Blog

  • DVD Review: The Flowers Of War

    DVD Review: The Flowers Of War

    I had never heard of the Chinese city of Nanking until I watched this film last night, and was entirely unaware of the brutal, tragic massacre that took place there in 1937. Having since briefly researched this episode in the war between China and Japan, I wish that The Flowers of War (2011) had more successfully depicted the true weight of the horror that ravaged the ex-capital. Instead, despite some stunning visuals and notable performances, this film falls just short of being truly moving.

    The international cast, headed by Christian Bale as American mortician John Millar, portray a single perspective on the city-wide massacre. The vast majority of the film, aside from the opening ten minutes, takes place inside the ‘Winchester’ Cathedral, which towers – relatively undamaged – amongst the dust and corpse-filled mayhem of Nanking. Hiding within its hallowed walls are a class of young Convent schoolgirls, subsequently joined by Bale’s John Millar as well as a group of sassy, colourful prostitutes from the infamous Qin Huai River district. The film depicts the tension between these factions, and ultimately the sacrifices that they make for one another in the face of a greater evil (in this case, the savage Japanese soldiers).

    Director Zhang Yimou (House of Flying Daggers, Hero) is quoted as saying that “Steven [Spielberg] read the script and said it was like the Schindler’s List of China.” This is a fair summary – the film is, like many others before it, a tale of one man fighting to protect the innocent amongst the chaos of war. The problem is that previous movies – Schindler’s List, Hotel Rwanda – have done it a lot better. The Flowers of War feels like an Ikea flatpack: they took all the parts required to make an Oscar-winning war drama, but got confused by the instructions and ended up with something that was almost a convincing coffee table; nevertheless, you wouldn’t want to actually rest your drink on it.

    As mentioned, the performances are great – all credit should be paid to the child actors, in particular Xinyi Zhang as the strong-willed schoolgirl Shu and Tianyuan Huang as the convent’s lone boy George. Christian Bale does what Christian Bale does: he plays the character with an accuracy and intensity that is impressive, if not wholly emotionally convincing. Again, there is a sense that aspects of the film were included because the writers or director felt that they should be there: Bale’s character begins as a cynical and selfish alcoholic, but quickly reveals his heart of gold – somewhat too quickly for it to be believable. Love interest Yu Mo (played well by newcomer Ni Ni) exposes the truth that her apparent strength hides a traumatic past, and again this feels somewhat hollow.

    The feminist philosophy student in me could write an essay on the reflections of sexuality, innocence and prostitution portrayed within The Flowers of War, but I’ll leave that for now (cue cheers from the reader). Suffice to say, there are some brutal, horrifying moments in the film that demonstrate the savagery of this particular slice of war history; these were the hardest-hitting and the most memorable. On the other hand, the sweeter emotional and sentimental aspects brought welcome respite from the violence, yet failed to leave a lasting impression.

    By the end of the film, I knew little about the massacre of Nanking but a lot about Zhang Yimou’s Oscar aspirations. The film is beautifully shot, no doubt thanks in part to the insanely high budget (“more than Schindler’s Listand Saving Private Ryan combined!” shouted the back of my DVD). However, this might be proof that spending a lot of money can’t necessarily buy you an Oscar, or a first rate review (clearly more important), no matter how hard you try.

  • Black Biscuit: Rebel Cinema Playing By The Rules

    Black Biscuit: Rebel Cinema Playing By The Rules

    Talking about Fabrizio Federico’s film Black Biscuit is quite a difficult thing to do, largely due to the fact that, despite having just watched it, I can’t be certain that I have the right idea as to what it was really about. Now, this might read like a cruel opening statement but bear with me. In the world of underground cinema, defining something as confused is as much commendation as it is criticism, and Black Biscuit, for all its puzzling obscurity, can at the very least be categorised as underground.

    Having been dubbed by BBC radio and Sight & Sound magazine as ‘rebel cinema’, Black Biscuit provides bizarre and brief insights into the lives of the odd, the ignored and the ordinary in ways that range from captivating to tedious. Using only children’s cameras and mobile phones, we witness drug taking, prostitution, a highly aggressive Ping-Pong game, a grainy heavy metal club juxtaposed with a bleached monochromatic ballet dancer and a nude model telling jokes to his aged painters. And that’s all within the first half of the two hour running time.

