Category: REVIEWS

Here is where you would find our film reviews on BRWC.  We look at on trailers, shorts, indies and mainstream.  We love movies!

  • Murder Made Easy: Review

    Murder Made Easy: Review

    Throughout history audiences have never been able to get enough a good murder mystery. We see the concept employed in a multitude of different genres and in a multitude of different ways. Whether it’s the grim and stomach churning quest for a killer in David Fincher’s Se7en to Eddard Stark’s slow discovery of who killed Jon Arryn in the first season of Game of Thrones, murder and mystery go hand in hand and viewers lap it up.

    While most certainly not the first, perhaps the most iconic of murder mysteries is Agatha Christie’s The Mousetrap. First published in 1952, the stage play is the longest running West End show, and while the big twist ending remains almost entirely unspoiled despite its continued popularity, a lot of the stereotypes and concepts we conjure up when we think of murder mysteries comes from here.

    In fact, I think it’s safe to say Christie’s work is almost entirely where our collective stereotype of the murder mystery sub-genre originates. She may not have been the first to employ the concept, but she’s without a doubt the one who popularised and cemented a style to it, which is a fact writers Tim Davis and David Palamaro seem all too aware of with their feature Murder Made Easy.

    The movie makes reference to Christie on more than one occasion, at one point even singling out The Mousetrap, but it never quite achieves the gravitas that Christie was able to bring to her stories. There’s something about Christie’s work that feels grandiose, even when its confined to a small, isolated and claustrophobic location, as so much of it is. But Murder Made Easy doesn’t have the level of poetry or skill Christie had, and so it never elevates to much beyond a simple sort of half inspired by thing.

    In fact, it sort of tries so hard to bring a new, almost “meta” concept to the Christie style that it winds up sharing more in common with Ira Levin’s underappreciated Deathtrap than it does anything in Christie’s back catalogue.

    Of course, Levin had a wit drier than a desert, and Murder Made Easy doesn’t even come close to matching it. There are moments of dialogue that brought a smile to my face, but nothing that cemented itself in my mind in the way Michael Caine confusedly announcing “I thought I heard the gun drop?” does in Deathtrap.

    Ultimately the biggest issue I find myself having with Murder Made Easy is that it almost doesn’t seem to know what it wants to be. It’s a great concept, and it twists and twists, but eventually it all sort of becomes a little repetitive and, worst of all for this type of movie, predictable. By the time it does start offering up a more interesting take on the subject matter my attention had already waned, and the film never really did enough to pull me back on side.

    Murder Made Easy TRAILER from David Palamaro on Vimeo.

    That’s not to say that I didn’t enjoy it. There’s plenty to enjoy here, as it begins to slowly unravel there are lots of nice touches (the dinner courses serving almost as chapter headings is great) and the cast all do a pretty decent job – with the exception of maybe Edmund Lupinski, who seems to be in an entirely different film to everyone else. I’m a sucker for a good murder mystery style narrative as is, so I was on board here before I’d even started watching it.

    Sadly, though, as the narrative starts to break down into a more violent, grislier movie than I was expecting, we’d already spent too long in the realms of television movie Christie wannabe.

    The film has an unusual visual style that I couldn’t quite decide on. It might have been fine, but it almost might have been really off-putting and cheap feeling. A lot of it seems to be shot on a gimbal or some sort of Steadicam, giving everything this half jerky jitteriness that doesn’t gel well with the style and tropes the rest of the movie is playing with. And it has this odd, rambling sort of mumblecore feel, where conversations go on just a little too long that they start to sound like improve – and not in a good way.

    I don’t want to say it was bad because, truthfully, it wasn’t. I had a lot of fun here, despite my waning interest as the film headed into its second half. To say anything about the plot proper would serve to spoil it, and so it’s worth taking a look at for the twists and turns alone. Overall though, while Murder Made Easy was serviceable it’s nothing to write home about, and perhaps could have done with a little more Levin and a little less Christie.

    If you’re going to watch on slightly meta, almost stage play style murder mystery film, watch Deathtrap, it’s a blast. If you’re going to watch another afterward, Murder Made Easy is there as an option, but it’s probably not going to be your immediate choice.

  • Review: Anna

    Review: Anna

    Ukrainian director Dekel Berenson’s film Anna premiered in the Short Film competition in Cannes last week. A tale of desire set in a bleakly real world, Anna sees a middle aged woman desperately trying to change her life in any way she can.

