Blog

  • Escape Room: Tournament Of Champions: Review

    Escape Room: Tournament Of Champions: Review

    Escape Room: Tournament of Champions Synopsis: Six people unwittingly find themselves locked in another series of escape rooms, slowly uncovering what they have in common to survive — and discover they’ve all played the game before. For Zoey (Taylor Russell) and Ben (Logan Miller), this second time through is a chance to take down the evil organization Minos for good.

    In a world where Hollywood is constantly looking for their next franchise, 2019’s Escape Room served as a delightful surprise. Integrating the death-defying Saw formula with the modern zest of extreme escape room settings, writer/director Adam Robitel skillfully crafted a pulse-pounding, B-movie delight. The film cleaned up financially during the doldrums of January, morphing a meager production budget (9 million) into a 155 million worldwide hit.

    Money talks in Hollywood, which leads us to the gleefully titled sequel Escape Room: Tournament of Champions. Robitel doubles down on the original’s preposterous tendencies, and while there are still hiccups intact, Tournament of Champions elicits another shameless good time at the multiplex.

    Making this type of bombastic shlock is harder than it appears. The tone requires a straight-faced delivery within an inherently silly premise, while the daunting escape rooms must match the original’s inventive design work. Thankfully, Robitel doesn’t miss a beat. His direction brazenly stretches towards high-art camp, escalating his promising premise into a narrative high-wire act chock-full of shocking twists and turns.

    Robitel exhibits remarkable poise and creativity, with a series of swift camera movements intoxicating viewers into the sweaty-palm thrills of each revolving setting. From shocking electrical currents to the cutting bite of acid rain, there are a plethora of inventive situations conjured to make the daunting escape rooms come to life. The director maintains this frenetic energy throughout the swift 88-minute duration, displaying astute self-awareness without ever overplaying his hand.

    Similar to Saw, the Escape Room series has discovered its own playful charm even when the stunts aren’t onscreen. The quartet of screenwriters (Will Honley, Maria Melnik, Daniel Tuch, and Oren Uziel) embrace the revolving mystery of each dangerous room, turning our characters into Sherlock Holmes equivalents as they piece together a series of obscure clues. It’s all kind of madness, but it’s the type of imaginative, high-energy jargon that instantly draws loving cackles from audiences (the plotting only gets more endearing with each ridiculous clue). Taylor Russell and Logan Miller deserve significant praise for continuing to ground the shlocky proceedings. Along with a well-calibrated ensemble, the two returners infuse enough gravity and humanity into their underwritten roles.

    I had a blast throughout Tournament of Champions, yet the series continues to press forward with the same missteps. Robitel and company struggle to humanize these characters past generic character tropes. The breakneck pace and imprecise writing prevent any of the six from gravitating much interest, while attempts at deeper ruminations on our paranoid surveillance state go virtually nowhere. I also hope this series goes for the gusto more with any potential sequels. Robitel assuredly operates in the confines of PG-13 horror, but an R-rating could allow these setpieces to land with grizzlier impact.

    Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is the type of B-movie crowdpleaser I love to see. It’s an infectiously dopey and wildly entertaining franchise, one that I hope presses on with its own Saw-like run of sequels.

    Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is now playing in theaters.

  • Jackass Forever: Trailer Talk

    Jackass Forever: Trailer Talk

    Jackass Forever: Trailer Talk

    Since cinemas have reopened, and film productions have resumed, I have decided to return to my previous weekly feature Trailer Talk. These were short opinion pieces on a newly released film or TV trailer…and what better way to re-introduce this feature than to return to the Jackass’ franchise for its fourth instalment!

    ‘Jackass Forever’ sees Johnny Knoxville, Steve-O and the Jackass crew return a decade later, to try out even more stunts, pranks and endure more pain!

