Blog

  • Nina Jarnum: Interview

    Nina Jarnum: Interview

    How California based Yoga Instructor Nina Jarnum Is Growing Her Empire . By Eleanor Klein.

    As a pioneer in the wellness industry, Nina Jarnum, a 42-year old Danish woman has become one of California’s most exciting up-and-coming Yoga instructors, offering Yoga classes, workshops, and online training to her growing following of Yogi’s. Nina’s knowledgeable teaching mixed with her strong authentic personality and sense of humor, delivered with her slight accent seems to captivate yogis not just in California, but around the world. 

    Her story begins from injury: she started practicing Yoga to counteract the impact years of competitive horse riding had on her body. After realizing her burning passion for yoga and the ability to teach the practice to others, she used the power of passionate determination, hard work, and creativity to share her love of movement with the world, by becoming a qualified instructor.

    Now with a long list of clients, an impressive Instagram following, magazine covers, and years of experience as a certified Yoga Instructor, Jarnum’s empire is on the rise.   

    Thank you for speaking to us today. We would love to hear more about how you got your start. Was there a particular moment when you realized you wanted to do Yoga for a living?  

    I had a very dedicated yoga practice for many years without considering becoming a teacher and even as I attended my first teacher training, it wasn’t with the specific intention of becoming a teacher, I just wanted to deepen my understanding of yoga. However, it was during this training I slowly realized that I had something to share, a voice and a unique perspective. My love of yoga evolved into a love of sharing yoga and that’s when I knew, I could and should be a teacher. 

    Many small businesses are suffering during this pandemic. How have you adapted during this time?   

    I’m lucky in that I already have a solid online presence, both through Instagram but also via online yoga platforms. The transition from normal studio classes to Zoom classes was therefore not that big to me; I’m used to being in front of a camera and understand how online teaching differs from real life. That being said, I do miss seeing people up close, doing hands-on adjustments, and feeling the energy of the room.  

    What are three lessons you have learned since starting your yoga journey?  

    I always like to talk about the lessons we learn on the mat and can implement into our life off the mat. For me, the most important lesson is being able to sit with discomfort. Think about it; how many things do you not do in your life because of fear of discomfort? Whether its walking away from a relationship that no longer serves us or starting a new business.. imagine no longer fearing failure, being alone, being humiliated? Truly understanding that discomfort does not kill us, and learn to sit with it… experience it.. is incredibly powerful.  

    Another important lesson from the mat is observing oneself; taking the time to witness my thoughts, my movements, my heart.. without interacting with the “drama” of my monkey-brain and ego. This sprouts an insight into your own instinctual patterns and reactions, which leads me to the third lesson: Understanding that you are something deeper than your thoughts, your ego, your instincts. It’s not that this is not part of you, but you are also something deeper than that. Once we understand that, we also realize that we have the power to change our patterns and reactions.  

    What has been the biggest risk you have taken so far in your career?   

    I walked away from a budding career in law and became a yoga teacher… nothing seems super risky after that haha.  

    I think deciding to make a living from teaching yoga is in itself very risky. It is one of the hardest industries to earn a decent living in. The yoga industry is saturated with teachers and less than adequate teacher trainings, which in many ways cheapens the profession. Another problem is that it is almost as if money is a dirty word when it comes to yoga.. like we should be ashamed that we earn money teaching the gift of yoga.  

    But that being said, with choosing to be a yoga teacher, I have followed my heart and despite the chance of failure, following my heart is never truly risky to me …and always worth it… 

    Is there a particular goal you are currently working towards right now?  

    Yes! I have a concept for a start-up in mind and its evolving as we speak… I wish I could share more, but I can’t. I also have a book that needs to be written at some point.  

    Nina Jarnum

    My more down to earth goals are simply expanding my knowledge. Ever since becoming a teacher, I have dedicated myself to training an average of a minimum of 100 hrs per year; expanding not only my understanding of yoga but also movement in general and mobility. This year Im doing a Functional Range Conditioning training, which is all about mobility. I think it is so important as a teacher of movement to not get locked into a box of your specific practice, but learn from other movement practices, be it dance, gymnastics, Tai Chi; it will give your a more whole understanding and approach as a teacher.  

    Where do you see yourself in 5 years time?  

    Older, a little wiser, and hopefully living 50/50 between US and Europe. I want to expand my community, increase my reach, and hopefully do my part in raising the training and education levels of yoga teachers in general.

  • The Last Days Of American Crime: Review

    The Last Days Of American Crime: Review

    Auteur directors leave their distinct stamp on every endeavor they’re attached to, injecting their stylistic flavor in a movie that becomes synonymous with their unique perspective. While the term is largely attributed to acclaimed craftsman, some auteurs are singular for their negative qualities. That’s where Olivier Megaton comes in, a Luc Besson prodigy who left his incoherent shaky-cam mark on the disappointing Taken sequels. After a five-year reprieve, Megaton is back with The Last Days of American Crime, a shockingly tone-deaf and bloated experience that ranks among the year’s worst projects. 

