Blog

  • High Ground: Review

    High Ground: Review

    In Australia’s Northern Territory in 1919, a group of Australian frontier servicemen advance on a camp of Aboriginal men and women peacefully going about life. Their goals are unclear, but their rifles remain prominent, and the tension continues to rise. The events that follow start rapidly, an indigenous man spots one of the trespassers and rushes him with a spear, only to be shot down. Suddenly, hearing the gunshot, the other servicemen rush to the scene, and a blood-curdling massacre begins.

    All the while, upon a nearby cliff face is Travis (Simon Baker), a sniper from The Great War, under orders to be the only one doing any shooting should any be required. He soon makes his way down to the drama and, in a fit of outrage, ends the life of one of the Queen’s men who was continuing to kill. With only his spotter from the war, Eddy (Callan Mulvey), and distraught priest Braddock (Ryan Corr) left alive, all Travis can do is soak in the misery and leave, but not before finding one final survivor, a young boy named Gutjuk (Jacob Junior Nayinggul), hiding in the river. 

    This is how Stephen Johnson’s High Ground opens, ruthlessly. Then the film cuts and begins again 12 years later as word goes around of a dangerous mob burning outposts and murdering those who get in their way, a discovery that points to High Ground’s narrative core, cycles of revenge. Revenge beginning with one previously unknown survivor of the opening events, Baywara (Sean Mununggurr), Gutjuk’s uncle. Johnson’s approach changes drastically after this revelation from high-intensity slaughter to drawn-out goose hunt. With no sign of the violence stopping, Travis takes Gutjuk to hunt Baywara down, showing no indication of if he will kill or spare him, and Eddy is sent out behind them to ensure the job gets done. Here is where the film will win over or lose everyone who watches it. 

    High Ground will move and absorb anyone drawn in by the subtle beauty of Travis and Gutjuk’s relationship. Those more interested in the grander scope of the period, and perhaps looking for more of a history lesson, will find themselves disinterested about as soon as Travis sets off. Of course, I don’t mean to insinuate that this isn’t firmly historically inspired, I’m just saying these characters aren’t real, and unlike Jennifer Kent’s “The Nightingale”, they don’t feel real either. The characters come across more as tools than people, or chess pieces, plenty of function and no personality. The story itself is full of near countless twists and turns, most of which land quite well, but there’s just a lack of humanity at times that only Baker and Mulvey manage to overcome. 

    The pair are enthralling together at times, often at each other’s throats in their own ways. Travis the much wiser and calm man, always knowing what Eddy will do before he does it, and Eddy, the aggressor, never understanding any of Travis’ motivations but never able to entirely turn his back on him. High Ground is at its best when they share the screen, which is unfortunately not all too often. Corr is also good, but his screen time almost amounts to only a cameo which is a shame. 

    As a whole, there is a lot to enjoy for those with the patience. The cinematography by Andrew Commis does a massive credit to the beauty in the harsh Northern Territory environment. The use of indigenous language throughout is also well worth noting as it is far too uncommon in films with similar subject matters, but is utilised frequently here. Nayinggul and Witiyana Marika who plays Gutjuk’s grandfather, provide strong turns as well, but neither gets as much to work with as you would assume. All of these aspects are things to like about High Ground, but you’ll still be looking for something to love. 

    Overall High Ground always teases that it’s going to be something exceptional and never manages to fully deliver. It’s still very much worth watching, but the sensation that it all should have been more will hang in the air as the credits roll.

  • Young Hearts: Review

    Young Hearts: Review

    Young Hearts: Review. By Trent Neely.

    This film centers on high freshman high school student Harper (Anjini Taneja Azhar) and sophomore Tilly (Quinn Liebling). They have known each other most of their lives as they are neighbors and Tilly is best friends with Harper’s older brother Adam (Alex Jarmon). The two themselves however have never really been very close. That all changes when the two begin dating. The remainder of the film focuses on how the relationship between the two evolves from acquaintances, to friends to romantically involved and how that change not only affects the two of them, but also their relationships with their friends, family, and classmates.

    Writer/Director Sarah Sherman along with co-director Zacharay Ray Sherman smartly differentiate the film from others focused on highschool by setting both characters at the start of their high school years. Countless films have been made about teens dealing with romance while also being concerned with existential questions of which college to go to or what job they wish to pursue. Since Harper and Tilly have been in high school long enough to adjust to the environment but still have time before graduation, the film is able to restrict its focus to how the pair deal with their relationship and balance it with their friendships and other interests.

