Blog

  • And Scene #3: The Thing – The Blood Test

    And Scene #3: The Thing – The Blood Test

    The value of a great scene is lost on most films. It seems a bizarre thing to say but watching as many as I do, you’d be amazed how set-pieces and moments of flair can be sacrificed for the all-consuming monolith of story. We’ve got to get to the next  scene as quickly as possible, so if a scene isn’t expressly about accomplishing that goal, more often than not it’s gotten rid of or marginalized. This isn’t always a bad thing, as most of the scenes I talk about in these parts are tangents from a mass, and if they’re not worth our time then they can bring the film to a screeching halt, momentum permanently lost. This perhaps why genre films excel at set-pieces, for if your plot is a monster is trying to kill these guys, or these two fall in love, then your plot is shorthand, a spine that allows you to the room to see what can really be accomplished in 5 minutes as opposed to two hours, and have that spine there to bring you back on course when you’re done being awesome.

    Whether you have seen John Carpenter’s The Thing or not, it should be patently obvious which category it falls into (not a romantic comedy). I’d call this film Carpenter’s best work, and then at some margin. I’m not exactly the man’s biggest fan, his films tended to be too right brain for me and lacked decent characters and often the capacity to surprise. That as well as the fact that I consider Halloween to be the most overrated film ever made in the history of cinema (no hyperbole, that’s actually my literal opinion) but The Thing is the exception that proves my Carpenter hating rule. I think it’s a deserving and lasting classic, Carpenter’s minimalism combines perfectly with an elegant set-up and ingenious monster design, and if there are many monster movies better than this, I haven’t seen them.

    The blood test scene, iconic enough that it probably needs very little introduction to the kind of people that would be reading a site like this, is an extra-ordinary example of how to wring every last drop of tension out of a scene. Carpenter has drawn occasional comparisons with Hitchcock, something that makes sense if you remove quality from the conversation. Both spent their entire careers making essentially the same film, both had an interest in filming variations on similar sequences in different movies, as if trying to craft a perfect version of said sequence and both an interest in incorporating technical advancement and experimentation. But this sequence is probably the only time Carpenter mastered suspense in the way Hitchcock could, in a way so carefully crafted and designed, where every beat comes at the perfect moment and a punch you know is coming manages to hit you as strong as any imaginable surprise or twist. Delightfully agonizing, you might call it.

    So in the name of set-up, the blood test occurs well into the running time of The Thing, and essentially kicks off the final act. Everyone at the extremely isolated base in Antarctica knows about the shape-shifting  monster that’s not only killing them, but making copies of its victims that then blend in amongst the other survivors (instead of just killing them instantly, which the alien could do with ease. Movie magic y’all) This of course means that anyone who’s been separated from the group for any period of time is a suspect. MacReady, our nominal anti-hero, is in exactly this position. So he takes radical action of taking all those not yet killed hostage by threatening to suicide bomb everyone with a stick off dynamite.

    His plan is thus. He’s noticed that almost every strand of Alien DNA is alive, it’s own separate entity. As have we by the way (Poor Norris got his head turned into a spider). Following that logic, if he were to take a blood sample from each other survivors, if any of them were alien, that blood sample would attempt to survive, its own separate entity, if under attack from a heated copper wire. So, with each survivor tied to a chair, MacReady proceeds to test the blood, one by one, whilst we wait for the inevitable jump. We know somebody is the monster, because come on, you can’t get us that way. Instead it’s a moment that has to be ‘Goldilocksed’  The time of the reveal, the identity of the monster, the manner of the gearshift from that moment on, it needs to get it all just right.

    First to be tested is Windows. Windows is a relatively minor character and that combined with his going first, you’re suspecting he’s going to be clean, or else this scene will have shot its wad before getting to the good stuff. But the shot lingers Windows looks terrified, my certainty is waning.  The copper wire fizzes into the blood. No reaction. Next goes MacReady himself. No reaction. Obviously. Carpenter is cutting around all possible suspects at all times, taking in everyone’s tension. Asshole Childs, Company man Garry, comic relief Palmer, newbie Nauls. No music, trusting the moment to play on its own wits. Which only makes everything that much more on a knife edge.

