Blog

  • Review: Mea Maxima Culpa

    Review: Mea Maxima Culpa

    By Lucy England.

    Alex Gibney’s documentary Mea Maxima Culpa, exploring the much debated and highly publicised topic of paedophilia in the Catholic Church is a must see. It follows four deaf alumni of the St John’s school of the deaf, and their role in bringing forward the first protest against clerical sexual abuse against children in America – the Lawrence Murphy Case.

    The film starts with reel of heart-warming images of the children at St John’s – happy in their silence in a supportive and loving atmosphere. Even their initial relationship with the man that will be their abuser is one of love and dependence. Father Murphy is their ‘second father’; they are desperate for his attention and he is a ‘Pied Piper’ figure. It is here that the sinister nature of their relationship begins to unfold.

    Later in the film, Tony Walsh the notorious ‘singing priest’ belts out Blue Suede Shoes live on television, in complete denial that he has committed and crime. As the film details, these men are able to justify their actions by their apparent closeness to God, clearing them of all blame. It is this denial then, that Gibney takes such an issue with, claiming himself that Pope Benedict’s resignation was somehow related to knowledge of abuse within the church.

    Therefore, the film focuses on the quiet truth of the four’s collective story, finally giving them the voice to express themselves to the world. As a whole, the film uses these interviews to weave together cuts of old footage with more modern research to express the scale of this issue, while still treating it with the necessary subtlety.

    A well thought out explorative film of a very potent issue, Mea Maxima Culpa identifies that the ‘most grievous fault’ made when dealing with this debate is keeping it quiet, forcing children to be ashamed and believe that what they are experiencing is right, or if wrong, something they deserve. By bringing the issue into the world of film Alex Gibney opens it up to discussion and a larger awareness, and hopefully children such as these will no longer be silenced.

  • Welcome To The Punch: Review

    Welcome To The Punch: Review

    By Gordon Foote.

    Eran Creevy, who some of you may remember from 2008’s Shifty, is back in the director’s chair with crime thriller Welcome To The Punch; the oddly named tale of ex-career criminal Jacob Sternwood (Mark Strong) and the policeman who failed to stop his last big job, Max Lewinsky ( James McAvoy).

    Three years later, Sternwood’s son is shot when a heist goes wrong and this forces Jacob back to London where Lewinsky is waiting for him – but as the pair continue their game of cat-and-mouse, it’s clear that Sternwood Jr. was involved in something big.

    With heavy hitters like McAvoy and Strong in the lead roles, it should come as no surprise to learn that there are some great performances in Punch. McAvoy continues to prove himself to be one of the more versatile actors out there at the moment; his depiction of Lewinsky burns with resentment and self-loathing as a leg injury reminds him daily that he let Sternwood escape.

    On the other side of the law, Strong is typically stalwart, giving an understated turn as the object of Lewinsky’s obsession.  He crafts a true professional; a man who broke laws to make money, not for any desire to hurt or wrong people, and as the film builds it’s hard not to feel sympathy for him.  Add to these the likes of Johnny Harris, David Morrissey, and Peter Mullan and you have a surprising amount of talent driving this cop drama forwards.

    The talent extends behind the camera too, with Creevy showing he can certainly turn on the style when the call comes.  Set in London (as all action films apparently have to be, at least in part, these days) the director’s vision of his home city is one of deep shadow and neon highlights by night, and muted pastels by day: gritty with a capital ‘G’, but also polished, beautifully shot, and confident in its execution.

    Welcome To The Punch is a film that oozes style; making promises of neo-film noir, and tipping its hat to the likes of Michael Mann’s Heat.  From the dynamic opening action scene, that concisely sets the tone and introduces the players, to the action packed finale, Creevy’s direction blends seamlessly with Ed Wild’s cinematography to create a film which is never less than slick and visually arresting.

    Sadly, while Eran Creevy’s direction is top flight, his writing lets the film down, doing little to hide the fact that under its layers of undeniable panache, Punch is a run-of-the-mill cop story with the usual tick-box partner/love interests, police corruption, and predictable plot twists all present and accounted for.  Despite its shiny new look, you have seen this film before, more than once.

