Author: Ben Gummery

  • Pride: Review

    Pride: Review

    By Benjamin Gummery and Lewis Mainwaring.

    Pride tells the story of ‘Lesbians & Gays Support The Miners‘; a real activist movement who came out in support of the miners during the 1984-1985 strike.

    The lesbian & gay community felt a kinship with the miners due to having dealt with a similar kind of oppression from the Thatcher government, the tabloids and authorities such as the police. However; the group met opposition from homophobic views held by the miners movement themselves, which led them to bypass the unions and get their donations directly to affected small towns in the South Wales valleys (the Dulais Valley)  as they attempted to overcome the prejudice and stereotypes that had existed.

    Pride film still

    The film was directed by Matthew Warchus and written by Stephen Beresford for UK based Calamity Films; with UK distribution from Pathé and BBC Films and features an incredible ensemble cast including Ben Schetzer, Bill Nighy, Andrew Scott, Dominic West, George MacKay and Paddy Constantine. It’s out in select UK cinemas Friday, September 12th. 

    This film has the same feel-good, small town charm as previous films on the subject such as Brassed Off (1996); it feels like a warm glass of milk (but with a whiskey chaser). It’s incredibly bright and uplifting; so much so that it pulls off the double trick of re-creating that time  period while also making the audience feel like this could be happening Today. It’s ‘in your face’; but not to the point where it would easily offend many.

    pride3

    There is a downside to this approach; the films darker moments are largely outweighed by the humour and incredibly positive momentum. For example, the AIDS crisis that was occurring in the UK at the time gets only a cursory mention so as not to distract from the films main focus. Some common gay & welsh stereotypes are also shown here.

    We initially mistook Bill Nighy as gratuitous star casting but he pulls off a masterful performance as repressed and conflicted miner Cliff; who experiences probably the largest character arc of the whole cast. There are brilliant, authentic performances from the entire ensemble cast and we found the women characters were particularly well developed as well as the authentic gay experiences of the male characters.

    pride2

    The screenplay and acting is supported by an uplifting score; consisting mostly of music carefully selected from the time and incredibly bright and bold cinematography. The film uses sequences including everything from characters dancing on tables to making sandwiches but makes these all seem incredibly compelling. We did feel the use of music was a little too much at times though.

    Our Verdict – A Must See. The film received a round of applause at the small preview screening we attended in South Wales; and rightly so.

    5/5

    Pride (2014) – Out in UK cinemas Friday 12th Sept

  • Review – Blood Valley: Seed’s Revenge (Seed 2)

    Review – Blood Valley: Seed’s Revenge (Seed 2)

    By Benjamin Gummery and Lewis Mainwaring.

    This film from writer/director Marcel Walz is the follow-up (but not a direct sequel) to the 2007 film ‘Seed’; which followed Max Seed on a rampage of blood and gore.

    Max Seed (played by Nick Principe in this film) is not in our opinion a modern day slasher icon such as Michael Myers (Halloween franchise), Jason Voorhees (Friday the 13th Franchise) or Freddy Krueger (A Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise) but was clearly deemed ‘popular’ enough to spawn a blood-soaked sequel; although this time he’s not killing alone.

    The story resolves around a group of four friends (Christine – Natalie Scheetz, Olivia – Christa Campbell, Claire – Annika Strauss and Barbara – Sarah Hayden) on their way home from a bachelorette party in Las Vegas. The film opens strongly with a grotesque horror sequence that stays with the audience long after the fade out before flashing back to the girls leaving Las Vegas; this in itself is not an unusual device for a horror film but as the film continues we realise the story is chopped up completely out of sequence and scenes appear to be inserted at random without consideration for the plot and character development.

    image3

     

    In classic horror movie cliché fashion, the RV they are travelling in breaks down in the isolation of the desert and a series of horrific grotesque events occur; in some ways this could be seen as a homage/blatant rip-off of the 2006 remake of The Hills Have Eyes.

    There are many other horror clichés in this film such as; taking the ‘scenic route’ through an isolated desert and talking to/picking up a hitchhiker who is clearly ‘creepy’ as noticed by half the main characters and 99% of the viewing audience (if they’ve managed to leave it on this long). This movie is so full of clichés that even the plot becomes a sort of spoof through its use of dialogue.

    Considering in the first film, Max Seed was a murderer who killed with purpose this film completely lacks any kind of back-story that would help to enhance the character and show why he is killing.

    As well as Max Seed, the four protagonists have to worry about his new wife (Manoush) and son (Jared Demetri Luciano) slaughtering them.

    These newly introduced members of the seed family are not explained thoroughly or at all. His new wife’s character development is severely lacking and only explained (poorly) just before the credits – and in our opinion is only there to link to the previous movie. She’s not as much menacing as just plain bizarre and we can’t decide if this is due to wooden acting or poor dialogue and direction.

    image1

    The hitchhiker character (Jeff Dylan Graham) appears at first only briefly (due to the sequence of time-line jumping shots) and later in a horrific sexually charged sequence that adds little to the plot; where in any other films this would have been used as more than just a cut-away (such as The Hitcher, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre etc).

