Blog

  • Neglected Classics – Rififi

    Neglected Classics – Rififi

    Review by walt.

    When Quentin Tarantino was writing his debut feature Reservoir Dogs, the video store clerk sought inspiration by watching some of the classics of the crime genre, including The Taking of Pelham 123, The Killing and Jules Dassin’s 1955 heist thriller Rififi. Just as Tarantino’s film went on to inspire a generation of filmmakers and spawn a host of imitations, Dassin’s Rififi set the standard to which all other heist films aspired.

    Set in the criminal underworld of Paris, Rififi tells the story of Tony le Stephanois, a tired world-weary career criminal, recently released after serving a 5 year prison sentence. The film opens with Tony losing his last few francs in a back room card game. Down on his luck and battling ill health, it’s clear from Tony’s drawn expression that here is a man who’s seen better days and is tired of the hand that life has dealt him. As the barman says “five years inside can mark a man”, and Tony has been well and truly marked by his experiences.

    So when a chance arises for Tony to turn his luck around in the form of a planned heist of a jewellery store, he sees the job as his way out. To guys like Tony, crime is not so much a choice as a way of life, an inevitable means to an end – a chance to escape.

    Everything about Rififi is masterfully done. The gritty dialogue, dramatic music, atmospheric cinematography and compelling performances all combine to form a classic film noir, which Francois Truffaut referred to as “the best crime film I have ever seen”. The one element that marks the film out above all other films in that genre is the heist scene itself. The sequence begins with each of the men leaving their homes, and ends some 33 minutes later with Tony meeting the others back at the rendez-vous, with the jewels in tow.

    What makes this scene all the more remarkable is the fact that not one single word of dialogue is uttered throughout its duration. The only sounds on the soundtrack are those of the men working, as they race against time through the night to break into the jewellery store. It’s a piece of pure cinematic visual storytelling, so perfectly formed that it could exist alone as a compelling short film. No dialogue or fast editing is needed to ramp up the tension. Dassin employs gestures, shadows and torchlight, sweaty brows and Georges Auric’s effective score, to build up the dramatic tension as the men crack the safe and make their escape.

    Anyone who shares the belief that the coming of sound, and subsequent reliance on dialogue diluted cinema as a visual form, can take great pleasure in watching how Dassin builds the sequence visually – we are not told, we are shown – a method many modern filmmakers could learn from.

    It’s no surprise then that the heist scene has been imitated many times since, most notably in Jean-Pierre Melville’s excellent movie Le Circle Rouge. What is more surprising is the influence over Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs, a heist film where we never get to see the heist. Dassin chose to make the scene the centrepiece of his movie, whereas Tarantino played with standard plot conventions by showing us the aftermath, not the action itself. Perhaps having seen Rififi, Tarantino realised he couldn’t improve upon the perfection of Dassin’s scene, and decided to be as equally original by not showing the heist at all.

    This film is more than just a robbery scene though. There’s much more here to admire and secure the film’s reputation as a classic. There are some truly shocking moments, such as the scene in which Tony brutally whips his ex-girlfriend with a belt offscreen. The camera focuses on a photo of the couple in happier times, as we hear the beating in the background – with the implied violence left to our own imagination. In contrast there are also lighter touches, such as Jo and Tony playing with Jo’s young son, and Mario and his girlfriend fooling around in the bath. Dassin uses these moments to endear us to his leading characters, so we end up willing them to succeed, despite being on the wrong side of the law. It’s this empathy with Tony and his gang that is the most important element of the film. At its heart Rififi is a tragic human story about desperate men who cannot escape their fate. Like Carlito’s Way and Layer Cake, the last big pay day is an illusion, and any attempt to break free from this criminal life is futile.

  • The Bicycle Thief That Stole My Heart

    The Bicycle Thief That Stole My Heart

    Review by wmasta.

    Ladri di Biciclette

    An Italian Neo-realist film where a man searches for his stolen bicycle and finds his SOUL.

    Let’s see…we begin in post-depressed World War II Italy, where all are hungry, war-torn and unemployed. In the midst of misery, we find Antonio Ricci, our post-optimistic protagonist, receiving the moment of a lifetime, A JOB, with good pay, amidst a crowd of desperate and unemployed pisants.

    The only requirement – a bicycle, which he does not have, but knows he can get by pawning everything of value in his household, including his bed linens.