    Next up are two of the recently deceased, Copper and Clark. The latter of which MacReady has just shot in the head in self defence.  Copper. No reaction for Copper. Clark. No reaction for Clark. In a moment that slightly alters the tone of the scene, Childs (played emphatically by genre legend Keith David) points out that this makes MacReady a murderer. A moment of regret flashes on Kurt Russell’s face. Palmer next.  A nervous Garry calls this nonsense and not proof of anything. MacReady, clearly suspecting Garry, calls him out in a moment of triumphant hubris, then BAM. Palmer’s blood shoots into the air, screaming everywhere, Palmer begins to morph into a thing whilst Nauls, Childs and Garry, all tied to him, collectively shit themselves. Complete calm to complete pandemonium, Carpenter pulling the trigger at just the right moment. Long enough that we’d settled into the scene and began to let our guard down, but quick enough for the thing not to overstay its welcome.

    Palmer was the perfect choice because although he wasn’t exactly the kind of character that survives this kind of thing, he’d played the role of the movie’s likable guy. And with 6/7 people left it felt way too early for him to go. Carpenter intelligently keeps him largely quiet for the entire scene, so the punch of it works so much better. In many ways, this is the classic hitchcockian sequence, removed from all the grandstanding gore, it’s someone hiding something and our hero forcing them to reveal it with lives at stake. Just you know, instead of a bomb going off, or a spy getting burned, dude’s head is going to open, flesh jaws are going to come out and eat poor Windows. But you know, roughly the same.

    After blowing up the Palmer-Monster with blowtorches and dynamite. There’s nothing left to do but continue the test, with Nauls, Cilds and Garry yet to go. Each passes, and after an exasperated Garry screams in disbelief, we fade out, as if the movie knew we needed to charge down after so much awesomeness. Ladies and Gentleman, THAT is how you do a set-piece in a horror movie.

  • Stitches – Review

    Stitches – Review

    *Please excuse the language – sorry Mum*

    Oh what the fuck is this fresh hell?

    Stitches is an over-weight, chain smoking, useless clown who’s accidentally killed by a bunch of children at a birthday party (it sounds funnier written down). Six years later… I don’t know why six years later ask the writer… he comes back to life when the same bunch of kids from the birthday bash put on a house party.

    Stitches is essentially a “comical” version of a slasher film. Inexplicably Ross Noble takes the lead as the royally pissed un-dead clown. Really. Ross Noble. Everyone’s favourite, cheeky, off-beat yet still accessible to mainstream taste comedian has decided to pick this monumental shit shop as his first starring role.

    You may have gauged that I didn’t like Stitches.

    The casting decision of Ross Noble seems absolutely ludicrous as they could have hired any un-fit schleb to run around in clown feet muttering obscenities under his breathe. Maybe Noble thought the script was genuinely funny? Maybe the producers have something on him? Either way he brings nothing of his comedic charm to this film in the slightest. The whole film seems to coast along on the conceit the premise is funny enough to not bother with any other gags. How many times does director/co-writer Conor McMahon think we need to here Noble mumour “fuck’s sake” everytime he falls over. It wasn’t funny the first fucking time!

    Stitches would have been so much simpler if it was just trying to be a straight forward spoof of generic slasher flicks. Instead it aims to bring some Skins style teenage angst among the gaggle of teenagers that are hunted down. I’m not going to bother naming each one. They’re either amazingly annoying or so forgettable that you could be excused for not giving the tiniest shit when they’re offed.

    The visual style of the film is borderline student. Save for a few out-of-the-blue moments where they obviously hired a really expensive camera for the day to shoot close ups of severed heads falling to the ground. In fairness these shots do look impressive. Would the film have been better had the whole thing been shot like that? Probably not. A herpes sandwich will still give you herpes even if it’s served in Warbuton’s Farmhouse bread – not sure what my point was there.

    The other concession I’ll give is that some of the effects are decent enough and the director likes his blood so gore-hounds might find something entertaining. A nice moment with an inflating head and some brains but that’s about it.