    Set in a near-future dystopia where crime is about to be eradicated by a government signal, The Last Days of American Crime follows Graham Bricke (Edgar Ramirez), a jaded criminal looking for revenge for his deceased brother. He soon teams up with the reckless Kevin Cash (Michael Pitt) and his elusive girlfriend Shelby (Anna Brewster) to commit one last heist before time runs out. The film is an adaptation of a graphic novel written by Rick Remender and Greg Tocchini.

    Inside its utterly-baffling 148-minute run time, Last Days of American Crime offers very little to endorse, with the sole highlight being Michael Pitt’s performance as Kevin. The underrated actor taps into manic energy as the smarmy cocksure crook while keeping audiences captivated with each bizarre personality quirk he imbues into the role. Under his abrasive façade, Pitt portrays an emotionally deranged emptiness that makes the character a menacing wildcard, elevating a role that would be cartoonish in the wrong hands 

    While Pitt throws his all into the role, his contemporaries seemingly sleepwalk through their poorly-written roles. Edgar Ramirez’s talents are wasted as generic action hero Graham Bricke, solemnly uttering his machismo dialogue without expressing any range of dynamic qualities. Anna Brewster is straddled with one of the most thankless female roles in recent memory, portraying a femme fatale that lacks any real dimension or humanity. It’s also quite bizarre seeing District 9 star Sharlto Copley briefly appear as an over-eager police officer, lacking an opportunity to render a complex character with what’s on the page. 

    The craftsmanship in The Last Days of American Crime reeks of clichés and ranges on borderline incompetence. Action screenwriter Karl Gajdusek offers the bare minimum with his by-the-books effort, establishing the most simplistic of motivations despite the high-concept premise. Olivier Megaton’s herky-jerky camerawork is more of a hindrance than an enhancement, showing an inability to create steady imagery in a desperate attempt to create a sense of style. His action setpieces are largely a bore, with an overuse of edits and lack of creativity preventing any sense of excitement. 

    There’s being bad, and then there’s being downright tone-deaf. Considering our society’s current unrest over racial injustices, the careless handling of the narrative’s social implications ends up being in poor taste. A critical eye could have used the film’s constant portrayals of police brutality as an indictment of America’s overly-militant state, but these moments are used as window dressing to create its senselessly machismo action landscape. 

    Equal parts dated and tasteless, The Last Days of American Crime fails desperately at its attempts to become a stylized genre hallmark. 

  • Disclosure: Review

    Disclosure: Review

    Disclosure. Not the 1994 erotic thriller starring Michael Douglas and Demi Moore. Nor the 2020 documentary on Hollywood’s depiction of Transgender people. This Disclosure, directed by Michael Bentham, is a drama set in an affluent suburb somewhere in Australia. 

    Danny and Emily Bowman (Mark Leonard Winter and Matilda Ridgway) are journalists trying to figure out the next steps following a sexual assault on their four year old daughter. Politician Joel Chalmers (Tom Wren) and his wife Bek (Geraldine Hakewill) are the parents of the boy involved, and would like nothing more than to sweep this whole thing under the carpet. As the couples are long standing friends, a friendly chat might be all it would take to make this whole thing go away. For, you see, Joel is a good politician. His career could be in jeopardy if this got out etc etc, you see where this is going.

    Disclosure shows how quickly this delicate situation can become encumbered by the baggage and agendas of the surrounding adults. They work quickly to discredit the accounts given by the children, then throw in blame and blackmail when that doesn’t work. The film uses Bek’s historic rape to explore the concept of victim blaming, and the way society can convince sexual assault victims that somehow they asked for it or could have prevented it.

    The tagline “There are two sides to every story, and then there is the truth” refers to the two couples, building their own narratives to rationalise what has happened, erasing the voice of the child as they wrestle to have the upper hand. Disclosure utilises the relationship between politicians and journalists to illustrate a fluctuating power-dynamic. In doing so, it also illustrates the complexity of the relationship between government and the press.

    Bentham takes a pressing matter (child-on-child violence; #metoo) and tries to illustrate it earnestly. However, Disclosure plays like a soap opera storyline and leans heavily on  slow-motion as a way to create gravitas. It adds nothing for the most part, except perhaps the flower smashing segment, which echoes a scene from that 2011 Polanski dreck Carnage. Disclosure has many parallels with Carnage, though the trailer is more than enough to see this, so don’t bother with the whole of Carnage—it’s a bore. Essentially, both films see the parents take something that has happened between their children, and make it all about themselves.

    For similar themes and more complex storylines see Rewind (2019) and The Slap (2015).

  • What’s Up Tiger Lily? Rewatch

    What’s Up Tiger Lily? Rewatch

    What’s Up Tiger Lily? Woody Allen Retrospective – By Alif Majeed.