    This is another strength of the script and direction. While Harper and Tilly’s relationship is obviously significant and impactful for them, the movie takes care to ensure that neither individual is fully defined by their feelings for the other. Harper throughout the film is shown to be thoughtful and passionate about gender equality. When rumors about her promiscuity begin to spread around the school, we the audience see that it not only offends her personally, but also as a woman because of the stigma that such rumors place on women.

    Harper is also shown to be an active participant in the relationship, not purely subject to Tilly’s whims and desires. For his part, Tilly is shown to be conscious of Harper as a person and respectful of her during their courtship. When it comes to Tilly’s other interests, he is shown to be a drama student who loves to perform. In addition, he is torn between his feelings for Harper and the fact that by dating her, his relationship with Adam is frayed as a result.

    The performances by the two leads bring these notions to life. Anjini Taneja Azhar and Quinn Liebling have great on-screen chemistry and bounce off each other well. Additionally, while both actors do a great job of conveying the emotional complexities stated above, they and the script also remember that these characters are teens. At the beginning of their relationship, the conversations are stiff, awkward, and center on things that teenagers actually talk about including what shows they watch and which classes and teachers they like. All of these aspects come through in the performances. Even when discussing the more heavy topics like romance, love and sex, the vocabulary and delivery continue to reflect the age of the characters.

    When it comes to other technical aspects, they all seek to serve the characters and the performances. Martim Vian’s cinematography largely consists of long tracking shots as Harper and Tilly walk and talk. The camera feels like an unobtrusive observer that is purely documenting this relationship. When the camera does come closer, it’s to catch the significance of a particular emotional beat or to capture the nuance of a facial performance.

    The editing by John-Michael Powell does a nice job of maintaining a pace that allows the viewer to get the sense that they are seeing a relationship go through various stages, while at the same time making sure that momentum is always maintained.

    If you are looking for a film centered on highschoolers that features realistic performances and dialogue for that age group, and a romance that feels developed but doesn’t deprive either person involved of their individuality, watch this film if given the opportunity.    

  • Zhao, GameStop, Abrams: Weekly Round Up

    Zhao, GameStop, Abrams: Weekly Round Up

    Zhao, GameStop, Abrams: Weekly Round Up – So, last week we had rumblings of movement on the long-anticipated Last Voyage of the Demeter, based on an underdeveloped but key part of Bram Stoker’s classic horror novel, Dracula, and a few weeks ago we had news of Jennifer’s Body and The Invitation director Karyn Kusama’s take on the vampire iconic, but they always say that great things come in threes, so this week there’s some more blood-curdling Dracula news for us to… um… sink our teeth into.

    It would seem that Universal, perhaps learning the lessons from their failed (and now somewhat infamous) attempts at launching a so-called “Dark Universe”, have now decided that the best approach to dealing with their classic monster icons is to, well, throw everything at them and hope that something will stick. And folks, let me tell you I am here for it.

    Thus, our third Dracula project is being headed up by director Chloe Zhao, who is currently earning awards buzz for her last movie, Nomadland, which stars Francis McDormand. Zhao’s next movie will be Marvel’s Eternals, which has reportedly already been filmed as it was shot concurrently alongside Nomadland, but we are yet to see or hear much of anything about the project. Given that she’s already finished – or finished-ish – with the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it makes sense that Zhao will be looking for something else to keep her occupied.

    What she’s come up with sounds absolutely bonkers in the best possible way. The Zhao take on Stoker’s classic villain will reportedly be a futuristic, science-fiction western that the director will write, direct, and produce for Universal Pictures.

    There was some mild backlash over the announcement in some corners of the twitter-verse, but I say if you’re not excited about the prospect of multiple Dracula movies on the go all at once, then you’re missing the point of these characters. The reason Universal’s “Dark Universe” failed (aside from the fact that the movie was shit) is that the classic monsters are icons in and of themselves. They can and should be given to creatives who are willing to try new things with them, and we’ve already seen this approach work when it comes to Leigh Whannell’s The Invisible Man.

    Another franchise that seems to have taken the “throw-everything-at-the-wall-and-hope-it-sticks” approach is J J Abrams’ and Bad Robot’s Cloverfield series. Of course, the original Cloverfield, which was released way back in 2008 (simpler times, hey folks?) was a big-budget found-footage movie that centered around a mysterious Godzilla inspired monster running rampant around New York.

    That film was a big success, and for a long time rumors of a potential sequel were constant, but we finally did get another addition to the franchise in 2016 – a full eight years later – in the form of 10 Cloverfield Lane, a claustrophobic thriller starring Mary Elizabeth Winstead and John Goodman. That film began life as an entirely separate standalone movie called The Cellar before it was reworked late during pre-production to be loosely integrated into the Cloverfield franchise. A similar journey befell 2018’s underwhelming The Cloverfield Paradox, with started as an original film called God Particle.