    Svetlana Alekseevna Barandich is brilliant as the struggling heroine, a single mother working in a meat factory. When she hears an advert listing an opportunity to meet single men visiting from the US, Anna jumps on the chance, even if she isn’t quite what the organisers are looking for. As she meets to hear about the party she is to attend, her keenness is endearing, but more than a little sad.

    Berenson languishes in long shots featuring little action, setting up a beautiful yet cripplingly lonely world for Anna. Not a second is wasted – each and every moment tells so much, even with such a small amount of dialogue.

    In one of the longer sequences, a translator paraphrases the exchanges between Anna and a would be suitor, trying to tell each of them what she thinks they want to hear. The comedy is perfectly balanced with a sympathetic sadness. Berenson proves himself to be a very capable writer and director here, angling for as much emotional investment in his character as possible.

    As Anna dances alone, we see the energy she is using to hold up a façade of attractive confidence, we share fully in her almost encapsulating desperation.

    Although Berenson’s short missed out on the Short Film Palme d’or this week in Cannes, the fantastic news is that the piece has been picked up to be adapted into a feature. With any hope, Berenson will retain all of the beauty, melancholy and sweet humour, without stretching the material to fill a longer run time.

  • Starfish: The BRWC Review

    Starfish: The BRWC Review

    Following the death of her best friend Grace, Aubrey (Virginia Gardner, Halloween) breaks into her vacant apartment to feed the pets and immerse herself in the memories of their relationship. When she awakens on the sofa the next day, Aubrey finds the deserted streets outside covered in snow, stained with blood, and roamed by monstrous alien creatures. 

    Confined and confused, she rummages through Grace’s journals and tapes, discovering a rambling mess of research on some apocalyptic interstellar signal. But through her notes, Grace has left a trail of breadcrumbs that leads Aubrey on a scavenger hunt collecting cassettes from the pair’s old haunts – mixtapes that played together will save the world.

    The feature debut of filmmaker A.T. White, Starfish is a slow-burning lo-fi sci-fi that sits comfortably with such company as Monsters, Coherence and Another Earth

    The film is poetically shot by cinematographer Alberto Bañares, who conjures a woozy, dreamlike world with lingering imagery. While the dialogue is sparse, the narrative is driven by Gardner’s compelling lead (almost solo) performance, and White’s knack for musical storytelling.

    As befits a film preoccupied with mixtapes, Starfish boasts a cool-as-heck, hipster-friendly soundtrack featuring post-rock pioneers Sigur Rós and 65daysofstatic, as well as alt/indie rockers like Grandaddy and Seafood, while White himself composed the spare yet stirring score.

    The film occasionally flirts with becoming too clever for its own good, as White flourishes every cinematic trick in his toolbox: artsy hallucination, animation, and a particularly audacious moment of post-modern self-reflexivity. Yet amidst the flash is Gardner’s understated, magnetic performance, which carries the film right up to its climax – an enigmatic and emotionally resonant revelation, reminiscent of Donnie Darko and Benson & Moorhead’s The Endless.

    An introspective and evocative trip through grief and guilt, Starfish is an assured debut that heralds a distinctive new cinematic voice and vision.

    See Starfish on VOD from 28th May.

  • Another Look At Pokemon: Detective Pikachu

    Another Look At Pokemon: Detective Pikachu

    By Megan Williams.

    I’ve been a Pokemon fan since I was six years old. I collected the cards and played the games, and have followed the franchise ever since its creation in 1997. However, the release of the Nintendo 3DS game ‘Detective Pikachu’ baffled me. The game is unique to the Pokemon franchise in that it is a mystery solving experience.

    As well as this, the main character, Tim Goodman, interacts with a talking Pikachu that sounds extremely similar to Danny Devito. Out of all of the games in the franchise, this is the one that was least expected to be adapted for the big screen. And yet, ‘Pokemon: Detective Pikachu’ was released in cinemas on the 10th May 2019.

    ‘Pokemon: Detective Pikachu’ is a live-action/CGI adaptation starring Justice Smith and Ryan Reynolds. After a car accident causes Detective Harry Goodman’s supposed death, his son Tim Goodman (Justice Smith) travels to Rhyme City, a place where humans and Pokemon work together in peace. Once there, he discovers that his father might actually be alive, so decides to uncover the truth, with the help of Harry’s Pokemon partner Pikachu (voiced by Ryan Reynolds). 

