consumers to take the plunge rather than Tenet’s brand of icy, esoteric intelligence (and I say this as someone who thought it was a terrific movie).

    Tenet’s release just prefigured, however, the long expected second wave of Covid-19 cutting across Europe. Coronavirus on the march saw most of the major releases pushed back into September and October jump ship, leaving only No Time to Die to weather the storm. And in that, the government response continued to be paltry. This isn’t from the perspective of financial solvency, let’s be clear; bailing Cineworld out almost certainly would not have been viable as a major, international PLC with a significant turnover, even with the disappearing furlough scheme for employees helping businesses out across 2020. The poor response lies solely with the consistent government mishaps in bringing Covid-19 to heel, with badly enforced, confusing rules across the country, conflicting advice, problems with mass testing and a track & trace system still lagging behind other nations. If people were being told they shouldn’t visit relatives in their homes, why would they risk going to a cinema, even one operating at around 30% capacity?

    The simple reality, however, as to why Cineworld has ended up in this position is due to the dearth of pictures available for people to see. We have already seen a trend away from cinemas, in the main, making money from smaller, independent films, at the expense of the major blockbusters that fill up copious screens in the primary chains. I’m as guilty as the rest for this; despite having a Cineworld card, I’m far less likely to venture out to see Kajillionaire than I would have been Black Widow, and I say this as someone who enjoys independent film and studies cinema, rather than just a regular fan who goes to the movies and doesn’t think too hard about it. So, this is the public’s fault, right? If cinemas are supposedly safe, with few cases of Covid being contracted in them, then their avoidance has surely resulted in closures? The public don’t mind having raves or illegal parties or infesting shopping centres and going out for meals, but they won’t show up for smaller films to support their cinemas.

    Here’s where the issue is chicken and egg. No Time to Die moved because Eon & MGM saw a continued resurgence of Covid-19 in Europe where the franchise makes a significant amount of box office, and ultimately they have a responsibility to protect their bottom line and aim for the film to make as much profit as possible – No Time to Die will be aiming for that sweet billion, ultimately. Had the U.K. better controlled the spread of infection, keeping Covid down by not sending hundreds of thousands of children back to school at once or releasing restrictions too soon in various sectors, the film might well have opened in November. Not everyone would have ventured out to see it, but it would have given Cineworld, and other chains and particularly independents, the boost they needed and possibly encouraged the bigger hitters delayed until Christmas—Dune, Wonder Woman 1984 etc… – to go for broke, further boosting the sector. But that didn’t happen. Those films will almost certainly now move and if they do, there will be little incentive for most audiences to return to cinemas until realistically around Easter 2021.

    Yes, the studios are trying to protect their shareholders. Yes, the public have at times been reckless and not obeyed Covid restrictions. And yes, Cineworld didn’t even pre-warn their staff of redundancies before the news leaked to The Sunday Times. But if the film sector is collapsing in the U.K., let’s aim the blame where it’s due: a haphazard, mercurial government whose ineptitude now could see thousands of hard-working people out of a job just in time for Christmas. Hardly the magic of movies at work.

  • Wyatt McDill: Interview

    Wyatt McDill: Interview

    BRWC went behind the scenes with Writer-Director Wyatt McDill 

    Writer-director Wyatt McDill has made multiple films, music videos and TV commercials over the years including the latest to be released “3 Day Weekend”, which he made with business partner and wife Megan Huber, set to release October 8.

    What is the backstory to your latest film ‘3 Day Weekend’? What inspired the idea for the film?

    Megan and I wanted to make a film we’d love to watch, an old-fashioned caper where one surprise just leads naturally to the next ‘til everyone is miles off course. Making films is hard, so we figured, let’s pour it on! “3 Day Weekend” is the result: a dense puzzle, seen from four points of view, with time jumps forward and backwards, and all told with no dialogue.

    It is fascinating to us at BRWC that you chose to write the script without any dialogue. Why is that? 

    In the film, people occasionally talk, and even sometimes to each other, but they never successfully communicate. A Sleeper Cell film always makes the writing itself a key part of the story, so no dialogue – or communication – just made sense. I always love a movie that shows a story, not tells it, and asks the viewer to keep up, or even fill in what’s happening. No dialogue is just taking that idea to its extreme.

    With that in mind, how did that effect casting? Can you explain the process ahead of your final key cast choices of Maya Stojan, Morgan Krantz, Nathan Phillips and Scott MacDonald?