    When it comes to Jackass, what you see is what you get. I’ve liked the franchise ever since I was a teenager; it’s the visual representation of the phrase ‘humour can come from the despair of others’ and it seems to become more and more extreme with each entry. And, with this being around a decade later, it’s also great to see the crazy crew back. 

    As expected, there’s more stunts, pranks and injuries onscreen, as well as the occasional guests returning. This time that includes TV host and comedian Eric Andre and musician Machine Gun Kelly. The stunts also feel like an extension of previous ones; Machine Gun Kelly’s stunt involves a giant foam hand, which looks similar to the one in ‘Jackass 3D’, and the trailer opens with someone being fired out of a cannon, which was also seen in ‘Jackass The Movie: Number Two’. 

    Either way, it’s great to see the crew back for more mayhem, especially after eleven years. And, despite the gap in time, it feels like it’s only been a few weeks since the last entry, due to their close friendship and charm. Overall, welcome back!  

    ‘Jackass Forever’ crashes into cinemas October 22nd 2021.

  • Star Trek Beyond – A Five-Year Mission For Reconsideration

    Star Trek Beyond – A Five-Year Mission For Reconsideration

    In many ways, Star Trek Beyond was a film no one wanted.

    Paramount Pictures’ reboot of the classic sixties sci-fi, first helmed by JJ Abrams in 2009, were initially well received but as time went on devotion seemed to dwindle. Enthusiasm on this 21st century Star Trek waned most after the 2012 entry, Into Darkness, went through something of a reappraisal after its first release and came out the other end in a bad light.

    Still, a third film was on the horizon but on it there were a lot of doubts cast, from both outside and within – Karl Urban, who portrayed Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy in the first two films, said he didn’t want to reprise the role. He did though, as well as the rest of the Enterprise crew, and after some delay full of troubling events – a lot of back and forth between the filmmakers which saw foreign investors and a new director brought in – the film that became Star Trek Beyond was finally set for international release in the Summer of 2016.

    During that period however, an uneasy feeling had grown among onlookers that this reimagining of Star Trek was moving away from creator Gene Rodenberry’s original intentions and instead shifting to a more action-centric, mainstream model. Early news reports seemed to reaffirm this: first the hiring of Fast and Furious doyen Justin Lin to direct; then Simon Pegg, now co-writer in addition to playing the part of Montgomery ‘Scotty’ Scott, saying the studio wanted his and fellow scribe Doug Jung’s script to be re-worked after deeming it, in his words, “too Star Trek-y”.

    The poor reception that was met with the first trailer, which seemed to confirm anxieties that the unique qualities of the property had been forsaken, proved to be the final straw and dampened any chance at generating more hype. This was seemingly confirmed by its later performance: despite plenty of favourable reviews, it did not make the box-office returns needed for it to be an outright success.

    Some of the early criticisms levelled again Star Trek Beyond are valid, but looking at the final product, while it is geared for wider audiences, is a spectacular thrill-ride, made as a film with a lot of love for what inspired it. To some it appeared that Star Trek had been turned into something that it is not, but that may have worked in its advantage.

    One way Beyond does this is by paying homage to old ideas, but not re-hashing them. The previous film, Into Darkness, may be fun but when looked at subjectively is more or less just a re-tread of 1982’s The Wrath of Khan. The tension there suffers at the moment when Benedict Cumberbatch’s true identity is revealed. After that, only those with no prior knowledge of Star Trek could not tell what was going to happen next. (Even then it was obvious as to what would happen next.)

    It could be said, then, that Beyond is more aligned towards the Trek faithful on the grounds of it not trying to pass off old plotlines as new ones. Its story is definitely reminiscent of many classic episodes of the show that inspired it: a voyage to a distant planet and a battle of minds and muscle with a megalomaniacal foe bent on wreaking destruction.

    What’s more, those behind this third film do a better job of fulfilling the brief. JJ Abrams did well in his duties to update Trek when he first came on board, but by Into Darkness it was clear he didn’t seem to know where to take it. As evidenced in that film, his “mystery box” style of storytelling doesn’t work in all instances and his insistence on using lens flare as much as possible proving to be an annoying distraction.