    I am pleased to announce that the curse of bad video game-film adaptations has been lifted. While Ryan Reynolds carries the film as a witty but charming talking Pikachu, Justice Smith is also fantastic as a lead character, and they work off each other extremely well. I look forward to seeing Justice Smith in more films, and I hope he gains more lead roles from this point onwards. Ryan Reynolds should also pursue more voice acting roles; while it’s a strange casting choice, it’s a choice that works due to the narrative, and the craziness of the whole film. 

    As a child, I never thought Pokemon would be brought to the ‘real world’, or at least a recreation of the real world. However, the incredible CGI and visual effects have brought them to life in a way fans have never seen before. The film has chosen to keep their iconic appearances from the animated show, and placed them in the real world, rather than giving them a more realistic look.

    The former is a much better, and obvious, decision. The world-building is amazing; even if Pokemon weren’t featured, this would still be an enjoyable experience. The Pokemon aren’t always put in the limelight; they just happen to inhabit the same space as humans. ‘Detective Pikachu’ opens up the possibility of more Pokemon films like this, which is an extremely exciting thought for fans of the franchise. 

    The musical score, by Henry Jackman (Kingsman: The Secret Service, Ant-Man, X-Men: First Class), is also fantastic and helps bring this new world to life. The mixture of orchestral and 8-bit style sounds demonstrates that, while the franchise has grown and evolved, it hasn’t forgotten its Gameboy Colour origins. And, if moviegoers weren’t convinced by that, then ‘Detective Pikachu’ also features the original TV show theme tune, and the main menu music from the original games. While ‘Detective Pikachu’ shows us new Pokemon, it hasn’t left fans of the original Pokemon media behind.

    Overall, ‘Detective Pikachu’ is charming, funny and a lot of fun. The two lead actors work extremely well together, and the visuals are incredible. This will appeal to both long-time fans of the franchise, as well as those who are just starting to show an interest in the world-wide phenomenon. After seeing this film, I am really looking forward to the future of Pokemon films.

    5/5

  • Who Is Arthur Chu? – Review

    Who Is Arthur Chu? – Review

    The question posed by the title of this documentary, ‘Who is Arthur Chu?’, is a layered one. Most people watching this in England may not have come across him before, but in the States, he is a relatively renowned public figure. What Scott J. Drucker and Yu Gu seek to explore in their documentary, though, is how easily we can feel we know someone in the public eye and make assumptions about them, without really getting to the heart of the person. 

    Chu rose to fame as a sort of resident villain on American quiz show Jeopardy. He combined his ferocious IQ with fiendish tactics and ruthless determination to dominate a game that was seen generally as one of luck. He didn’t play by the rules, he put his opponents off, and unapologetically earned his title of eleven-time champion of the game. Following this, Chu became somewhat of an unlikely celebrity, and in this film, we see him attempting to use that fame for the greater good.

    There is a widely held idea of the stereotypical Chinese/American being highly intelligent, but quiet, unobtrusive and polite. Chu is at his most engaging when he talks about challenging those preconceived ideas, and going against what people expect of him. The documentary sees him not only speaking confidently on stage to a room full of people, but also in intimate family moments, most notably the strained and particularly awkward exchanges that he has with his father, who seems slightly disapproving of Chu’s career in the public eye. 

    We are shown his journey from Jeopardy villain to writer and public speaker, voicing important cultural issues. He recently wrote a powerful piece that went viral about Elliot Rodgers, the Isla Vista shooter who claimed that he was driven to murder because of the way women had treated him in the past. Chu serves as a spokesperson of ‘nerd culture’ and is working to expose and combat the misogyny that he says is prevalent in the psyche of the ‘nerd’ or the outcast. As relatively unchartered territory, it makes for fascinating subject matter. 

    It is at times quite difficult viewing. Chu’s every move is accompanied by the onslaught of shockingly abusive tweets that are displayed across the screen as he reads through them. This technique is powerful, as there is such a disconnect in this day and age between the online presence and the human behind it. People forget that the people they are ‘trolling’ are real human beings with lives and loved ones, and this film deals with this concept in a clever and moving way. Chu is a married man, who struggles with his family as well as finding time to spend with his then wife, Eliza Blair, and be a supportive husband to her through her battle with fibromyalgia. 

    Drucker and Gu have created something original and personal. Chu is an unconventional spokesperson and at times a very flawed character, but he is someone who is constantly going against what is expected of him. He is a difficult subject, though, he is reserved and seems slightly out of touch with his emotions, so the task to get under his skin is difficult, but the directors have created something engaging and interesting with the material they have.