film reviews, interviews, features | BRWC

Blog

  • Almost Kings – DVD Review

    Almost Kings – DVD Review

    Almost Kings, previously known as The Wheeler Boys, was winner of the Netflix ‘Find Your Voice’ competition and is now getting a home cinema release courtesy of Breaking Glass Pictures. Almost Kings has a plot that on the face of it sounds largely at odds with the intensity of the movie you watch – as he reaches high school maths geek Ted (Lorenzo James Henrie) tries to live up to the spectacle of his older brother, Truck (Alex Ross, perhaps best known for being terrifying in Gus Van Sant’s Elephant), who is perceived as cooler and more popular surrounded by his gang of ‘Kings’ (a mixture between the cool kids, jocks, and the perpetual screw offs from every American high school movie ever made). In trying to become like his brother he succumbs to a world of partying, alcohol, and as it unravels malevolence, violence, deception, and betrayal.

    There are moments when the movie flirts with being a trivial teen comedy, the central plot revolves around the idea of sleeping with as many freshman girls as possible, but unlike the jovial frivolity that might be found in that concept had this been a John Hughes movie or similar, Almost Kings opts for an ever diminishing spiral of dark drama. Director and co-writer Philip G. Flores has made an intense depiction of high school, and familial, anxieties tinged with realism (if slightly exaggerated).

    Truck’s ‘Kings’ are of course patently obnoxious, that is how they are meant to be, we’re supposed to feel a mix of admiration for them that quickly becomes disgust at the things that they do, and encourage in others. Hass (played by Alex Russell who you might recognise from the recent hit Chronicle) in particular typifies the kind of self-entitled jack ass that can uniformly be found in the American high school movie setting. Truck himself is a bit of an enigma, his character flits backwards and forwards from being a protective older brother, fiancee, and future father to a reckless, violent, selfish, cesspool of teenage hormones and immorality – at one point he encourages Ted to essentially rape a passed out drunk girl.

    However, while that is all true, the film is by no means without it’s flaws, it can be a bit slow which is exaggerated by the overall tone of despair. The ‘game’ of sleeping with as many girls as possible spills over into Ted’s academic world, as does his partying and he transforms, or at least plays at doing so, from the innocent studious boy from the beginning to a mirror of his brother. It’s his character that is the most annoying, his kamikaze mission to destroy all the relationships around him is at times painful to watch – not always because it’s intended to be, but because the movie feels like a bit of a chore to watch.

    Russell and Henrie give decent, and believable, performances as the leads as do the rest of the supporting cast. Intense is, overall, the best way to describe Almost Kings, and indeed as it marks Flores’s first feature movie (always a notably difficult, often faltering, first step) it bodes well for his career that the movie feels, if not great, coherent and well assembled.

    Almost Kings is out on DVD June 12.

  • Catch .44

    Catch .44

    Screen legends Bruce Willis and Forest Whitaker star alongside Malin Akerman (Watchmen), Deborah Ann Woll (True Blood) and Nikki Reed (The Twilight Saga) in this sexy, violent crime thriller. With a bad-ass attitude and a killer twist, Catch .44 is an ultra-stylish cinematic love letter to the 90s movies that gave us Reservoir Dogs, Killing Zoe, Pulp Fiction and The Usual Suspects.

    When three sassy sisters-in-crime, Tes (Akerman), Kara (Reed) and Dawn (Woll), are sent by sleazy drug kingpin Mel (Willis) to rural Louisiana to intercept a lucrative dope deal, it looks like a walk in the park for the girls. But when the near-deserted roadside café erupts into an orgy of deadly gunfire before the deal even goes down it becomes apparent to all present that things aren’t quite what they seem. Whether the bloody carnage is the result of a tragic misunderstanding or something more sinister remains to be seen. Meanwhile, there’s a psychotic killer (Whitaker) on the road and there are no prizes for guessing where his journey will eventually end.