    I usually love films that are so bad they’re good but Stitches is just out and out shit. It’s not remotely funny, Ross Noble fans would be advised to stay clear. The plot manages to combine  I Know What You Did Last Summer, Mean Girls, Hollyoaks and Stephen King’s It (not a stellar line up I grant you) and come up with a mess that involves a mystical cult of clowns who seem to live in  the countryside of Ireland, sprouting up at random intervals to kill children.

    I’m angry that this film was bad. I’m angry that I watched this film but mostly I’m angry at Michael Bay – I don’t know why but I am.

  • Welcome To The Punch – Review

    Welcome To The Punch – Review

    Where did all the Londoners go? I’m pretty sure there are some. I shared a bus with a few of them this afternoon (wouldn’t recommend) and I can hear some outside now using sentences that are mostly made up of vowels. There’s over eight million of us. It seems Welcome to the Punch, however, was filmed when we all went on holiday that one time, because director Eran Creevy’s London is empty. It looks nice, don’t get me wrong. The Shard and the Gherkin have never sparkled so much in sweeping landscape shots; glass, granite and river all washed with a sleazy yet seductive blue palate sheen. It’s beautiful, but ultimately empty.

    No one lives in London but cops and robbers it seems. Characters meet in empty theatre auditoriums, shootouts occur in empty nightclubs. It’s so barren that, in the first scene, our protagonist Max (James McAvoy) is able to locate the people he’s pursuing by getting out of his car on an empty street and listening really hard. In London. Seriously. For a film as desperate as it is to showcase the expanse of London’s skyline, we see none of its life, only its corners and corridors.

    Combining this with short roster of characters does create a certain claustrophobic tone at least, that even in the huge expanse of the city this handful of people are bound together, locked into inevitable conflict by their sins or obsessions. This microscopic scope of storytelling would be fine if this were a character study, but the script – also by Creevy – is far more concerned with plot twists than character nuance which leaves the movie feeling shallow and insubstantial.

    So there’s this tough nut copper called Max, right. This fella’s got a rock hard cock on for this robber, real stern geezer. You know ee’s Stern cos ‘is name is actually Sternwood in the script. It’s a sorta clever touch thing. So the copper’s obsessed with this Sternwood bloke ‘cos he once gave Max a bit of a slap, shot his leg all gimpy like and made him look a tit. And you’ve cottoned on that Max is obsessed with ‘im – right – cause every Dick ‘n Harry keeps mouthin’ off to him “you’re obsessed” every few minutes. Its sorta helpful actually cause it means we don’t ‘ave to waste no time actually showin’ his obsession or – like – investin’ in Max’s character or nuffin when you can just – like – tell us he’s obsessed and we can just get on with it so the audience don’t get confused or distracted or wander off or nuffin.

    It’s one of those rare cases when a film could actually afford to be a little longer. It never stops to catch its breath, every scene advancing the plot plot plot. While this means that the first two acts move at a compelling pace, by the time the third act rears its head and all the twists flop onto the frame like dead fish, it’s hard to care because all the script’s characterisation of the cast has been either non-existent or so bluntly on-the-nose (“you’re obsessed, Max” or “That decision is bad” “Like your attitude”) that we’re invested in nobody. I don’t feel anything if a character I’ve barely met betrays another man I don’t care about. Had the pace slowed a little and we actually got to spend more time with these characters, their backgrounds, their histories, or just having them talk about anything other than plot we might care, maybe feel some tension, but the film’s closing moments just left me numb. Not bored necessarily, just unmoved.

    The plot itself is a functional but bland conspiracy featuring betrayals aplenty and more twists than the 60s, but it feels as rote and functional as any straight-to-DVD copper flick, more suited to a Danny Dyer than a James McAvoy. One has to think that it’s off the back of his debut film Shifty‘s critical kudos that Creevy was able to attract such an all-star cast of British thesps to such a B-movie project. James McAvoy, Mark Strong, David Morrisey, and Andrea Risborough all deserve much more than the script gives them and the few grace notes are all provided by them despite the material, rather than because of it. The flicker of Mark Strong’s eyes when he realises he has to return to a life of crime, the constant pain on James McAvoy’s face when he bends his bum knee, the frail cracks Andrea Risborough inserts into her one-note ‘ballsy woman’ character brief.