    Real life – with its history and its nuance and its messiness – is ten times more interesting than this hokey thing we do with actors and scripts and costumes and cameras called filmmaking. For this reason, we always ask our actors to stay as close as they’re comfortable to playing themself in any given role. In the end, we couldn’t have been happier with the expressive performances given by Maya and Morgan and Nathan and Scott, who all had a really difficult task: create a compelling character without ever speaking a line!

    Photo of Maya Stojan and Nathan Phillips courtesy of Sleeper Cell Films

    In a few words can you explain your directorial approach to the story?

    I was somewhat surprised to find that, when you’re shooting a film with no dialogue, there will also be no shot-reverse shots, and from there a lot of the rest of traditional filmmaking technique goes out the window, too. We ended up developing a specific way of shooting – a three-quarters over the shoulder shot that would come around the character to show reactions – to reflect the unique importance of POV in this story. I came away with a new fascination for filmmaking – it’s an artform that can adapt and innovate depending on the story you’re making. What other genre is like that?

    What was the atmosphere like on-set? Were there any challenges?

    Shooting entirely outside in Northern Minnesota on the cusp of winter would be a challenge for anyone. Also, we threw our actors into lakes and holes, onto ATVs, and into trucks and boats before literally burying one of them (Morgan Krantz) alive! Luckily, Megan creates the same atmosphere on set no matter what the challenges are: it’s calm and she’s in control. It’s only possible to make films under circumstances like these if the drama stays in front of the camera.

    Do you have a specific preference of the genre or types of projects you both want to spearhead?

    All of our films contain a storytelling conceit. Our first film, “Four Boxes,” was a movie that was actually a web drama. “3 Day Weekend” has no dialogue. Our next film, “Hollywood Fringe,” is a comedy about L.A. actors staging an autobiographical play in their apartment. What genre we work in isn’t as important to us as HOW we tell the story, which we always try to make innovative, like another character in the story.

    Can you tell us yours and Megan’s top 5 films of all time? Do you share a similar taste in films?

    I never settle down anywhere for long when it comes to lists, but “Mulholland Drive” is always there, and “American Movie.” Megan has the viewing taste of an 88-year-old widow – she can bark out all the lines from movies like “42nd Street,” and “Cabaret.” We overlap on Olivier Assayas. And “Sense and Sensibility.”

    What’s next for Sleeper Cell Films?

    We recently world-premiered “Hollywood Fringe” at the DWF Festival in Hollywood and were pleased to win an Audience Award. Next summer we’re back in the woods shooting another thriller, called “2 Feet Underground.” It’s the next installment in our “10,000 10” Series, which is ten puzzle-thrillers that all start with a number 1-10. And we’re developing a cooking show, and directing a Holiday special, and…

    How can people find out more about you? 

    Our movies have Facebook pages, I’m on Instagram, and we have a site with information about our projects at www.sleepercellfilms.com. Also, we are developing a streaming site where people can watch our films direct from the filmmaker: www.sleepercell.tv.

  • Maria Molino: A Quick Chat

    Maria Molino: A Quick Chat

    Maria Molino: A Quick Chat – We had the opportunity to chat with New Jersey-based stylist and blogger Maria Molino! By Eleanor Klein.

    Where are you based?

    Rumson, NJ

    Do you have any siblings?

    Yes. Two younger brothers.

    How did you get into blogging?

    I grew up loving to read, write and draw. When I graduated high school, I was torn between going to college for fashion vs. going for literature. I ended up going to Rutgers for Literature. After years of struggling on how to best combine all of my interests, I realized blogging and being a full-time Instagrammer were the answers I had been looking for.

    What was your first paid collaboration?

    My first paid collaboration was with a local lingerie boutique, Sweetest Sin.  

    What is your most memorable career moment?

    Getting to run the Instagram account for Pretty Woman: The Musical after being recognized by their creative execs after I posted photos of myself in costumes inspired by the show.

    Who are some of your favorite influencers?

    Aylin Koenig, Lorna Luxe, Leonie Hanne, Camila Coelho and Aimee Song.

    Who is your style icon?

    Forever Coco Chanel. Unafraid, Independent and Classy. It all came through in her style.

    How would you describe your personal style?

    Simple, functional, but flirty! 

    You can follow Maria on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/mariamolino/?hl=en