    So Tarantino-esque it almost hurts (but in a good way), Catch .44 unashamedly wears its influences on its sleeve. It’s also got Willis, Whitaker and a trio of hot chicks (Akerman, Woll and Reed) with guns, unexpected outbursts of violence, a killer soundtrack that includes tracks by David Bowie, The Sweet, The Raveonettes and The Kills amongst others, and it features a great in-joke for anyone with fond memories of Bruce Willis’ late-1980s singing career. The Return of Bruno, indeed! For us, watching Catch .44 provided a welcome reminder of those heady days of the 1990s video rental experience when you could visit the local video store and unexpectedly find yourself taking home an edgy gem for the evening.

  • Tiny Furniture – DVD Review

    Tiny Furniture – DVD Review

    Having just graduated from college, split up with her longtime boyfriend, and thrust into the ‘real world’, Aura returns to her family home in New York, directionless and unsure of herself. Tiny Furniture is from writer, director, and star Lena Dunham, whose latest TV series Girls is proving a hit on US network HBO. The movie is a comedy, but it’s an indie comedy so the humour is really derived from a kind of despair at the world and it’s various absurdities, centred squarely on the feeling of being adrift in a post education, pre-career haze without a sense of clear purpose or identity.

    Moving back in with her famous artist mother, Siri, and her still in high school younger sister, Nadine, Aura finds herself back in a world that she doesn’t quite fit into anymore. Various other characters orbit around her: Frankie, a friend from College who is moving to New York to get an apartment with her; Charlotte, an old friend that she reunites with at a party and who helps to get her a job; Jed, a semi-famous YouTuber who she’s interested in but who seems a bit too concerned with himself; and Keith, the sous chef at the restaurant where she get’s a job as a day hostess. Siri and Nadine are played by Dunham’s real life mother and sister and the film is largely filmed in her mother’s actual Tribecca apartment so we can assume that, at the very least, the basis of Tiny Furniture is autobiographical. Even the title is derived from the photographs that Siri (and Laurie Simmons in reality) takes, which of course feature small furniture arrangements.

    All of the characters succumb to the sort of witty self-involvement associated with arty intellectual types that are rife in indie cinema and whilst Aura comes across as quite real some of the others verge on being insufferable assholes. As Aura invites Jed to stay in her mothers apartment whilst she’s away it’s clear that he’s only too willing to sponge off of her good natured hospitality. Also as she gets closer to Keith at work it’s unclear which of the two she’s really interested in, perhaps Jed intellectually and Keith physically as an unvarnished and brief sex scene (that’s difficult to watch only for it’s proximity to the raw and unsatisfying nature of reality) between the two attests. Indeed all the films relationships are complex yet fairly unsatisfying, with Aura showing a frankly human potential for inadvertently being her own worst enemy. Her relationship with her mother is perhaps the most sincere, having found a diary of hers from when she was around the same age it is apparent that she too was equally lost at that age – as indeed are most.

    As mentioned the comedy creeps in at the edges rather than supplying any particular bang, one of the standout moments involving trying to locate light bulbs in ‘the’ white cupboard when the apartment is an expanse of purely white cupboards, and another being the ill chosen setting for Aura and Keith’s sex scene. Tiny Furniture is a type of black comedy concerned with the crisis of people’s early twenties; certainly not laugh out loud funny, or even that pleasurable to watch. The pace is always languid and there’s sometimes a detached nature to the dialogue and fairly blank cinematography, but it’s Aura herself that makes it compelling enough to watch. It is an accomplishment of Dunham’s will that the movie exists, and whilst it might not make any big splash, to use TS Eliot “not with a bang but a whimper”, it is at least honest.

    Tiny Furniture is out on DVD May 28.

  • Iron Sky – Review

    Iron Sky – Review

    The concept for Iron Sky, the Finnish comedy/sci-fi/action/Nazi mash-up, was borne from the dream of writer Jarmo Puskala and a subsequent conversation with the eventual director, Timo Vuorensola, in a sauna. Not surprising really, for a film that is utterly ridiculous, completely nonsensical and absolutely brilliant for it.

    Set in the not-too-distant future, Iron Sky sets out an alternate reality whereby the Nazis retreated to the dark side of the moon after defeat in World War 2. Following 70 years of lunar exile, they plan to return to Earth and finish what the National Socialist Party started with their newly manufactured armada of Nazi-space ships. Yes, it’s that ridiculous.

