Blog

  • Gold Dust: Review

    Gold Dust: Review

    Treasure hunting buddies Moses (David Wysocki) and Fink (David Wall) on a lifelong search for a legendary ghost ship along the Mexican border, stumble into the crosshairs of a drug kingpin, his enigmatic assassin, a band of lost children and a huge pile of dirty cash. The pair have their friendship tested as they must choose between their dreams of fortune or doing the right thing. 

    One of the hardest things to pinpoint with Gold Dust is who exactly it is for. The adventure narrative and lifelong buddy relationship between Moses and Fink would lend itself to a family-oriented movie. The former being an almost childlike grown-up who often pesters his friend, while the latter is the straight man with a somewhat immature lifegoal.

    The chemistry is fun and often comedic and easily the best part of the movie. It’s just a shame when the focus is on the questionably accented drug baron and his mute enforcer, the tone becomes muddled. It’s hard to reconcile the quirky, well-worn adventure narrative with the exaggerated antagonists, who seem to have wandered out of a Joe Carnahan knock-off.

    One of the most striking elements of Gold Dust is Egor Povolotskiy’s gorgeous photography. The desert locations look incredible and there’s a deft use of light and colour which is complimented by the tactile costumes and Beyond Thunderdome’esque garb of the orphan children. Gold Dust makes use of classical music with Jessy Ribordy’s score often subtly placed to commendable effect.

    Writer, director, producer and star, David Wall delivers a serviceable (if a little rote) movie that doesn’t quite gel at times. The tone is inconsistent, the performances vary from Wall and Wysocki’s great chemistry and rapport to characters/ performances that don’t quite fit.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJofUtHCjOA

    The younger actors are all solid, but the audience would have benefitted from more in-depth characterisation. There’s a decent family adventure in there somewhere but it’s just not teased out enough either comedically or emotionally.

    While I wasn’t particularly taken by Gold Dust, I’d be interested to see what Wall works on next. There’s the seed of a good movie here and I’m hopeful that this will come to fruition somewhere in the future.

  • Birds Of Prey Bursts In At Number 1

    Birds Of Prey Bursts In At Number 1

    Birds of Prey: And the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn makes a marvellous return to the Official Film Chart, as it claims the Number 1 spot for the first time following its release on disc formats.

    Originally peaking at Number 3 on its digital download release in April, the film stars Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn and chronicles the character’s adventures after splitting up with the Joker.

    Harley teams up with superheroes Black Canary (Jurnee Smollett-Bell), Huntress (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) and tough cop Renee Montoya (Rosie Perez) to save a young girl being targeted by nefarious crime lord Roman Sionis/The Black Mask (Ewan McGregor).

    Dolittle rebounds one place to Number 2, just ahead of 1917 at Number 3. The Personal History of David Copperfield enters the Top 10 for the first time, flying 24 places to Number 4. Set in the 1840s, this modernistic adaptation of Charles Dickens’ semi-autobiographical classic was written & directed by Armando Ianucci and stars Dev Patel as the eponymous character.

    Last week’s Number 1 Sonic the Hedgehog drops to Number 5, edging ahead of Bad Boys for Life which hangs on to Number 6 for another week. Animated adventure Onward is down three to Number 7 as Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker returns to the Top 10 at Number 8.

    The Call of the Wild is back in the chart at Number 9 following its release on disc, and finally Jumanji: The Next Level holds on to spend its twelfth consecutive week in the Top 10, falling three to Number 10.

    This week’s online show features a preview of supernatural horror Fantasy Island, available to Download & Keep from June 29.