    Peter Mullen and Johnny Harris (channeling a young Eddie Marsan) fare much better, because their characters are supposed to be slightly eccentric. It’s the only time Creevy’s script remembers to add colour to the dialogue, and Mullen and Harris leap on it with relish, creating a deeply sympathetic old rogue in one, and an intensely unsettling psychopath in the other. If only the script had endeavoured to make the other characters as remarkable, Welcome to the Punch could have a nice little classic.

    Because, storytelling aside, the filmmaking on display here is actually of high quality. The ensemble are giving it all they’ve got but as a director Creevy also impresses. There are a number of set-piece scenes – a shootout in a club, a shootout in a hotel room, a brilliant Pinteresque confrontation in an old Nan’s living room – that are all well-composed, brilliantly sound-designed, and shot with a real kinetic energy, confirming that Eran Creevy is a british director with a strong sense of stylistic flair.

    The direction and acting elevate it above your average friday night rental, no doubt. However, I’ll leave it up to your own moviegoing sensibilities whether you think it’s worth a full cinema ticket to see a movie with undeniable production value but lacking in any discernible personality.

    It’s beautiful, but ultimately empty. Make your choice, Londoners, if there are indeed any of you out there.

  • The Croods – Top 10 Pre Historic Films

    The Croods – Top 10 Pre Historic Films

    The Croods is a prehistoric comedy adventure that follows the world’s first family as they embark on a journey of a lifetime when the cave that has always shielded them from danger is destroyed. Traveling across a spectacular landscape, the Croods discover an incredible new world filled with fantastic creatures — and their outlook is changed forever.

    To celebrate the release of The Croods in cinemas on 22nd March we are going to look at the top 10 prehistoric films to watch in your cave.

     

    The Croods. – 2013

    About to receive its theatrical release on 22nd March, The Croods family are taken on an epic journey outside of their cave, which has always protected them from the outside world, after it is destroyed. They venture into the out and discover fantastic creatures and landscapes. Their view on the world becomes changed forever. Starring Nicolas Cage, Emma Stone and Ryan Reynolds. Join them on their adventure!

     

    The Land Before Time – 1988

    The 1988 release of the animated The Land Before Time follows five orphaned dinosaurs as they travel through the ruins of their world whilst grieving for their families. It’s a tale of survival and pulling together. After its release a further five The Land Before Time films were released.

     

    Jurassic Park – 1993

    The Steven Spielberg directed Jurassic Park saw a preview tour of a theme park go horribly wrong when a power fault allows the cloned dinosaur exhibits in the park to run wild. Starring Richard Attenborough and Jeff Goldblum the film has inspired theme park rides and a further two Jurassic Park films have followed its lead.

     

    California Man – 1992

    After discovering a frozen caveman in their back yard, two teenage outcasts decide to melt the ice releasing him into the modern world. They decide to introduce him to how life works in the 20th century. Starring Sean Astin and Brendan Fraser this comedy sees how the teenagers learn to enjoy life.

     

    Dinosaur – 2000

    2000 saw the release Disney’s Dinosaur; the story of an orphaned dinosaur raised by lemurs decides to join a long trek when a meteor shower threatens to wipe out his family home. A young Hayden Panettiere and Max Casella loaned their vocal talents to the film.

     

    One Million Years B.C – 1966

    Starring Raquel Welch and John Richardson, One Million Years B.C sees Tumak, a caveman banished by his tribe. The story follows Tumak and his love interest Loana (Welch) as they embark on a quest to defeat the leader of the tribe from which he was banished. With giant dinosaurs and creepy crawlies we see the world from a caveman’s perspective.