    The Moon Nazis are coming…yes, Moon Nazis

    Right from the off, the film is fully aware of what it is and has no aspirations of being anything other than an absurdly raucous action comedy that never takes itself seriously (how can it? it has Moon Nazis). While it’s well and truly a modern B-Movie affair, complete with hammy acting, one-liners and a crappy soundtrack, the action scenes look pretty damn cool. With some exceptional craft design, particularly on the Nazi’s behemoth of a war ship, almost all of the sci-fi CGI is none too shabby at all. We’ve got some more than convincing looking space battles, an epic earth invasion and some really crisp green screen compositions. Yes it may sometimes look like an internet/made for TV movie, but for it’s modest budget, it makes the most of its truly outlandish ideas and presents them with a wonderful sense of self-awareness.

    As mentioned earlier, the performances have more ham in them than a European continental breakfast, but this is by no means a bad thing. As each character knowingly lampoons current and historical figures, it only makes sense for the actors to be gross exaggerations of the characters they are playing. Be that Stephanie Paul’s quite blatant and superb impression of Sarah Palin or the consistently brilliant Udo Kier as the Führer, each performance has its tongue very firmly in cheek throughout. The partnership that develops between Julia Dietze’s innocent Nazi teacher and Chris Kirby’s quite hilarious black astronaut is charming without ever being overly schmaltzy or forced. Peta Sergeant’s stylist-cum-Secretary of Defence makes a constant mockery of the Western worlds obsession with style over substance, and does so with completely over the top bravado; a style very much suited the movie itself. It is however, Gotz Otto’s superbly devilish turn as the movie’s villain that steals it. Always smarmy and consistently evil, his performance as the Führer to be is every Indiana Jones villain rolled into one, with a little bit of Roger Moore era Bond villain for good measure. He’s brilliant.

    Gotz Otto as Klaus Adler

    Occasionally the jokes fall a little flat, but on the whole the film is littered with straight up hilarious moments and brilliant one-liners (the best is saved for the very end). As a commentary on the nature of war, and the reasons behind such, it is surprisingly quite clever in places offering political jibes at almost all the major world leaders somewhat reminiscent of Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove. As a result, the film very much feels like something from the Matt Stone and Trey Parker School of comedy; anyone and everyone is fair game as the subject of unabashed parody.  Even the Finnish get a roasting at one point.

    You won’t find Michael Bay’s overly bombastic production values, or Oscar worthy performances, but Iron Sky never intends or aspires to be that. Put simply, it’s as ridiculous as it is entertaining. It pokes fun at people who deserve it, while never becoming overly offensive or cheap. The jokes are funny and the action holds up despite not being the most polished film ever made…but most of all, it’s fun.

    Taken for what it is, then, Iron Sky is a hilarious slice of Nazi action cake and thoroughly entertaining for it’s entire 93-minute duration.

    Iron Sky is in Cinemas nationwide on the 23rd of May for one day only and available on DVD and Blu-Ray from the 28th of May.

    If you’re in London however, The Prince Charles Cinema in Leicester Square has a full run from Friday the 25th of May. (For more details visit www.princecharlescinema.com)

  • The Raid: Q&A With Director & Star

    The Raid: Q&A With Director & Star

    Here is a great with director Gareth Evans and star Iko Uwais.  Thanks to The Cult Lab.

    Q: Gareth, how did you come to establish yourself as a filmmaker in Indonesia?
    Gareth Evans: I was living in Wales for 26, almost 27 years of my life, and I’d tried doing short films. I did one low-budget feature film in the UK, but I didn’t really do enough to get myself noticed by the film industry. I stayed very localised, and I didn’t really put myself out there enough. I didn’t chase it as much as I should have. When I got married, my wife and I were living in Swansea, and she could see that… I’d drifted back into my nine-to-five office job. She was looking for work but was struggling to settle. We were happy in Swansea – we loved the city, we loved the house and everything – but Monday to Friday was the sticking point. (Laughs) Weekends were great, but Monday to Friday was the sticking point.