    What’s Up Tiger Lily is a very confusing film in Woody Allen’s oeuvre that came from his comic writer phase. Calling it a film written and directed by Woody Allen might not be the correct term to use. For the edited version, you could probably say it is a film he wrote and “supervised.” He had mainly taken a Japanese movie International Secret Police: Key of Keys, a straight spy thriller about guerrilla fighters and black money, and re-dubbed and re-shot it, changing the plot to make it revolve around the quest for a secret egg salad recipe.

    It’s a movie created by a comic and not a movie writer that comes off as an extended sketch comedy. Seeing that the name is a play on his first movie, you might be confused in thinking it is a sequel to the first movie he wrote, What’s New Pussycat? 

    It would have taken quite a thing to watch that original movie and decide the swap, switch the scenes around to turn it into a film about an international super spy in a quest to find the secret recipe for the world’s most fabulous scrambled egg. If you think it has no business to work, it somehow comes together reasonably well. 

    The problem with the movie is that while it is funny and manages to hit the spot with the gags more often than it would seem, it does try too hard to be smart. Like he was an intelligent writer trying to show off and wanted every line in the movie to be a gag, all dialed up. What makes it works is Woody Allen throwing everything and the kitchen sink at whatever scene is playing on the screen. It is also a pure product of its time. 

    The original Japanese spy movie, though a straight film, does come off as silly at times. Coming on the heals of all the film that at least partly tried to cash in on the James Bond craze of the ’60s. Or even the ones that played it straight during that era like the Henry Palmer movies. But the spoofs like the Dean Martin Matt Helm series. You know, the ones that are easily spoofed by the likes of Austin Powers.

    Nevertheless, his experience as a sketch comedy writer shines through here, especially in scenes where the spies are trying to put their best ladies man hat on. By adding a few looks here and there, and a few lines here and there, he manages to change the reactions entirely. The Kuleshov Effect is in full display with some slight editing changes giving it some whole new meaning and character. 

    He even manages to turn Tatsuya Mihashi, the Japanese actor playing the spy in the original, into a Woody Allen surrogate in some scenes involving the woman. It might not be obvious, but it is still there.  

    It might not feel that much different from an MST3K version of a Woody Allen sketch, but he does manage to turn it into something slightly more than a string of gags stuck together.

  • The Vast Of Night: Review

    The Vast Of Night: Review

    With high-concept science fiction narratives seldom getting the spotlight in mainstream cinema, some directors have focused on re-living the genre’s glory days by harkening back to past eras. Films like Super 8, as well as the hit TV series Stranger Things, embraced an 80’s aesthetic in their telling of Spielbergian sci-fi-horror tales. The latest to join the sci-fi nostalgia lineage is The Vast of Night, which cleverly utilizes its 1950’s setting to tell an earnest and engaging radio serial brought to the screen. 

    The Vast of Night follows Fay (Sierra McCormick), an eager aspiring radio operator working alongside her wise-talking host Everett (Jake Horowitz). While the town is preoccupied with the school basketball game, the two uncover an idiosyncratic radio signal that could lead to something far more sinister. 

    Operating with a shoestring budget and a relatively unheralded cast, the success of Vast of Night’s unique approach is attributed to writer/director Andrew Patterson’s stellar debut (also served as editor and producer). Patterson displays rare patience in his shooting techniques, utilizing smoothly-constructed tracking shots seamlessly while creating a taut sense of momentum. This approach fits the slow-burn tale to a tee, dulling out nuggets of information throughout while keeping audiences on their toes. 

    Many films have utilized a nostalgic approach to wear an era’s zeitgeist qualities as a cheap pastiche, but Patterson’s screenplay cleverly weaves 50’s culture into its presentation. As well as capturing the zippy vernacular of the time, Patterson plays off the era’s mixed emotions of the impending future, wistfully embracing the potential of technological advancements while holding a deeply-seated paranoia for what could be out there. 

    These conceits are baked into every frame of the film, playfully capturing a sense of discovery and danger with impressive results. Credit to stars Sierra McCormick and Jake Horowitz for balancing this tonal high-wire act, with their easy-going chemistry and sharp banter creating an instantly likable duo on screen. McCormick adeptly captures Fay’s longing for a grander life, while Horowitz elevates the wisecracking archetype with a clever embodiment of that persona. 

    There’s so much to admire about The Vast of Night, yet its slight missteps constraint the effort from reaching genre classic territory. Patterson’s script features familiar debut faults, including a framing device that goes nowhere despite its intriguing introduction. While I appreciate the slight approach to its singularly macabre vision, the third act ultimately feels rushed and unsatisfying, with the destination being far less absorbing than the journey that proceeded it. 

    The Vast of Night is a unique low-budget surprise, with Andrew Patterson’s inspired 50s serial approach displaying his bright future in the film industry.