    Well, it appears that old mystery box Abrams is looking to try and kick some life into his mish-mashed franchise of unrelated but kind of related monster movies, but this time rather than take an unrelated project and rework it, it appears the plan is to craft an actual Cloverfield movie from the ground up.

    Of course, in rather typical Abrams fashion, very little is known about the movie at this point beyond the fact that it won’t be a found footage film. It is curious though, that the team would now decide to try and produce a Cloverfield movie that is designed as a Cloverfield movie. What does this mean? Have they finally realized that lazily shoehorning in otherwise interesting movies into their meandering and inconsistent franchise ideas and retroactively try and fit it into a narrative rather than take an anthology approach perhaps wasn’t the best idea? I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

    And, finally, it was only last week that news broke that a small group of Redditors were busy taking down the system with GameStop stock. Since then, there have been more twists and turns in that narrative than an M Night Shyamalan movie, but it seems Hollywood was busy taking note as there are not one, not two, but a total of THREE different movie adaptations of the events in the early stages of production.

    There’s The Antisocial Network, which is based on the book proposal by Ben Mezrich (who wrote the book Bringing Down the House, which the movie 21 was based on), which has been snapped up by MGM. There’s a narrative project in production over at Netflix, and a third potential dramatization is in the early stages, based on r/wallstreetbets founder Jaime Rogozinski, who sold his life rights to… er… Brett Ratner’s production company RatPac. Let’s just ignore that one. – Zhao, GameStop, Abrams: Weekly Round Up

  • London Critics Name Nomadland Film Of 2020

    London Critics Name Nomadland Film Of 2020

    London Critics Name Nomadland Film Of 2020 – The improvised American road movie Nomadland won three top honours including Film of the Year, at the 41st London Critics’ Circle Film Awards, which were held in a virtual ceremony on Sunday night. The film’s lead Frances McDormand was named Actress of the Year, while writer-director Chloé Zhao won Screenwriter of the Year. Acclaimed British dramatic horror Saint Maud also won three awards: British/Irish Film of the Year, British/Irish Actress of the Year for Morfydd Clark, and Breakthrough British/Irish Filmmaker for writer-director Rose Glass.

    Double London Critics winners included Sarah Gavron’s London coming-of-age drama Rocks, with lead actress Bukky Bakray named Young British/Irish Performer of the Year and Lucy Pardee given the Technical Achievement Award for casting. Steve McQueen was presented with Director of the Year for his five Small Axe films, while Shaun Parkes won Supporting Actor of the Year for the first drama in the collection, Mangrove. Riz Ahmed was named British/Irish Actor of the Year for his work in Sound of Metaland Mogul Mowgli. And the short that Ahmed wrote, produced and starred in, The Long Goodbye directed by Aniel Karia, was named British/Irish Short Film of the Year.

    The late Chadwick Boseman won Actor of the Year for Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, and his award was accepted in a moving video message from costar Coleman Domingo. Maria Bakalova also appeared virtually to accept Supporting Actress of the Year for Borat Subsequent Moviefilm. In addition, Alexander Nanau’s journalistic documentary Collective won Documentary of the Year, while Thomas Vinterberg’s alcohol-infused black comedy Another Round was named Foreign-Language Film of the Year.

    “As always, the critics have spread the love around among a range of films this year, particularly recognising female filmmakers and a diverse range of talent both behind and in front of the cameras,” said Film Section Chair Rich Cline. “This year, our 160 members watched an unusually large number of films, both theatrical and streaming releases, and they’ve sifted out the best of the best for our awards. We look forward to holding a party in-person, and of course getting back into cinemas, as soon as it’s safe to do so.”

    The event was held on the Critics’ Circle’s YouTube channel for the first time, with awards presented by member critics who serve on the event’s organising committee and acceptance videos from almost all of the winners. An in-person celebration with nominees and winners is planned for later in the year along with long-time sponsors The May Fair Hotel and Audi.

    Full list of winners:

    FILM OF THE YEAR
    Nomadland

    FOREIGN-LANGUAGE FILM OF THE YEAR
    Another Round

    DOCUMENTARY OF THE YEAR
    Collective

    The Attenborough Award:
    BRITISH/IRISH FILM OF THE YEAR
    Saint Maud

    DIRECTOR OF THE YEAR
    Steve McQueen – Small Axe

    SCREENWRITER OF THE YEAR
    Chloé Zhao – Nomadland

    ACTRESS OF THE YEAR
    Frances McDormand – Nomadland

    ACTOR OF THE YEAR
    Chadwick Boseman – Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom

