Category: REVIEWS

Here is where you would find our film reviews on BRWC.  We look at on trailers, shorts, indies and mainstream.  We love movies!

  • Tenet: The BRWC Review

    Tenet: The BRWC Review

    In 2006 Christopher Nolan asked us if we were watching closely, now fourteen years later he’s making sure we still are. Tenet requires every ounce of attention you can muster, and blanking at the wrong moment could leave you lost for everything left to come. This is what he does though, and it always has been. Nolan doesn’t just make films; he makes spectacles of the highest order. For all its ruthlessness his auteurism is as distinct and audacious as the other elite of the filmmaking craft, and although he’s used his talents to greater effect in the past, Tenet is a welcome reminder of the genius of his method. 

    No director thinks as much of humanity as Nolan does. Almost all his films speak to the power of individuals to transcend perceived reality and achieve great things. He deals with grand abstract themes traversing dreams and dimensions and yet presents them in such a way that there is always a human who can master them, or at the very least keep them at bay. His obsessions don’t lie explicitly within the supernatural, more aptly they lie in humanities ability to traverse it. In Inception, this meant experiencing dreams as a reality and Cobb venturing deeper into them than ever before. In Interstellar, it manifests as a fourth dimension of human creation that allows Coop to send signals back through time. As for Tenet, the “Nolanness” here is the ability to move forwards while moving backwards. 

    To explain this is to explain the movie so I’ll begin with our protagonist, simply named “The Protagonist” (John David Washington). He’s an operative who proves himself worthy of knowing two things. The first is a gesture composed of intertwining the fingers on both hands and spreading the palms, and the second is simply a word, “Tenet”. Combining these two things is described to us as something that will open many doors, not all of them the right ones. Armed with these mysteries The Protagonist begins to investigate a strange kind of ammunition he’s been encountering in the field, one with the ability to defy physics. It turns out massive amounts of concentrated radiation is causing objects to reverse the flow of time, instead of moving forward as we do, they are moving backwards, and if bullets can be “inversed” as they describe it, then any manner of larger and more dangerous objects can too.

    One man controls this phenomenon, a man with the ability to contact the future and have things sent back to the past. He is Andrei Sator (Kenneth Branagh), a Russian oligarch who suddenly came into his riches despite his low-class upbringing. Rapidly it becomes clear that his intentions with the new technology are nefarious and contain world-ending ramifications. In short, he needs to be stopped. The Protagonist is then left with a fight against, and through, time itself and has two main companions to help him. The first is Neil (Robert Pattinson) a resourceful man who knows too much and explains too little, and the second is Kat (Elizabeth Debicki) Andrei’s emotionally battered wife who proves to be the only means of getting near her husband.

    That is as clear as Tenet can be laid out without unnecessary confusion or blatant spoilers, and therein lies its most significant problem because Tenet is so much more than that. Countless lines pass with great difficulty to comprehend them, and it leaves you grasping for essential pieces of context and explanation. Often a sensation arises that the film is passing by without inspiring any great feeling or leaving any imprint. Here is when Tenet is at its weakest, its an oddly stubborn and uncompromising beast you desperately want to understand but can’t, because frankly, it won’t let you.

    However, the film has more than enough saving graces, and the action is its first and most prominent. Nolan is known for his adrenaline-fuelled set pieces, and Tenet has some of his best ever, many of which play simultaneously in reverse and forward motion. There’s nothing quite like the experience of feeling a cinema shake during a Nolan movie, and as this time-defying combat occurs, it’s impossible not to be enthralled. Ludwig Göransson had impossibly big shoes to fill in the absence of legendary composer and long-time Nolan collaborator Hans Zimmer, and he delivered expertly. These sequences ensure even the most lost of viewers will be in awe for a few moments, and even with a lack of full comprehension, their pulses will race. 

    The performances are the films other triumphs. Even with what is a rather one-track role, Washington has never felt more like a superstar, proving he is just as at home in high-budget blockbusters as he is in indie films. Robert Pattinson is every bit as charismatic as he has proven he is of late, and this is another welcome addition to his recent homerun filled filmography. Their two largest co-stars steal the show, however, and without them, the film would be void of emotional stakes. Kenneth Branagh and Elizabeth Debicki have the rare kind of chemistry that speaks to genuine hatred. Their characters have a relationship based on blackmail and manipulation, and when they go at each other, they go hard. Together they make for an irresistible cocktail of villainy and despair, and when all is said and done, it will be them whom you remember the most. 

    For better or for worse Tenet is Christopher Nolan’s ultimate puzzle. Those with the constitution to unwaveringly pay attention to its secrets will be rewarded with an epic tale found somewhere beyond time. Those without may just have to get by on the visual achievements alone.