     

    Ice Age – 2002

    This family adventure has a Hollywood cast loaning their voices to an array of prehistoric characters with Ray Romano taking the lead as Manfred the mammoth, we see Manfred and his two new friends Diego the saber tooth tiger and Sid the sloth discover a human baby and follow their journey as they try to return the child to his family. Two more Ice Age films have followed on seeing the three characters evolve even more.

     

    10,000 BC- 2008

    The Roland Emmerich directed, 10,000 BC is a prehistoric adventure following a young mammoth hunter’s journey through a rather uncertain territory after his heart’s desire; Evolet is stolen by a warlord. D’Leh, the young hunter gathers members of his tribe and leads them to the end of the world in order to save the future of his tribe.

     

    The Clan of the Cave Bear – 1986

    Released in 1986 and starring Daryl Hannah, The Clan of the Cave Bear takes a more serious look at the world from a cavepersons point of view; we follow the tale Ayla, a Cro-Magnon female who is torn apart from her family post earthquake. Adapted from a series of novels by Jean M. Auel the film takes a dramatic look back at the beginning of man.

     

    The Journey to the Centre of the Earth – 1959

    A slightly older look back at the prehistoric era comes in the form of the 1959 release of The Journey to the Centre of the Earth. An adaption of the Jules Vern classic novel and directed by Henry Levin, the story follows Professor Oliver Lindenbrook and his group of explorers as they follow an explorer’s trail down an Icelandic volcano to the Earth’s centre. Along the way they uncover a fantastical world of overgrown reptiles, like dinosaurs and underground oceans. Follow Pat Boone and James Mason as they journey on an epic adventure.

    The Croods is released in cinemas on 22nd March.

  • The Croods  – Top 5 Famous Voices

    The Croods – Top 5 Famous Voices

    The Croods is a prehistoric comedy adventure that follows the world’s first family as they embark on a journey of a lifetime when the cave that has always shielded them from danger is destroyed. Traveling across a spectacular landscape, the Croods discover an incredible new world filled with fantastic creatures — and their outlook is changed forever.

    The Croods characters are voiced by Ryan Reynolds (Guy), Emma Stone (Eep) and Nicolas Cage (Grug) to name a few.  In this feature we look at the top 5 actors who you may not expected to have voiced characters in films.

     

    Nicolas Cage:

    Nicolas Cage is best known for his roles in action films such as Con Air, National Treasure and Gone in Sixty Seconds but is now voicing protective father, Grug in The Croods, released on 22nd March.  The Croods isn’t the first animated film Cage has loaned his voice to, playing Dr Tenma in the 2009 animated action, Astro Boy, Speckles the guinea pig in G-Force released the same year and as Zoc in the 2006 adventure comedy The Ant Bully.

     

    George Clooney:

    Renowned for his roles in both film and television since the early 80s, George Clooney has only loaned his voice to one film, as the lead, Mr. Fox in the adaptation of the Roald Dahl book, Fantastic Mr. Fox alongside Meryl Streep, Michael Gambon and Bill Murray.

     

    Vin Diesel:

    Before taking on his roles in action films such as The Fast and The Furious and The Chronicles of Riddick, Vin Diesel starred as the lead in the Brad Bird directed, The Iron Giant released in 1999, starring alongside Jennifer Aniston and Harry Connick Jr. His only voice credit to date.

     

    Angelina Jolie:

    Angelina Jolie has actually voiced characters in several films, starring alongside Will Smith, Renee Zellweger, Robert De Nero, Jack Black and Martin Scorsese in the 2004 DreamWorks release of A Shark’s Tale where she voiced Lola. She has since teamed up again with Jack Black to play the role of Tigress in King Fu Panda 1 and 2 as well as some shorts.

     

    Christopher Walken:

    Known for playing a spectrum of roles in films, with a career spanning from television appearances in the 1950s, Christopher Walken took on the role of Colonel Cutter in the 1998 DreamWorks animation, Antz. Starring alongside a host of Hollywood actors including, Danny Glover, Gene Hackman, Dan Aykroyd, Sylvester Stallone, Sharon Stone and Jennifer Lopez. Again, this is his only voice credit to date.

    The Croods is released on 22nd March.