    SUPPORTING ACTRESS OF THE YEAR
    Maria Bakalova – Borat Subsequent Moviefilm

    SUPPORTING ACTOR OF THE YEAR
    Shaun Parkes – Mangrove

    BRITISH/IRISH ACTRESS OF THE YEAR (for body of work)
    Morfydd Clark – Eternal Beauty, Saint Maud

    BRITISH/IRISH ACTOR OF THE YEAR (for body of work)
    Riz Ahmed – Mogul Mowgli, Sound of Metal

    The Philip French Award:
    BREAKTHROUGH BRITISH/IRISH FILMMAKER
    Rose Glass – Saint Maud

    YOUNG BRITISH/IRISH PERFORMER
    Bukky Bakray – Rocks

    BRITISH/IRISH SHORT FILM
    The Long Goodbye

    TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT
    Rocks – Lucy Pardee, casting

    NB. Small Axe is a collection of five films: Alex Wheatle; Education; Lovers Rock; Mangrove; Red, White and Blue.

  • PVT Chat: Review

    PVT Chat: Review

    PVT Chat tells the tale of Jack, an online blackjack gambler in the city of New York who often spends his money on cam sessions and special massages. He begins to develop an obsession over one cam girl from San Francisco named Scarlett, and they both start opening up to each other. On one night, Jack suspects that he has seen Scarlett walking around the streets in NYC Chinatown, and the two must navigate between the lives they present in the virtual fantasy and their lives in the real world. 

    One of the notable stars in this film is Julia Fox, who was heavily praised for her breakout role in Uncut Gems by the Safdie Brothers. That isn’t the end of the Safdie Brothers’ connection as we also see Buddy Duress who was in Good Time, which was also directed by the two. However, despite all the correlations this film has with the acclaimed directors, it’s a slower paced film in contrast with the anxiety-inducing claustrophobia that the Safdies are known for. 

    PVT Chat starts off really well with a slice-of-life approach to storytelling. From the opening shot we are instantly thrown in the middle of a cam session between Jack and Scarlett. From there, the film slowly reveals more details about Jack’s character and we can easily distinguish his actual life from the affectation he puts on during his cam sessions with Scarlett. Jack is given character beats that establish his overall demeanor. Many of the choices he makes never feels forced and stays true to who he is as a character. However, Jack does embody characteristics to what the internet culture identifies as a ‘simp’, which is considered a pejorative term used to define a person who excessively does everything they can to satisfy a person they like. This does make his character interesting in some ways, but I never fully connected with him because of the way he was writtened. The filmmakers never really dived deep into Jack’s loneliness and how it impacts him mentally. At times, he is subjected to being more of a laughing stock than someone sincere. 

    On the other hand, Fox proves that she is not just a fluke. Having actual experiences of being a dominatrix in high school, it was as if this role was made for her. She fully embodies that sexual and voluptuous spirit into her character. However, her character is not entirely treated as clueless or the manic pixie dream girl. Scarlett actually showcases many flaws as a human, and her current situation on top of her growing relationship with Jack raises ambivalence of her own motives. There was some depth to her character that you could sympathize with. 

    The film does introduce a couple of themes that generate thought. For one, it touches on the isolation and disconnect often associated within the adult entertainment industry as well as the relationships between sex workers and their cilents. Although Jack and Scarlett were able to open up with each other through genuine conversations on cam, they never seemed to be in touch with their own realities. The film also discusses our selfishness in every relationship, which was spoon-fed to the audience by our main character. Once it finally showed the audience a scene that corresponded to what the character was talking about before, it all just felt too sanctimonious. 

    The film has a small scale and makes many editing choices and shots that feel unconventional. Many of the scenes were shot in handheld and included run-and-gun filming. This does make it feel more intimate but sometimes felt too jarring. Nevertheless, I did enjoy the overlays used to creatively signify whenever a character would chat or donate from the cam site. 

    While this movie does construct an engaging and consistent first and second act. It shifts in tone by the third act, and there were a couple of narrative choices that relied on the suspension of disbelief, which needed to happen in order to drive the plot forward. This took me out of the film because I could not fully believe in what was happening. By the end, it felt overcooked in the eroticism and undercooked in the story. Running at under 90 minutes, the film could have benefitted with more time to help flesh out the relationships between several characters. The rushed ending left many unanswered questions, but perhaps director Ben Hozie wanted to evoke the silver lining underneath the fragmented and rocky relationship between both Jack and Scarlett. 

    There are certain elements to this film that really interested me. I liked the slice-of-life approach that it initially presented. There is a compelling story here that gets off to a strong start. However, the film falters by the third act and could have attributed more time to develop upon its themes and character dynamics. 

    With a little more nuance and less style, PVT Chat could have been an excellent examination on social relationships within the digital age of the internet, but it suffers from an undercooked story.