    Q: What was that first feature you made?
    GE: It was a film called Footsteps. That was kind of a social drama. (Laughs) It sounds more high concept than it really was. It’s about a young guy who becomes disenfranchised within society, and as he drifts further and further down, he ends up, unwillingly, becoming involved sort of a snuff-film trade. But we shot it in more of a matter-of-fact way, because we didn’t want to do it like, say, 8mm or something, where everyone’s wearing grungy clothing and it’s dark. So we did it, like, “Oh, there’s an office block somewhere…” And in that office block they casually film people being killed. So that was the first one we did, and it was a big, big learning curve.

    Q: In what way?
    GE: Because we didn’t know what we were doing! (Laughs) We had a budget of £8,000. Two and a half grand of that went on the camera. We shot for two weeks. I had a crew of four people – that’s including me – and we did everything ourselves: make-up, props, and locations. Some places, we wouldn’t get permits, we’d just film until the police came. It was really more like a gung-ho shoot, grabbing stuff whenever we could. There are obviously limitations in doing a film that way, but then there are things you learn as well. So that was a big learning-curve film, and it gave me a taste of what it would be like to do that as a job. To know that on a Tuesday morning at 10am, instead of sitting down with a cup of tea, looking at my computer, I was out on the streets somewhere, shooting someone’s performance. It was this weird feeling of, “Oh, I want to do this.”

    Q: What was your day job back then?
    GE: It sounds weird now, but I was doing web videos to teach people the Welsh language. My boss, who passed away a year ago, was this incredible lady who supported me throughout. When I did Footsteps, I took the money out to do it, and, because I couldn’t risk losing my job, I said, “Can I please take a month off? You don’t have to pay me, I just want to shoot this film and get it out of my system.” And she agreed, she let me do it. So thanks to her, I had that opportunity. And then when we finished shooting… then the work got harder. (Laughs) I was doing my nine-to-five job, and then at night I’d go home and edit. I’d edit until 2am, wake up at seven and go to work. So that was the first film. It was completely different. I never, ever thought I’d make martial arts films.

    Q: So how did the move to Jakarta come about?
    GE: My wife put in a few calls back in Indonesia, she had a few contacts there, and one of them was a producer who was working on a documentary series. It was supposed to be five episodes, and each one was about a different element of Indonesian culture. And she was looking for a director to do one on silat, the local martial art. She knew that I was interested in martial arts, and she knew that I’d done a film before, and she was looking for someone from the outside that she could trust to make the film and give it an outsider’s perspective, because she didn’t want it to be made by someone who knew everything about martial arts.

    Q: How much did you actually know about the subject?
    GE: I’d seen karate, kung fu, muay thai and all those martial arts disciplines in so many movies, from my childhood right up to now, but I’d never seen silat before. And when I finally saw it, it just felt like nothing else. It felt completely different from all the other martial arts, and what I loved about it was that it was so adaptable to different situations and environments.

    Q: In what way?
    GE: Like, they might be fighting eye to eye but in a heartbeat they’ll come down low and take your legs from you! It was that sneaky style that I really loved about it – it was so direct and so abrupt. And during that documentary I got introduced to the traditions and cultures in Indonesia. We shot five different masters in five different areas of the country, and the idea was to get to grips more with the philosophy of silat rather than the physical side. So we were following different people on different journeys in their life, and one of them was a young boy doing merantau [a rite of passage among the Minangkabau people that involves leaving home on a journey of self-discovery]. That was the impetus. As soon as I found out it was a real tradition, a real piece of culture, I filed it away for a storyline later on. And also during the documentary, once we got to the Jakarta section, we were filming one master and one of his students was Iko. So through that documentary I met Iko, I met the choreography team, I found a martial art I loved, I really embraced the philosophy and the culture of it – and I had a tradition I could use as a storyline for a film.

    Q: Iko – how did you first meet Gareth?
    Iko Uwais: The first time was when Gareth was making this documentary about silat in Indonesia. When he was in Jakarta he came to my silat school and straight away he said, “I want to make a silat film. Do you want to do it with us?” I said, “OK.” (Laughs) I didn’t really believe him! I thought, maybe I can help with the choreography and the fighting. I didn’t think I could be the leading actor! So then Gareth went back to Wales. Then he came back to Jakarta and immediately he showed me the script for Merantau. He said, “You’re the leading actor, you’re going to play Yuda.” That’s when I started to believe him!