    Skeletal dialogue, at times, makes characters unrelatable, and it is only due to the calibre of the cast that this doesn’t threaten to derail the entire film.  It’s a shame, because Creevy’s film-making is skilful enough, and backed up by a cast brimming with capable actors, that he manages to drag you along and hold your interest. Even as the film hurriedly garbles its final, overly familiar plot contrivance before putting up its feet and letting its tense, well-crafted action carry you through to the inevitable conclusion, it’s hard to begrudge Punch too much.

    It’s a destination you know well, but this is a fun way to get there.

    3/5

  • Famous Actors Who Despise Their Own Films

    Famous Actors Who Despise Their Own Films

    When an actor subverts the Hollywood paradigm by speaking out against their own work, it isn’t the same as Joe Schmo debating his boss on a policy change. Actors risk lost endorsements, blacklists and millions in potential income whenever they open their mouths — which is why the public is so fixated on their candor. In some cases, it’s a clear attention and publicity grab gone wrong, but others show valid, legitimate concerns that echo public opinion.

    Jim Carrey on ‘Kick-Ass 2’ (2013)

    The comedic actor and one-time Jenny McCarthy devotee made waves with his Twitter account when he recently attacked his latest film “Kick-Ass 2.” Carrey claims that the tragic shooting Sandy Hook Elementary caused a change of heart. The film’s producer, Mark Miller, reacted with surprise, pointing out on his website that there is nothing in the film that wasn’t in the screenplay 18 months ago. Carrey sounds more like an aging actor that used a horrific tragedy to parlay his name into relevancy for ten more seconds (he did the same unforgivable fame-grab with Autism awareness a few years ago).

    Kate Winslet on ‘Titanic’ (1997)

    If you were a tween in the late nineties, the notion that anyone didn’t love “Titanic” would have made you rage. Fifteen years later it’s a bit more forgivable. Although “Titanic” is one of the highest grossing films of all time and earned 11 Academy Awards, its leading lady doth protest. Winslet told CNN that she takes issue with every single scene, including her American accent. She wishes she could re-do her performance, which has literally left her with the urge to vomit every time she hears Celine Dion’s “My Heart Will Go On.”

    Woody Allen on ‘Manhattan’ (1979)

    Much to the chagrin of his American Express business cards, Mr. Allen hated “Manhattan” so much that he offered to make another movie for free if the studio axed it completely (Robert Weide’s “Woody Allen: A Documentary”). “Manhattan” is considered one of Allen’s best films and one of the finest comedies ever made, but he simply “doesn’t like it.” Allen is known for his neurotic frankness, but it’s anyone’s guess why the iconic film rubbed him the wrong way.

    James Franco on ‘Tristan and Isolde’ (2006)

    James Franco’s resume is stacked with impressive feats, but he wasn’t nearly as big back in 2006 when he played Tristan in the “epic” love story. Franco complained to Newsweek that the film was a big mistake, and that he was an “overzealous” young actor who wanted to make excellent movies, but “T & I” was not one of them. Franco said his personality clashed with the director, who kept trying to make him smile in scenes he didn’t deem appropriate, which resulted in some harsh words and even harsher critical reception.

    Christopher Plummer on ‘The Sound of Music’ (1965)

    One of the most celebrated movies of all time is hated by its own star character. The classic film captured the hearts and imaginations of generations, and Captain Von Trapp and Plummer are one and the same forever. Yet Plummer has complained about it for years. He told “The Hollywood Reporter” that he finds the film “too sentimental” and “gooey,” and he despises it so much that he refers to it as “The Sound of Mucus.”

  • Cloud Atlas: Jim Sturgess & Doona Bae Chat

    Cloud Atlas: Jim Sturgess & Doona Bae Chat

    We caught up with Jim Sturgess & Doona Bae to talk about Cloud Atlas.

    QUESTION: This film is a wonderful trip through the history of the world. Do you feel the same way?

    JIM STURGESS: Definitely. It’s such an exciting and ambitious project that does travel through all these vast amounts of time and to get to play a character in each one of those periods of time was a big challenge, but more than exciting.

    QUESTION: What did you like about the story besides working with great directors?