  • S.A.M – Review

    S.A.M – Review

    S.A.M – Review. By Heidi Sharpley.

    “I have a crush on him,” Sam played by George Webster, unabashedly proclaims to his friends in the park at the very start of this short film. If you don’t listen carefully, it just slips on by. Unheard and unacknowledged by his friends, they are too busy taking the piss out of the lone kid on the swings, also named Sam and played by Sam Retford.

    Yet, this is perhaps the most powerful line of S.A.M and the whole point it was made. You see, our first Sam has Down’s Syndrome and it seems his friends and perhaps a lot of the audience, don’t expect him to have a romantic or sexual aspect to his life.

    During the rest of this short film we are privileged to be part of the intimate interactions of the two Sams as they pass time on the swings developing a mutually respectful relationship. Acted beautifully by Webster and Retford, the themes of love, self acceptance, dysfunctional families, all unpacked so movingly as the boys sway back and forth.

    Retford plays the teenage angst faultlessly. Webster delivers his Sam’s acceptance of his natural instincts with ease. Inclusion and diversity come at us from different perspectives. There is a beautiful moment when Sam played by Webster turns around in his swing to face the same way as Retford’s Sam. The symbolic act of unity and acceptance, not lost on me.

    The writing and directing team Eyre & Ely have given a voice, face and identity to part of the LGBTIQA+ community with learning disabilities who more often than not move through the broader community with an unacknowledged sexual identity. Perhaps even viewed as asexual.

    More than the message, this story is so beautifully and realistically told. It left me wanting more. I’d love to see this short film developed into a full length feature but only under the care and nurturing of the custodians of Eyre and Ely whose casting, script and direction were faultless.

    And finally, there’s nothing I love more than a love story with a great sound track. Ali Ingram’s, songs Tornado and Your’s Alone are perfectly placed in this movie.

  • The One And Only Ivan: Review

    The One And Only Ivan: Review

    While trapped in a cage at the Exit 8 Big Top Mall and Video Arcade, a gorilla named Ivan (voice of Sam Rockwell) teams up with a caring elephant named Stella (voice of Angelina Jolie) to piece together his mysterious past and hatch a cunning escape from their shared captivity.

    Thea Sharrock’s The One and Only Ivan is one of those movies that you can put on for your kids in the background while they are playing on their tablets or just running around the house. It may capture their attention for a few minutes, but I genuinely cannot see them getting completely sucked into this story which is disappointing considering the fact that it’s based on a true story that is actually quite dark and emotionally moving.

    Instead of telling this story in a powerful way that does the real-life story justice, the film panders so much to children that it sometimes comes across as a little bit cringeworthy. There are dozens of lazy one-liners that some youngsters are going to laugh at, but anybody over the age of four is probably going to find tiresome and more frustrating than some dad jokes even.

    But aside from the weak humor, the film’s moments of genuine compassion and heartfelt character dynamics are too few and far between. The best parts of the entire movie have to revolve around the relationship between Ivan, Stella, and her daughter Ruby. Ivan knows what it’s like to be stuck in a cage and be forced to perform in front of dozens of little kids every single day. He knows that out in the wild, he can be free and live a peaceful life without having to always put on a show for people. Ruby is too young and innocent to realize the dangers of being trapped in a cage her whole life which is why Ivan wants to do his best to break Ruby and the others out of the circus so they can roam free and have a wonderful life.

    At its core, it’s a sweet tale of a gorilla that feels like he cannot have a life of his own and wants to do whatever he can in order to gain his freedom. The problem with The One and Only Ivan isn’t the actual plotline of the movie, just the execution. Screenwriter Mike White just simply doesn’t take the story as seriously as he should have. If you actually go and look into the real-life story which I have, you will find that it’s actually quite heartbreaking but ultimately rewarding. This film however is just a mindless series of events that really don’t amount to much because the film’s tone is far too comedic to be taken seriously.

    If there is something worthy of praise here, it’s most certainly the voice acting from the entire cast. Sam Rockwell is wonderfully energetic and full of charisma as the titular Ivan, and Angelina Jolie feels quiet and reserved but ever-so endearing as Stella. There truly isn’t a weak link among the entire cast. Bryan Cranston can be a little bit goofy and over-the-top in the role of Mack, who owns the Big Top Mall but even still, he is a delight to watch and delivers yet another good performance in his filmography.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-uIQDRS4a8

    Not only that but the motion capture work here is absolutely stellar. Just like Andy Serkis in the Planet of the Apes trilogy, Ivan the gorilla looks so lifelike it’s a little bit uncanny. Yes, he does talk in the movie but it never detracts away from the fact that this fake gorilla looks like an actual gorilla. The other animals in the film look incredibly real as well, and I have to give props to the motion capture and visual effects team here.