    Q: Were you always involved in martial arts?
    IU: I’ve been learning silat since 1993. At the same time I was doing silat, I used to play football. I was a junior until 2003, and then I stopped. There was a silat competition and I was the winner of the national round in the Indonesia area. I was in London for the UK Open in 2006. That was before I met Gareth.

    Q: What was your day job then?
    IU: I worked as a driver for a phone company for two years. When Gareth did the documentary he said, “Do you want to join us? I said, “Yes, but I have a contract with the phone company.” He said, “When does it run out?” I said, “May 16.” He said, “OK, when you’re finished, come with us and make the movie.” So I signed with him and I switched being a driver for making a movie.

    Q: Gareth – was it difficult to make the change?
    GE: When I got to Indonesia, and when I started designing Merantau, which, after all, was only my second film, it didn’t feel weird. It felt like, “Oh, I’ve watched a few martial arts films, I know how they work.” So I’d just go back and re-watch a bunch of the key films – the classics, like Drunken Master, old Bruce Lee films, anything with Jackie Chan – looking at the cinematography, the choreography and the editing to figure out a way to riff on it, while at the same time trying to create our own feeling and style.

    Q: Merantau does seem very old-fashioned and traditional, especially in comparison to The Raid. It’s also a little more artistic, in a way.
    GE: I guess so. Look, I like to mix up genres together. So The Raid is me mixing martial arts with horror, really. I realise when we were designing The Raid that it’s a survival horror. Technically, at its core, it’s a survival horror film. Merantau is more of a drama. (Laughs) Perhaps there’s a little bit too much drama in there, compared to action, although the last 15 minutes is pure action. But we deliberately set up these little scenes, with all these different characters, so that by the one hour mark, everything would start to tumble down – there’s consequence after consequence after consequence. But The Raid, obviously, is a lot more streamlined. We just step on the pedal.

    Q: Merantau is a little bit reminiscent of the Kung Fu TV series…
    GE: Yeah, for sure. It was kind of like a throwback. A lot of people said it was very similar to Ong Bak, but that was inescapable. We couldn’t get past the idea of a south-east Asian guy leaving his village to go to the city, and then stuff goes wrong. Yes, I understand why people said it was like Ong Bak. But for me it was like The Big Boss, the Bruce Lee film: country boy goes to Thailand and gets mixed up with nefarious characters. It’s been done so many times before, the storyline wasn’t new, but what I hoped to bring to it was a greater emotional connection to the characters.

    Q: Iko, how did you prepare for Merantau?
    IU: I had never tried acting in front of the camera, but Gareth trusted me with the moves. Maybe he taught me a little bit about character. For the fight scenes I can express myself. But the problem is, when I do the dramatic scenes, I had to learn so much.

    Q: How would you describe your character in Merantau?
    IU: My character Yuda is really quite gentle, really normal. He has a normal family, a really good family, and when he leaves his village to go to the big city, he is surprised, slightly. Life is much tougher. Everything is really difficult for him. In The Raid, just the accent is different from me. I was more confident for The Raid, it was much faster and there was more action.

    Q: Gareth, how do you choreograph the fight scenes?
    GE: This might sound a little highfalutin’, but when we do the choreography, we do bear in mind the psychology of the scene. So for Merantau, the hero is a good guy with a good heart, so in the early fights in the film he’s just trying to defend himself against his attackers. He doesn’t want to hurt anybody, just enough to let them know he’s in control. It’s only as the film progresses that things get more and more serious, and he’s called upon to take the fight to them. So the film becomes more aggressive towards the tail end of the film.