    JIM STURGESS: I liked that it’s so vast. There’s just so much going on in one story. Although it is six different stories, it does sort of weave together to tell one bigger story. So that whole idea of all these different genres actually coming together to make a whole new genre of filmmaking was amazing.

    QUESTION: How enriching was it for you to jump from one character to another and from one era to another? I guess that’s what every actor would love to do, no? 

    JIM STURGESS: It was just an opportunity like no other. You knew that there’s never going to really be a film like that again. When you get to do that and get to play more than one character in one film. That’s a rare opportunity.

    QUESTION: Would you say the film explores the human condition in general regardless of ethnic origin, sexual orientation, historical period?

    JIM STURGESS: I think it was really an ingenious idea to have all the actors play different characters because it does bring out that whole idea. It does transcend race and gender and age and all the things you were just talking about. To do that visually by using the same actors to bring that idea to the forefront, obviously that’s not a concept that’s in the book. I mean it’s a concept in the book but it’s not done by using the same characters, obviously, because you can’t do that in a novel. For Lana [Wachowski], Andy [Wachowski] and Tom [Tykwer] to use the visual medium of film and actors to highlight the ideas in the book was really clever.

    QUESTION: Doona, I think you did a wonderful job. How did you like being part of the movie?

    DOONA BAE: It was such an honor being part of it and my character is great. She is so pure and innocent, but at the same time she’s got a strong strength inside herself. It was fun to do. Working with them, working with all the cast and the crews and directors. I really enjoyed it. I love it.

    QUESTION: Would you like to do more movies in Hollywood or outside of Korea?

    DOONA BAE: Outside of Korea, yes, I would like to. I’ve been working for Japanese films. There is no border in filmmaking.

    QUESTION: Do you think that film is an international language? In this case it’s amazing; you get to go all over the world, different periods. You sit there and it’s a great trip. Did you feel that way doing the film?

    JIM STURGESS: What’s always so great about making a film is that you get transported to whatever period of time that film is set. You get to learn about the historical background or the political background of that particular time. It’s one of the great things about telling stories and being involved in filmmaking.

    QUESTION: So are we going to see you in more Hollywood films?

    JIM STURGESS: I don’t know. I don’t really see it on those terms. I just try and find interesting stories with interesting characters and wherever that sits is where it sits. I’m not really interested in whether it’s a Hollywood film. I mean, this is actually a very big independent film. A lot of the money came from Asia more so than it did from Hollywood, I think. So it’s kind of its own beast. I consider it to be a giant independent film.

    Cloud Atlas is available to own on Blu-ray and DVD 1st July

     

    Thanks to Juliana.

  • Entity: Review

    Entity: Review

    Entity is the debut feature from director Steve Stone. Shot in just eighteen days the ambitious production is set in the eerie setting of the Siberian woods, combining associated threats of the military and paranormal activity.

    The film follows a small ghost hunter production team as they use the powers of psychic Ruth (Dervia Kirwan) and translator Yuri (Branko Tomovic) to seek out the location of a series of myserious deaths that occurred during the late 90s. As they come closer to the truth what unfolds is a truly sinister backstory that in turn traps the entire group in a supernatural prison which they can not escape.

    The opening passage is so disturbing it almost sets the bar too high. Probably one of the scariest moments was this night-vision picture showing a man trapped moaning and shaking alone in the dark, reminiscent of the creepy monster scenes in The Descent. The rest of the film seems to play a little slower comparatively and doesn’t pack quite the same sort of punch. Having said that, it has its moments particularly during Ruth’s spiritual interactions with the tormented soul that is prominent throughout. One of the best being during the climax of the movie, as presenter Kate (Charlotte Riley) is left scrambling for her life.

    The atmosphere is helped with the use of a found footage, shakey camera technique, cleverly leaving the dramatic parts to the imagination as well as taking the viewer on the same ride as the characters. This is cut between regular film shots which kept the more thoughtful and plot thickening moments clear and level.

    Entity was shot in just over two weeks and for that fact alone the film deserves a mention. The location in which it was captured successfully emits an uneasy air and despite the limited time the acting does not seem rushed or compromised. Although this movie may not be quite as bold as is said on the tin, it is an entertaining watch and there are certainly moments that’ll make you squeal.