    While Justin Lin was not a popular choice for the next custodian of Star Trek, he brings a new energy, strikes a good balance between action and story and does not dilute or sell the source material out short. He is also responsible for putting together Beyond’s many exciting action sequences. Beginning with the Enterprise, attacked while on a rescue mission near the remote planet Altamid, coming under attack from a swarm of alien ships, the action continues at a brisk and constant pace for the remainder.

    Yet the filmmakers know what makes Star Trek work is not just its effect sequences, but the camaraderie between the Enterprise crew. The first two films focused on Kirk and Spock, perhaps rightly so as Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto had both nailed their respective roles. Here they give all of the main characters a chance to come out from the background and into the fore front, allowing the audience more insight into each of them.

    There are new characters to contend with as well; feisty Jaylah (Sofia Boutella), stranded on Altamid like the crew, who find her resourcefulness and wits of great use in their survival mission. It’s on this strange new planet they all find themselves at the mercy of the villainous Krall (There’s no point in naming the A-lister who portrays him, as it could be anyone under all that heavy makeup). In many ways a classic Star Trek villain: megalomaniacal, destructive, with a grudge against Star Fleet and looking somewhat like a man in a rubber suit.

    Beyond is not all throwback, though, as it tries to put its own spin on old tropes and give new situations and dilemmas for its characters to overcome. For example, the previously adventurous Kirk has grown tired of exploring the never-ending expanse of space and through the events of the film, re-learns what it was that first made him want to explore the universe. As with all series, Star Trek was in danger of becoming repeatedly treading old ground and Beyond invents new directions for all involved, making it a more intriguing joruney.

    Well-written and made with expertise, the biggest selling point of Star Trek Beyond is that it is, pure and simply, good fun. It has the feel of a time before all studio films became dour and serious, but while this film is serious in wanting the audience to care about what happens, the tone is not a dour one which causes events to drag.

    Unfortunately on release it was not met with the audience it needed or deserved, which was disappointing and also bringing this new Star Trek series to a grinding halt. A sequel to Beyond was on the cards but has failed numerous times to get off the ground, even with some of the biggest names in the game attached to it. As of summer 2021 Paramount have stated a follow-up is on the horizon, but it’s uncertain what the eventual final product will look like.

    Another reason for the post-Beyond stagnation may be the loss of a main cast member. Not long before the film’s release, Anton Yelchin died in tragic circumstances at the age of 27. His performance as Pavel Chekov in all three of these Star Trek films was his most visible and for him to have gone so young left an air of sadness over what was to be his final performance in the series. His absence would have to been addressed in any further films, as he would have to be re-cast or written out.

    Star Trek Beyond‘s difficult birth saw it miss out on its chance to enthrall the world even more than its two predecessors did. With everything firing on all cylinders, it’s easily the best of the three films made to date. It is ripe for re-discovery – and what better time than its five-year anniversary.

  • The Nest: Review

    The Nest: Review

    The Nest: Review – Meg (Maple Stuttles) is a little girl with separation anxiety. Her mother, Beth (Sarah Navratil) is a recovering drug addict and after she got clean, she comes back to reconnect with her daughter, the trouble is that Meg is worried that her mother will leave her again.

    So, one day while browsing a garage sale, Meg falls in love with a stuffed, wide eyed teddy bear and the owner, a creepy old man, gives her the teddy bear as a gift. Little does Beth or Meg realise, but the teddy bear holds a nest of ants which start to have a serious affect on Meg’s young mind and before her family realise it, the parasitic insects come for them as well.

    The Nest is a horror creature feature which harkens back to an earlier time in horror where it seemed like every new horror needed a creature of the month. Movies like Invaders from Mars, The Stuff and Basket Case were all the rage and have become cult classics, so if that’s your kind of thing then you know what to expect from The Nest.