    Q: The Raid, on the other hand, is more like a grindhouse movie…
    GE: Yeah. A lot of the criticisms levelled at Merantau were, “Oh, it’s too soft.” We really love Tony Jaa’s work and we respect him very much as a talent – he’s an incredible martial artist – but a lot of the Tony Jaa fanboys turned against us. They said, “Aw, fuck Iko – he’d have his arse kicked by Tony Jaa. He’s got no power, no speed.” So the choreography design on The Raid was almost a response to that. It was like, “We’ve got to up our game. We can’t keep soft.” In Merantau the choreography couldn’t be too aggressive because it didn’t suit the character and it didn’t suit the situation. But in The Raid the psychology is completely different. Every single situation is: kill or be killed. So we had to be more aggressive this time.

    Q: Gareth, was Iko your first choice for The Raid? Did you write it for him?
    GE: Yeah, when we did Merantau it was a project that we designed for him, so we wanted it to be his thing, like, ‘This is going to launch Iko as a star.’ So for The Raid it was a no-brainer. I always knew I was going to write the role for him; I was just trying to find something new for him to do. So for the sequel we have to push him even more – make the character a lot more complex and give him more moral dilemmas. He’s become kind of like my little brother. We’ve gone through this whole process together, so everything that happened to us on Merantau and The Raid has happened to us at the same time. So I’ve got this thing where I kind of want to look after him, or look out for him. So when it comes to his career, I want to push him more with each film – develop his acting skills more. Because there’s no doubt that he can fight. But he can’t fight forever. So the idea is, once he reaches the point where he can’t do martial arts any more, he starts to slow down or tire, then he can make the shift into serious drama, in the way Jet Li did for a while. So hopefully he can aspire to having that kind of career later on.

    Q: Iko, how did you prepare for The Raid?
    IU: To prepare, before the shoot, me and all the other fighters had a boot camp. We went to see the army in Indonesia where we learned how to be like the characters. I had to get the character of someone in a SWAT team. The training was tough. Absolutely! They’re really like, “Go! Go! Go!” Really, really tough. And really, really strict. (Laughs) They really shouted at me!

    Q: How long did it take to choreograph The Raid?
    GE: When we design the fight sequences we spend about three months designing them – every single fight sequence in the film. It’ll be me, Iko and Yayan Ruhian – he’s the one who plays Mad Dog in The Raid – the three of us will be together in an office space with loads of crash-mats and a Handycam. I’ll tell them about the props, the location, the situation, the tone of the fight, as well as the opponents and what their skill set is. All of these details I give them. And then I give them a walk-through, so they can fill in the gaps and workshop it. For that first three months we film it as a wide shot, so we have all the detail. Then we go back and re-film everything, this time filming it like we would the film. It’s like a pre-visualisation storyboard of the entire fight, so by the end of that three months we have a locked template of how every single fight scene is going to be shot and edited. We do this because we’re still in our infancy with action films and we use it as a safety net, so when it comes to production we know exactly what we’re shooting.

    Q: Do you shoot the whole movie this way?
    GE: Just the fight scenes. Literally, from the beginning to the end. The only thing we don’t do in pre-visualisation is the drama element.

    Q: Iko, did you ever get hurt?
    IU: Every scene! I have a mark on my hand. There was one scene where I was fighting one fighter with a machete – it wasn’t a real machete, it was a fake machete – and I had to block him with my arm. For maybe 17 takes I had to do the same movement, every time, and every take. One time, I didn’t move quick enough, and the knife broke against my arm, because it was really strong and really hard. I still have the mark. It was really bad for continuity.

    Q: Gareth, could you talk a little more about the horror element? The music is especially effective…
    GE: As much as Die Hard was an influence, Assault on Precinct 13 was a bigger influence, I think. The thing with Die Hard was that it was all about the spectacle – how big we could do the action scenes and what we could do with the downtime in between to rebuild the tension. But Assault On Precinct 13 gave me the idea of creating tension and claustrophobia while also making people feel that this building was super-dangerous and filled with swarms of bad guys – without actually showing them! Because we didn’t have the budget for that many extras, so a lot of it was down to creating that feeling with sound. So a lot of times, you’ll hear crowds banging on doors – but you don’t see anyone. You just see a shadow on a doorway. We hear people, we hear crowds, but it’s really just my sound guys in Thailand just screaming into a microphone. So there were all these low-budget horror-movie techniques that we used to amp up the tension, amp up the fear.