    The Official Film Chart Top 10 – 24th June 2020

    LWPosTitleLabel
    RE1BIRDS OF PREY AND THE FANTABULOUSWARNER HOME VIDEO
    32DOLITTLEUNIVERSAL PICTURES
    231917ENTERTAINMENT ONE
    284PERSONAL HISTORY OF DAVID COPPERFIELDLIONSGATE
    15SONIC THE HEDGEHOGPARAMOUNT
    66BAD BOYS FOR LIFESONY PICTURES HE
    47ONWARDWALT DISNEY
    118STAR WARS IX: THE RISE OF SKYWALKERWALT DISNEY
    RE9THE CALL OF THE WILDWALT DISNEY
    710JUMANJI: THE NEXT LEVELSONY PICTURES HE

    © Official Charts Company 2020

    VIEW THE FULL TOP 40 – https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/film-chart/

  • Artemis Fowl: Disney+ Talk

    Artemis Fowl: Disney+ Talk

    Rumours of an ‘Artemis Fowl’ adaptation have been rumoured ever since I was 12. I always hoped I would see a film based on the book series during my childhood. However, it wouldn’t be until 16 years later that I’d see one…and it’s awful!

    ‘Artemis Fowl’ is the adaptation of the beloved book series by Eoin Colfer, and revolves around a 12-year old criminal mastermind who is caught up in a battle between magical creatures, and a quest to find the artefact Aculos, which was stolen from the fairies by Artemis’ father. 

    If the plot sounded confusing, don’t worry: the film is also a confusing mess!

    Until now, I had never seen a book adaptation as bad as ‘Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant’ (another book series that I grew up with), but at least that film followed the first book’s basic plot. In a confusing decision, this tries to mix different plotlines from the overall series into a 90-minute film. Originally, I was going to write an article comparing the film to the book series. However, after watching ‘Artemis Fowl’, I realize that this can’t be achieved, because of the mixture of plots. 

    At the same time, what else is there to say other than it’s terrible and really boring? Most of the cinematography is made up of long, panning shots and is used whenever the film can. The editing and pacing are all over the place; the first 20 minutes is painfully slow but then suddenly changes its pace awkwardly and without any warning. Because of the rushed beginning (which could’ve been achieved in 5 minutes), the relationship between Artemis and his father (played by Colin Farrell) isn’t established, making them unimportant. Their emotional core is also non-existent because the film rushes to get rid of Farrell’s character to start the main plot. I’m also convinced that some shots have been cut earlier than they were supposed to, making some scenes awkward and uncomfortable.

    All the actors sound bored and, for the most part, have no change of tone or expression in their voices. Colin Farrell tries his best with the small amount of screen time he gets but again, like previously mentioned, the film rushes through the plot, giving us hardly any character development and no reason to care about him. Ferdia Shaw, who plays the titular character, tries to carry the film, but all I ended up realizing is that he can’t carry an Irish accent, and sometimes forgets that Fowl is even supposed to have one! 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl2r3Fwxz_o

    Even Josh Gad, who plays the giant dwarf Mulch Diggums, does a mediocre job with his character and the narration he’s given. But the narration is often confusing; at the start of the film, it’s established that he’s telling the film’s events to whoever’s keeping him captive. However, at certain points, the narration seems to address the audience. The first signs of this happening are 20 minutes into the film.

    If I had to say anything positive about ‘Artemis Fowl’, it would be that the character designs and costumes are my favourite parts, however the film industry has had ‘Lord of the Rings’ to thank for the character designs. By now, the fantasy genre has found its formula so copying or even finding inspiration isn’t too difficult when approaching this genre. 

    Overall, the 16 year wait for an adaptation of the ‘Artemis Fowl’ series wasn’t worth it, and I can only repeat what other sources have said about it, including our own review here on the site. It’s boring, uneven and a mess that newcomers to the franchise would probably find very confusing. 

    Fly away from this film as fast as you can!

  • Take The Money And Run: Rewatch

    Take The Money And Run: Rewatch

    Take The Money And Run: Rewatch. By Alif Majeed.

    What’s Up Tiger Lily is generally considered as Woody Allen’s first movie, but that point is pretty moot. Sure, he did shoot additional scenes for the film and tinkered it to turn it into its present form. But it doesn’t change the fact that he was working on a pre-existing movie that was already there.

    Take The Money And Run is that respect is the first original move he made. It is also the first time Woody Allen donned his famous triple role, i.e., acting, directing, and writing. Juggling all the three hats with ease time and again has been one of the most defining aspects of his career.