    With job and bike in hand, Antonio kisses his wife exuberantly, tows his son on the handlebars and heads happily off to work.

    BUT ALAS, the bike is stolen, his income is gone, his security is lost and hope remains an elusive friend.

    “What happens if we don’t find the bike, father?”, asks Antonio’s son.

    “We will starve” states our hero.

    What happens next?

    In the words of the fortune teller from whom Antonio seeks advice, ” You’ll the find the bicycle quickly, or not at all.”

    That is my summary, to you potential viewer, regarding Ladri di Biciclette,.. you’ll get the point quickly, or not at all….

  • David Farland Talks Runelords

    David Farland Talks Runelords

    We talked about the upcoming adaptation of Runelords.  We spoke to it’s creator and writer David Farland.

    What are you up to today?

    I just finished teaching a workshop on writing for young readers, and I’m exhausted! So I’m catching up on correspondence, with plans to launch into the final book of the Runelords series again on Monday.

    What is the appeal of science fiction and fantasy?

    There are a lot of appeals. The biggest emotional appeal deals with wonder, but whenever you encounter the strange, there is also a strong possibility of finding the horrific, and even something humorous.  Beyond that, stories set in science fiction and fantasy worlds almost always need to touch upon vital moral issues, such as “What is the right use of power?”

    Didn’t you have an idea about a boy at a school for wizards years and years ago?!

    Oh, yes. My first novel, which I began to write at the age of 17, was called A Wizard in Halflight, and it told the exploits of a young teen who goes to an academy for wizards. I began that novel in about 1973, and of course others have done similar things.

    You write as Dave Wolverton and David Farland. Why?

    I started out writing science fiction, and did quite well, but I’d always loved fantasy and I wanted to keep my two audiences separate.  There is a little crossover among readers, but not enough.  In fact, there are a lot more fantasy readers, and so if you as a science fiction author write your own novels But there are a lot more fantasy readers, and if you as a science fiction author write outside your genre, the bookstore chains aren’t likely to order enough of your books if you use your science fiction moniker. So it makes good business sense to use a pseudonym, if you write in two genres.  Besides, my fantasy name gets my books put up at eye-level on the bookshelves, which can be a problem if your name comes low in the alphabet.

    Would your novels make great films/TV series? Star Wars: The Courtship of Princess Leia?

    They would. In fact, we’re getting ready to take the Runelords to Hollywood and make a movie. I’ve written the screenplay, and you can
    learn more about it at www.runelordsmovie.com.

    Tell us about the Runelords?

    The Runelords is a fantasy novel set in a strange world where the lords can draw attributes–such as brawn, wit, glamour, and speed–from their vassals, through the use of magical branding irons called “forcibles.”  Thus, a lord can have the strength of ten men, the speed of three. But the spell only lasts as long as the lord and the vassal both remain alive, and so the lords must be careful to
    protect those who serve them.

    The story tells of Gaborn Val Orden, a prince who is reluctant to use his powers. He hates the idea of taking the wit from a man, leaving
    him a fool, or taking the sight from a man, leaving him blind.

    While on the way to visit a princess who is of like mind, he discovers that her kingdom has been invaded by a king who has taken so many attributes, he is godlike in his power. So Gaborn finds himself thrust into a battle for the fate of a girl, a kingdom, and an entire
    world.

    Why make this into a film?

    I love storytelling in all mediums. Film is much easier for an audience to grasp than a book, though it isn’t as satisfying.

    How is the process from book to film going?

    It’s going great. I’ve done eight drafts on the film, and we’ll begin taking meetings with studios soon.

    Why is Hollywood focused on comic books right now?

    Uh, because they somehow believe that we’ll never tire of them. The truth is that one of the studios bought the rights to all of the
    comic-book line of one major publisher, and so we’ll be seeing them role these out for years.

    In Hollywood, we have a lot of visual filmmakers. Comics of course are a visual medium, so it doesn’t take much imagination to figure out how to take advantage of the existing intellectual property.

    What would you want us to take from the Runelords?

    Ah, now we’re getting into themes. The Runelords is about a world where ruthless men abuse those without wealth. Ultimately, it’s about compassion, sacrifice, and honor.

    Anything else you want to get off your chest?!