    Federico’s creation seems to be homage to the crossroads faced by so many when the romantic intentions and harsh realities of ones life cease to mesh; a particularly interesting theme due to the fact that the film is at a crossroads itself, between the ingenious and the rambling; half nightmarish surrealism, half sinister veracity. Taking the theme of social junctions and emphasising it by using, in his words, the ‘punk angels’ of society’s underbelly, the effect is certainly fascinating and, at times, morbidly pretty. In between odd compilations of imagery with deliberately incorrect censoring and interesting musical overlaps, these moments of colourful disturbance are occasionally entertaining, often baring striking similarities to Gus Van Sant’s My Own Private Idaho (1991).

    In general, the film is a total assault of the senses. Despite its highly stylised cinematography, which displays somewhat gritty and honest characters – or perhaps, to put it more aptly, subjects – in childlike, bleached and almost moving Polaroid ways, Black Biscuit is not a film for everyone.  As the Pink8 Manifesto dictates, Federico was required, as director, to cast himself in a starring role as Chet, a young man seduced by the uncomfortable and quick-rich lifestyle of a prostitute. Despite being easily the most enthralling strand within the multi-narrative and schizophrenic film, his presence is as narcissistic as it is charming. Equally, the wholly raw and almost accidental nature of the film could be heralded as brilliantly unorthodox or disjointed and uninvolving. Whilst one viewer might think the scenes are too quickly cut with too little explanation, another may think Federico is presenting them with a series of emotive and bizarre images, honourably allowing his audience to interpret their meaning with no hints or coercion.

    4577953157_360x453

    Having premiered at the Raindance Festival, the fact that the entire film is available to stream on YouTube solidifies this creation as one born of passion rather than exploitation, and irrespective of any individual’s opinion of it, Federico has undeniably done the Pink8 Manifesto (the explanation of which can be found here) proud. If mistakes are beautiful and continuity is wrong (rules 15 and 16) then Black Biscuit is gloriously and glowingly right. If bewildering, vague, self-indulgent, plot-less, risky, egotistical, limpid, raw, ugly and imperfect are perfect (rule 17), then this is a film that is is close to perfection. Federico has adhered unwaveringly to a set of rules that have defined his creation from balls to bones, and there is something to be, at the very least, wholeheartedly respected in this, even if you are in disagreement with the manifesto’s rules.

    So is my inability to understand it fully a good or bad thing? I’m not entirely sure myself.  However what I do know is when watching it I was very much reminded of the once-underground indie cult classics like Gummo (Harmony Korine, 1997) or even Eraserhead (David Lynch, 1977). And like either of those films, love or hate it, one must respect Black Biscuit’s bewildering and unshakable difference to everything on the film circuit today and accept that perhaps the only certainty is that both the film and it’s creator are cult classics in the making.

     

  • Where Do You Stand? Nightmare Before Christmas, For Halloween Or Christmas

    Where Do You Stand? Nightmare Before Christmas, For Halloween Or Christmas

    By Blitzwing.

    Ah, Halloween the big day of the year when all the scary DVDs (or VHS is your into the classics) come out from the bottom of the pile for another yearly spin. Another horror franchise releases the latest installment of a saga long past it’s prime, Saw – I’m looking at you, Paranormal Activity – don’t make me come over there. And BBC schedulers will be ever so creative and pick one of the Halloween films out of a hat to stick on in the middle of the night.

    The other day someone told that Halloween gave them the excuse to break out The Nightmare Before Christmas. “What?” I so eloquently pondered, “but surely that’s more of a Christmas watch”. Every yule time it fits lovingly beside Muppets Christmas Carol, Home Alone and Jack Frost 2: Revenge Of The Mutant Killer Snowman as one of my favourite views. But thinking about it Nightmare does have a lot going for it as a Halloween watch. Firstly the world the main characters live in is Halloween Town, pretty big indicator there. All the colourful characters inhabiting the town are classic horror figures – vampires, mummies, witches, clowns with tear-a-way faces etc. Even the stop-motion animation lends itself more to fully realizing the grotesques and the skewed architecture of the town. It’s when we’re in Halloween Town that the film feels truly comfortable. Aside from that Halloween Jack, our hero, has become a figure for disillusioned teens and people who think it’s really cool to wear his face on a jumper to… wear his face on a jumper. Halloween Jack seems to have more in common with music like The Misfits and Marilyn Manson rather than Slade and Bing Crosby. My God I’ve been so foolish, of course it’s a Halloween watch.