    He could have chosen to make a simple enough movie about is about Virgil Starkwell (Woody Allen), the world’s most inept bank robber. Which is what the film is about. But he mostly took that one line gag and turned it into a mockumentary complete with interviews, sound bites, and flashbacks about what makes the guy so useless as a robber. 

    Mockumentaries can often get a very tricky thing to pull off, especially when it comes to its execution. It has to flirt with a thin line of being convincing or not, and there is a point where you know its a farce. Some pull it off well like This is Spinal Tap and some, not so much. (Looking at you, I’m not there.)

    Peter Jackson also managed to fool many people by initially billing Forgotten Silver, his mockumentary of a New Zealand filmmaker who invented many of the standard cinematic techniques used today as an actual documentary. The reason why he managed to do that is he played it straight. With Take the Money and Run, Woody Allen wants to leave no doubt in your mind that what you are watching is anything close to something real. He makes the gags as outrageous as possible to imagine it to be a true story. The trick then is probably not to look at it as a rockumentary but a fictional tale even if it hard to shake of its format. 

    Woody Allen also manages to throw in just enough gags to show the ineptitude of Virgil. It is not an understatement to call him a terrible bank robber, the extent to which the jokes are played out to make it look like he is truly worthy of that title. It indeed looks like this man can find a way to get caught even if he is alone in a room n a secluded island the key to which might be locked and kept in the very bank he tried to rob. Disastrously, of course. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrc706HsKPQ

    Though it is a lot less funny than it thinks it is and the gags can be a hit and miss, the visual gags are there in abundance, and the movie also keeps the funny lines coming. Watch out for a memorable scene where Woody goes into a bank to rob it with only a gun and a piece of paper explaining the situation to the staff. Only to be thwarted as the staff gets into a debate about the ransom note, as they can’t figure out if they are being robbed with a gun or gub. It is a scene that escalates perfectly and sticks the landing well with Woody having an awkward conversation over the phone with his sweetheart explaining he might not be able to make it home for dinner.

    Woody Allen would later go on to perfect the mockumentary format with movies like Zelig (about a mysterious loner in the 1920s) and Sweet and Lowdown (about the world’s second greatest Jazz Guitarist). But a lot of it that came started right here, from the movie where it all started. Some of the childhood flashback sequences also bring back memories to similar scenes in some of his later classics, like the childhood of Alvy Singer in Annie Hall. Those are enough reasons to seek out and watch this movie.

  • Interview: James Warwick, Entrepreneur

    Interview: James Warwick, Entrepreneur

    By Eleanor Klein. We had the pleasure of chatting with British entrepreneur James Warwick today…

    How did you get into the vodka business?

    I used to work in financial advisory and investments in Warsaw, I had always dreamed of running my own bar, so one day I decided to take the risk and do this.

    After a successful launch and initial few months I was approached to sell my shares in the venue. The offer was great so I agreed to do this, after a short time off travelling i decided to invest into starting fb my own premium vodka brand; Illuminati Vodka.

    The brand has been really successful since launch, I was selling in the best venues in Warsaw, replacing the likes of Belvedere and Grey Goose.

    What are your plans for the future with the brand?

    Since the coronavirus crisis I have made the decision to relaunch the brand into much more lucrative markets, but keeping it as an ultra exclusive brand. I am about to launch Elite private parties hosted by Illuminati Vodka in Marbella, New York and Miami. I am also working on a new line of vodka and a range of energy drinks, including a pre mixed vodka energy drink.

    You are very into fitness, how does this go alongside owning a vodka brand and hosting events?

    I actually drink very rarely these days, I do believe in moderation so I will workout and diet a lot, and then let myself have fun on special occasions. I find you value your free time more when you have a disciplined structure, and maintaining this balance is key to productivity and success

    How often do you work out?

    I work out 6 days a week, with a mixture of weightlifting and cardio. 

    What is your diet like?

    At the moment because it is summer I eat very clean with a structured diet plan, i have a cheat meal once a week. When I am not trying to keep my fat as low then i am eating a cheat meal every other day or sometimes more! Again life is about moderation and letting yourself appreciate things.

    Thanks James Warwick.