    There is also a lot of religious symbolism in the film; which is similarly out of place and helps to confuse the plot even further. This seems to be the only potential motive for the ‘seed family’ to kill and in our opinion is a rip-off of the ‘firefly family’ from Rob Zombies House of 1000 Corpses and it’s sequel The Devil’s Rejects.

    This conversation pretty much sums up our view after watching the film all the way through.

    Lewis: “I’d rather be shot than mutilated”

    Ben: “I’d rather be shot than watch this film again”

    If you want see this type of horror movie executed properly with a clear plot and well thought out characters rent any of the films this movie tries to imitate (poorly).

    0.1 out of 5

  • Movie Gem Of The Week: Gentlemen Broncos

    Movie Gem Of The Week: Gentlemen Broncos

    Gentlemen Broncos (is a quirky, off-beat comedy from Writer/Director Jared Hess (Napoleon Dynamite, Nacho Libre) about a teenage aspiring science fiction writer; who’s novel ‘Yeast Lords’ catches the attention of his writing idol and the various quirky ‘characters’ he meets along the way.

    Interspersed are surreal (and just plain bizarre) fantasy sequences based on ‘Yeast Lords’; reminiscent of Heavy Metal (1981).

    Gentlemen Broncos poster

    Jemaine Clement (Flight of the Conchords, Men In Black 3, Rio) has a brilliant turn as the jaded and eccentric ‘best-selling’ writer; which parodies the genre perfectly.

    I also enjoyed Jennifer Coolidge (American Pie, 2 Broke Girls) as the wacky single mother who owns a dated clothing store.

    If you enjoyed the zane wackiness of Napoleon Dynamite then it’s safe to say you will enjoy this flick; if not it may be something of an acquired taste, but worth a try!


    When I see a film like this receiving such an average rating on IMDb it really makes me wonder why certain people feel the need to rate a film that they must know is just not aimed at them. Just leave it alone and go rent some formulaic pseudo-quirky comedy like the Hangover or something. But for those of you who believe humor is something that needs constant re-inventing then look no further than Jared Hess’ films. Gentlemen Broncos is quite simply one of the freshest, funniest, well acted (from a comedic standpoint), and sharply written comedies I’ve had the privilege of seeing.

    The film tells a small but endearing tale which is playfully examined on a number of skilfully interwoven levels. Like Hess’s earlier film, Napoleon Dynamite, Broncos is populated by an array of quirky characters, each with hidden depths. The setting is another small town in ‘Nowheresville USA’, and the context is the wonderfully brought to life world of trashy science fiction writing. Again, as he did in ND, Hess manages to create a world so utterly bizarre from a visual and aesthetic point of view but so familiar from an emotional point of view that the emotional tribulations of the characters become the dominant focus of the film. And this, of course, is the point. The emotions that the film both explores and manages to stir within the audience are the truest feature of the conceptual landscape. So as the film progresses, the realness of the characters increasingly stands out against the more surreal elements of the film and, with that, the audience becomes increasingly enamoured of each and every one of them.

    The story itself centres on an insecure adolescent, Benjamin (Angarano), who writes science fiction novellas. Hess succeeds wonderfully in giving us yet another central character who we immediately root for and admire despite, and perhaps because of, his obvious lack of typical mainstream lead character traits. Angarano is, as usual, excellent in the lead role in that he manages to play a shy character with little to say while simultaneously holding the viewers’ attention throughout. The supporting roles are all manned ably with Coolidge, White, and Clement scoring particularly well. However, as is the case with every film he stars in, Sam Rockwell steals the show from his very first scene to the very end of the closing credits. Choosing yet another quirky secondary character, Rockwell again shows that he’s not just the most talented character actor of his generation but one of the most instinctively and originally funny as well. Being a good actor and being funny in a film are not necessarily mutually compatible skills but Rockwell does it with ease and as the fictional heroes of both Bronco and Brutus, he gives us two entirely different and insanely original comedy Sci-Fi characters that I will personally relish watching again and again.

    As a backdrop to the action Hess uses the world of pulp science fiction novels and, as intimated above, it is with this multi-layered device that main thrust of the comedy is delivered. The fictional world of the “Yeast Lords” is so outrageously funny that I defy anyone to get through the four or five scenes starring Bronco or Brutus without cracking up at least once (for those who have the DVD, there’s a particularly hilarious blooper where Rockwell can’t bring himself to say the line “were there pimps?” without breaking into laughter at the sheer absurdity of his lines). All in all, the film sends up this peculiar little genre of “writing” while clearly maintaining a strong affection for the potential imaginative freedom it sometimes manages to exploit.