    Sure, I also have a new series that I’m starting. The novel Nightingale is available as an e-book, audiobook, and in hardcover.  It tells the story of a young man who is abandoned at birth, and kicked from home to home for being “too strange.” At the age of 16 he meets a wondrous new teacher who recognizes instantly that he isn’t even human. He’s what her people call a “Nightingale,” a creature sent to live among human.

    You can learn all about it at www.nightingalenovel.com.

    Thanks Dave.

  • Four Hours

    Four Hours

    Four Hours, directed by 19 years old “Norwegian Tarantino” Andre Rettedal, has just been released on DVD and VOD. The film is a British action comedy filmed in London.  It tells the story of gangsters Capone and Tung, whose plan to rob a bar turns out to be much more complicated than expected. When they realise that they will have to wait four hours to get the code to the safe, they hold barmaid Charleene and loser Bob hostage. And, as Capone puts it “We are going to have a lot of fun in these four hours!”

    Born on the Norwegian coast, Andre Rettedal always wanted to become a film director. He started writing the script for Four Hours at the age of 15. As soon as he turned 18, he left Norway to London with his grandfather’s suitcase, £3000 in his pocket and a fair amount of trust in his lucky star. He eventually managed to put a team together and completed Four Hours in 6 days. The film was then acquired at the last Cannes Film Festival by Denton Distribution for international distribution.

    If that doesn’t inspire you to get off your ass and make a film, nothing will…

    Four Hours has just been released globally on DVD and VOD. The film is available for sale from the Denton Distribution website or through streaming on Denton Distribution’s Facebook page. A competition is on to win a DVD of Four Hours by becoming a fan of Denton Distribution’s Facebook page.

  • John Carter – Review

    John Carter – Review

    So begins another cinema blockbuster season chock full of action, explosions, shallow plots, spotty acting and 3D gimmickry in tow. John Carter, based upon the Barsoom series of books by Edgar Rice Burroughs, is an action adventure following the eponymous character finding himself transplanted from post-civil war America to Mars (or Barsoom to the locals) and embroiled in an ongoing war between the native populations of the red planet. Think Avatar set in a desert, by way of Planet of the Apes minus the time travel, and you’ll be on the right track.

    Flawed as it may be, which we will get to, there are some very entertaining aspects to this movie. The action is constant and exciting, the effects are for the most part very well produced, the sets and costumes (or lack thereof) are grand and consistent, and the 3D creates depth – helping to fully immerse you in the film’s world, rather than resorting to flinging debris or bullets out of the screen. Directed by Andrew Stanton, previously responsible for directing the fantastic Pixar films Finding Nemo and Wall-E, here making his live action debut. Taylor Kitsch in the title role of John Carter has the gruff masculinity, yet pretty boy, look required for a Disney blockbuster and Lynn Collins stylishly looks the part of the scientist/warrior princess, Dejah Thoris, although she becomes increasingly grating as the film wears on.

    Wearing on is a very apt description as, rolling in at 2 hours 30 minutes, this isn’t a brief movie and it does get a bit lost in the middle, becoming very dialogue heavy, before picking up again towards the final action sequences. As is sometimes the case with blockbusters John Carter tries, and fails dismally, to involve the audience emotionally and delve too deeply into the characters backstories so as to better entice the viewer into narrative. It would have done better to eschew the poor attempt at depth and accept style over substance. There’s a whole middle chunk of the movie concerned with trying to flesh out the characters; a horrible moment of which pits Carter against an entire army, intercutting the fight sequence with the death and burial his family back on earth and the result is so tacky and lacking in sincerity that each second it continues is like having an army of baby Tharks stabbing you in the eyes.

    But this is a movie involving a 19th century American army officer transported to Mars who, given the differing gravitational force, has enhanced strength (that translate mostly as an obscene ability to jump) so going in you can only expect the ludicrous. John Carter falls into the category of schlock films that allow you to sit down, shut off the brain and watch the pretty moving colours and in this function is performs well. It is nonsensically ridiculous, at times funny, constantly action-packed, maddeningly stupid but, for the most part, a fun ride. Should it have been better? Yes, given the directors previous animated output the pacing, characters, and script should have been better but shut off your brain and forgive it is follies and you might leave the theatre entertained.

    6 out of 10 – you can tell by the trailer is this is going to be your sort of thing.