    Q: Which scenes in particular?
    GE: There are probably two major moments where we borrowed elements from the horror genre. Like, when the guy with a machete is checking the toilet cubicles, one by one, and he’s tapping his machete against the tiles. That’s like a stalk-and-slash movie. And when the guy’s hiding in the wall, again, it’s all about playing around with feelings of claustrophobia and fear. It’s a situation with no escape. Actually, that wall scene was inspired by Michael Jackson’s Thriller! When I was a kid, that final moment, when the girl is in the house and all the zombies start breaking in through the walls… that terrified me. I was terrified by that – I hated that feeling, the idea that it doesn’t matter how much you hide yourself, someone, or something, can always break in and find you. So that was the reasoning behind the wall scene. I wanted that feeling, but in an action film. I was trying to find elements that you don’t usually get in a martial arts film, because I know people, from the outside are going see that this as a martial arts film. It’s going to be labelled a martial arts film, without a doubt. So I wanted people to be surprised by some of the elements we’ve thrown in there as well. And hopefully that comes across.

    Q: Iko, how would you describe the movie?
    IU: (Laughs) I would say that before you see the movie, maybe you should go to the toilet go to pee! From the beginning to the end, the audience cannot breathe. Every level just goes up and up and up.

    Q: Gareth, the film is called The Raid: Redemption in the US, isn’t it?
    GE: Yeah. I wrote a blog about it, actually. Because that was one big backlash when that happened – people went nuts. They thought it was the studio messing with some Asian film, like, “They don’t respect it…: But Sony totally respect it. The preparation and the work that has gone into raising the awareness of this title has been huge, and it hasn’t come just from me. It’s been a collective effort. Sony tried hard – we all tried hard – to keep the title, but it was a legal thing that we couldn’t get cleared. So we had to have a back-up, and maybe people don’t like The Raid: Redemption, and that’s fine. It’s not a problem. But the film is exactly the same. And you’re only going to see that title for four seconds at the beginning and four seconds at the end. That’s it.

    Q: So will there be more Raid movies?
    GE: Yeah. It serves a purpose, to create this feeling of a franchise. The second one, in Indonesia, is called Berandal. Berandal is “thug” in English, but it doesn’t work. It’s not really a translatable title, so we might call it The Raid: Berandal, just to maintain the audience awareness. The hardcore fans? They’ll always know what the film is, what it’s about and when it’s coming out. But the mainstream audience won’t, and we have to keep them in the loop. Before I made the film – before I made any film – I was, and still am, a huge fan of Asian cinema. I’ve always imported DVDs from Hong Kong and Japan. Even if they don’t have English subtitles, that’s how badly I want to see them! But what’s worked really well for The Raid is that the gap between release dates in different countries is not that big any more. And that was a conscious decision – I told the guys, “I want the releases in the key territories to be very close together.” (Laughs) Because there’s nothing worse than being the guy who wants to see a film and can’t, sometimes for up to a year. I wanted to bridge that gap.

    Q: So do you have the story worked out? Is it a trilogy?
    GE: It’s definitely two films. But a trilogy? I’m working on ideas for a third. I know where it’s going to go, but I haven’t really had a chance to sit down and work on the crux of the story. I’ve got a basic idea, but nothing I can really tell you. I think the third one won’t be until a long time yet.

    Q: Do you feel the weight of expectation for the second one?
    GE: Kind of. It would be impossible not to. But when we did the first one, we did it without feeling like we were answering to anyone. I think we have to maintain that, and we have to switch off that part of the brain that asks, “What are people going to react to?” When we made the first one, we sold the US and UK rights while we were still shooting. It was all on the same day. So I was like, “Shit, we’ve got big distributors in the US and UK.” But I still had a month of shooting left. And the next day my brain was like, “Fuck, this is like a studio film now.” You start to question everything, you start to doubt yourself. And then I thought, “This is ridiculous – what are you doing?” I mean, they’d bought the film based on the stuff that I’d shot earlier, when I didn’t even know they were interested. So I just shut it out of my brain and carried on making the film the way we wanted to do it. So what I’m hoping for the second one is to do the same thing: rely on our gut instinct.