    Gentlemen Broncos is the most original and authentically eccentric film I’ve seen, well since Napoleon dynamite. This latter aspect to Hess’ films is a true virtue given the plethora of ‘whacky-by-numbers’ films that Hollywood has been inflicting on us over the past decade. At no time watching Broncos did I feel like I’d seen any of it before and the freshness combined with the innate razor-sharp wit of the writing and acting allowed me to laugh the most refreshing and honest laughs I had laughed in years. If you watched it and didn’t like it but did like ND, please go back and watch it again. This is a rare gem of a film and if you ultimately change your mind and come to agree with us small band of Hess devotees then do your best to get that ridiculously inappropriate rating up.

  • For The Weekend: Time Travel Movies

    For The Weekend: Time Travel Movies

    By Benjamin Gummery.

    This week we explore the much loved and discussed sci-fi sub-genre of time travel.

    We’ve chosen not to focus on blockbusters like Back to the Future in order to bring you some of the lesser-known films of the genre; although films like those arguably deserve their place as well.

    Although this device is often used it is rarely mastered; as attested to by hundreds of posts on blogs and IMDB ‘goofs’ pages. The true time travel fan will not be fooled if the time travel concept is ill thought out or if there are obvious problems with the time-line. Similarly, the best examples of this genre will explore the consequences; both positive and negative, of travelling through time; pushing them almost to the extremes whilst at the same time avoiding convenient plot devices.

    Primer (2004)
    Primer is the independent, ultra-low budget directorial debut from visionary director Shane Carruth (Upstream Color). Filmed for around $7,000 and featuring a cast of two for the majority of the picture (including Shane Carruth himself); it does not on paper sound like the recipe for a sci-fi hit but the film was well received; winning a Grand Jury prize at Sundance in 2004.

    primer poster

    The plot centres on a group of struggling inventors working out of their garage. Whilst working on one of their projects they accidentally create a device capable of sending an object through time. Cautiously at first, they create a full-scale version and experiment with the benefits time travel can bring; but as is always the case with these films they take things too far. While very little actually happens during the film, there is a growing sense of dread and it is a deeply unsettling experience; which is added to by the films ‘lo-fi’ look and feel. It is worth noting the film does suffer from its low budget in that the dialogue is hard to make out at times (you may want to watch this with subtitles). The time travel concept used is baffling. Forget string theory; you will need to watch the film several times to fully understand it. The film serves as an excellent exploration of how the relationship between two friends changes with their newfound power.

    Los Cronocrimenes  – ‘Timecrimes’ (2007)
    From Spanish director Nacho Vigalondo; this film is unlikely to win any awards for the cinematography or special effects and the performances are not all that spectacular, however the screenplay is compelling. Karra Elejalde plays Héctor, a middle-aged man who has moved to a country house that he is renovating with his wife. A series of events unfold that lead him to the house of a local scientist (played by director Nacho Vigalondo) seeking refuge after he is attacked by an unknown assailant. As the plot develops, we discover that Héctor is actually in conflict with himself. This is a trip to the darker side of time travel and the evil that is potentially inside all of us; the extents that an individual will go to in the belief of self-preservation.

    Retroactive(1997)
    From director Louis Morneau(Bats) and starring James Belushi & Kylie Travis this is more of a fun retro thriller than a serious genre film. Karen(Travis) hitches a ride from the violent and abusive Frank(Belushi) who is travelling with his wife. Fearing that frank will harm her she seeks the help of a scientist with an experimental time machine. This film uses the ‘Groundhog Day’ plot device as Karen goes back multiple times to try and alter the events of the day.

    What do you think of this genre? What are your favourite time travel films?. Let me know your thoughts.

  • Movie Gem Of The Week: Kids (1995)

    Movie Gem Of The Week: Kids (1995)

    Despite my avid interest in 90’s Independent Cinema I have surprisingly not seen ‘Kids‘ until now. I should start by saying the film was(and arguably still is) Controversial given the subject matter, sexual scenes(both consenting and not), foul language and drug use involving minors(who make up the majority of the cast). Whilst it could be argued nothing particularly explicit is shown in the film; it was enough to earn it a NC-17 rating in the US. Therefore, viewer beware! (this is not a film for the easily shock-able).

    The storytelling is partly a pseudo ‘fly-on-the-wall’ style; with narration from some of the main characters. Another key device used is ‘boys vs. girls’; as we see their contrasting but some-what similar stories of their sexual experiences. For me this film has the same ‘hyper-reality‘ element I have enjoyed in other pictures such as The Breakfast Club(1985) & Dazed and Confused(1993) .

    kids poster

    Visually, the film uses a lot of what may now be regarded as Indie pastiches such as slow fades to black and POV camera shots; however in this film their use is stylistically justified. While this is clearly a first film in terms of the cinematography this only adds to it’s indie credentials.

    My opinion; a must see if you like independent cinema and are not easily shockable.