    Will this self revelation make me take the disc for a spin tonight? Nah I’m already planning to watch [Rec]. To me Nightmare will always be a Christmas film. You could say that the ‘Nightmare’ in the title is Halloween itself, meaning that we should enjoy the story before Christmas time comes along. But the film lovingly shows all that’s joyful about the season of good will. From the tacky to the heartfelt, Jack wants to emulate it and by emulating it, celebrates it. In his own bastardized way. The excitement of the people of Halloween reflects the excitement I feel every year. It has musical numbers in it! Now I may be quite conservative in this but Christmas time is filled with cheesy sing-a-long tunes and the occasional downbeat, heart string tugger but I can’t associate a song like ‘Mr. Oogie Boogie’ with the devil’s day.

    Why bother having this internal battle anyway? Why not just watch it twice in a year? I could but the seasons are too close together. I’ve been thinking about this entirely too much and now I’m going to take an aspirin.

    What does everyone else think?

  • You’ll Want Bad Meat Over Christmas

    You’ll Want Bad Meat Over Christmas

    Starring Dave Franco (21 Jump Street), Elisabeth Harnois (Mars Needs Moms) Jessica Parker-Kennedy (Decoys) and Mark Pellegrino (Mulholland Drive) Bad Meat, which premiered at London’s Frightfest before screenings at Razor Reel in Belgium and Fancine in Spain, tells the story of a group of teenage delinquents who contract a deadly virus after being ordered to a remote camp for rehabilitation.

    Compared to Eli Roth’s Cabin Fever and Michal J Bassett’s Wilderness, Bad Meat trades in all manner of bodily fluids, puking perverts, a graphic dog dissection, amateur stomach-pumping, chewed body-parts and ripped-off genitals.

  • Retro Review – Crocodile (A-Go)

    Retro Review – Crocodile (A-Go)

    Korea is home to some of the finest films of our generation. Often beautiful, powerful and unashamedly graphic, movies from this particular part of the Far East offer a compelling riposte to the safe and friendly cinema of the West. Increasing in popularity since Chan-Wook Park’s incredible Vengeance Trilogy, Korean cinema has been consistent even before then, and the 1996 debut of Ki-duk Kim is a fine example of this.

    Crocodile (Jae-hyeon Jo) is a homeless thug; unhinged and violent, he lives underneath a bridge by the Han River in Seoul with a young chewing-gum peddling boy and an old man. After saving a young woman, Hyun-Jung, from drowning due to a suicidal jump from the bridge, Crocodile shamefully uses her purely for his own sexual ratification. Rather than escaping however, the woman chooses to stay with Crocodile and a dysfunctional family bond develops between the foursome as a romance blossoms between the titular character and the woman he saved from certain death.

    A peculiar relationship indeed

    Utterly uncompromising in its portrayal of a Korean street life, Crocodile is a raw and honest tale of a disturbed but ultimately fragile and frustrated man. Despite being a serial rapist and uncontrollably violent, we really shouldn’t like Crocodile but by the film’s beautifully poetic denouement we can’t help but sympathise with him. Full credit, then, to Jae-hyeon Jo’s perfectly balanced performance and Ki-duk Kim’s superlative writing as he masterfully crafts a film around a truly loathsome character that eventually becomes the subject of audience compassion. Taking several twists and turns throughout, Crocodile hits hard often; frequent rape and violence occur without apology but it never becomes overly graphic or needlessly gratuitous. It’s controversial in its themes, but not in its representation of them and as such, Ki-duk Kim gives reason to the unspeakable crimes of its lead character rather than being a littering of tasteless titillation for the sake of it. It’s got a fair dash of natural humour as well. Jae-hong Ahn as the young boy who helps Crocodile make his money is a welcome break from the intenseness of the slums, and his performance safely belongs on the list of truly great child performances (with the pinnacle being Salvatore Cascio in Cinema Paradiso of course).

    It’s not the prettiest film ever committed to celluloid, but then external beauty isn’t the point of Crocodile. The grimy underbelly of Seoul is at the forefront here, and it would be almost inappropriate for the film to look clean in its presentation. Being a student of fine art, it’s apparent that Ki-duk Kim offers a more cerebral expression of the medium as its beauty is found in his superb script and story rather than the way his debut looks on screen.

    Raw in every sense of the word, Crocodile is another fine exponent of Korean cinema. Superbly scripted and acted, Ki-duk Kim’s seminal debut kicked off an incredible career in cinema for the man himself, and together with The Isle and Address Unknown, it remains one of his grittier efforts. His subsequent catalogue of movies is second to very few however, and if there was ever a reason to give Korean cinema a go, Ki-duk Kim is it.