    Plus, the ending, while extremely predictable even for those who are unfamiliar with the true story, is without a doubt heartwarming and is sure to bring a smile on your face. It’s just a big shame that the rest of The One and Only Ivan wasn’t as endearing and fun as its conclusion.

    The One and Only Ivan constantly settles for cheesy humor and is a giant missed opportunity to tell a genuinely heartfelt and inspiring story.

  • Unhinged: The BRWC Review

    Unhinged: The BRWC Review

    Pegging itself as the first nationwide COVID19 release, Unhinged has boldly asserted itself in pole position during a time where Hollywood trepidatiously approaches the re-opening of theaters. This lean-and-mean pulpy thriller will never be considered high-art by returning audiences, yet it does deliver an agreeable genre throwback throttled forward by its dedicated Oscar-winning star.

    Unhinged follows Rachel (Caren Pistorius), a down-on-her-luck mom trying to get her life in order amidst a recent divorce. While driving her son (Gabriel Bateman) to school, a road rage incident involving a mysterious man (Russell Crowe) turns deadly when the man begins to track her down for her actions.

    Like a caged lion gnawing to break free, Russell Crowe has an absolute blast sinking his teeth into his villainous role (this clip will give you a good idea of what to expect). Playing “The Man” with a sweaty ferocity and an unnerving menace, it’s a joy to watch Crowe fully embrace the twisted tendencies of the stalker character, putting his all into the performance with his looming physicality and wide-eyed glaze. What could have been a familiar foe in lesser hands becomes a memorably sinister figure under Crowe’s command, reminding us again of the actor’s storied talents. Caren Pistorius and Gabriel Bateman also deserve mention for their committed performances as victims of Crowe’s wrath, selling their torment with authenticity and weight.

    Unhinged B-movie thrills are self-awarely constructed from director Derrick Borte’s assured effort. He wisely keeps his film moving at a fast and furious clip, rarely taking a detour from the taunt atmosphere established in the opening frames. Borte’s craftmanship satisfies that genre movie itch, executing a plethora of hard-hitting car crashes and eerie frames with workmanlike effectiveness (Borte and Cinematographer Brendan Galvin nail the kind of intimidating villain shots you would see typically in a horror movie). It’s refreshing to watch a film that knows exactly what it wants to be and approaches its goal with shameless dedication.

    Unhinged has thrills to spare, but seldomly rises above its fatigued conventions. Carl Ellsworth’s screenplay does his characters no favors, with a melodramatic first third doing a poor job of setting them up as anything more than mere cliches. Any attempts at elevating its trappings, including a vague commentary on society’s casual cruelty towards each other, fail to render a substantive throughline, leaving audiences with a disposable thriller that won’t stick in your memories. With a vehicle like this though, I expect to be in it for a good time rather than an experience that will linger long past the closing credits.

    Russell Crowe’s deranged performance elevates Unhinged into a satisfying B-movie throwback.

  • Random Acts Of Violence: The BRWC Review

    Random Acts Of Violence: The BRWC Review

    Todd (Jesse Williams) and Ezra (Jay Baruchel) are a couple of comic book writers who created the successful and yet controversial, Slasherman comic book series which was inspired by a real-life serial killer. Todd’s wife, Kathy (Jordanna Brewster) is also inspired by her husband’s work, although she intends to write a book about the victims of Slasherman to reveal their stories and to discuss the use of real-life tragedies as entertainment where the real stories affect real people every single day.

    The conflict between Todd and Kathy’s work is leading to a long overdue confrontation, but after Todd receives a strange phone call over the air whilst being dragged across the coals by a radio presenter, Todd starts to realise that his work may have inspired a serial killer to mimic his best work.

    Random Acts of Violence is the feature debut of director Jay Baruchel who co-wrote the screenplay, based on the comic book of the same name written by Justin Gray and Jimmy Palmiotti and is coming to Shudder.

    What could be described as a postmodern horror movie taken from a postmodern comic, Random Acts of Violence is not your typical slasher movie. Random Acts of Violence not only talks about the validity of horror as entertainment (particular true crime horror), but it also talks about the responsibility of authors when creating material which could then be interpreted in a way that the author never intended.

    However, while all these small discussions are going on in a movie about comic book writers that’s based on a comic about comic book writers writing a comic that could be in a horror movie (with me so far?) it all seems to be delivering mixed messages.

    Whereas the comic book could give its readers some time to pause for thought about what the deeper messages of writing all means, the movie doesn’t have the luxury of doing it for the audience.

    So, by the final act Random Acts of Violence seems to be delivering to its audience what it knows horror fans will want and not enough time for them to breathe and really think about its wider implications.