    Dee Wallace, the queen mother of horror even plays Meg’s grandmother, which will give the audience that nostalgia for the kind of horror they just don’t seem to do anymore.

    There are many things to like about The Nest, it’s certainly the kind of horror where the audience knows what to expect and the typical signs are there, although the audience may have to connect some of the dots so that it makes sense.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92kRK9WLNtg

    Maple Stuttles does a good job of both being cute and menacing when she needs to be and the scenes between her and her on screen mother are very good and help with their emotional connection. Also, there’s enough here to delight fans of high concept horror with particular detail in a scene which reveals one of the little bugs in all its glory.

    However, there perhaps should have been an ultimate goal for the invading arthropods and it feels like transporting their nest in a teddy bear in hopes of infecting an innocent family may have not been all that efficient. Just don’t think about the finer details too much though and you’re bound to enjoy The Nest.

  • Joe Bell: The BRWC Review

    Joe Bell: The BRWC Review

    Joe Bell Synopsis: The true story of a small town, a working-class father, Joe (Mark Wahlberg), who embarks on a solo walk across the U.S. to crusade against bullying after his son, Jadin (Reid Miller), is tormented in high school for being gay.

    Representation and inclusion continue to be challenging issues in the film industry. For every notable step forward (2021 films like In the Heights and Raya and the Last Dragon presented diversity with thought and authenticity), Hollywood still embraces a medley of poorly conceived decisions (Music and Hillbilly Elegy took dated stereotypes to regressive new lows). It’s clear the industry wants positive progress, but studio executives are still learning the difference between meaningful representation and blatant pandering.

    Landing in theaters after a tumultuous festival run, the LGBTQ drama Joe Bell falls under a similar trap. While bolstered with good intentions and proper sensitivity, Joe Bell’s inert and self-congratulatory execution adds little to an essential conversation.

    The issues are apparent from jump street. This is a potent story centered around the damaging effects of bigotry and intolerance, with Jadin’s all-too-familiar arc touching upon the brokenness left in the wake of hateful targeting. Instead of Jadin’s vital perspective, screenwriters Diana Ossana and Larry McMurty fixture their narrative around Joe’s walk for redemption after tragic circumstances. Like Joe himself, the film’s bizarre structuring leaves audiences at a constant distance from Jadin’s pressing struggles. We experience Jadin’s life solely from the viewpoint of after-school special flashbacks and Joe’s solemn reflections, reducing his meaningful story into an ineffective and oddly disconnected narrative.

    Without touching into spoilers, the two screenwriters also decide to reorganize the timeline of events. I can understand their intentions, but the questionable execution left me feeling queasy. With most of the Joe scenes traveling through a repetitive cycle without a sufficient arc (the character flip flops between embracing change and going back to his old ways), the change in timeline stands to create a more dramatized narrative, one that feels in poor taste to the film’s real-world origins. Not only does the narrative not work, but its haphazard delivery poorly represents the film’s themes of empathy and communication.

    Even with the film’s deficiencies, Joe Bell showcases a few bright spots. Director Reinaldo Marcus Green imbues enough tact and sensitivity to enhance the maudlin melodrama, stripping away overworked Hollywood artifice to create a more toned-down experience (the lack of searing score choices was refreshing). The subdued tones make a great canvas for the cast to shine. Reid Miller is a revelation as Jadin, unearthing nuanced emotions in a demanding performance that features only a handful of frames. Mark Wahlberg is typically imperfect (his attempts at an accent are inconsistent), but I’d rather see the star stretch his wings than settling with blah blockbusters. His performance elicits enough honest truths to represent Joe’s personal reckoning.

    Joe Bell is too earnest to condemn, although that doesn’t excuse the film’s lack of impact and understanding. It’s a dated and flatly-conceived attempt at jumpstarting a meaningful conversation.

    Joe Bell arrives in theaters nationwide on July 23rd.